joe212
joe212
  • Threads: 4
  • Posts: 10
Joined: Jun 23, 2014
July 7th, 2014 at 8:13:52 AM permalink
Hey guys thanks in advance for helping me with this. Are these interpretations correct?

16 v t - hit in the negs
12 v 4 - stand in the negs
13 v 4 - hit -1 or higher (0, +1...)
12 v 5 - stand -2 or higher
12 v 6 - stand - 1 or higher
13 v 3 - stand -2 or higher
AxiomOfChoice
AxiomOfChoice
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 5761
Joined: Sep 12, 2012
July 8th, 2014 at 3:49:01 PM permalink
Quote: joe212

Hey guys thanks in advance for helping me with this. Are these interpretations correct?

16 v t - hit in the negs
12 v 4 - stand in the negs
13 v 4 - hit -1 or higher (0, +1...)
12 v 5 - stand -2 or higher
12 v 6 - stand - 1 or higher
13 v 3 - stand -2 or higher



A couple of these (specifically 12v4 and 13v4) are backwards. When the choice is between hitting and standing, lower counts favor hitting and higher counts favor standing.

This stands to reason -- lower count means fewer 10s so it is safer to hit your 12s and 13s.
  • Jump to: