The family alleges that the restaurant staff would not allow them to leave the premises and that the police were called. Finally, the family decided to pay the 17% before they left. Of course, the fact that this has made national news is probably not good for this particular seafood restaurant.
However, my question is can the can the restaurant legally force you to pay this gratuity? It is clearly stated and posted on the menu.
Quote: Juyemura... my question is can the can the restaurant legally force you to pay this gratuity? It is clearly stated and posted on the menu.
I am not a lawyer, but my guess is that they can, just by calling it one of their charges. Places sell you stuff for $3 and then charge $20 shipping and handling when that probably only costs $2 or $3.
The more relevant question is why would a business be so stupid as to force such an issue when a customer says that service was poor?
i know of at least THIS THREAD where this was discussed.
I think that there are probably consumer protection statutes that outline the legality of these types of things on a local basis.
I think it is wrong of the restaurant to try to enforce a gratuity for poor service.
I also think it is wrong that the wait staff is paid sub-minimum wage and the public is supposed to make up the difference.
My best friend refuses to tip above 10% unless there is exceptional service.
I hate to say it but I agree with his position on this.
I think the answer to the original question is yes. Why would they not be able to collect a charge that was clearly listed on the menu? But I agree with Doc that is is bad business, as is the party of 5 policy. This publicity will probably cost them a ton of business.
does he inform the waitress of his nationality on his way out the door?
Walking out without paying a restaurant bill, or not paying it in full, is a crime in most jusrisdictions. Either theft or fraud, I think. And if the charge is mentioned on the menu, or you're advised of it beforehand, and it's legal in that jurisdiction, then you have to pay it. It seems poor business for the manager not to at least reduce the gratuity, but some people are bad at business.
I'm curious, though: who called the police, the restaurant or the customers?
You hoser! Everybody can tell a Canadian from a kilometer away, eh?Quote: WongBois there a stereotype that canadians are poor tippers?
does he inform the waitress of his nationality on his way out the door?
Quote: DocThe more relevant question is why would a business be so stupid as to force such an issue when a customer says that service was poor?
I am under the impression that:
(a) somehow, the restaurant keeps a record of which people were served by which staff, and
(b) the IRS makes the assumption that the average tip is something like 8%.
If both of these are something close to the truth, then the business has an interest in making sure tips are collected from large parties; otherwise, what waiters would want to serve them?
Quote: jml24But I agree with Doc that is is bad business, as is the party of 5 policy. This publicity will probably cost them a ton of business.
Stuff like this happens daily for many places. It is very unlikely that the restaurant thought that this would go national.
Quote: Juyemura
However, my question is can the can the restaurant legally force you to pay this gratuity? It is clearly stated and posted on the menu.
ABSOLUTELY NOT. To force you to pay it is a deceptive trade practice.
This is established case law. If it is a gratuity, then it cannot be mandatory. If it is mandatory, then it must be charged across the board, regardless of party size, otherwise it is discriminatory. And if it is mandatory, then the establishment must charge and report SALES TAX on it.
Quote: Mosca
This is established case law. If it is a gratuity, then it cannot be mandatory. If it is mandatory, then it must be charged across the board, regardless of party size, otherwise it is discriminatory. And if it is mandatory, then the establishment must charge and report SALES TAX on it.
Thanks for some factual legal information. This is a perfect example of a time when common sense does not coincide with the law.
the law makes perfect "common sense" IMO
Obviously there are various tradeoffs between pressing charges for theft of services and enduring the resultant publicity. Rarely does a prosecutor really want to take something like this to court anyway. So some judge in a tourist area of NY dropped the charges. Fine.
What DA really wants to try this? What client really wants to pay his lawyer to fight it?
Quote: DeMangoI wonder if the tip was calculated before tax. If so then it would be taxed on gross equalizing out to about 15%, what we normally tip anyway. But party of 5 is still wrong.
The tip is calculated before tax. There is no sales tax on labor, in Texas at least.