Thread Rating:

Poll

57 votes (47.89%)
33 votes (27.73%)
12 votes (10.08%)
10 votes (8.4%)
4 votes (3.36%)
3 votes (2.52%)

119 members have voted

Joeshlabotnik
Joeshlabotnik
Joined: Jul 27, 2016
  • Threads: 20
  • Posts: 943
August 15th, 2016 at 3:42:44 PM permalink
Quote: ams288

As if the Trump campaign wasn't enough of a joke, one of Trump's most enthusiastic fellators surrogates, Rudy Giuliani, claims there were no Islamic terrorist attacks before Obama came into office.

Giuliani forgets 9/11

What a moron.



Well, there was Christian terrorism, tall people terrorism, left-handed terrorism, advantage player terrorism, etc. etc. long before WASHINGTON took office, so it's an asinine debate.

The Idiot Right (the bottom 97%) labels terrorism committed by a Muslim as "(radical) Islamic terrorism," implying that the reason the person(s) carried out the attacks was religious extremism--which, apparently, in the minds of Trumpers is defined as "being a Muslim." In reality, most if not all acts of terrorism are committed by crazy or borderline crazy people who have an ax to grind with the world, regardless of their religious views.

To use the term "radical Islamic terrorism" is to imply that there is something inherent about being a Muslim that makes a person gravitate toward terrorism. If that were true, we would see daily--hourly--terrorist incidents from the 1.5 million Muslims that live in this country. The more accurate term should be "batshit crazy a**hole terrorism," but the Trumpers don't want to see it that way, because The Dumbald doesn't have any strategies for protecting us from batshit crazy a**holes. Heck, there are always thousands of such people at his rallies!

And yes, Giuliani is a moron. Making him an ideal Trumper.
mdh
mdh
Joined: Feb 23, 2011
  • Threads: 0
  • Posts: 169
August 15th, 2016 at 6:46:17 PM permalink
Quote: Joeshlabotnik

Quote: ams288

As if the Trump campaign wasn't enough of a joke, one of Trump's most enthusiastic fellators surrogates, Rudy Giuliani, claims there were no Islamic terrorist attacks before Obama came into office.

Giuliani forgets 9/11

What a moron.



Well, there was Christian terrorism, tall people terrorism, left-handed terrorism, advantage player terrorism, etc. etc. long before WASHINGTON took office, so it's an asinine debate.

The Idiot Right (the bottom 97%) labels terrorism committed by a Muslim as "(radical) Islamic terrorism," implying that the reason the person(s) carried out the attacks was religious extremism--which, apparently, in the minds of Trumpers is defined as "being a Muslim." In reality, most if not all acts of terrorism are committed by crazy or borderline crazy people who have an ax to grind with the world, regardless of their religious views.

To use the term "radical Islamic terrorism" is to imply that there is something inherent about being a Muslim that makes a person gravitate toward terrorism. If that were true, we would see daily--hourly--terrorist incidents from the 1.5 million Muslims that live in this country. The more accurate term should be "batshit crazy a**hole terrorism," but the Trumpers don't want to see it that way, because The Dumbald doesn't have any strategies for protecting us from batshit crazy a**holes. Heck, there are always thousands of such people at his rallies!

And yes, Giuliani is a moron. Making him an ideal Trumper.

Thread terrorism. Why are you so hateful?
zippyboy
zippyboy
Joined: Jan 19, 2011
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 1108
August 15th, 2016 at 9:35:41 PM permalink
I think we all have gotten know Trump as a person more than we had before his fiasco campaign. I for one, only thought of him as a billionaire NYC real estate mogul with a stab at AC casinos which ultimately failed. I never knew he was so easy to rile, or would speak without thinking like he does, or talk about himself so continuously every time he has the mic. He's such a clown. Now that he's survived this far into the final stretch, he finally realizes how unqualified he is and is actively sabotaging his chances at winning with one stupid news-grabbing comment after another. His ego won't allow him to simply quit, so he has to make it look like it's someone else's fault he lost. "If I lose, the election is rigged!" he has said.

I've said it before, and stand by it, the Republicans will have to pull him somehow before he wins, or find a way to impeach him afterwards, or nullify the results on some technicality (It's rigged!)...you'll see. There's no way we can have him be our leader on the world stage. The fact he has any followers at all speaks poorly of the American people.
"Poker sure is an easy game to beat if you have the roll to keep rebuying."
Joeshlabotnik
Joeshlabotnik
Joined: Jul 27, 2016
  • Threads: 20
  • Posts: 943
August 15th, 2016 at 10:20:42 PM permalink
Quote: zippyboy


I've said it before, and stand by it, the Republicans will have to pull him somehow before he wins, or find a way to impeach him afterwards, or nullify the results on some technicality (It's rigged!)...you'll see. There's no way we can have him be our leader on the world stage. The fact he has any followers at all speaks poorly of the American people.



This is the problem they have. They can't un-nominate him. If they could do that, they probably would, as while that would make the entire party a laughingstock, they're arguably well down that road already. Furthermore, they do have the problem that he was nominated by a popular vote process. Throwing The Dumbald under the bus would be telling all those primary voters that their voices don't count! Those redneck knuckle-draggers WANT Trump! They LOVE him! Taking their pet orangutan away at this point would alienate many of them irrevocably, and they'd probably vote Nazi in the next election.

If Trump was elected President, he'd have to commit an impeachable offense before he could be impeached; being a complete douchebag and a moron to boot aren't such offenses in and of themselves. And would enough Republican senators defect to reach the 2/3rds necessary to impeach? Problematic. Though if it could be pulled off, it would be a way to replace Trump, but not with Clinton. Again, though, the knuckle-draggers and those who pander to them have enough Trump love that it probably wouldn't happen.

Like you, I'm appalled and disgusted at Trump's success so far. Our country and people have been made worse by his candidacy. Our image abroad is eroding, and our friends and allies are wondering nervously what will happen if he gets elected. Another really sad thing--there are many, many issues that should have been thoroughly discussed during this election season, but all we ever saw on the news was that bloviating buffoon and discussions of the latest rotten thing he'd said. On the Democrat side, we didn't hear much about Clinton's views and policies--we just heard BENGHAZI BENGHAZI BENGHAZI EMAILS EMAILS EMAILS. What should have been a serious discussion among adults was reduced to drunken Uncle Donald stripping to his underwear and dancing on the conference table.

At least that asswipe won't win. He seems to be doing everything in his power to make sure that won't happen. He's found out that the other kids won't let him be the quarterback, so he's taking his ball and going home.
ams288
ams288
Joined: Sep 26, 2012
  • Threads: 21
  • Posts: 5390
August 16th, 2016 at 5:35:33 AM permalink
Clinton preps for Trumpís Lewinsky attack

Quote:

The person picked to be Hillary Clinton's sparring partner in her upcoming debate prep sessions is expected to confront her about the death of Vincent Foster, label her as a rapist's enabler, and invoke the personally painful memories of Monica Lewinsky and Gennifer Flowers.



She will be ready for any mud Trump will try to sling at her.

I can't wait!
Eater of Worlds
RonC
RonC
Joined: Jan 18, 2010
  • Threads: 40
  • Posts: 4874
August 16th, 2016 at 7:49:15 AM permalink
Quote: ams288

Clinton preps for Trumpís Lewinsky attack

She will be ready for any mud Trump will try to sling at her.

I can't wait!



It sure would be nice if there wasn't so much mud available for slinging...of course, the pat answer is that there is nothing there and it is just all part of the "vast right wing conspiracy"...
ams288
ams288
Joined: Sep 26, 2012
  • Threads: 21
  • Posts: 5390
August 16th, 2016 at 8:03:04 AM permalink
Quote: RonC

Quote: ams288

Clinton preps for Trumpís Lewinsky attack

She will be ready for any mud Trump will try to sling at her.

I can't wait!



It sure would be nice if there wasn't so much mud available for slinging...of course, the pat answer is that there is nothing there and it is just all part of the "vast right wing conspiracy"...



