Thread Rating:

Poll

12 votes (24%)
31 votes (62%)
7 votes (14%)

50 members have voted

mrjjj
mrjjj
Joined: Sep 4, 2010
  • Threads: 75
  • Posts: 1579
June 20th, 2012 at 5:55:53 PM permalink
Quote: buzzpaff

I for one am in favor of a seperate thread only for those system that have shown they can overcome
a negative expectation. But I would limit that thread to no more than 14 winning systems.




Will this same RULE of PROOF be for ALL bettors here?

Ken
buzzpaff
buzzpaff
Joined: Mar 8, 2011
  • Threads: 112
  • Posts: 5328
June 20th, 2012 at 6:00:04 PM permalink
I think we can accept the integrity of those posting. I see no need for the math experts
in this forum to validate everyone's work. An intelligent reader will quickly recognize
those systems that actually do work !
mrjjj
mrjjj
Joined: Sep 4, 2010
  • Threads: 75
  • Posts: 1579
June 20th, 2012 at 6:09:21 PM permalink
Quote: buzzpaff

I think we can accept the integrity of those posting. I see no need for the math experts
in this forum to validate everyone's work. An intelligent reader will quickly recognize
those systems that actually do work !




No, no, no....thats not what I meant. Will PROOF be shown for EACH individual here who says they WIN at the casino on a regular basis?

Ken
buzzpaff
buzzpaff
Joined: Mar 8, 2011
  • Threads: 112
  • Posts: 5328
June 20th, 2012 at 6:10:50 PM permalink
Quote: mrjjj

No, no, no....thats not what I meant. Will PROOF be shown for EACH individual here who says they WIN at the casino on a regular basis?

Ken




I see no need for that. After all, except for Paigowdan, we are all gentlemen here.
Ibeatyouraces
Ibeatyouraces
Joined: Jan 12, 2010
  • Threads: 68
  • Posts: 11933
June 20th, 2012 at 6:42:23 PM permalink
deleted
DUHHIIIIIIIII HEARD THAT!
mrjjj
mrjjj
Joined: Sep 4, 2010
  • Threads: 75
  • Posts: 1579
June 20th, 2012 at 6:45:27 PM permalink
Quote: Ibeatyouraces

Only the ones that supposedly beat unbeatable games, not those that beat proven beatable games.




Thats NOT the same as showing PROOF that you actually do it. Thats like me saying.....Ok, I count cards and am an AP (cough).

I net around 628K per year. Is that ok to post it because it deals with AP (cough)?

Ken
Ibeatyouraces
Ibeatyouraces
Joined: Jan 12, 2010
  • Threads: 68
  • Posts: 11933
June 20th, 2012 at 7:07:15 PM permalink
deleted
DUHHIIIIIIIII HEARD THAT!
mrjjj
mrjjj
Joined: Sep 4, 2010
  • Threads: 75
  • Posts: 1579
June 28th, 2012 at 6:34:35 PM permalink
I just thought of this......If a person wants to start a thread regarding a method, why not have this rule? >> Any member who comments on that thread with an insult, gets their post deleted and a warning of a ban. Also included......"can you explain why your method will work, this game has not been beat for 957 years".

Ya see, that counts as an insult. (lol) With this rule, it would eliminate the attack posts in the thread, problem solved. I can understand, this rule would not be liked by all. ;)

Ken
Ibeatyouraces
Ibeatyouraces
Joined: Jan 12, 2010
  • Threads: 68
  • Posts: 11933
June 28th, 2012 at 7:14:45 PM permalink
deleted
DUHHIIIIIIIII HEARD THAT!
mrjjj
mrjjj
Joined: Sep 4, 2010
  • Threads: 75
  • Posts: 1579
June 28th, 2012 at 7:21:39 PM permalink
Quote: Ibeatyouraces

Whats insulting are people that claim they can win/beat an unbeatable game without mathematical proof when we all know damn well that the game and any combo of bets have been picked apart and cannot overcome the house advantage so people can win. Not only is it insulting to all the math people, its insulting to the real people out there in anonymity playing casino games with a REAL mathematical edge on the game. I here the same BS all day, every day in the casinos about how these people win on this bet or that bet and all I see is these same people consistantly buying more chips to lose.




So you ADMIT (?), you are on the list that would be posting on such a thread. I assume you hate my new rule idea?

Ken

  • Jump to: