WABJ11
WABJ11
  • Threads: 10
  • Posts: 67
Joined: Dec 26, 2020
January 2nd, 2022 at 11:53:46 PM permalink
There’s this guy named Mikki who has made a splash recently on the hustler live poker stream and gambling world. He went onto the “No Jumper” podcast you can YouTube, I cannot link it.

He claims he can beat baccarat and he’s been backed off from it (and a bunch of other crazy stuff he claims). Can anyone confirm if this guy has actually been backed off of Baccarat? Spencer Cornelia tried to do an investigation, but he got sucked into it and didn’t end up really coming to a conclusion on him. This guy has had me thinking lately about baccarat. Obviously we know you can’t beat baccarat, but what has mystified me
Is the guy has the money to prove and back up he’s “winning” or at least inherited a trust fund? Perhaps he has found a system, card counting method, way they deal the game, that has been over looked by professionals? Something that nobody has discovered, and is actually beating the game? Can someone confirm if this Mikki guy has been backed off of Baccarat in Las Vegas?

I really want to get to the bottom of this…
darkoz
darkoz 
  • Threads: 300
  • Posts: 11916
Joined: Dec 22, 2009
Thanked by
odiousgambitHunterhillJohnzimboteddys
January 2nd, 2022 at 11:58:26 PM permalink
Does (M)ikki go by the nickname Dawg?
For Whom the bus tolls; The bus tolls for thee
WABJ11
WABJ11
  • Threads: 10
  • Posts: 67
Joined: Dec 26, 2020
January 3rd, 2022 at 12:58:25 AM permalink
YouTube’Mikki Gambling’ and the videos will pop up. I can’t link them since I don’t have enough posts but this guy has taken the gambling world by storm.
OnceDear
OnceDear
  • Threads: 64
  • Posts: 7543
Joined: Jun 1, 2014
January 3rd, 2022 at 2:38:15 AM permalink
Quote: WABJ11

YouTube’Mikki Gambling’ and the videos will pop up. I can’t link them since I don’t have enough posts but this guy has taken the gambling world by storm.
link to original post

Loads of him out there in google land...

https://www.google.com/search?q=Mikki+Mase+baccarat+influencer
All sorts of suggestions about him and claims by him. I make no further comment at this time.
Psalm 25:16 Turn to me and be gracious to me, for I am lonely and afflicted. Proverbs 18:2 A fool finds no satisfaction in trying to understand, for he would rather express his own opinion.
heatmap
heatmap
  • Threads: 272
  • Posts: 2368
Joined: Feb 12, 2018
January 3rd, 2022 at 4:45:34 AM permalink
Dude is trash. You can judge a book by its cover it’s what humans do. Face tattoos? Any thing that has a face tattoo you can assume it’s all a show.

He makes his money bluffing crazy rich people at poker. I’ve only seen him play poker mostly and I don’t understand the people who are coming here asking about him why they don’t mention poker.
odiousgambit
odiousgambit
  • Threads: 327
  • Posts: 9776
Joined: Nov 9, 2009
Thanked by
teliot
January 3rd, 2022 at 6:26:02 AM permalink
Quote: WABJ11


link to original post

you say you are mystified by his evidence, but if that evidence is so flawed that merely by flashing his wealth as "proof"* it would be what he is doing ... why would you pay any attention to that?

* you say his evidence could merely be an "inherited a trust fund"
the next time Dame Fortune toys with your heart, your soul and your wallet, raise your glass and praise her thus: “Thanks for nothing, you cold-hearted, evil, damnable, nefarious, low-life, malicious monster from Hell!”   She is, after all, stone deaf. ... Arnold Snyder
WABJ11
WABJ11
  • Threads: 10
  • Posts: 67
Joined: Dec 26, 2020
January 3rd, 2022 at 10:01:46 PM permalink
I’m a professional gambler. I’ve played poker professionally for 15 years, have played blackjack professionally for 5, and I’m in OSN and have to play blackjack under the radar. I consider myself pretty acclimated with casinos and advantage play. What has me intrigued about Mikki is nobody can say “I work at so and so and he hasn’t been banned.” Also the way he words things such as if he revealed how he wins casinos would have to “stop dealing baccarat” the way they deal the game. If I were to win at baccarat this is what I would expect to find a flaw to beat the game.

More than likely he is full of $hit, but all the checks from casinos, money, winning stubs, and other things he’s showcased (which I know any chump could do) have just peaked my curiosity.
kewlj
kewlj
  • Threads: 216
  • Posts: 4635
Joined: Apr 17, 2012
Thanked by
odiousgambit
January 3rd, 2022 at 10:13:18 PM permalink
Quote: WABJ11

I’m a professional gambler. I’ve played poker professionally for 15 years, have played blackjack professionally for 5, and I’m in OSN and have to play blackjack under the radar. I consider myself pretty acclimated with casinos and advantage play. What has me intrigued about Mikki is nobody can say “I work at so and so and he hasn’t been banned.” Also the way he words things such as if he revealed how he wins casinos would have to “stop dealing baccarat” the way they deal the game. If I were to win at baccarat this is what I would expect to find a flaw to beat the game.

More than likely he is full of $hit, but all the checks from casinos, money, winning stubs, and other things he’s showcased (which I know any chump could do) have just peaked my curiosity.



I am surprised at you WABJ11. You know better than this. Advantage play is about math. These guys, popping up on youtube AND FORUMS, with their claims not only not supported by math, but that flat out DEFY math, are just modern day carnival barkers.

Now I only very recently became aware of Mikki and have watched a total of about 10 minutes of one of his videos, but it is the same exact nonsense that so many of us that participate here are familiar with. There is no math to it. There is no reality to it.
ChallengedMilly
ChallengedMilly
  • Threads: 27
  • Posts: 291
Joined: Jul 25, 2021
January 4th, 2022 at 4:59:34 PM permalink
Quote: kewlj

Quote: WABJ11

I’m a professional gambler. I’ve played poker professionally for 15 years, have played blackjack professionally for 5, and I’m in OSN and have to play blackjack under the radar. I consider myself pretty acclimated with casinos and advantage play. What has me intrigued about Mikki is nobody can say “I work at so and so and he hasn’t been banned.” Also the way he words things such as if he revealed how he wins casinos would have to “stop dealing baccarat” the way they deal the game. If I were to win at baccarat this is what I would expect to find a flaw to beat the game.

More than likely he is full of $hit, but all the checks from casinos, money, winning stubs, and other things he’s showcased (which I know any chump could do) have just peaked my curiosity.


I am surprised at you WABJ11. You know better than this. Advantage play is about math. These guys, popping up on youtube AND FORUMS, with their claims not only not supported by math, but that flat out DEFY math, are just modern day carnival barkers.

Now I only very recently became aware of Mikki and have watched a total of about 10 minutes of one of his videos, but it is the same exact nonsense that so many of us that participate here are familiar with. There is no math to it. There is no reality to it.
link to original post

I mean we do know baccarat can be exploited, look at the Tran family drama.
Last edited by: OnceDear on Jan 5, 2022
Dieter
Administrator
Dieter
  • Threads: 16
  • Posts: 6122
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
Thanked by
MDawg
January 4th, 2022 at 7:51:26 PM permalink
Quote: ChallengedMilly

I mean we do know baccarat can be exploited, look at the Tran family drama.
link to original post



Many games can be exploited with a controlled shuffle.
May the cards fall in your favor.
lilredrooster
lilredrooster
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 7098
Joined: May 8, 2015
January 5th, 2022 at 6:36:00 AM permalink
Quote: Dieter



Many games can be exploited with a controlled shuffle.



would you mind elaborating on your comment

are you referring to shuffle tracking?___________________thanks

.
the foolish sayings of a rich man often pass for words of wisdom by the fools around him
Dieter
Administrator
Dieter
  • Threads: 16
  • Posts: 6122
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
January 5th, 2022 at 6:39:23 AM permalink
Quote: lilredrooster

Quote: Dieter



Many games can be exploited with a controlled shuffle.



would you mind elaborating on your comment

are you referring to shuffle tracking?___________________thanks

.
link to original post



Yes. No.
May the cards fall in your favor.
darkoz
darkoz 
  • Threads: 300
  • Posts: 11916
Joined: Dec 22, 2009
January 5th, 2022 at 6:53:07 AM permalink
Quote: lilredrooster

Quote: Dieter



Many games can be exploited with a controlled shuffle.



would you mind elaborating on your comment

are you referring to shuffle tracking?___________________thanks

.
link to original post



The Tran family paid dealers to fake their shuffling. So the cards previously tracked could have the outcomes predicted.

This lead to multiple convictions.

The Tran family did not beat the game if Baccarat. They cheated in a manner that gave them guaranteed success (aside from crime doesn't pay, etc).
For Whom the bus tolls; The bus tolls for thee
Marcusclark66
Marcusclark66
  • Threads: 33
  • Posts: 1140
Joined: Mar 26, 2020
Thanked by
gordonm888
January 5th, 2022 at 7:05:03 AM permalink
Here. We use a lot of material from the Tran case for in house training to this day.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/co-founder-casino-cheating-criminal-enterprise-sentenced-36-months-prison-targeting-casinos

References if you care to research.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tran_Organization
Marcus Clark. Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66. *Professional Casino Security Expert. *Certified EMT *Certified Company Firearms Instructor. *Certified Gaming Regulations Interpreter for Corporate Applications. *Domestic UrbanTactical Combat Casualty Expert. *Tic-Tac-Toe Expert (Real Competitive Versions) & Mastering Chess. *Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club. *Mastering Cracking it. Bit-by-Bit, Piece-by-Piece Crediting Forum Members. *Certified Casino Property Entry & Exit Point Analyzer *Baccarat Winning Session Record: 12 out of 12 & 1 out of 1 Mini Session. Baccarat Losing Session Record: 2 Losing Sessions.
ChumpChange
ChumpChange
  • Threads: 131
  • Posts: 5112
Joined: Jun 15, 2018
January 5th, 2022 at 10:06:39 AM permalink
I'm revamping my Baccarat betting system/strategy for progression wins on Banker. I never wanted to play Banker because of the vig, but I've been convinced lately that runs of x amount of wins will be much more frequent by playing Banker, so maybe that will make up for the vig somehow. I'm also not pressing my bets until after the 2nd win because 'chop' is such a large part of the results and my session money will last longer when it isn't 'chopped up' by the 'chop'. I used to feel that way about Place Bets too, and maybe I should reconsider that.
kewlj
kewlj
  • Threads: 216
  • Posts: 4635
Joined: Apr 17, 2012
January 5th, 2022 at 10:23:26 AM permalink
Quote: ChallengedMilly

[I mean we do know baccarat can be exploited, look at the Tran family drama.



Exploiting a casino game, cheating and criminal activity involving that play are 3 very different and escalating things.

Saying The Tran Org "exploited" the game is like saying Al Capone was a businessman.
Marcusclark66
Marcusclark66
  • Threads: 33
  • Posts: 1140
Joined: Mar 26, 2020
January 5th, 2022 at 11:20:53 AM permalink
Quote: ChumpChange

I'm revamping my Baccarat betting system/strategy for progression wins on Banker. I never wanted to play Banker because of the vig, but I've been convinced lately that runs of x amount of wins will be much more frequent by playing Banker, so maybe that will make up for the vig somehow. I'm also not pressing my bets until after the 2nd win because 'chop' is such a large part of the results and my session money will last longer when it isn't 'chopped up' by the 'chop'. I used to feel that way about Place Bets too, and maybe I should reconsider that.
link to original post



Almost every casino has EZ Baccarat, Five Treasures, or one of several others that have NO COMMISSIONS NO VIG on the bankers side winning hands.
Marcus Clark. Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66. *Professional Casino Security Expert. *Certified EMT *Certified Company Firearms Instructor. *Certified Gaming Regulations Interpreter for Corporate Applications. *Domestic UrbanTactical Combat Casualty Expert. *Tic-Tac-Toe Expert (Real Competitive Versions) & Mastering Chess. *Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club. *Mastering Cracking it. Bit-by-Bit, Piece-by-Piece Crediting Forum Members. *Certified Casino Property Entry & Exit Point Analyzer *Baccarat Winning Session Record: 12 out of 12 & 1 out of 1 Mini Session. Baccarat Losing Session Record: 2 Losing Sessions.
Dieter
Administrator
Dieter
  • Threads: 16
  • Posts: 6122
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
January 5th, 2022 at 11:56:25 AM permalink
Quote: Marcusclark66

Quote: ChumpChange

I'm revamping my Baccarat betting system/strategy for progression wins on Banker. I never wanted to play Banker because of the vig, but I've been convinced lately that runs of x amount of wins will be much more frequent by playing Banker, so maybe that will make up for the vig somehow. I'm also not pressing my bets until after the 2nd win because 'chop' is such a large part of the results and my session money will last longer when it isn't 'chopped up' by the 'chop'. I used to feel that way about Place Bets too, and maybe I should reconsider that.
link to original post



Almost every casino has EZ Baccarat, Five Treasures, or one of several others that have NO COMMISSIONS NO VIG on the bankers side winning hands.
link to original post



Yeah, but banker bets win less often to make up for it.
May the cards fall in your favor.
OnceDear
OnceDear
  • Threads: 64
  • Posts: 7543
Joined: Jun 1, 2014
January 5th, 2022 at 12:32:37 PM permalink
Quote: Dieter

Quote: Marcusclark66

Quote: ChumpChange

I'm revamping my Baccarat betting system/strategy for progression wins on Banker. I never wanted to play Banker because of the vig, but I've been convinced lately that runs of x amount of wins will be much more frequent by playing Banker, so maybe that will make up for the vig somehow. I'm also not pressing my bets until after the 2nd win because 'chop' is such a large part of the results and my session money will last longer when it isn't 'chopped up' by the 'chop'. I used to feel that way about Place Bets too, and maybe I should reconsider that.
link to original post



Almost every casino has EZ Baccarat, Five Treasures, or one of several others that have NO COMMISSIONS NO VIG on the bankers side winning hands.
link to original post



Yeah, but banker bets win less often to make up for it.
link to original post



Is Chumpchange playing bricks and mortar casinos, or is this a virtual play experiment with play money?
Serious question. no offence meant.
Psalm 25:16 Turn to me and be gracious to me, for I am lonely and afflicted. Proverbs 18:2 A fool finds no satisfaction in trying to understand, for he would rather express his own opinion.
ChumpChange
ChumpChange
  • Threads: 131
  • Posts: 5112
Joined: Jun 15, 2018
January 5th, 2022 at 12:50:22 PM permalink
There's no EZ Baccarat. Five Treasures, etc. that I've come across yet. One video said there was a vig no matter what you bet for (P or B) on EZ Baccarat, but it didn't say how much.
As for B & M casinos my plan is to beat Bubble Craps, Craps Tables, Spanish 21, and Baccarat. I may drop by a BJ table, and spend some time at a Roulette table. But the table minimums and my weak bankroll have to be considered before I move up levels or games. Table minimums are $1, $3, $15, $25, $50, and $100 for various games. I want to be ready to move up when I can, so I play the home games almost all the time during the plague times.
CyrusV
CyrusV
  • Threads: 7
  • Posts: 103
Joined: Aug 8, 2015
January 5th, 2022 at 4:39:29 PM permalink
https://youtu.be/CkBAzTDwZrM
Marcusclark66
Marcusclark66
  • Threads: 33
  • Posts: 1140
Joined: Mar 26, 2020
January 5th, 2022 at 4:53:33 PM permalink
Quote: CyrusV

https://youtu.be/CkBAzTDwZrM
link to original post



Extremely well put together video with more fact checking and reality than YouTube Social Sales Stuff!

Absolutely great video put together that highlights Mikki.

Must watch.
Last edited by: Marcusclark66 on Jan 5, 2022
Marcus Clark. Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66. *Professional Casino Security Expert. *Certified EMT *Certified Company Firearms Instructor. *Certified Gaming Regulations Interpreter for Corporate Applications. *Domestic UrbanTactical Combat Casualty Expert. *Tic-Tac-Toe Expert (Real Competitive Versions) & Mastering Chess. *Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club. *Mastering Cracking it. Bit-by-Bit, Piece-by-Piece Crediting Forum Members. *Certified Casino Property Entry & Exit Point Analyzer *Baccarat Winning Session Record: 12 out of 12 & 1 out of 1 Mini Session. Baccarat Losing Session Record: 2 Losing Sessions.
MrV
MrV
  • Threads: 364
  • Posts: 8158
Joined: Feb 13, 2010
January 5th, 2022 at 5:52:46 PM permalink
I believe that Spencer, the guy who made the video about Mikki, is being sued by someone else for something claimed to be (ahem) "defamatory."

So be careful: don't let your mouth or fingers write checks that your bank can't cash.
"What, me worry?"
billryan
billryan
  • Threads: 255
  • Posts: 17235
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
January 5th, 2022 at 5:54:49 PM permalink
I didn't watch the video but took thirty seconds to read the comments. Didn't have to watch it after that.
The older I get, the better I recall things that never happened
Deucekies
Deucekies
  • Threads: 58
  • Posts: 1486
Joined: Jan 20, 2014
January 5th, 2022 at 6:51:18 PM permalink
Based on what little I've seen, my verdict is he's a trust fund kid just like Dan Bilzerian. If he's backed off in Vegas, it may just be because his action is too big for them. Not even Vegas casinos want swings in the tens of millions per day.
Casinos are not your friends, they want your money. But so does Disneyland. And there is no chance in hell that you will go to Disneyland and come back with more money than you went with. - AxelWolf and Mickeycrimm
Marcusclark66
Marcusclark66
  • Threads: 33
  • Posts: 1140
Joined: Mar 26, 2020
January 5th, 2022 at 7:08:17 PM permalink
Quote: Deucekies

Based on what little I've seen, my verdict is he's a trust fund kid just like Dan Bilzerian. If he's backed off in Vegas, it may just be because his action is too big for them. Not even Vegas casinos want swings in the tens of millions per day.
link to original post



And casinos are private property so they can ban anyone for virtually anything they desire, especially in relationship to play.
Marcus Clark. Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66. *Professional Casino Security Expert. *Certified EMT *Certified Company Firearms Instructor. *Certified Gaming Regulations Interpreter for Corporate Applications. *Domestic UrbanTactical Combat Casualty Expert. *Tic-Tac-Toe Expert (Real Competitive Versions) & Mastering Chess. *Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club. *Mastering Cracking it. Bit-by-Bit, Piece-by-Piece Crediting Forum Members. *Certified Casino Property Entry & Exit Point Analyzer *Baccarat Winning Session Record: 12 out of 12 & 1 out of 1 Mini Session. Baccarat Losing Session Record: 2 Losing Sessions.
MrV
MrV
  • Threads: 364
  • Posts: 8158
Joined: Feb 13, 2010
January 5th, 2022 at 7:15:25 PM permalink
Quote: Deucekies

. Not even Vegas casinos want swings in the tens of millions per day.



Not most casinos, cetainily.

But unless things have changed I question whether you are correct.

Didn't a few strip casinos bend over backwards to entice big whales to gamble with them in the past?

Guys like Kerry Packer were sought after, not barred, even though his wins or losses would typically be in the millions.

Forty percent of casino gambling revenue came from guys like that, "preferred players," or so I recall reading somewhere.
"What, me worry?"
Marcusclark66
Marcusclark66
  • Threads: 33
  • Posts: 1140
Joined: Mar 26, 2020
January 6th, 2022 at 4:33:28 PM permalink
Watch.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wlBRrFzFsGk
Marcus Clark. Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66. *Professional Casino Security Expert. *Certified EMT *Certified Company Firearms Instructor. *Certified Gaming Regulations Interpreter for Corporate Applications. *Domestic UrbanTactical Combat Casualty Expert. *Tic-Tac-Toe Expert (Real Competitive Versions) & Mastering Chess. *Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club. *Mastering Cracking it. Bit-by-Bit, Piece-by-Piece Crediting Forum Members. *Certified Casino Property Entry & Exit Point Analyzer *Baccarat Winning Session Record: 12 out of 12 & 1 out of 1 Mini Session. Baccarat Losing Session Record: 2 Losing Sessions.
heatmap
heatmap
  • Threads: 272
  • Posts: 2368
Joined: Feb 12, 2018
January 6th, 2022 at 6:37:22 PM permalink
Quote: Marcusclark66

Watch.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wlBRrFzFsGk
link to original post



damn you. DAMN YOU! i dont want to believe! I DONT WANT TO BELIEVE!!!! GAHHH blahhhhh kljdfvnlkjsdfvlkjsdbv;knad;knasdsv
AxelWolf
AxelWolf
  • Threads: 170
  • Posts: 22695
Joined: Oct 10, 2012
Thanked by
odiousgambit
January 6th, 2022 at 10:50:22 PM permalink
I have no idea if Mikki has some back-end deals with the casinos or what kind of profits he makes from his social media stuff. There's certainly a potential +EV situation given the right situation, especially if he has the money and knowledge to negotiate a favorable deal. I believe he actually does. I can see a situation where casinos are/were willing to bend over backwards offering player-friendly deals(+EV) to get a shot at his and his connections money only to realize after the fact that they have been duped.

With that being said, I just lost any faith I had in Spencer Cornelia's investigation abilities. It's clear he is capable of being easily bamboozled. He looks at ONE(one he Mikki chooses himself) of Mikki's casino online casino player accounts and deems him legit. 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

It doesn't matter if you look at three or four or five or six, it's the one account that has a massive loss on it and that totality of all his play that really matters. Even then, you would have to factor in good old positive variance.

If Mikki's investors don't have an actual advantage(Fyi Mikki could be making something off the back end for himself) and he's just using some Marty system or whatever, Spencer Cornelia just helped perpetuate a financially dangerous situation to some gullible ignorant people.

It seems like it's only people who have a s*** ton of money to lose, that this has the potential to affect.
Last edited by: AxelWolf on Jan 6, 2022
♪♪Now you swear and kick and beg us That you're not a gamblin' man Then you find you're back in Vegas With a handle in your hand♪♪ Your black cards can make you money So you hide them when you're able In the land of casinos and money You must put them on the table♪♪ You go back Jack do it again roulette wheels turinin' 'round and 'round♪♪ You go back Jack do it again♪♪
OnceDear
OnceDear
  • Threads: 64
  • Posts: 7543
Joined: Jun 1, 2014
Thanked by
odiousgambit
January 7th, 2022 at 2:40:24 AM permalink
Quote: heatmap


damn you. DAMN YOU! i dont want to believe! I DONT WANT TO BELIEVE!!!! GAHHH blahhhhh kljdfvnlkjsdfvlkjsdbv;knad;knasdsv
link to original post



Quote: AxelWolf


With that being said, I just lost any faith I had in Spencer Cornelia's investigation abilities. It's clear he is capable of being easily bamboozled. He looks at ONE(one he Mikki chooses himself) of Mikki's casino online casino player accounts and deems him legit. 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️...
It seems like it's only people who have a s*** ton of money to lose, that this has the potential to affect.
link to original post



Heatmap.... Keep the faith Brother!
* Influencer, upon influencer, upon influencer.

We have an 'influencer' and famous youtuber: Spencer Cornelia who most of us had never heard of a month ago, Who first 'debunks' and later 'endorses' another influencer. Who's selling what, and to whom?. Clue..... with youtube, YOU and I are the product. Our clicks, Our identities, Ultimately our opened wallets.

Mikki gave a good presentation, convinced Spencer of something. Who controlled the whole situation? Think about this:-
Spencer was 100% on Mikki's territory, alone.
Mikki had his entourage including the one with the distracting chest.
Spencer was like a kid in a candy store, we could see his awe and embarrassment at asking questions. He was easily convinced by Mikki's speil. See how quickly Mikki bamboozled him when discussing blackjack. It was as if neither even knew the game well enough. He was like a schoolkid interviewing Bill Gates at Microsoft HQ after being picked up in a Microsoft Limo. An easy mark.

Where were Spencer's props? pen? notepad? tablet? Spencer was winging it. Mikki showed him some reports on a web page on a phone. Where else have you seen that sort of evidence? Americas Got Talent? David Copperfield? David Blaine? Any number of street magicians? A screen on a phone handed to you can display ANYTHING. If Mikki ever wants a career in Vegas, then he has the patter and audience control to be a great magician.

Spencer was out of his depth, and Mikki had 100% control of the whole situation. I reckon he was totally pwned. Anyone who comes away convinced by the interview..... Pwned!

Let's be clear: Whatever their underlying business model profitability, both are making a LOT of money just for getting eyes on the ads on their youtube channels.

Follow the money. If something looks too good to be true..... It's probably not true.

* Actually, the layers of influencers gets deeper. Does our own, ever winning, MarcusClark, subtly endorse Spencer, endorsing Mikki?
Will we get another relentless winner along shortly saying "See guys, it's not just me and Marcus that can thrash the casino" and endorsing THE IDEA? THE VERY CONCEPT of easy money.?

Believe nothing of what you hear and half of what you see.
Psalm 25:16 Turn to me and be gracious to me, for I am lonely and afflicted. Proverbs 18:2 A fool finds no satisfaction in trying to understand, for he would rather express his own opinion.
Marcusclark66
Marcusclark66
  • Threads: 33
  • Posts: 1140
Joined: Mar 26, 2020
January 7th, 2022 at 3:50:23 AM permalink
Quote: OnceDear

Quote: heatmap


damn you. DAMN YOU! i dont want to believe! I DONT WANT TO BELIEVE!!!! GAHHH blahhhhh kljdfvnlkjsdfvlkjsdbv;knad;knasdsv
link to original post



Quote: AxelWolf


With that being said, I just lost any faith I had in Spencer Cornelia's investigation abilities. It's clear he is capable of being easily bamboozled. He looks at ONE(one he Mikki chooses himself) of Mikki's casino online casino player accounts and deems him legit. 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️...
It seems like it's only people who have a s*** ton of money to lose, that this has the potential to affect.
link to original post



Heatmap.... Keep the faith Brother!
* Influencer, upon influencer, upon influencer.

We have an 'influencer' and famous youtuber: Spencer Cornelia who most of us had never heard of a month ago, Who first 'debunks' and later 'endorses' another influencer. Who's selling what, and to whom?. Clue..... with youtube, YOU and I are the product. Our clicks, Our identities, Ultimately our opened wallets.

Mikki gave a good presentation, convinced Spencer of something. Who controlled the whole situation? Think about this:-
Spencer was 100% on Mikki's territory, alone.
Mikki had his entourage including the one with the distracting chest.
Spencer was like a kid in a candy store, we could see his awe and embarrassment at asking questions. He was easily convinced by Mikki's speil. See how quickly Mikki bamboozled him when discussing blackjack. It was as if neither even knew the game well enough. He was like a schoolkid interviewing Bill Gates at Microsoft HQ after being picked up in a Microsoft Limo. An easy mark.

Where were Spencer's props? pen? notepad? tablet? Spencer was winging it. Mikki showed him some reports on a web page on a phone. Where else have you seen that sort of evidence? Americas Got Talent? David Copperfield? David Blaine? Any number of street magicians? A screen on a phone handed to you can display ANYTHING. If Mikki ever wants a career in Vegas, then he has the patter and audience control to be a great magician.

Spencer was out of his depth, and Mikki had 100% control of the whole situation. I reckon he was totally pwned. Anyone who comes away convinced by the interview..... Pwned!

Let's be clear: Whatever their underlying business model profitability, both are making a LOT of money just for getting eyes on the ads on their youtube channels.

Follow the money. If something looks too good to be true..... It's probably not true.

* Actually, the layers of influencers gets deeper. Does our own, ever winning, MarcusClark, subtly endorse Spencer, endorsing Mikki?
Will we get another relentless winner along shortly saying "See guys, it's not just me and Marcus that can thrash the casino" and endorsing THE IDEA? THE VERY CONCEPT of easy money.?

Believe nothing of what you hear and half of what you see.
link to original post



You know OnceDear you throw me in your rant and you are strongly insinuating that I supposedly endorsed the Spencer deal doing the sudden 180.

Seriously. Why?

Because I was forwarded the video and I posted it with the one single word, ONE WORD, “Watch”.

I do not and did not endorse Spencer. In fact I thought and posted so Spencer’s first video of Mikki was very well put together, etc., etc.

Our casino was already made aware of Mikki and Spencer by our consultants we use for intelligence gathering, etc.

So carry on and I am disappointed in your insinuating something I did not in anyway whatsoever post, say, write or believe.

Respectfully,
Marcus Clark AKA Marcusclark66
Marcus Clark. Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66. *Professional Casino Security Expert. *Certified EMT *Certified Company Firearms Instructor. *Certified Gaming Regulations Interpreter for Corporate Applications. *Domestic UrbanTactical Combat Casualty Expert. *Tic-Tac-Toe Expert (Real Competitive Versions) & Mastering Chess. *Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club. *Mastering Cracking it. Bit-by-Bit, Piece-by-Piece Crediting Forum Members. *Certified Casino Property Entry & Exit Point Analyzer *Baccarat Winning Session Record: 12 out of 12 & 1 out of 1 Mini Session. Baccarat Losing Session Record: 2 Losing Sessions.
Dieter
Administrator
Dieter
  • Threads: 16
  • Posts: 6122
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
January 7th, 2022 at 4:06:30 AM permalink
Quote: Marcusclark66


You know OnceDear you throw me in your rant and you are strongly insinuating that I supposedly endorsed the Spencer deal doing the sudden 180.

Seriously. Why?

Because I was forwarded the video and I posted it with the one single word, ONE WORD, “Watch”.

I do not and did not endorse Spencer. In fact I thought and posted so Spencer’s first video of Mikki was very well put together, etc., etc.

Our casino was already made aware of Mikki and Spencer by our consultants we use for intelligence gathering, etc.

So carry on and I am disappointed in your insinuating something I did not in anyway whatsoever post, say, write or believe.

Respectfully,
Marcus Clark AKA Marcusclark66
link to original post



I make but one observation:

"Must watch." is not a disclaimer.

edit: formatting. I forgot to remove a chunk of OD's text, which was misformatted and implied a misquote of MC66.
May the cards fall in your favor.
Marcusclark66
Marcusclark66
  • Threads: 33
  • Posts: 1140
Joined: Mar 26, 2020
January 7th, 2022 at 4:24:48 AM permalink
Quote: Dieter

Quote: Marcusclark66


You know OnceDear you throw me in your rant and you are strongly insinuating that I supposedly endorsed the Spencer deal doing the sudden 180.

Seriously. Why?

Because I was forwarded the video and I posted it with the one single word, ONE WORD, “Watch”.

I do not and did not endorse Spencer. In fact I thought and posted so Spencer’s first video of Mikki was very well put together, etc., etc.

Our casino was already made aware of Mikki and Spencer by our consultants we use for intelligence gathering, etc.

So carry on and I am disappointed in your insinuating something I did not in anyway whatsoever post, say, write or believe.

Respectfully,
Marcus Clark AKA Marcusclark66
link to original post



I make but one observation:

"Must watch." is not a disclaimer.

edit: formatting. I forgot to remove a chunk of OD's text, which was misformatted and implied a misquote of MC66.
link to original post



Again. I posted one word, ONE SINGLE WORD.

“Watch”.

Please explain how that puts myself in the endorsement category?

Because I do not.

Thank you. Please explain.
Marcus Clark. Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66. *Professional Casino Security Expert. *Certified EMT *Certified Company Firearms Instructor. *Certified Gaming Regulations Interpreter for Corporate Applications. *Domestic UrbanTactical Combat Casualty Expert. *Tic-Tac-Toe Expert (Real Competitive Versions) & Mastering Chess. *Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club. *Mastering Cracking it. Bit-by-Bit, Piece-by-Piece Crediting Forum Members. *Certified Casino Property Entry & Exit Point Analyzer *Baccarat Winning Session Record: 12 out of 12 & 1 out of 1 Mini Session. Baccarat Losing Session Record: 2 Losing Sessions.
Dieter
Administrator
Dieter
  • Threads: 16
  • Posts: 6122
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
January 7th, 2022 at 4:34:39 AM permalink
Quote: Marcusclark66

Quote: Dieter

Quote: Marcusclark66


You know OnceDear you throw me in your rant and you are strongly insinuating that I supposedly endorsed the Spencer deal doing the sudden 180.

Seriously. Why?

Because I was forwarded the video and I posted it with the one single word, ONE WORD, “Watch”.

I do not and did not endorse Spencer. In fact I thought and posted so Spencer’s first video of Mikki was very well put together, etc., etc.

Our casino was already made aware of Mikki and Spencer by our consultants we use for intelligence gathering, etc.

So carry on and I am disappointed in your insinuating something I did not in anyway whatsoever post, say, write or believe.

Respectfully,
Marcus Clark AKA Marcusclark66
link to original post



I make but one observation:

"Must watch." is not a disclaimer.

edit: formatting. I forgot to remove a chunk of OD's text, which was misformatted and implied a misquote of MC66.
link to original post



Again. I posted one word, ONE SINGLE WORD.

“Watch”.

Please explain how that puts myself in the endorsement category?

Because I do not.

Thank you. Please explain.
link to original post



Quote: Marcusclark66

Quote: CyrusV

https://youtu.be/CkBAzTDwZrM
link to original post



Extremely well put together video with more fact checking and reality than YouTube Social Sales Stuff!

Absolutely great video put together that highlights Mikki.

Must watch.
link to original post



I'm sure it's a technical error on my phone that makes the "Absolutely great video" post appear on my screen 5 posts earlier in the thread.
May the cards fall in your favor.
Marcusclark66
Marcusclark66
  • Threads: 33
  • Posts: 1140
Joined: Mar 26, 2020
January 7th, 2022 at 4:45:16 AM permalink
Quote: Dieter

Quote: Marcusclark66

Quote: Dieter

Quote: Marcusclark66


You know OnceDear you throw me in your rant and you are strongly insinuating that I supposedly endorsed the Spencer deal doing the sudden 180.

Seriously. Why?

Because I was forwarded the video and I posted it with the one single word, ONE WORD, “Watch”.

I do not and did not endorse Spencer. In fact I thought and posted so Spencer’s first video of Mikki was very well put together, etc., etc.

Our casino was already made aware of Mikki and Spencer by our consultants we use for intelligence gathering, etc.

So carry on and I am disappointed in your insinuating something I did not in anyway whatsoever post, say, write or believe.

Respectfully,
Marcus Clark AKA Marcusclark66
link to original post



I make but one observation:

"Must watch." is not a disclaimer.

edit: formatting. I forgot to remove a chunk of OD's text, which was misformatted and implied a misquote of MC66.
link to original post



Again. I posted one word, ONE SINGLE WORD.

“Watch”.

Please explain how that puts myself in the endorsement category?

Because I do not.

Thank you. Please explain.
link to original post



Quote: Marcusclark66

Quote: CyrusV

https://youtu.be/CkBAzTDwZrM
link to original post



Extremely well put together video with more fact checking and reality than YouTube Social Sales Stuff!

Absolutely great video put together that highlights Mikki.

Must watch.
link to original post



I'm sure it's a technical error on my phone that makes the "Absolutely great video" post appear on my screen 5 posts earlier in the thread.
link to original post



Absolutely great video. =. Exposing Mikki and his so called claims and open ended statements, etc. I thought Spencer did a good/great job of debunking.

So I am wrong now?
Marcus Clark. Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66. *Professional Casino Security Expert. *Certified EMT *Certified Company Firearms Instructor. *Certified Gaming Regulations Interpreter for Corporate Applications. *Domestic UrbanTactical Combat Casualty Expert. *Tic-Tac-Toe Expert (Real Competitive Versions) & Mastering Chess. *Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club. *Mastering Cracking it. Bit-by-Bit, Piece-by-Piece Crediting Forum Members. *Certified Casino Property Entry & Exit Point Analyzer *Baccarat Winning Session Record: 12 out of 12 & 1 out of 1 Mini Session. Baccarat Losing Session Record: 2 Losing Sessions.
OnceDear
OnceDear
  • Threads: 64
  • Posts: 7543
Joined: Jun 1, 2014
January 7th, 2022 at 5:14:59 AM permalink
Quote: Marcusclark66

Quote: OnceDear

* Actually, the layers of influencers gets deeper. Does our own, ever winning, MarcusClark, subtly endorse Spencer, endorsing Mikki?
Will we get another relentless winner along shortly saying "See guys, it's not just me and Marcus that can thrash the casino" and endorsing THE IDEA? THE VERY CONCEPT of easy money.?

Believe nothing of what you hear and half of what you see.
link to original post



You know OnceDear you throw me in your rant and you are strongly insinuating that I supposedly endorsed the Spencer deal doing the sudden 180.

Seriously. Why?

Because I was forwarded the video and I posted it with the one single word, ONE WORD, “Watch”.

I do not and did not endorse Spencer. In fact I thought and posted so Spencer’s first video of Mikki was very well put together, etc., etc.

Our casino was already made aware of Mikki and Spencer by our consultants we use for intelligence gathering, etc.

So carry on and I am disappointed in your insinuating something I did not in anyway whatsoever post, say, write or believe.

Respectfully,
Marcus Clark AKA Marcusclark66
link to original post



Hi Marcus
I'm sorry that you are disappointed and annoyed. I didn't think my post was a rant, so much as an observation on the video that you suggested we watch. I misinterpreted your advice to watch the video as some sort of endorsement of the value of its content. You did NOT endorse Mikki's claims. You did NOT endorse Spenser's endorsement. You simply suggested that we watch a video where Spenser had implicitly endorsed Mikki as 'legit'. I never really considered your motive for doing so, let alone intend to insinuate anything.

Both the videos that you brought to attention were interesting and together they gave a balanced report.

I raised a question "Does our own, ever winning, MarcusClark, subtly endorse Spencer, endorsing Mikki?"
It was a question. Not meant as an insinuation. I'm sorry if you see it that way. I think I was trying to indicate that you and indeed all of us that pass on or mention this content, are 'influencers'

Thank you Marcus for answering that question.

I did not say that you did endorse anybody, but I apologise to you if you believe that i did insinuate anything. That was not my intention.

Regards,
OD
Last edited by: OnceDear on Jan 7, 2022
Psalm 25:16 Turn to me and be gracious to me, for I am lonely and afflicted. Proverbs 18:2 A fool finds no satisfaction in trying to understand, for he would rather express his own opinion.
Dieter
Administrator
Dieter
  • Threads: 16
  • Posts: 6122
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
January 7th, 2022 at 5:20:07 AM permalink
Quote: Marcusclark66

Absolutely great video. =. Exposing Mikki and his so called claims and open ended statements, etc. I thought Spencer did a good/great job of debunking.

So I am wrong now?
link to original post



That would appear to be an endorsement of Spencer and his videos, at least on this subject.

Urging people to watch another video of his shortly after would seem to be a furtherance of the prior endorsement.
May the cards fall in your favor.
OnceDear
OnceDear
  • Threads: 64
  • Posts: 7543
Joined: Jun 1, 2014
January 7th, 2022 at 5:21:26 AM permalink
Quote: Marcusclark66


Absolutely great video. =. Exposing Mikki and his so called claims and open ended statements, etc. I thought Spencer did a good/great job of debunking.

So I am wrong now?
link to original post


I agree.
The first of the videos was a thoughtful and powerful debunking
In my humble opinion, the second video devalued the earlier one and as Axelwolf said,

Quote: AxelWolf

...I just lost any faith I had in Spencer Cornelia's investigation abilities. It's clear he is capable of being easily bamboozled. He looks at ONE(one he Mikki chooses himself) of Mikki's casino online casino player accounts and deems him legit. 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

link to original post

[Trimmed for brevity]
Psalm 25:16 Turn to me and be gracious to me, for I am lonely and afflicted. Proverbs 18:2 A fool finds no satisfaction in trying to understand, for he would rather express his own opinion.
OnceDear
OnceDear
  • Threads: 64
  • Posts: 7543
Joined: Jun 1, 2014
January 7th, 2022 at 5:26:19 AM permalink
Quote: Dieter

Quote: Marcusclark66

Absolutely great video. =. Exposing Mikki and his so called claims and open ended statements, etc. I thought Spencer did a good/great job of debunking.

So I am wrong now?
link to original post



That would appear to be an endorsement of Spencer and his videos, at least on this subject.

Urging people to watch another video of his shortly after would seem to be a furtherance of the prior endorsement.
link to original post



To give Marcus credit where it is due, he seems to, quite reasonably, highlight the value of watching the videos while not endorsing the content.
Hard to say whether highlighting the value of something equates to 'endorsing it' I'm inclined to think they are different things.
Psalm 25:16 Turn to me and be gracious to me, for I am lonely and afflicted. Proverbs 18:2 A fool finds no satisfaction in trying to understand, for he would rather express his own opinion.
Dieter
Administrator
Dieter
  • Threads: 16
  • Posts: 6122
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
January 7th, 2022 at 5:46:19 AM permalink
Quote: OnceDear

Quote: Dieter

Quote: Marcusclark66

Absolutely great video. =. Exposing Mikki and his so called claims and open ended statements, etc. I thought Spencer did a good/great job of debunking.

So I am wrong now?
link to original post



That would appear to be an endorsement of Spencer and his videos, at least on this subject.

Urging people to watch another video of his shortly after would seem to be a furtherance of the prior endorsement.
link to original post



To give Marcus credit where it is due, he seems to, quite reasonably, highlight the value of watching the videos while not endorsing the content.
Hard to say whether highlighting the value of something equates to 'endorsing it' I'm inclined to think they are different things.
link to original post



True enough. Is "recommend" a more suitable word than "endorse" here?
May the cards fall in your favor.
OnceDear
OnceDear
  • Threads: 64
  • Posts: 7543
Joined: Jun 1, 2014
January 7th, 2022 at 6:05:19 AM permalink
Quote: Dieter

Quote: OnceDear


To give Marcus credit where it is due, he seems to, quite reasonably, highlight the value of watching the videos while not endorsing the content.
Hard to say whether highlighting the value of something equates to 'endorsing it' I'm inclined to think they are different things.
link to original post



True enough. Is "recommend" a more suitable word than "endorse" here?
link to original post

How about we rewind and don't use any words, lest we misinterpret or are misinterpreted.
Psalm 25:16 Turn to me and be gracious to me, for I am lonely and afflicted. Proverbs 18:2 A fool finds no satisfaction in trying to understand, for he would rather express his own opinion.
Dieter
Administrator
Dieter
  • Threads: 16
  • Posts: 6122
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
January 7th, 2022 at 6:17:01 AM permalink
Quote: OnceDear

Quote: Dieter

Quote: OnceDear


To give Marcus credit where it is due, he seems to, quite reasonably, highlight the value of watching the videos while not endorsing the content.
Hard to say whether highlighting the value of something equates to 'endorsing it' I'm inclined to think they are different things.
link to original post



True enough. Is "recommend" a more suitable word than "endorse" here?
link to original post

How about we rewind and don't use any words, lest we misinterpret or are misinterpreted.
link to original post



May the cards fall in your favor.
Marcusclark66
Marcusclark66
  • Threads: 33
  • Posts: 1140
Joined: Mar 26, 2020
January 7th, 2022 at 6:30:29 AM permalink
Quote: Dieter

Quote: Marcusclark66

Absolutely great video. =. Exposing Mikki and his so called claims and open ended statements, etc. I thought Spencer did a good/great job of debunking.

So I am wrong now?
link to original post



That would appear to be an endorsement of Spencer and his videos, at least on this subject.

Urging people to watch another video of his shortly after would seem to be a furtherance of the prior endorsement.
link to original post



The one video, yes. In most ways on a personal level I would side with Spencer or I would tend to agree with the majority of what Spencer was bringing forward as an observer.

However, IMO and hopefully that of most others, since I did not say I totally endorse or Spencer is always spot on, etc, whatever else Spencer comes out with does not automatically obtain my approval and endorsements.

I don’t believe I urged people to watch a video. Urging, would have to be, IMO, a bit ‘stronger’ than ‘watch’, no?

But maybe I am wrong?
Marcus Clark. Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66. *Professional Casino Security Expert. *Certified EMT *Certified Company Firearms Instructor. *Certified Gaming Regulations Interpreter for Corporate Applications. *Domestic UrbanTactical Combat Casualty Expert. *Tic-Tac-Toe Expert (Real Competitive Versions) & Mastering Chess. *Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club. *Mastering Cracking it. Bit-by-Bit, Piece-by-Piece Crediting Forum Members. *Certified Casino Property Entry & Exit Point Analyzer *Baccarat Winning Session Record: 12 out of 12 & 1 out of 1 Mini Session. Baccarat Losing Session Record: 2 Losing Sessions.
Marcusclark66
Marcusclark66
  • Threads: 33
  • Posts: 1140
Joined: Mar 26, 2020
January 7th, 2022 at 6:37:48 AM permalink
Quote: OnceDear

Quote: Dieter

Quote: Marcusclark66

Absolutely great video. =. Exposing Mikki and his so called claims and open ended statements, etc. I thought Spencer did a good/great job of debunking.

So I am wrong now?
link to original post



That would appear to be an endorsement of Spencer and his videos, at least on this subject.

Urging people to watch another video of his shortly after would seem to be a furtherance of the prior endorsement.
link to original post



To give Marcus credit where it is due, he seems to, quite reasonably, highlight the value of watching the videos while not endorsing the content.
Hard to say whether highlighting the value of something equates to 'endorsing it' I'm inclined to think they are different things.
link to original post



To watch something, to sit in a conference, to read a summation of an incident or review video footage, etc, is to become aware and learn what is happening or might happen or what is out there, etc.

To endorse, approve of, side with, recommend as the correct way, etc, is to be included in such and such trend of thought or actions and furtherance of what the author or the subject is presenting.

The above two is my way of thinking.
Marcus Clark. Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66. *Professional Casino Security Expert. *Certified EMT *Certified Company Firearms Instructor. *Certified Gaming Regulations Interpreter for Corporate Applications. *Domestic UrbanTactical Combat Casualty Expert. *Tic-Tac-Toe Expert (Real Competitive Versions) & Mastering Chess. *Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club. *Mastering Cracking it. Bit-by-Bit, Piece-by-Piece Crediting Forum Members. *Certified Casino Property Entry & Exit Point Analyzer *Baccarat Winning Session Record: 12 out of 12 & 1 out of 1 Mini Session. Baccarat Losing Session Record: 2 Losing Sessions.
Marcusclark66
Marcusclark66
  • Threads: 33
  • Posts: 1140
Joined: Mar 26, 2020
January 7th, 2022 at 6:45:39 AM permalink
Quote: AxelWolf

I have no idea if Mikki has some back-end deals with the casinos or what kind of profits he makes from his social media stuff. There's certainly a potential +EV situation given the right situation, especially if he has the money and knowledge to negotiate a favorable deal. I believe he actually does. I can see a situation where casinos are/were willing to bend over backwards offering player-friendly deals(+EV) to get a shot at his and his connections money only to realize after the fact that they have been duped.

With that being said, I just lost any faith I had in Spencer Cornelia's investigation abilities. It's clear he is capable of being easily bamboozled. He looks at ONE(one he Mikki chooses himself) of Mikki's casino online casino player accounts and deems him legit. 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

It doesn't matter if you look at three or four or five or six, it's the one account that has a massive loss on it and that totality of all his play that really matters. Even then, you would have to factor in good old positive variance.

If Mikki's investors don't have an actual advantage(Fyi Mikki could be making something off the back end for himself) and he's just using some Marty system or whatever, Spencer Cornelia just helped perpetuate a financially dangerous situation to some gullible ignorant people.

It seems like it's only people who have a s*** ton of money to lose, that this has the potential to affect.
link to original post



I thought twice about it, (Axel and I have wrestled a bit, LOL) but his rendering of Spencer’s video described in his post above is excellent IMO!

However I have done zero investigation or read anything more than an industry wide bulletin/memo regarding both Mikki and Spencer. My end of the memo was to alert another department’s personnel if those two individuals are recognized on the floor. That dies not imply anything is wrong or against the gaming regulations that govern our properties.

Again, I would side with Axel’s interpretations.
Marcus Clark. Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66. *Professional Casino Security Expert. *Certified EMT *Certified Company Firearms Instructor. *Certified Gaming Regulations Interpreter for Corporate Applications. *Domestic UrbanTactical Combat Casualty Expert. *Tic-Tac-Toe Expert (Real Competitive Versions) & Mastering Chess. *Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club. *Mastering Cracking it. Bit-by-Bit, Piece-by-Piece Crediting Forum Members. *Certified Casino Property Entry & Exit Point Analyzer *Baccarat Winning Session Record: 12 out of 12 & 1 out of 1 Mini Session. Baccarat Losing Session Record: 2 Losing Sessions.
OnceDear
OnceDear
  • Threads: 64
  • Posts: 7543
Joined: Jun 1, 2014
January 7th, 2022 at 7:22:17 AM permalink
Quote: Marcusclark66


To watch something, to sit in a conference, to read a summation of an incident or review video footage, etc, is to become aware and learn what is happening or might happen or what is out there, etc.

To endorse, approve of, side with, recommend as the correct way, etc, is to be included in such and such trend of thought or actions and furtherance of what the author or the subject is presenting.

The above two is my way of thinking.
link to original post


Use of single word sentences in English.
E.g.
Imperatives or commands (example: Watch!)

"Watch." is a complete sentence. The sentence commenced with a capital letter and was terminated by a period.
If it were referring to timepieces, or if it were just a verb, we would normally need a second word.

Now. I did not use an exclamation mark, so I did not URGE you to click that spoiler button. I 'suggested', 'commanded', or we might say 'recommended' that you click on it. You clicked on it. Thank you.
Now, Let's all stop assuming what we each mean or are thinking. Let's just read what we see on the screen and let's not argue about what we infer?
Click!
Psalm 25:16 Turn to me and be gracious to me, for I am lonely and afflicted. Proverbs 18:2 A fool finds no satisfaction in trying to understand, for he would rather express his own opinion.
Marcusclark66
Marcusclark66
  • Threads: 33
  • Posts: 1140
Joined: Mar 26, 2020
January 7th, 2022 at 7:27:04 AM permalink
Quote: OnceDear

Quote: Marcusclark66


To watch something, to sit in a conference, to read a summation of an incident or review video footage, etc, is to become aware and learn what is happening or might happen or what is out there, etc.

To endorse, approve of, side with, recommend as the correct way, etc, is to be included in such and such trend of thought or actions and furtherance of what the author or the subject is presenting.

The above two is my way of thinking.
link to original post


Use of single word sentences in English.
E.g.
Imperatives or commands (example: Watch!)

"Watch." is a complete sentence. The sentence commenced with a capital letter and was terminated by a period.
If it were referring to timepieces, or if it were just a verb, we would normally need a second word.

Now. I did not use an exclamation mark, so I did not URGE you to click that spoiler button. I 'suggested', 'commanded', or we might say 'recommended' that you click on it. You clicked on it. Thank you.
Now, Let's all stop assuming what we each mean or are thinking. Let's just read what we see on the screen and let's not argue about what we infer?
Click!

link to original post



Within the definition that was contained in the dictionary under your ‘click’ for ‘click’:


“to fit or agree exactly”

Which we all do when we click on click?

Disclaimer. Lol, I’m joking, :)
Marcus Clark. Real Person; AKA MarcusClark66. *Professional Casino Security Expert. *Certified EMT *Certified Company Firearms Instructor. *Certified Gaming Regulations Interpreter for Corporate Applications. *Domestic UrbanTactical Combat Casualty Expert. *Tic-Tac-Toe Expert (Real Competitive Versions) & Mastering Chess. *Honorary & Official #1 Fan of the MDawg Adventures Club. *Mastering Cracking it. Bit-by-Bit, Piece-by-Piece Crediting Forum Members. *Certified Casino Property Entry & Exit Point Analyzer *Baccarat Winning Session Record: 12 out of 12 & 1 out of 1 Mini Session. Baccarat Losing Session Record: 2 Losing Sessions.
OnceDear
OnceDear
  • Threads: 64
  • Posts: 7543
Joined: Jun 1, 2014
January 7th, 2022 at 7:29:02 AM permalink
Quote: Marcusclark66

My end of the memo was to alert another department’s personnel if those two individuals are recognized on the floor. link to original post

Just curious as to why the casino would care if Spencer was on the gaming floor? Concern that he might be filming?
Mikki would not exactly blend in, would he?
Psalm 25:16 Turn to me and be gracious to me, for I am lonely and afflicted. Proverbs 18:2 A fool finds no satisfaction in trying to understand, for he would rather express his own opinion.
OnceDear
OnceDear
  • Threads: 64
  • Posts: 7543
Joined: Jun 1, 2014
January 7th, 2022 at 7:35:07 AM permalink
Quote: Marcusclark66

Quote: OnceDear


Use of single word sentences in English.
E.g.
Imperatives or commands (example: Watch!)

"Watch." is a complete sentence. The sentence commenced with a capital letter and was terminated by a period.
If it were referring to timepieces, or if it were just a verb, we would normally need a second word.

Now. I did not use an exclamation mark, so I did not URGE you to click that spoiler button. I 'suggested', 'commanded', or we might say 'recommended' that you click on it. You clicked on it. Thank you.
Now, Let's all stop assuming what we each mean or are thinking. Let's just read what we see on the screen and let's not argue about what we infer?
Click!

link to original post



Within the definition that was contained in the dictionary under your ‘click’ for ‘click’:


“to fit or agree exactly”

Which we all do when we click on click?

Disclaimer. Lol, I’m joking, :)
link to original post

Well done. You saw an amusing subtlety that I had not intended. But if I had, I'd have been proud.
Let's agree exactly.
Psalm 25:16 Turn to me and be gracious to me, for I am lonely and afflicted. Proverbs 18:2 A fool finds no satisfaction in trying to understand, for he would rather express his own opinion.
  • Jump to: