Thread Rating:
So, please beta test our new game (click the link above) before I announce it on the Odds site. As always, I welcome all comments and corrections.
My first comment: it would be nice if there was a way to suppress the advice. Options include a checkbox, roll-over, or an option to have a pop up warn you if you click the wrong one.
I usually assume my Java is working fine, but I do not seem to be getting advice. Or how does it work, how should I be seeing it?
Edit - perhaps it is the JavaScript issue...
I raised after the flop and it said that was not the best play.
Then I saw the cards!
I got 4 deuces every hand
Perhaps next time, I could consult on this. My poker scoring algorithm works on thousands of seven card hands per second.Quote: WizardSeven-card poker hands are also slower to score than five cards. However, with a combination of Java and JavaScript, JB managed to get the job done.
The game now enabled between advice always/upon mistake/or never, with radio buttons at the top.
Thanks for the offer of help with the scoring of 7-card hands. I may hit you up for help on that sometime. The way I do it now is if there is not flush possible then the logic is pretty straightforward. If there is a flush possible it still determines the best non-suited hand, and then the best suited-hand, and takes the higher of the two. It is significantly faster than scoring all combin(7,5)=21 possible 5-card poker hands out of 7 cards.
Select @l_temp = cameltoe.dbo.f_eval_flush( @c1, @c2, @c3, @c4, @c5, @c6, @c7 ) ;
If @l_temp = 0
Begin
Select @l_temp = cameltoe.dbo.f_eval_straight( @c1, @c2, @c3, @c4, @c5, @c6, @c7 ) ;
If @l_temp = 0
Begin
Select @l_temp = cameltoe.dbo.f_eval_pair( @c1, @c2, @c3, @c4, @c5, @c6, @c7 ) ;
If @l_temp = 0
Select @l_return = cameltoe.dbo.f_eval_nothing( @c1, @c2, @c3, @c4, @c5, @c6, @c7 ) ;
Else
Begin
Select @l_return = cameltoe.dbo.f_eval_four( @c1, @c2, @c3, @c4, @c5, @c6, @c7 ) ;
If @l_return = 0
Select @l_return = cameltoe.dbo.f_eval_fh( @c1, @c2, @c3, @c4, @c5, @c6, @c7 ) ;
If @l_return = 0
Select @l_return = cameltoe.dbo.f_eval_three( @c1, @c2, @c3, @c4, @c5, @c6, @c7 ) ;
If @l_return = 0
Select @l_return = cameltoe.dbo.f_eval_twopair( @c1, @c2, @c3, @c4, @c5, @c6, @c7 ) ;
If @l_return = 0
Set @l_return = @l_temp
End
End
Else
Set @l_return = @l_temp
End
Else
Begin
Select @l_return = cameltoe.dbo.f_eval_sf( @c1, @c2, @c3, @c4, @c5, @c6, @c7 ) ;
If @l_return = 0
Set @l_return = @l_temp
End
Return @l_return ;
End ;
For a hand that is a flush, the only better thing is a straight flush to it goes through that grinder twice.
The hand that costs the most computing power is two pair which goes:
Flush? No!
Straight? No!
Pair? Yes!
Four of a Kind? No!
Full House? No!
Three of a Kind? No!
Two Pair? Yes! or No! Then it must be a pair.
I would save a few steps if I branched at Three of a Kind instead of at Pair, I think I'll rework this a little bit and see if I can punch it up.
But in terms of raising, should you raise 4x if you have a 2 of clubs? Because you'll usually pair, but it's the lowest pair. Thoughts?
Very nice work, of course, beyond the obvious bugs. Slicker than the game that is available at discountgambling.net (maybe you should hire Stephen?)
Why the inordinately bad paytable on Trips? I've never seen a paytable like that in a real casino.
Quote: UCivanWOO, Why don't you have the Trips-Ante-Blind-Play look exactly like SM's layout, Trips on the top and Play at the bottom? Is the design patented and U have to avoid it?
Yeah, that is basically the issue. It is Shufflemaster's game and I don't want to be too egregious about using it.
Your website is already the hands-down best gambling site ever devised,
And the addition of the games makes it even better.
I would never dream of playing CSP, LIR, 3CP, or UTH for money but now I get to enjoy them for free!
I love the pai gow tiles the most, although I wish it were programmed for optimal instead of house way!
Keep up the great work!
The "WIN" box does not add if there was a payout on the blind (straight or higher).
Quote: UCivanWOO, why do U feel the need to compete against discountgambling.net? It has a practice module too. Do U agree with his play strategy?
I didn't know he had one. Even if I did, it isn't that I'm competing with him, I just want to do my own version. I'm sure his strategy is fine, but I haven't analyzed it.
Quote: rama13The Trips paytable on the layout is wrong for any iteration of a game seen in a casino.
You're right. Thanks, good catch.
Quote: rama13The "WIN" box does not add if there was a payout on the blind (straight or higher).
It does for me. Can anybody else corroborate the above?
Works fine for me too.Quote: WizardIt does for me. Can anybody else corroborate the above?
I was almost busted, playing crazy, and hit 6 blind bet winners of straights or better. The last 3 were full houses.
The win box on my computer showed the correct amount each time.
proof of the last
I think the more info/options for the players the better! There's no competition here; I don't care about anything other than vanity hits for my site :) I *do* care about players *not* giving any EV back to the house.
It'd be good to show the player the actual dollar cost of the wrong decision(s), like I did in my recent Mississippi Stud calculator. This might be the only way to get people to bet their hands (they check way too much at the tables).
Thanks for the links to my site over the years!
Steve
however, there could be a glitch in advice? for the shown situation, I get scolded for trying to raise:
sorry for the tiny pics. The situation is, I have a pair of 4s, one of the 4s is in my hole cards. Shouldnt I raise?
pic 1
pic 2
#@%$#@ can't get a bigger pic. Umm, out of time, if you know how to enlarge the whole screen you can see them better. [hit control/+]
Quote: stephenhowThanks for the links to my site over the years!Steve
Steve, nice to hear from you! I hope all is well with you. For those who don't know, Steve How is the genius behind one of the best gambling sites on the web discountgambling.net/.
I've tried to write to you the last few years but didn't get a reply. Maybe I have a bad Email address. Can you PM me with your best contact information.
Welcome to my forum and I hope you'll stick around.
Quote: odiousgambitmuch better now!
however, there could be a glitch in advice? for the shown situation, I get scolded for trying to raise:
sorry for the tiny pics. The situation is, I have a pair of 4s, one of the 4s is in my hole cards. Shouldnt I raise?
You don't raise bottom pairs against scary boards, like straight or flush draws.
I don't think Stephen caught the straight problem in his strategy (he knows about not raising against flush draws), but I've noticed it from playing too many practice rounds with the calculator on. I plugged your hand into the wiz's calculator, and it confirms you should check. It's borderline, -0.584 vs -0.574.
Quote: dwheatleyYou don't raise bottom pairs against scary boards, like straight or flush draws.
I don't think Stephen caught the straight problem in his strategy (he knows about not raising against flush draws), but I've noticed it from playing too many practice rounds with the calculator on. I plugged your hand into the wiz's calculator, and it confirms you should check. It's borderline, -0.584 vs -0.574.
Thanks. Interesting. The calculator would seem to trump the webpage, which perhaps is simpler. Good to know the WoO Game is not just suffering a glitch.
I biggest error I know about is the strategy says to play any non-pocket pair against an off-suit board. Instead, you should check some low pairs against some straight draws. I have no idea about the details.
Quote: dwheatleyStephen claims his is 2.2% vs 2.1% optimal, so I have been going by that.
where do you find that strategy?
Quote: dwheatley
Thanks. Looks like I'll be able to laminate it and use it too. Will take time to fully decipher that jargon/slang though!
I play this game a lot and am ahead on it, thanks mostly to a $900 straight flush I hit a year or two ago with $10 ante/$10 trips. (I never play that much anymore; only $5 antes, no trips).
Quote: WizardIt does for me. Can anybody else corroborate the above?
It seems to be working now.
Seems odd that I would get a straight flush too, after not so many as all that. If a glitch, an odd one.
Dealt: 2D and 4H check
Flop: KD 10C JD check
4th and River: AH and AS, I attempted to fold. Game recommended I Play. I lost. The only hand I would beat would be 2 3, not sure why I would play.
Unless dealer had a T,J,Q,K, or A.
Still I would think it was better to fold
reason - play the board. Board cards are all high. u could push. Dealer gets bad cards like players. If there was no pair on the board, with 5 high cards, when dealer did not pair up with the board, your Ante would be pushed. Why not play?Quote: SONBP2Right play?? (Sorry can't seem to attach the picture).
Dealt: 2D and 4H check
Flop: KD 10C JD check
4th and River: AH and AS, I attempted to fold. Game recommended I Play. I lost. The only hand I would beat would be 2 3, not sure why I would play.
On your new game, I can’t get the “advice” at all....I have Java 1.6 working on Safari osX Lion.....do u have idea why?
Also, enjoying radio show a lot.