Poll

1 vote (50%)
1 vote (50%)
1 vote (50%)
2 votes (100%)
No votes (0%)
1 vote (50%)
1 vote (50%)
1 vote (50%)
No votes (0%)
No votes (0%)

2 members have voted

MrCasinoGames
MrCasinoGames
  • Threads: 200
  • Posts: 11314
Joined: Sep 13, 2010
March 4th, 2019 at 2:19:59 AM permalink


Roulette Link-Bets® 輪盤連路™ ©2010. Patented and Registered Design.
* The First Roulette Layout-Design to Offers Split and Corner betting between numbers in the First and Third columns.

* FREE-Play Roulette Link-Bets® on YOUR Mobile or PC: https://buff.ly/2SGd2SA

Roulette Link-Bets® Offers Split and Corner betting between numbers in the First and Third columns that were previously not possible because they are not adjacent.

Link-Bets are made possible by the addition of a Fourth column which duplicates the First column. In other words while columns with 1, 2 and 3 existed, allowing for a split bet between 1 and 2 or 2 and 3, there is now a fourth column with the number 1 again thus allowing for a split bet between the two adjacent numbers of 3 and 1.

​e.g. Link-Splits: (7 and 9), (16 and 18). Link-Corners: (7, 9, 10 and 12) (13, 15, 16 and 18).

NOTE: ALL Roulette-Numbers from (4 to 33) NOW has Four Split-Bets and Four Corner-Bets.

* The Question is what do you think about (​Roulette Link-Bets®) and WHY?
Any Comments are Welcome Good or Bad (Please give Comments with reasons) so I know WHY and learn from it.

Mr Casino Games® Chip-Tricks EXTRA:
* Mar/2019 Switch-Combo Part-1 (Thumb-Flip/Finger-Flip) https://buff.ly/2SEtClO
* Ultra Anti-Gravity. https://buff.ly/2vzrXaY
* 6-Chips Flower. https://buff.ly/2G18YLi
Last edited by: MrCasinoGames on Mar 4, 2019
Stephen Au-Yeung (Legend of New Table Games®) NewTableGames.com
SOOPOO
SOOPOO
  • Threads: 121
  • Posts: 10939
Joined: Aug 8, 2010
Thanked by
MrCasinoGames
March 4th, 2019 at 11:40:21 AM permalink
I see no negative to it. But i do not think there is a demand for this variant over the regular layout. I do not think it will add additional -EV bets by the player, but rather it will just be DIFFERENT -EV bets. Since I am assuming there is an additional cost to the casino for this game when compared to regular roulette, I do not think it will be a commercial success. (Lucky for you my analysis has no foundation other than my hunches....)
MrCasinoGames
MrCasinoGames
  • Threads: 200
  • Posts: 11314
Joined: Sep 13, 2010
March 5th, 2019 at 9:47:42 PM permalink
Quote: SOOPOO

I see no negative to it. But i do not think there is a demand for this variant over the regular layout. I do not think it will add additional -EV bets by the player, but rather it will just be DIFFERENT -EV bets. Since I am assuming there is an additional cost to the casino for this game when compared to regular roulette, I do not think it will be a commercial success. (Lucky for you my analysis has no foundation other than my hunches....)


Hi SOOPOO,

It may not be a commercial success for Land-based Casinos.
I think it can be Successful for ETG or Online-Casinos, if the price is right.

The Roulette Link-bet® will be a part of my Roulette-Layout for my New Roulette-Games, and there is NO additional cost to the Casino.
e.g. Roulette-18® (see below).

* FREE-Play Roulette Link-Bets® on YOUR Mobile or PC: https://buff.ly/2SGd2SA

Last edited by: MrCasinoGames on Mar 5, 2019
Stephen Au-Yeung (Legend of New Table Games®) NewTableGames.com
  • Jump to: