Quote: SlotenthusiastIt’s hilarious the mods have allowed this thread to continue for so long. 14 years!
link to original post
There usually has to be a good reason to close a thread.
Quote: DieterQuote: SlotenthusiastIt’s hilarious the mods have allowed this thread to continue for so long. 14 years!
link to original post
There usually has to be a good reason to close a thread.
link to original post
lol! So cruel.
Surely evenbob is now a multi-millionaire using his strategy. Ahh makes perfect sense now! He bought the forums.
Quote: SlotenthusiastQuote: DieterQuote: SlotenthusiastIt’s hilarious the mods have allowed this thread to continue for so long. 14 years!
link to original post
There usually has to be a good reason to close a thread.
link to original post
lol! So cruel.
Surely evenbob is now a multi-millionaire using his strategy. Ahh makes perfect sense now! He bought the forums.
link to original post
To the best of my knowledge, this is not correct.
Enjoy the day!
Quote: ChumpChangeLooks like a $50 minimum.
link to original post
Not quite. Online casinos always have very low minimums, this one is 50 Cents. At least they're getting back to me on my complaints I've now been moved up the line to something called a 'player advocate' who is dealing with the situation.
Quote: SlotenthusiastIt’s hilarious the mods have allowed this thread to continue for so long. 14 years!
link to original post
What is it about to thread that you don't understand, ask and I'll explain it to you. You're obviously confused.
Quote: EvenBobQuote: ChumpChangeLooks like a $50 minimum.
link to original post
Not quite. Online casinos always have very low minimums, this one is 50 Cents. At least they're getting back to me on my complaints I've now been moved up the line to something called a 'player advocate' who is dealing with the situation.
link to original post
You posted rather cynically that you only played low limits when you wanted to demonstrate your system but otherwise you played for big money. Your responses were paraphrasing something like "it doesn't matter the amount to prove I have a winning system in my logs and demonstrations ".
Clearly you were gambling for real with the rejected bets above. So you have this big big winning system and you only wager max $50 but more like $10 hence the amount awarded for the error?
Quote: darkozQuote: EvenBobQuote: ChumpChangeLooks like a $50 minimum.
link to original post
Not quite. Online casinos always have very low minimums, this one is 50 Cents. At least they're getting back to me on my complaints I've now been moved up the line to something called a 'player advocate' who is dealing with the situation.
link to original post
You posted rather cynically that you only played low limits when you wanted to demonstrate your system but otherwise you played for big money. Your responses were paraphrasing something like "it doesn't matter the amount to prove I have a winning system in my logs and demonstrations ".
Clearly you were gambling for real with the rejected bets above. So you have this big big winning system and you only wager max $50 but more like $10 hence the amount awarded for the error?
link to original post
I have no idea why they gave me $10, so far in our discussions nobody asked me how much the bets were that I wasn't paid for. And I've dealt with a bunch of people and not a single one of them has inquired about the bets. I suspect the $10 is the shut up and go away amount.
Quote: EvenBobQuote: darkozQuote: EvenBobQuote: ChumpChangeLooks like a $50 minimum.
link to original post
Not quite. Online casinos always have very low minimums, this one is 50 Cents. At least they're getting back to me on my complaints I've now been moved up the line to something called a 'player advocate' who is dealing with the situation.
link to original post
You posted rather cynically that you only played low limits when you wanted to demonstrate your system but otherwise you played for big money. Your responses were paraphrasing something like "it doesn't matter the amount to prove I have a winning system in my logs and demonstrations ".
Clearly you were gambling for real with the rejected bets above. So you have this big big winning system and you only wager max $50 but more like $10 hence the amount awarded for the error?
link to original post
I have no idea why they gave me $10, so far in our discussions nobody asked me how much the bets were that I wasn't paid for. And I've dealt with a bunch of people and not a single one of them has inquired about the bets. I suspect the $10 is the shut up and go away amount.
link to original post
Quote: EvenBobQuote: darkozQuote: EvenBobQuote: ChumpChangeLooks like a $50 minimum.
link to original post
Not quite. Online casinos always have very low minimums, this one is 50 Cents. At least they're getting back to me on my complaints I've now been moved up the line to something called a 'player advocate' who is dealing with the situation.
link to original post
You posted rather cynically that you only played low limits when you wanted to demonstrate your system but otherwise you played for big money. Your responses were paraphrasing something like "it doesn't matter the amount to prove I have a winning system in my logs and demonstrations ".
Clearly you were gambling for real with the rejected bets above. So you have this big big winning system and you only wager max $50 but more like $10 hence the amount awarded for the error?
link to original post
I have no idea why they gave me $10, so far in our discussions nobody asked me how much the bets were that I wasn't paid for. And I've dealt with a bunch of people and not a single one of them has inquired about the bets. I suspect the $10 is the shut up and go away amount.
link to original post
Actually it was surmised from the screenshot you show that the minimum was $50. You then stated online you could play for pennies so that was just saying fifty cents
The screenshot shows 50-5,000 as the range so if as you claim it's showing a minimum of 50 cents then the max wager you could make based on that screenshot is fifty dollars (5,000 pennies).
Quote: EvenBobQuote: darkozQuote: EvenBobQuote: ChumpChangeLooks like a $50 minimum.
link to original post
Not quite. Online casinos always have very low minimums, this one is 50 Cents. At least they're getting back to me on my complaints I've now been moved up the line to something called a 'player advocate' who is dealing with the situation.
link to original post
You posted rather cynically that you only played low limits when you wanted to demonstrate your system but otherwise you played for big money. Your responses were paraphrasing something like "it doesn't matter the amount to prove I have a winning system in my logs and demonstrations ".
Clearly you were gambling for real with the rejected bets above. So you have this big big winning system and you only wager max $50 but more like $10 hence the amount awarded for the error?
link to original post
I have no idea why they gave me $10, so far in our discussions nobody asked me how much the bets were that I wasn't paid for. And I've dealt with a bunch of people and not a single one of them has inquired about the bets. I suspect the $10 is the shut up and go away amount.
link to original post
It may be. Yesterday on DraftKings they advertised a promo to boost winnings on an NCAA parlay. It just wouldn’t work. Today I got a message telling me they are crediting me with a $10 free bet to make up for the problem on their end. I turned that free bet into $25 real money, so I’m happy with the result.
Are you happy with the $10 or feel it’s not enough to make up for their error?
Quote: darkoz
Actually it was surmised from the screenshot you show that the minimum was $50. You then stated online you could play for pennies so that was just saying fifty cents
The screenshot shows 50-5,000 as the range so if as you claim it's showing a minimum of 50 cents then the max wager you could make based on that screenshot is fifty dollars (5,000 pennies).
link to original post
Not So. DarkOz.
The way it shows onscreen on these gaffs, and the way he truncated it, it could have been $0.50 - 5,000
Academic really.
Bets get rejected all the time for all sorts of reasons. EB has no comebacks.
Quote: darkoz
The screenshot shows 50-5,000 as the range so if as you claim it's showing a minimum of 50 cents then the max wager you could make based on that screenshot is fifty dollars (5,000 pennies).
link to original post
I didn't even notice that the screenshot didn't include the period before the 50 that would make it 50 cents. I then cleared it up by saying what it really was. You just can't stand it, you want to get somebody else in the position you were in so badly and it's so obvious. Move on, you're getting ridiculous.
Quote: SOOPOOQuote: EvenBobQuote: darkozQuote: EvenBobQuote: ChumpChangeLooks like a $50 minimum.
link to original post
Not quite. Online casinos always have very low minimums, this one is 50 Cents. At least they're getting back to me on my complaints I've now been moved up the line to something called a 'player advocate' who is dealing with the situation.
link to original post
You posted rather cynically that you only played low limits when you wanted to demonstrate your system but otherwise you played for big money. Your responses were paraphrasing something like "it doesn't matter the amount to prove I have a winning system in my logs and demonstrations ".
Clearly you were gambling for real with the rejected bets above. So you have this big big winning system and you only wager max $50 but more like $10 hence the amount awarded for the error?
link to original post
I have no idea why they gave me $10, so far in our discussions nobody asked me how much the bets were that I wasn't paid for. And I've dealt with a bunch of people and not a single one of them has inquired about the bets. I suspect the $10 is the shut up and go away amount.
link to original post
It may be. Yesterday on DraftKings they advertised a promo to boost winnings on an NCAA parlay. It just wouldn’t work. Today I got a message telling me they are crediting me with a $10 free bet to make up for the problem on their end. I turned that free bet into $25 real money, so I’m happy with the result.
Are you happy with the $10 or feel it’s not enough to make up for their error?
link to original post
Why would I give one crap about a stupid $10? It's chicken feed boloney, I just want the ability to bet on the single zero roulette back. And they still haven't fixed it. It's interesting that you're obviously thrilled with the $25 you made, that shows us where your head is at. Chicken feed Central.
Quote: EvenBobQuote: darkoz
The screenshot shows 50-5,000 as the range so if as you claim it's showing a minimum of 50 cents then the max wager you could make based on that screenshot is fifty dollars (5,000 pennies).
link to original post
I didn't even notice that the screenshot didn't include the period before the 50 that would make it 50 cents. I then cleared it up by saying what it really was. You just can't stand it, you want to get somebody else in the position you were in so badly and it's so obvious. Move on, you're getting ridiculous.
link to original post
So to be clear you are saying the range was fifty cents to $5,000
Quote: darkozQuote: EvenBobQuote: darkoz
The screenshot shows 50-5,000 as the range so if as you claim it's showing a minimum of 50 cents then the max wager you could make based on that screenshot is fifty dollars (5,000 pennies).
link to original post
I didn't even notice that the screenshot didn't include the period before the 50 that would make it 50 cents. I then cleared it up by saying what it really was. You just can't stand it, you want to get somebody else in the position you were in so badly and it's so obvious. Move on, you're getting ridiculous.
link to original post
So to be clear you are saying the range was fifty cents to $5,000
link to original post
Yes
Quote: EvenBobQuote: darkozQuote: EvenBobQuote: darkoz
The screenshot shows 50-5,000 as the range so if as you claim it's showing a minimum of 50 cents then the max wager you could make based on that screenshot is fifty dollars (5,000 pennies).
link to original post
I didn't even notice that the screenshot didn't include the period before the 50 that would make it 50 cents. I then cleared it up by saying what it really was. You just can't stand it, you want to get somebody else in the position you were in so badly and it's so obvious. Move on, you're getting ridiculous.
link to original post
So to be clear you are saying the range was fifty cents to $5,000
link to original post
Yes
link to original post
So how much were you wagering? You have mentioned you only flatbet so this should be an easy peasey question to answer
Said the guy who claims he can achieve an 80% hit rate on even money roulette bets and only makes enough to pay poverty level bills.Quote: EvenBobQuote: SOOPOOQuote: EvenBobQuote: darkozQuote: EvenBobQuote: ChumpChangeLooks like a $50 minimum.
link to original post
Not quite. Online casinos always have very low minimums, this one is 50 Cents. At least they're getting back to me on my complaints I've now been moved up the line to something called a 'player advocate' who is dealing with the situation.
link to original post
You posted rather cynically that you only played low limits when you wanted to demonstrate your system but otherwise you played for big money. Your responses were paraphrasing something like "it doesn't matter the amount to prove I have a winning system in my logs and demonstrations ".
Clearly you were gambling for real with the rejected bets above. So you have this big big winning system and you only wager max $50 but more like $10 hence the amount awarded for the error?
link to original post
I have no idea why they gave me $10, so far in our discussions nobody asked me how much the bets were that I wasn't paid for. And I've dealt with a bunch of people and not a single one of them has inquired about the bets. I suspect the $10 is the shut up and go away amount.
link to original post
It may be. Yesterday on DraftKings they advertised a promo to boost winnings on an NCAA parlay. It just wouldn’t work. Today I got a message telling me they are crediting me with a $10 free bet to make up for the problem on their end. I turned that free bet into $25 real money, so I’m happy with the result.
Are you happy with the $10 or feel it’s not enough to make up for their error?
link to original post
Why would I give one crap about a stupid $10? It's chicken feed boloney, I just want the ability to bet on the single zero roulette back. And they still haven't fixed it. It's interesting that you're obviously thrilled with the $25 you made, that shows us where your head is at. Chicken feed Central.
link to original post
Quote: AxelWolfSaid the guy who claims he can achieve an 80% hit rate on even money roulette bets and only makes enough to pay poverty level bills.
link to original post
I can make as much as I want but I choose to make enough to pay my bills. My life isn't ruined by gamblers greed like yours is.
Excuse me? I take offense to that, it's a personal insult.Quote: EvenBobQuote: AxelWolfSaid the guy who claims he can achieve an 80% hit rate on even money roulette bets and only makes enough to pay poverty level bills.
link to original post
My life isn't ruined by gamblers greed like yours is.
link to original post
I don't have gamblers or any greed, and my life isn't ruined.
Quote: AxelWolfExcuse me? I take offense to that, it's a personal insult.Quote: EvenBobQuote: AxelWolfSaid the guy who claims he can achieve an 80% hit rate on even money roulette bets and only makes enough to pay poverty level bills.
link to original post
My life isn't ruined by gamblers greed like yours is.
link to original post
I don't have gamblers or any greed, and my life isn't ruined.
link to original post
You told me I only make enough money to pay poverty level bills. I take that as an insult so we're even. You can't say whatever you want then expect nothing in return. You can't imply that I live in poverty and expect nothing in return.
Quote: EvenBobQuote: AxelWolfExcuse me? I take offense to that, it's a personal insult.Quote: EvenBobQuote: AxelWolfSaid the guy who claims he can achieve an 80% hit rate on even money roulette bets and only makes enough to pay poverty level bills.
link to original post
My life isn't ruined by gamblers greed like yours is.
link to original post
I don't have gamblers or any greed, and my life isn't ruined.
link to original post
You told me I only make enough money to pay poverty level bills. I take that as an insult so we're even. You can't say whatever you want then expect nothing in return. You can't imply that I live in poverty and expect nothing in return.
link to original post
But you basically agreed with Axel with your answer. That you live in poverty level because unlike Axel, you don't live with gamblers greed and haven't ruined your life.
Are you changing your reply now?
I never said you live IN poverty, I said poverty level bills. You claim to own your house and live a frugal lifestyle. That would be poverty-level bills, no?Quote: EvenBobQuote: AxelWolfExcuse me? I take offense to that, it's a personal insult.Quote: EvenBobQuote: AxelWolfSaid the guy who claims he can achieve an 80% hit rate on even money roulette bets and only makes enough to pay poverty level bills.
link to original post
My life isn't ruined by gamblers greed like yours is.
link to original post
I don't have gamblers or any greed, and my life isn't ruined.
link to original post
You told me I only make enough money to pay poverty level bills. I take that as an insult so we're even. You can't say whatever you want then expect nothing in return. You can't imply that I live in poverty and expect nothing in return.
link to original post
Quote: AxelWolfI never said you live IN poverty, I said poverty level bills. You claim to own your house and live a frugal lifestyle. That would be poverty-level bills, no?Quote: EvenBobQuote: AxelWolfExcuse me? I take offense to that, it's a personal insult.Quote: EvenBobQuote: AxelWolfSaid the guy who claims he can achieve an 80% hit rate on even money roulette bets and only makes enough to pay poverty level bills.
link to original post
My life isn't ruined by gamblers greed like yours is.
link to original post
I don't have gamblers or any greed, and my life isn't ruined.
link to original post
You told me I only make enough money to pay poverty level bills. I take that as an insult so we're even. You can't say whatever you want then expect nothing in return. You can't imply that I live in poverty and expect nothing in return.
link to original post
link to original post
Who pays poverty level bills that doesn't live in poverty. Get real, that's what you said and that's what you meant. I took that as a personal insult, we both get suspended so be it. You think you can say anything you want and get away with it.
I don't think what I said was a personal insult, however, I'm willing to accept it is, but I don't think there's such a thing as calling it even on here. I suggest we both get 1 week off.Quote: EvenBobI take that as an insult so we're even.
Quote: AxelWolfI don't think what I said was a personal insult, however, I'm willing to accept it is, but I don't think there's such a thing as calling it even on here. I suggest we both get 1 week off.Quote: EvenBobI take that as an insult so we're even.
link to original post
Personal insults are 3 days not a week no I'm not agreeing to anything. Let the moderators decide that's what they're here for. Who died and made you a moderator.
Quote: AxelWolfI don't think what I said was a personal insult, however, I'm willing to accept it is, but I don't think there's such a thing as calling it even on here. I suggest we both get 1 week off.Quote: EvenBobI take that as an insult so we're even.
link to original post
Before I even saw this "suggestion", my instinct was 7 days a piece. I seem to recall some mutual history of antagonism which merits penalty beyond the barest minimum.
Since I'm supposed to spell it out...
Axelwolf, 7 days, personal insult.
EvenBob, 7 days, personal insult.
There's plenty in the prior dozen posts, hopefully excerpts and permalinks can be foregone.
Quote: DieterQuote: AxelWolfI don't think what I said was a personal insult, however, I'm willing to accept it is, but I don't think there's such a thing as calling it even on here. I suggest we both get 1 week off.Quote: EvenBobI take that as an insult so we're even.
link to original post
Before I even saw this "suggestion", my instinct was 7 days a piece. I seem to recall some mutual history of antagonism which merits penalty beyond the barest minimum.
Since I'm supposed to spell it out...
Axelwolf, 7 days, personal insult.
EvenBob, 7 days, personal insult.
There's plenty in the prior dozen posts, hopefully excerpts and permalinks can be foregone.
link to original post
Wasn't there some spaghetti western where both gunfighters killed each other?
Quote: darkoz
Wasn't there some spaghetti western where both gunfighters killed each other?
link to original post
Not sure. I tended to stick with the wholesome "singing cowboy" westerns.
(Yes, I regularly "watched" Riders in the Sky on the radio, although I stopped short of idolizing Ranger Doug.)
Quote: DieterI tended to stick with the wholesome "singing cowboy" westerns.
What about the UNwholesome "singing cowboy" flicks.
Hello, Coen Bros. "Buster Scruggs."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_XLQDeYqpE
Quote: DieterQuote: darkoz
Wasn't there some spaghetti western where both gunfighters killed each other?
link to original post
Not sure. I tended to stick with the wholesome "singing cowboy" westerns.
(Yes, I regularly "watched" Riders in the Sky on the radio, although I stopped short of idolizing Ranger Doug.)
link to original post
Lmao
Quote: EvenBobPersonal insults are 3 days not a week no I'm not agreeing to anything. Let the moderators decide that's what they're here for. Who died and made you a moderator.
link to original post
This was EB's last post since Jan 25. I hope he is okay.
Quote: MrVHe posted on another forum last Sunday, so...
link to original post
That's good news.
But let's look on the bright side, Nathan is back.Quote: WizardQuote: MrVHe posted on another forum last Sunday, so...
link to original post
That's good news.
link to original post
Quote: TigerWuIf somebody has trouble affording the minimum bet going from 50 cents to $1, they probably shouldn't be gambling in the first place.
link to original post
But they are not betting 50 cents. They are betting on 20 numbers so it's $10. Now to bet on 20 numbers they have to bet $20. Every time, every 50 seconds. They literally have to bet twice as much as they were betting and this adds up very quickly. Or they can bet on 10 numbers which means they'll win half as often. Either way this is not good for Casino customer relations.
Quote: EvenBobhttps://www.youtube.com/shorts/3TRT4sxlAaI
link to original post
LOL.... classic gamblers.
I don't think there's a single casino in the world that would let a $350,000 bet ride on a single number, let alone a Tribal casino.
Quote: TigerWuQuote: EvenBobhttps://www.youtube.com/shorts/3TRT4sxlAaI
link to original post
LOL.... classic gamblers.
I don't think there's a single casino in the world that would let a $350,000 bet ride on a single number, let alone a Tribal casino.
link to original post
The whole video is ridiculous. 31 black? As opposed to what, 31 red? Obviously the bit was written by somebody who knows nothing about roulette or casinos because you're right, no Casino would take the next bet.
Quote: ChumpChange13 black keeps hitting to break the red streak on the machine.
link to original post
But saying 13 black is redundant because there is no 13 red. 13 keeps hitting to break the red streak.
Quote: EvenBobQuote: ChumpChange13 black keeps hitting to break the red streak on the machine.
link to original post
But saying 13 black is redundant because there is no 13 red. 13 keeps hitting to break the red streak.
link to original post
You have never actually heard live dealers call winners?
They usually call the number and color because most players don't have the color scheme memorized and may be betting just black or red.
Odd/even and high/low are much more obvious to casual players.