That is the correct answer.

...but this debate prep may all be irrelevant.

We don't even know if Trump will show up to the debates. He might chicken out.

Or he might not even be the nominee at that point. Who knows? His candidacy is such a disaster... anything could happen.
Eater of Worlds
RonC
RonC
Joined: Jan 18, 2010
  • Threads: 40
  • Posts: 4874
August 16th, 2016 at 8:31:49 AM permalink
Quote: ams288

Quote: RonC

Quote: ams288

Clinton preps for Trumpís Lewinsky attack

She will be ready for any mud Trump will try to sling at her.

I can't wait!



It sure would be nice if there wasn't so much mud available for slinging...of course, the pat answer is that there is nothing there and it is just all part of the "vast right wing conspiracy"...



That is the correct answer.

...but this debate prep may all be irrelevant.

We don't even know if Trump will show up to the debates. He might chicken out.

Or he might not even be the nominee at that point. Who knows? His candidacy is such a disaster... anything could happen.



No, it is the incorrect answer. Hillary Clinton and her family are sleazy; they will likely win because the other candidate is sleazy, too--certainly not because a person like her deserves to be President. If Trump had Hillary's record (and none of his own). the media would be going nuts about all the sleaze. Nuts enough that she likely would not have gotten nominated dog catcher in a two person race.
terapined
terapined
Joined: Dec 1, 2012
  • Threads: 76
  • Posts: 5257
August 16th, 2016 at 12:15:16 PM permalink
Quote: RonC

[ Hillary Clinton and her family are sleazy; they will likely win because the other candidate is sleazy, too-.


Too sleazy
how about more sleazy
How about more stupid
Benghazi Mom went after Hillary hard at the Republican convention. No response from Hill is the smart move
Gold star Khan goes after Trump at the debates. Dumb and stupid Trump takes the bait
Quote: RonC


If Trump had Hillary's record (and none of his own). the media would be going nuts about all the sleaze. Nuts enough that she likely would not have gotten nominated dog catcher in a two person race.


Foxnews is all over this. If there is any anti Clinton info out there, fox is on it.
As to the traditional media, very little influence.
Millennials are not scheduling their day around the 630pm news.
Very few are
They are not watching CNN either (unless major story breaking)
These days, its the internet
Its kind of funny Trump complaining about the media. Its the internet
If you want to listen to Trumps latest gaffs in a speech, you go to youtube, no media filter needed
Trump should be complaining about youtube and the internet crashing his campaign.
"Everybody's bragging and drinking that wine, I can tell the Queen of Diamonds by the way she shines, Come to Daddy on an inside straight, I got no chance of losing this time" -Grateful Dead- "Loser"
ams288
ams288
Joined: Sep 26, 2012
  • Threads: 21
  • Posts: 5390
August 16th, 2016 at 12:22:37 PM permalink
Quote: RonC

Quote: ams288

Quote: RonC

Quote: ams288

Clinton preps for Trumpís Lewinsky attack

She will be ready for any mud Trump will try to sling at her.

I can't wait!



It sure would be nice if there wasn't so much mud available for slinging...of course, the pat answer is that there is nothing there and it is just all part of the "vast right wing conspiracy"...



That is the correct answer.

...but this debate prep may all be irrelevant.

We don't even know if Trump will show up to the debates. He might chicken out.

Or he might not even be the nominee at that point. Who knows? His candidacy is such a disaster... anything could happen.



No, it is the incorrect answer. Hillary Clinton and her family are sleazy; they will likely win because the other candidate is sleazy, too--certainly not because a person like her deserves to be President. If Trump had Hillary's record (and none of his own). the media would be going nuts about all the sleaze. Nuts enough that she likely would not have gotten nominated dog catcher in a two person race.



Speaking of "sleaze" - Donald Trump is bringing on Roger Ailes to try and save his failing campaign.

Roger Ailes, the serial-sexual harasser of pretty blonde women who work under him. That should help Trump win over women voters who already hate him!
Eater of Worlds

  • Jump to: