Poll
No votes (0%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
1 vote (12.5%) | |||
1 vote (12.5%) | |||
1 vote (12.5%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
5 votes (62.5%) |
8 members have voted
Direct: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BrrQjMYewdg
The question for the poll is what was your favorite game from the show? One vote only.
Quote: WizardThis thread shall be for discussion about the new table games seen at the 2023 Global Game Protection and Table Games Conference (long name). As always, Angela gets the honor of the first video. Here she is demonstrating Match 52.
Direct: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BrrQjMYewdg
The question for the poll is what was your favorite game from the show? One vote only.
link to original post
Definitely an original concept, but I think there are some concerns for this game on a physical table, there are a lot of cards to deal, speed of play, and the real estate required by a larger table all come to mind. It seems a roulette table (with a chipper) would make more sense here. That being said, it is a creative concept, simple to get, and I could see myself playing this game at a bar top or in an electronic format.
Direct: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CNIVZLmgMEw
Quote: WizardHere is the next game in my series from the 2023 table game show -- 3 Shot Poker. This one can already be played at the Grand Sierra in Reno.
Direct: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CNIVZLmgMEw
link to original post
Too high a house edge for me...
The next game in our series is Big Bet Blackjack by our own zbrownson.
Direct: https://youtu.be/yC2PX_04BhE
Quote: WizardHappy Summer Solstice everyone!
The next game in our series is Big Bet Blackjack by our own zbrownson.
Direct: https://youtu.be/yC2PX_04BhE
link to original post
Any chance The Wiz can do a statistical analysis of game play at some point? Pretty please?
3 cards,player's unbusted hand pays 1:2
4 cards, player's unbusted hand pays 1:1
5 cards, player's unbusted hand pays 3:2
6 cards, player's unbusted hand pays ????
7 cards, player's unbusted hand pays ????
In the video, it is mentioned that the payout increases to 100:1; for how many dealer cards in a busted hand?
Does this mean that you are more or less likely to raise when dealer's faceup card is a 2?
Quote: gordonm888If dealer busts with:
3 cards,player's unbusted hand pays 1:2
4 cards, player's unbusted hand pays 1:1
5 cards, player's unbusted hand pays 3:2
6 cards, player's unbusted hand pays ????
7 cards, player's unbusted hand pays ????
In the video, it is mentioned that the payout increases to 100:1; for how many dealer cards in a busted hand?
Does this mean that you are more likely to raise when dealer faceup card is a 2?
link to original post
6 cards pay 3:1
7 cards pay 10:1
8+ cards pay 100:1
Here is when you will make a 2x raise (triple)
If player has a hand such as 8-8 vs 7, can the player make the 2X raise and then split his 8-8 hand? If splitting after a big raise, does this mean that each split hand is played with the original wager plus the 2x raise amount? If you are allowed to Double after splitting, does this mean that the tripled wager can then be doubled?
Quote: gordonm888Another question about the rules.
If player has a hand such as 8-8 vs 7, can the player make the 2X raise and then split his 8-8 hand? If splitting after a big raise, does this mean that each split hand is played with the original wager plus the 2x raise amount? If you are allowed to Double after splitting, does this mean that the tripled wager can then be doubled?
link to original post
Good questions. So you can make a big bet after a split, but cannot split after a big bet. So in your scenario you would split 8's first, then make a big bet (if you hit a 2 or 3 or Ace on either or both hands).
The big bet in this game replaces the double down rule (you can still technically "double" by making a 1x big bet and choosing to hit only once). A big bet is always more advantageous than a traditional double. Part of this advantage is that when you make a big bet, is it just acts as a raise, you can still continue to hit as many times (if any) as you want.
Quote: GenoDRPhWhat's the HE of the side bet?
link to original post
It is highly countable, thus has a high house edge (20-25% range based on paytable) to offset, very similar to a Lucky Ladies or Kings Bounty.
Quote: GenoDRPhAny chance you'd be willing to provide the gameplay analysis, even if by email?
link to original post
Sure, here are the interesting bits, I will eventually get it uploaded on my website but for now here it is.
Big Bet Rules:
- player can make a "big bet wager" up to 2x main wager on any 2 card hand under 20 (19 or less)
- player can continue to hit after a big bet
- big bet replaces double down option
- cannot split after a big bet, but can big bet after a split
- cannot big bet A9, AA, or Blackjack (aces considered 11 so hand is considered 20 or over)
Standard Blackjack Rules:
- 6 or 8 deck shoes
- No Surrender
- Split up to 3 times (4 total hands)
- one card on split aces
- dealer hits soft 17
Direct: https://youtu.be/g__eXl1kS8E
Quote: WizardIt's time for the next game, Lotrec 2. I must admit I walked away from the making of this video still not understanding the game very well.
Direct: https://youtu.be/g__eXl1kS8E
link to original post
I guess I don't follow, why does the red square, blue square, or black square win but not the white square? (4 minutes 12 seconds in video...)
https://youtu.be/g__eXl1kS8E?t=252
Where is the element of fun in this game? I can't recognize whether I have a good hand or a bad hand. It was so boring that I didn't finish the video.
However, it goes to show that games that are totally outside the box never get far.
Why didn’t the person with 2 red squares get paid 2x
Seems bad to have identical cards then? I guess you’re hoping to be dealt 6 totally different colors and shapes ??
Direct: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svDVfcECwJE
Comments?
Direct: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3v0bGgWi18
Quote: GialmereThis poor guy with his circles and squares again. I wish every game designer all the luck in the world. God knows they need it. I can only hope that internet casino reps attend these events because he has zero chance of Nevada casinos showing any interest at all.
link to original post
He was such a nice guy and lots of fun to hang out with and do magic tricks for. I didn't have the heart to tell him his games, as presented, didn't have a chance. This one, Lotrec 1, I actually understood, but it took a while.
Next year, I think I'll try to personally understand each game before I do the video, so I can ask appropriate questions in the video if anything isn't clear. However, it's confusing when you see one new game after another.
With this game the presenter was so nervous that I suggested I just explain the game myself, which he agreed to.
Direct: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DSoeKHpeMRU.
As always, I welcome all thoughts on the video. I thought as I was making it that buying a half-point (turning a push into a win) for 1/4 the cost of the bet might also work.
Quote: TheguyoverthereVery interesting .. so no changes to the base game? It’s just an additional option you can do? So this would have a lower house edge than normal black Jack for the well informed player? Is the idea that most people are gonna throw away money when faced with the classic 19 vs 10? Also what happens to the money you put up to buy the point? Is it like a vig that just always gets taken?
link to original post
so no changes to the base game? Yes
It’s just an additional option you can do? Yes
So this would have a lower house edge than normal black Jack for the well informed player? Yes
Is the idea that most people are gonna throw away money when faced with the classic 19 vs 10? Yes
Also what happens to the money you put up to buy the point? Is it like a vig that just always gets taken? Yes
This actually is not a bad idea. This table at the show didn't get much attention, but I think is the kind of boring idea that would actually work. Super easy to explain and deal.
However, I think the average player would see half the price of the bet to be rather expensive. That's why I think selling a half point for 1/4 the bet amount (I reserve all rights to this idea) might improve it. Then again, my own Ties Win Blackjack game was a abject failure.