kewlj
kewlj
  • Threads: 216
  • Posts: 4635
Joined: Apr 17, 2012
September 8th, 2013 at 10:32:23 AM permalink
2 of the first 3 scores on this first Sunday of the gear were safeties (Pittsburgh & Jacksonville). Jets safety a few minutes later for 3 safeties in first 20 minutes of play
terapined
terapined
  • Threads: 95
  • Posts: 6595
Joined: Dec 1, 2012
September 8th, 2013 at 10:54:34 AM permalink
Watching Tampa Bay Bucs vs Jets, 1st score, a safety.
When somebody doesn't believe me, I could care less. Some get totally bent out of shape when not believed. Weird. I believe very little on all forums
ThatDonGuy
ThatDonGuy
  • Threads: 133
  • Posts: 7531
Joined: Jun 22, 2011
September 8th, 2013 at 11:32:02 AM permalink
The first safety (Steelers-Titans) was more "oops" than anything else. ("But I was standing on the goal line, which is part of the end zone!")
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1540
  • Posts: 27940
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
September 8th, 2013 at 11:51:48 AM permalink
I'm having doubts about betting this "no safety" this Super Bowl. I've lost more than I care to say betting the "no safety" lately. They happened in two out of the last three Super Bowls. Still, in my data from 2000 to 2009, they occurred in 5% of games only.
"My life is spent in one long effort to escape from the commonplace of existence. These little problems help me to do so." -- Sherlock Holmes
paisiello
paisiello
  • Threads: 21
  • Posts: 546
Joined: Oct 30, 2011
September 8th, 2013 at 12:09:25 PM permalink
Are 10 games a large enough sample size to have any reasonable confidence in the 5% rate? What is the rate for all NFL regular season games?
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1540
  • Posts: 27940
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
September 8th, 2013 at 12:59:33 PM permalink
Quote: paisiello

Are 10 games a large enough sample size to have any reasonable confidence in the 5% rate? What is the rate for all NFL regular season games?



I can tell you in in the 2713 games I've recorded from week 1 of 2000 through week 4 of 2010 (when I got tired of the tedious data entry), 5.1% of games had a safety.

To answer your question, no, 10 games are not a large enough sample size, especially for something that doesn't happen often.
"My life is spent in one long effort to escape from the commonplace of existence. These little problems help me to do so." -- Sherlock Holmes
AZDuffman
AZDuffman
  • Threads: 244
  • Posts: 14966
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
September 8th, 2013 at 2:00:28 PM permalink
Quote: Wizard

I can tell you in in the 2713 games I've recorded from week 1 of 2000 through week 4 of 2010 (when I got tired of the tedious data entry), 5.1% of games had a safety.

To answer your question, no, 10 games are not a large enough sample size, especially for something that doesn't happen often.



A bigger question is do you know how often the losing team get a non-intentional safety? Twice in one day has to be unusual.
All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1540
  • Posts: 27940
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
September 8th, 2013 at 2:50:23 PM permalink
Quote: AZDuffman

A bigger question is do you know how often the losing team get a non-intentional safety?



No. My data doesn't indicate the reason for the safety.
"My life is spent in one long effort to escape from the commonplace of existence. These little problems help me to do so." -- Sherlock Holmes
YouCanBetOnThat
YouCanBetOnThat
  • Threads: 14
  • Posts: 96
Joined: Nov 7, 2012
October 6th, 2013 at 3:15:13 PM permalink
Quote: Wizard

I'm having doubts about betting this "no safety" this Super Bowl. I've lost more than I care to say betting the "no safety" lately. They happened in two out of the last three Super Bowls. Still, in my data from 2000 to 2009, they occurred in 5% of games only.


At least two more safeties again this week. Yeah, I wouldn't blame you for steering away from the "no safety" bet on the next Super Bowl.
YouCanBetOnThat.com, a podcast for the recreational gambler
  • Jump to: