kewlj
kewlj
  • Threads: 216
  • Posts: 4635
Joined: Apr 17, 2012
September 8th, 2013 at 10:32:23 AM permalink
2 of the first 3 scores on this first Sunday of the gear were safeties (Pittsburgh & Jacksonville). Jets safety a few minutes later for 3 safeties in first 20 minutes of play
terapined
terapined
  • Threads: 89
  • Posts: 6206
Joined: Dec 1, 2012
September 8th, 2013 at 10:54:34 AM permalink
Watching Tampa Bay Bucs vs Jets, 1st score, a safety.
Its just a forum. Nothing here to get obsessed about.
ThatDonGuy
ThatDonGuy
  • Threads: 117
  • Posts: 6296
Joined: Jun 22, 2011
September 8th, 2013 at 11:32:02 AM permalink
The first safety (Steelers-Titans) was more "oops" than anything else. ("But I was standing on the goal line, which is part of the end zone!")
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1494
  • Posts: 26527
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
September 8th, 2013 at 11:51:48 AM permalink
I'm having doubts about betting this "no safety" this Super Bowl. I've lost more than I care to say betting the "no safety" lately. They happened in two out of the last three Super Bowls. Still, in my data from 2000 to 2009, they occurred in 5% of games only.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
paisiello
paisiello
  • Threads: 21
  • Posts: 546
Joined: Oct 30, 2011
September 8th, 2013 at 12:09:25 PM permalink
Are 10 games a large enough sample size to have any reasonable confidence in the 5% rate? What is the rate for all NFL regular season games?
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1494
  • Posts: 26527
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
September 8th, 2013 at 12:59:33 PM permalink
Quote: paisiello

Are 10 games a large enough sample size to have any reasonable confidence in the 5% rate? What is the rate for all NFL regular season games?



I can tell you in in the 2713 games I've recorded from week 1 of 2000 through week 4 of 2010 (when I got tired of the tedious data entry), 5.1% of games had a safety.

To answer your question, no, 10 games are not a large enough sample size, especially for something that doesn't happen often.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
AZDuffman
AZDuffman
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 13991
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
September 8th, 2013 at 2:00:28 PM permalink
Quote: Wizard

I can tell you in in the 2713 games I've recorded from week 1 of 2000 through week 4 of 2010 (when I got tired of the tedious data entry), 5.1% of games had a safety.

To answer your question, no, 10 games are not a large enough sample size, especially for something that doesn't happen often.



A bigger question is do you know how often the losing team get a non-intentional safety? Twice in one day has to be unusual.
All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1494
  • Posts: 26527
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
September 8th, 2013 at 2:50:23 PM permalink
Quote: AZDuffman

A bigger question is do you know how often the losing team get a non-intentional safety?



No. My data doesn't indicate the reason for the safety.
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
YouCanBetOnThat
YouCanBetOnThat
  • Threads: 14
  • Posts: 96
Joined: Nov 7, 2012
October 6th, 2013 at 3:15:13 PM permalink
Quote: Wizard

I'm having doubts about betting this "no safety" this Super Bowl. I've lost more than I care to say betting the "no safety" lately. They happened in two out of the last three Super Bowls. Still, in my data from 2000 to 2009, they occurred in 5% of games only.


At least two more safeties again this week. Yeah, I wouldn't blame you for steering away from the "no safety" bet on the next Super Bowl.
YouCanBetOnThat.com, a podcast for the recreational gambler
  • Jump to: