Quote: EvenBobQuote: darkozQuote: tuttigymQuote: EvenBobQuote: gordonm888Betting systems may not be offered for sale anywhere on the site.
link to original post
I could never figure out if you have a method or system that wins far more than it loses why would you ever sell it if you can still play it. If you had a Goose that laid golden eggs why would you ever sell it. Thorp wrote his book about blackjack because he no longer wished to play it, so he sold it in the form of a book. I might eventually give my method away for free but I would never sell it.
link to original post
There is no need. You already outlined in detail how it "works" within this thread. The folks here are just too stubborn to absorb the info and run to the tables to give it a try.
tuttigym
link to original post
Every time I try EB's system I have a "feeling "...that it doesn't work!
link to original post
What system would that be, I only have a method. You are confused again..
link to original post
A rose by any other name is still a system
Quote: darkozQuote: EvenBobQuote: darkozQuote: tuttigymQuote: EvenBobQuote: gordonm888Betting systems may not be offered for sale anywhere on the site.
link to original post
I could never figure out if you have a method or system that wins far more than it loses why would you ever sell it if you can still play it. If you had a Goose that laid golden eggs why would you ever sell it. Thorp wrote his book about blackjack because he no longer wished to play it, so he sold it in the form of a book. I might eventually give my method away for free but I would never sell it.
link to original post
There is no need. You already outlined in detail how it "works" within this thread. The folks here are just too stubborn to absorb the info and run to the tables to give it a try.
tuttigym
link to original post
Every time I try EB's system I have a "feeling "...that it doesn't work!
link to original post
What system would that be, I only have a method. You are confused again..
link to original post
A rose by any other name is still a system
link to original post
Nope. A method and a system are two completely different things.
"System: a set of things working together as parts of a mechanism or an interconnecting network; a complex whole. Method: a particular procedure for accomplishing something,'
This is why I always correct it when somebody says I have a system. I have no system at all, I really wish I did because I think it would be easier to play. But I'm convinced there's no system that can beat roulette, it's a complete waste of time.
Quote: tuttigym
I am skipping "elderly" in that I do not need a cane for upright mobility, and I am 83. So, what other "basic things" require additional assistance for you? AND I can bench press my 3.5 lb chihuahua.
I sure hope I skip elderly. I would like to go from old to dead.
Quote: EvenBobQuote: darkozQuote: EvenBobQuote: darkozQuote: tuttigymQuote: EvenBobQuote: gordonm888Betting systems may not be offered for sale anywhere on the site.
link to original post
I could never figure out if you have a method or system that wins far more than it loses why would you ever sell it if you can still play it. If you had a Goose that laid golden eggs why would you ever sell it. Thorp wrote his book about blackjack because he no longer wished to play it, so he sold it in the form of a book. I might eventually give my method away for free but I would never sell it.
link to original post
There is no need. You already outlined in detail how it "works" within this thread. The folks here are just too stubborn to absorb the info and run to the tables to give it a try.
tuttigym
link to original post
Every time I try EB's system I have a "feeling "...that it doesn't work!
link to original post
What system would that be, I only have a method. You are confused again..
link to original post
A rose by any other name is still a system
link to original post
Nope. A method and a system are two completely different things.
"System: a set of things working together as parts of a mechanism or an interconnecting network; a complex whole. Method: a particular procedure for accomplishing something,'
This is why I always correct it when somebody says I have a system. I have no system at all, I really wish I did because I think it would be easier to play. But I'm convinced there's no system that can beat roulette, it's a complete waste of time.
link to original post
Calling your system a method is no different than Calling a whale a fish.
Just as a whale superficially looks like a fish, but isn't your system may superficially resemble a method but it isn't no matter how many times you call it such. What you use is a system and a flawed system at that.
You got one thing right. No system can beat roulette. Sorry to inform you that you have a system.
Quote: darkozQuote: EvenBobQuote: darkozQuote: EvenBobQuote: darkozQuote: tuttigymQuote: EvenBobQuote: gordonm888Betting systems may not be offered for sale anywhere on the site.
link to original post
I could never figure out if you have a method or system that wins far more than it loses why would you ever sell it if you can still play it. If you had a Goose that laid golden eggs why would you ever sell it. Thorp wrote his book about blackjack because he no longer wished to play it, so he sold it in the form of a book. I might eventually give my method away for free but I would never sell it.
link to original post
There is no need. You already outlined in detail how it "works" within this thread. The folks here are just too stubborn to absorb the info and run to the tables to give it a try.
tuttigym
link to original post
Every time I try EB's system I have a "feeling "...that it doesn't work!
link to original post
What system would that be, I only have a method. You are confused again..
link to original post
A rose by any other name is still a system
link to original post
Nope. A method and a system are two completely different things.
"System: a set of things working together as parts of a mechanism or an interconnecting network; a complex whole. Method: a particular procedure for accomplishing something,'
This is why I always correct it when somebody says I have a system. I have no system at all, I really wish I did because I think it would be easier to play. But I'm convinced there's no system that can beat roulette, it's a complete waste of time.
link to original post
Calling your system a method is no different than Calling a whale a fish.
Just as a whale superficially looks like a fish, but isn't your system may superficially resemble a method but it isn't no matter how many times you call it such. What you use is a system and a flawed system at that.
You got one thing right. No system can beat roulette. Sorry to inform you that you have a system.
link to original post
A system and a method are two entirely different things no matter how you trying to spin it. If they were the same they wouldn't have two different definitions. Duh..
Quote: DRichQuote: tuttigym
I am skipping "elderly" in that I do not need a cane for upright mobility, and I am 83. So, what other "basic things" require additional assistance for you? AND I can bench press my 3.5 lb chihuahua.
I sure hope I skip elderly. I would like to go from old to dead.
link to original post
But you think 60 is old. It's not.
Quote: EvenBobQuote: darkozQuote: EvenBobQuote: darkozQuote: EvenBobQuote: darkozQuote: tuttigymQuote: EvenBobQuote: gordonm888Betting systems may not be offered for sale anywhere on the site.
link to original post
I could never figure out if you have a method or system that wins far more than it loses why would you ever sell it if you can still play it. If you had a Goose that laid golden eggs why would you ever sell it. Thorp wrote his book about blackjack because he no longer wished to play it, so he sold it in the form of a book. I might eventually give my method away for free but I would never sell it.
link to original post
There is no need. You already outlined in detail how it "works" within this thread. The folks here are just too stubborn to absorb the info and run to the tables to give it a try.
tuttigym
link to original post
Every time I try EB's system I have a "feeling "...that it doesn't work!
link to original post
What system would that be, I only have a method. You are confused again..
link to original post
A rose by any other name is still a system
link to original post
Nope. A method and a system are two completely different things.
"System: a set of things working together as parts of a mechanism or an interconnecting network; a complex whole. Method: a particular procedure for accomplishing something,'
This is why I always correct it when somebody says I have a system. I have no system at all, I really wish I did because I think it would be easier to play. But I'm convinced there's no system that can beat roulette, it's a complete waste of time.
link to original post
Calling your system a method is no different than Calling a whale a fish.
Just as a whale superficially looks like a fish, but isn't your system may superficially resemble a method but it isn't no matter how many times you call it such. What you use is a system and a flawed system at that.
You got one thing right. No system can beat roulette. Sorry to inform you that you have a system.
link to original post
A system and a method are two entirely different things no matter how you trying to spin it. If they were the same they wouldn't have two different definitions. Duh..
link to original post
I agree that a system and a .method are two different things.
What I am saying is that no matter how many times you call your system a method, it is still a system.
Quote: darkozQuote: EvenBobQuote: darkozQuote: EvenBobQuote: darkozQuote: EvenBobQuote: darkozQuote: tuttigymQuote: EvenBobQuote: gordonm888Betting systems may not be offered for sale anywhere on the site.
link to original post
I could never figure out if you have a method or system that wins far more than it loses why would you ever sell it if you can still play it. If you had a Goose that laid golden eggs why would you ever sell it. Thorp wrote his book about blackjack because he no longer wished to play it, so he sold it in the form of a book. I might eventually give my method away for free but I would never sell it.
link to original post
There is no need. You already outlined in detail how it "works" within this thread. The folks here are just too stubborn to absorb the info and run to the tables to give it a try.
tuttigym
link to original post
Every time I try EB's system I have a "feeling "...that it doesn't work!
link to original post
What system would that be, I only have a method. You are confused again..
link to original post
A rose by any other name is still a system
link to original post
Nope. A method and a system are two completely different things.
"System: a set of things working together as parts of a mechanism or an interconnecting network; a complex whole. Method: a particular procedure for accomplishing something,'
This is why I always correct it when somebody says I have a system. I have no system at all, I really wish I did because I think it would be easier to play. But I'm convinced there's no system that can beat roulette, it's a complete waste of time.
link to original post
Calling your system a method is no different than Calling a whale a fish.
Just as a whale superficially looks like a fish, but isn't your system may superficially resemble a method but it isn't no matter how many times you call it such. What you use is a system and a flawed system at that.
You got one thing right. No system can beat roulette. Sorry to inform you that you have a system.
link to original post
A system and a method are two entirely different things no matter how you trying to spin it. If they were the same they wouldn't have two different definitions. Duh..
link to original post
I agree that a system and a .method are two different things.
What I am saying is that no matter how many times you call your system a method, it is still a system.
link to original post
'Method is based on procedure whereas system is based on plan.'
This is a good explanation of the difference. My Method has no plan attached to it, it's free-flowing and not rigid. A system is always rigid.
Quote: EvenBobQuote: DRichQuote: tuttigym
I am skipping "elderly" in that I do not need a cane for upright mobility, and I am 83. So, what other "basic things" require additional assistance for you? AND I can bench press my 3.5 lb chihuahua.
I sure hope I skip elderly. I would like to go from old to dead.
link to original post
But you think 60 is old. It's not.
link to original post
"Old" is subjective, not absolute.
I'm in my mid-forties and consider myself "old".
My "old lady" lives with multiple cats, and is "old" because all her joints creak and pop, despite being notably younger than me.
If Mr. Tuttigym hasn't gotten old yet, more power to him.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Obo9Vb0dahs
I do the same thing in roulette. Through observation I noticed that at times randomness produces outcomes that are in my favor and I have learned how to exploit those times. It's not rocket science it's just plain old observation. Randomness in blackjack and in roulette repeats itself and if you can learn how to detect when that's happening you can produce a winning method.
Quote: EvenBobI do not see any difference in what I do and what a card counter does in blackjack. Through observation, before Thorp wrote his book, a few blackjack players noticed that at different times the end of the deck would be in their favor. There were times when randomness would produce results that were favorable to them. So they learned how to keep track of the cards that were already played to see if they could spot when that favorableness was going to happen.
I do the same thing in roulette. Through observation I noticed that at times randomness produces outcomes that are in my favor and I have learned how to exploit those times. It's not rocket science it's just plain old observation. Randomness in blackjack and in roulette repeats itself and if you can learn how to detect when that's happening you can produce a winning method.
link to original post
You do realize that a deck in play runs out of cards never to be used again in that round of play, don't you? While the numbers in roulette play are constantly available throughout all of the rounds of play. I believe you are a bit confused.
tuttigym
Quote: EvenBobQuote: tuttigymQuote: EvenBobQuote: gordonm888Betting systems may not be offered for sale anywhere on the site.
link to original post
I could never figure out if you have a method or system that wins far more than it loses why would you ever sell it if you can still play it. If you had a Goose that laid golden eggs why would you ever sell it. Thorp wrote his book about blackjack because he no longer wished to play it, so he sold it in the form of a book. I might eventually give my method away for free but I would never sell it.
link to original post
There is no need. You already outlined in detail how it "works" within this thread. The folks here are just too stubborn to absorb the info and run to the tables to give it a try.
tuttigym
link to original post
So I already outlined it in detail, huh. Refresh my memory, exactly how does it work again? Expect to hear the soothing sound of crickets now.. LOL
link to original post
A thread with 1500 posts and you still haven’t explained anything? Pffft.
Quote: rxwine
A thread with 1500 posts and you still haven’t explained anything? Pffft.
link to original post
This is what my cats say when I try and teach them how to read. They just never get it.
Quote: tuttigymQuote: EvenBobI do not see any difference in what I do and what a card counter does in blackjack. Through observation, before Thorp wrote his book, a few blackjack players noticed that at different times the end of the deck would be in their favor. There were times when randomness would produce results that were favorable to them. So they learned how to keep track of the cards that were already played to see if they could spot when that favorableness was going to happen.
I do the same thing in roulette. Through observation I noticed that at times randomness produces outcomes that are in my favor and I have learned how to exploit those times. It's not rocket science it's just plain old observation. Randomness in blackjack and in roulette repeats itself and if you can learn how to detect when that's happening you can produce a winning method.
link to original post
You do realize that a deck in play runs out of cards never to be used again in that round of play, don't you? While the numbers in roulette play are constantly available throughout all of the rounds of play. I believe you are a bit confused.
tuttigym
link to original post
I was going to respond to this silliness then I saw who it was from. Never mind.
Quote: EvenBobQuote: tuttigymQuote: EvenBobI do not see any difference in what I do and what a card counter does in blackjack. Through observation, before Thorp wrote his book, a few blackjack players noticed that at different times the end of the deck would be in their favor. There were times when randomness would produce results that were favorable to them. So they learned how to keep track of the cards that were already played to see if they could spot when that favorableness was going to happen.
I do the same thing in roulette. Through observation I noticed that at times randomness produces outcomes that are in my favor and I have learned how to exploit those times. It's not rocket science it's just plain old observation. Randomness in blackjack and in roulette repeats itself and if you can learn how to detect when that's happening you can produce a winning method.
link to original post
You do realize that a deck in play runs out of cards never to be used again in that round of play, don't you? While the numbers in roulette play are constantly available throughout all of the rounds of play. I believe you are a bit confused.
tuttigym
link to original post
I was going to respond to this silliness then I saw who it was from. Never mind.
link to original post
What no "LOL"? How disappointing.
tuttigym
Quote: EvenBobMy point is in some casino games the randomness is very repetitive and you just need to find a way to know when it's coming; I think most experienced players know that randomness can be repetitive but they waste their time making bets when it's not in their favor because they don't take the initiative to figure out when the best time to bet is.
link to original post
OK, let's go with that premise. If you truly believe in that method, then craps would be a much better game with a higher profit potential in that one only needs to worry about a 7 out and only six numbers are available to win big. So, one could pick just one number bet big and watch it hit and then come down. Quite simple, yes? Better yet, since you would kinda know when the 7 will appear through the "repetitive randomness," bet big on all the numbers (4,5,6,8,9, & 10 plus the horn) hit just one number, then come down and leave. 84% chance of winning or thereabouts certainly better than a 50% chance of winning an even money bet.
I think you should consider it.
tuttigym
Quote: tuttigymQuote: EvenBobMy point is in some casino games the randomness is very repetitive and you just need to find a way to know when it's coming; I think most experienced players know that randomness can be repetitive but they waste their time making bets when it's not in their favor because they don't take the initiative to figure out when the best time to bet is.
link to original post
OK, let's go with that premise. If you truly believe in that method, then craps would be a much better game with a higher profit potential in that one only needs to worry about a 7 out and only six numbers are available to win big. So, one could pick just one number bet big and watch it hit and then come down. Quite simple, yes? Better yet, since you would kinda know when the 7 will appear through the "repetitive randomness," bet big on all the numbers (4,5,6,8,9, & 10 plus the horn) hit just one number, then come down and leave. 84% chance of winning or thereabouts certainly better than a 50% chance of winning an even money bet.
I think you should consider it.
tuttigym
link to original post
I'm sorry I nodded off snoring after I read the word craps. Has to be the most boring game in the casino played by screaming maniacs.
My favorite casino is catching on to what I'm doing and they are starting to slow down my play by constantly disconnecting me after I make a bet. So I'm spreading out my play among more casinos and playing a grinding method rather than to jump in make my one unit and quit. By grinding I actually lose sometimes, have losing sessions, but I always end up making money at the end of the month and that's what counts. Being greedy never gets you anywhere except caught.
Quote: EvenBobI remember years ago at some offshore Casino that allowed American players that if I was winning too much they would start frequently disconnecting me. I had forgotten all about that but now I'm reminded. The casino I play at the most will often wait till I make a bet and then disconnect me and when I come back the bet didn't go through. 5 minutes later the same thing happens so it's not a coincidence. If it's a regular day and I'm making just regular plain old bets as usual I'll never get disconnected, never. It's only when you're inactive that they disconnect you and make you log back in. So they're trying to slow down my play.
link to original post
Most financial institutions will log you off after some time of inactivity. That's for your protection, not to slow you down
Quote: darkozQuote: EvenBobI remember years ago at some offshore Casino that allowed American players that if I was winning too much they would start frequently disconnecting me. I had forgotten all about that but now I'm reminded. The casino I play at the most will often wait till I make a bet and then disconnect me and when I come back the bet didn't go through. 5 minutes later the same thing happens so it's not a coincidence. If it's a regular day and I'm making just regular plain old bets as usual I'll never get disconnected, never. It's only when you're inactive that they disconnect you and make you log back in. So they're trying to slow down my play.
link to original post
Most financial institutions will log you off after some time of inactivity. That's for your protection, not to slow you down
link to original post
Good God do you even read what I wrote? They are not cutting me off when I'm inactive they're cutting me off after I place a bet. Then when I place another bet 5 minutes later they cut me off again. Yes I know as I said they cut you off if you're inactive for a long of time but that isn't the case here. If you don't have time to read the post why do you bother responding to it.
Quote: EvenBobQuote: darkozQuote: EvenBobI remember years ago at some offshore Casino that allowed American players that if I was winning too much they would start frequently disconnecting me. I had forgotten all about that but now I'm reminded. The casino I play at the most will often wait till I make a bet and then disconnect me and when I come back the bet didn't go through. 5 minutes later the same thing happens so it's not a coincidence. If it's a regular day and I'm making just regular plain old bets as usual I'll never get disconnected, never. It's only when you're inactive that they disconnect you and make you log back in. So they're trying to slow down my play.
link to original post
Most financial institutions will log you off after some time of inactivity. That's for your protection, not to slow you down
link to original post
Good God do you even read what I wrote? They are not cutting me off when I'm inactive they're cutting me off after I place a bet. Then when I place another bet 5 minutes later they cut me off again. Yes I know as I said they cut you off if you're inactive for a long of time but that isn't the case here. If you don't have time to read the post why do you bother responding to it.
link to original post
You literally wrote "it's only when you're inactive that they disconnect you". And right before that you wrote "if it's a regular day and I am making regular plain old bets I'll never get disconnected, never"
So you are saying you wrote contradictory statements?
I mean good God did YOU even read what you wrote?
Quote: darkozQuote: EvenBobQuote: darkozQuote: EvenBobI remember years ago at some offshore Casino that allowed American players that if I was winning too much they would start frequently disconnecting me. I had forgotten all about that but now I'm reminded. The casino I play at the most will often wait till I make a bet and then disconnect me and when I come back the bet didn't go through. 5 minutes later the same thing happens so it's not a coincidence. If it's a regular day and I'm making just regular plain old bets as usual I'll never get disconnected, never. It's only when you're inactive that they disconnect you and make you log back in. So they're trying to slow down my play.
link to original post
Most financial institutions will log you off after some time of inactivity. That's for your protection, not to slow you down
link to original post
Good God do you even read what I wrote? They are not cutting me off when I'm inactive they're cutting me off after I place a bet. Then when I place another bet 5 minutes later they cut me off again. Yes I know as I said they cut you off if you're inactive for a long of time but that isn't the case here. If you don't have time to read the post why do you bother responding to it.
link to original post
You literally wrote "it's only when you're inactive that they disconnect you". And right before that you wrote "if it's a regular day and I am making regular plain old bets I'll never get disconnected, never"
So you are saying you wrote contradictory statements?
I mean good God did YOU even read what you wrote?
link to original post
Congratulations, you went back and actually read the post and you still don't understand it. Why am I not surprised.
Quote: EvenBobNow I have a conundrum. I have figured out a way that deals with my biggest problem and that is the times when I can't play because the conditions are wrong, because it's not playing my game. I figured out a way of keeping track of 6 different streams of information where one of these streams is almost always playing my game. The problem is I only have 20 seconds in between spins to write down all that information and then figure out which one to bet. A computer could do it immediately but I don't know how to write a computer program. I could pay somebody to do it but then I would be giving them a winning roulette method for nothing. Why would I do that. It might be not even that difficult to write a program but I would have no idea because that's a totally foreign area to me. It's even worse on the Playtech live roulette wheels because they only give you 15 seconds in between spins which is a ridiculously short time.
link to original post
Why would you care if Wizard, as an example, got your method for free? Just make an agreement that he can’t sell it. You make out because you have the program you want. He makes out because you pay him some fee. You could probably agree to get it for free if he agrees your method can make him money. A win-win.
I have evidence you said you were not going to be talking about this anymore. Care to bet?Quote: EvenBobNow I have a conundrum. I have figured out a way that deals with my biggest problem and that is the times when I can't play because the conditions are wrong, because it's not playing my game. I figured out a way of keeping track of 6 different streams of information where one of these streams is almost always playing my game. The problem is I only have 20 seconds in between spins to write down all that information and then figure out which one to bet. A computer could do it immediately but I don't know how to write a computer program. I could pay somebody to do it but then I would be giving them a winning roulette method for nothing. Why would I do that. It might be not even that difficult to write a program but I would have no idea because that's a totally foreign area to me. It's even worse on the Playtech live roulette wheels because they only give you 15 seconds in between spins which is a ridiculously short time.
link to original post
Quote: AxelWolfI have evidence you said you were not going to be talking about this anymore. Care to bet?Quote: EvenBobNow I have a conundrum. I have figured out a way that deals with my biggest problem and that is the times when I can't play because the conditions are wrong, because it's not playing my game. I figured out a way of keeping track of 6 different streams of information where one of these streams is almost always playing my game. The problem is I only have 20 seconds in between spins to write down all that information and then figure out which one to bet. A computer could do it immediately but I don't know how to write a computer program. I could pay somebody to do it but then I would be giving them a winning roulette method for nothing. Why would I do that. It might be not even that difficult to write a program but I would have no idea because that's a totally foreign area to me. It's even worse on the Playtech live roulette wheels because they only give you 15 seconds in between spins which is a ridiculously short time.
link to original post
link to original post
I'm not supposed to talk about it anywhere on WoV except this thread. Do try and check in once in a while and keep up.
Quote: SOOPOO
Why would you care if Wizard, as an example, got your method for free? Just make an agreement that he can’t sell it. You make out because you have the program you want. He makes out because you pay him some fee. You could probably agree to get it for free if he agrees your method can make him money. A win-win.
link to original post
But you don't think I have any such method, so what are your real intentions here. You absolutely believe that I have nothing, as you stated many times. So what am I to surmise is your real intent in making such a post. Seems pretty obvious to me.
It's a New Year but still the same old song.
Quote: EvenBobQuote: SOOPOO
Why would you care if Wizard, as an example, got your method for free? Just make an agreement that he can’t sell it. You make out because you have the program you want. He makes out because you pay him some fee. You could probably agree to get it for free if he agrees your method can make him money. A win-win.
link to original post
But you don't think I have any such method, so what are your real intentions here. You absolutely believe that I have nothing, as you stated many times. So what am I to surmise is your real intent in making such a post. Seems pretty obvious to me.
link to original post
Just having fun with a delusional old man? Just adding to my post count?
Of course I don’t believe you have a method to beat roulette. No one believes you. But my post is logical if you actually did have a winning method.
Happy New Year!
Quote: SOOPOO
Just having fun with a delusional old man? Just adding to my post count?
Of course I don’t believe you have a method to beat roulette. No one believes you. But my post is logical if you actually did have a winning method.
Happy New Year!
link to original post
Apparently I'm not too delusional, I didn't fall for your charade* for even a tenth of a second. You're going to give me good advice for something that you don't even believe exists? Of course you have an ulterior motive, LOL.
*cha·rade
/SHəˈrād/
noun
an absurd pretense intended to create a pleasant or respectable appearance.
Quote: EvenBobQuote: SOOPOO
Just having fun with a delusional old man? Just adding to my post count?
Of course I don’t believe you have a method to beat roulette. No one believes you. But my post is logical if you actually did have a winning method.
Happy New Year!
link to original post
Apparently I'm not too delusional, I didn't fall for your charade* for even a tenth of a second. You're going to give me good advice for something that you don't even believe exists? Of course you have an ulterior motive, LOL.
*cha·rade
/SHəˈrād/
noun
an absurd pretense intended to create a pleasant or respectable appearance.
link to original post
Wrong again! Will wonders never cease! If you actually presented facts, my advice was PERFECT. But since you know you didn’t, and we know you didn’t…. Frankly, everything you have ever posted about roulette is a charade. Thanks for the definition.
Quote: SOOPOOQuote: EvenBobQuote: SOOPOO
Just having fun with a delusional old man? Just adding to my post count?
Of course I don’t believe you have a method to beat roulette. No one believes you. But my post is logical if you actually did have a winning method.
Happy New Year!
link to original post
Apparently I'm not too delusional, I didn't fall for your charade* for even a tenth of a second. You're going to give me good advice for something that you don't even believe exists? Of course you have an ulterior motive, LOL.
*cha·rade
/SHəˈrād/
noun
an absurd pretense intended to create a pleasant or respectable appearance.
link to original post
Wrong again! Will wonders never cease! If you actually presented facts, my advice was PERFECT. But since you know you didn’t, and we know you didn’t…. Frankly, everything you have ever posted about roulette is a charade. Thanks for the definition.
link to original post
Blah blah blah. Never argue with a doctor because they are always 100% of the time right. Even if they are 100% wrong, they will argue it until everyone is convinced, including themselves, that they are correct. In this case you couldn't be more wrong if you tried, but you will argue you're totally uninformed point till you're red-faced and out of breath.
Quote: SOOPOOQuote: EvenBobNow I have a conundrum. I have figured out a way that deals with my biggest problem and that is the times when I can't play because the conditions are wrong, because it's not playing my game. I figured out a way of keeping track of 6 different streams of information where one of these streams is almost always playing my game. The problem is I only have 20 seconds in between spins to write down all that information and then figure out which one to bet. A computer could do it immediately but I don't know how to write a computer program. I could pay somebody to do it but then I would be giving them a winning roulette method for nothing. Why would I do that. It might be not even that difficult to write a program but I would have no idea because that's a totally foreign area to me. It's even worse on the Playtech live roulette wheels because they only give you 15 seconds in between spins which is a ridiculously short time.
link to original post
Why would you care if Wizard, as an example, got your method for free? Just make an agreement that he can’t sell it. You make out because you have the program you want. He makes out because you pay him some fee. You could probably agree to get it for free if he agrees your method can make him money. A win-win.
link to original post
I think Mr.Wizard or anyone else would need to recreate EB's methodology in a similar environment. I highly doubt anyone will consent to live in a cat infested house in Michigan, heated by candles long enough to get a database significant enough to make any conclusions.
Quote: EvenBob
Blah blah blah. Never argue with a doctor because they are always 100% of the time right. Even if they are 100% wrong, they will argue it until everyone is convinced, including themselves, that they are correct. In this case you couldn't be more wrong if you tried, but you will argue you're totally uninformed point till you're red-faced and out of breath.
You are using my being a doctor as your excuse for being delusional? You had a chance to show Wizard you could win at Roulette to the degree you state you do, AND FAILED.
I think I took maybe a year off from this thread. I’ve had my say. Time to withdraw from it. Seems Billy will have to foot alone.
Quote: SOOPOOQuote: EvenBob
Blah blah blah. Never argue with a doctor because they are always 100% of the time right. Even if they are 100% wrong, they will argue it until everyone is convinced, including themselves, that they are correct. In this case you couldn't be more wrong if you tried, but you will argue you're totally uninformed point till you're red-faced and out of breath.
You are using my being a doctor as your excuse for being delusional? You had a chance to show Wizard you could win at Roulette to the degree you state you do, AND FAILED.
I think I took maybe a year off from this thread. I’ve had my say. Time to withdraw from it. Seems Billy will have to foot alone.
link to original post
Thank God. Can't imagine having to read more back and forth between Soopoo and EB about a non workable roulette system.
(Better than AI conversations -Wink wink, nudge nudge)
Quote: billryanQuote: SOOPOOQuote: EvenBobNow I have a conundrum. I have figured out a way that deals with my biggest problem and that is the times when I can't play because the conditions are wrong, because it's not playing my game. I figured out a way of keeping track of 6 different streams of information where one of these streams is almost always playing my game. The problem is I only have 20 seconds in between spins to write down all that information and then figure out which one to bet. A computer could do it immediately but I don't know how to write a computer program. I could pay somebody to do it but then I would be giving them a winning roulette method for nothing. Why would I do that. It might be not even that difficult to write a program but I would have no idea because that's a totally foreign area to me. It's even worse on the Playtech live roulette wheels because they only give you 15 seconds in between spins which is a ridiculously short time.
link to original post
Why would you care if Wizard, as an example, got your method for free? Just make an agreement that he can’t sell it. You make out because you have the program you want. He makes out because you pay him some fee. You could probably agree to get it for free if he agrees your method can make him money. A win-win.
link to original post
I think Mr.Wizard or anyone else would need to recreate EB's methodology in a similar environment. I highly doubt anyone will consent to live in a cat infested house in Michigan, heated by candles long enough to get a database significant enough to make any conclusions.
link to original post
I am not willing to go observe in Michigan today, due to weather.
Maybe after spring, but before the giant mosquitoes hatch.
Maybe.
Quote: SOOPOO
I think I took maybe a year off from this thread. I’ve had my say. Time to withdraw from it.
link to original post
It's always best to retreat when you're losing an argument. At least you know enough to do that..
Quote: billryan
I think Mr.Wizard or anyone else would need to recreate EB's methodology in a similar environment. I highly doubt anyone will consent to live in a cat infested house in Michigan, heated by candles long enough to get a database significant enough to make any conclusions.
link to original post
First of all my house is not cat infested. And secondly this whole comment is ridiculous, relocate to write a computer program? Stick to what you know, giving Dollar Store socks and PB&J sandwiches to the hobos living in your backyard.
Quote: SOOPOOQuote: EvenBob
Blah blah blah. Never argue with a doctor because they are always 100% of the time right. Even if they are 100% wrong, they will argue it until everyone is convinced, including themselves, that they are correct. In this case you couldn't be more wrong if you tried, but you will argue you're totally uninformed point till you're red-faced and out of breath.
You are using my being a doctor as your excuse for being delusional? You had a chance to show Wizard you could win at Roulette to the degree you state you do, AND FAILED.
I think I took maybe a year off from this thread. I’ve had my say. Time to withdraw from it. Seems Billy will have to foot alone.
link to original post
I only dropped by because I heard there would be drama, and new material.