MDawg
MDawg
  • Threads: 41
  • Posts: 8118
Joined: Sep 27, 2018
October 11th, 2021 at 3:33:18 PM permalink
I believe I made myself clear, nothing more to add.

Speculate all you like.

The winning sums speak for themselves if I'm playing badly then more power to bad playing players like me! As far as I know, I am playing better than perfectly. I still lost pretty big one session but the wins have more than eclipsed the loss. As you know, no matter how you play you might still lose. Or win.
I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people. https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/betting-systems/33908-the-adventures-of-mdawg/
lilredrooster
lilredrooster
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 7094
Joined: May 8, 2015
October 11th, 2021 at 3:55:14 PM permalink
Quote: MDawg

I As far as I know, I am playing better than perfectly.




perfect play could be accomplished by a computer - and there are players who have used a hidden computer - tracking every single card and computing the probabilities based on dozens of pieces of information

so that's what you believe? - that your play is equal or better than what a computer could do?


I'll be frank with you MDawg - I know a great deal about blackjack

and from what I've read from you - I don't believe you do


.
the foolish sayings of a rich man often pass for words of wisdom by the fools around him
AxelWolf
AxelWolf
  • Threads: 170
  • Posts: 22690
Joined: Oct 10, 2012
October 11th, 2021 at 4:10:02 PM permalink
Quote: lilredrooster

Quote: MDawg

I As far as I know, I am playing better than perfectly.




perfect play could be accomplished by a computer - and there are players who have used a hidden computer - tracking every single card and computing the probabilities based on dozens of pieces of information

so that's what you believe? - that your play is equal or better than what a computer could do?


I'll be frank with you MDawg - I know a great deal about blackjack

and from what I've read from you - I don't believe you do


.
link to original post

And even that won't create a situation where you are winning all the time
♪♪Now you swear and kick and beg us That you're not a gamblin' man Then you find you're back in Vegas With a handle in your hand♪♪ Your black cards can make you money So you hide them when you're able In the land of casinos and money You must put them on the table♪♪ You go back Jack do it again roulette wheels turinin' 'round and 'round♪♪ You go back Jack do it again♪♪
ChumpChange
ChumpChange
  • Threads: 131
  • Posts: 5112
Joined: Jun 15, 2018
November 20th, 2021 at 10:48:00 AM permalink
The difference in the odds of winning 6 Pass Line bets in a row and winning 6 Player Baccarat bets in a row, is that there's an average of 8.5 rolls per shooter in craps. So you'll be waiting 8.5 times longer for that 1 in 70 chance to come along in craps (unless you're at the slowest baccarat table ever).
8.5 x 70 = 595 rolls of the dice
Ace2
Ace2
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 2706
Joined: Oct 2, 2017
Thanked by
ChumpChange
November 20th, 2021 at 11:50:33 AM permalink
Quote: ChumpChange

The difference in the odds of winning 6 Pass Line bets in a row and winning 6 Player Baccarat bets in a row, is that there's an average of 8.5 rolls per shooter in craps. So you'll be waiting 8.5 times longer for that 1 in 70 chance to come along in craps (unless you're at the slowest baccarat table ever).
8.5 x 70 = 595 rolls of the dice
link to original post

It takes an average of 557/165 =~ 3.38 rolls to reach a pass line decision. So about 236 rolls to get 70 decisions. But 70 decisions is irrelevant to this calculation

Assuming a 0.493176 (p) probability of winning a baccarat player bet (excluding ties), it will take an average of (1/p) + (1/p)^2 + (1/p)^3 + (1/p)^4 + (1/p)^5 + (1/p)^6 = 135.2 decisions (excluding ties) to get six consecutive wins

For a passline bet in craps, the probability (p) of winning is 244/495. Using the same formula, it will take an average of 135.5 decisions to get six consecutive wins. That times 557/165 is about 457 rolls to get six consecutive wins

8.53 is the average number of rolls to seven out. Also irrelevant to this calculation

All of this math applies to hot, cold, choppy and even neutral tables. However, if tuttigym is shooting, then math is temporarily suspended
Last edited by: Ace2 on Nov 20, 2021
It’s all about making that GTA
  • Jump to: