I'm not sure why you'd want to change the rules; the game's already terribly complicated, many players have cultural attachments to it, dealers have to be trained for hours to understand the current rules and house way/strategy, and the game has been around for centuries. (Pai gow poker, by contrast, dates to 1985.)
You're asking a question that people here (including the Wizard) often get paid to answer. To answer your question, one could use the data available on WoO to figure out all the cases in which Dealer Wong or Pair loses all Player Wong or Pairs, and switch around those probabilities. You're probably not getting to the current house edge(s) in the house way vs. house way match-up. Obviously then optimal or advanced strategies have to be re-drawn, and I don't think you're going to have many volunteers to do that. (I could be wrong.)
That said, welcome to the forum.
As players can take the bank, any idea such as used in Pai Gow poker wouldn't easily work.
Quote: AlFaHow difficult would it be to set up a Pai Gow tiles game with no commission? Removing commission would reduce the house edge, but could this be offset by a mechanism similar to that found in no commission Pai Gow Poker, or no commission Baccarat? Which hands would be used for this, i.e. how would the house edge be affected if a dealers hand with a wong was deemed as a push if the player has a higher hand? All thoughts and opinions welcome, but I do hope JB or Wizard may share some of their knowledge.
This has been done by Stanley Ko; I believe it is played in Australia. It bars one specific dealer's weak hand to recoup income to replace the commission, by not paying out on a rare hand that is a probable loser.
The question came up during a recent debate, with a colleague arguing that it should be reasonably easy to set up a no-commission version of Pai Gow tiles game similar to no-commission Baccarat.
I've argued to the contrary, given the nature of Baccarat (pre-determined rules on drawing cards) versus Pai Gow tiles (player banking, player having the freedom to set their hand any way they like, etc.). In addition, Pai Gow has way more complexity than Baccarat. Still, the question remained.
To answer the question why would you abolish the commission, I think some of the benefits would be a somewhat faster game if the payout was a simple even money job.
I've tried looking up Stanly Ko, but all I've managed to find is Pai Gow poker, and a Pai Gow tiles side bet (Bonanza Pai Gow) which is apparently used in Australia.
Quote: harrisI have been interested in this idea. If any game inventor is interested, I would be happy to collaborate on making this game. Pai Gow Poker and Baccarat have popular non-commission variants - why not Pai Gow Tiles?
link to original post
Quite easy. Dealer hand of 2/1 is an auto push. Similar to queen high Pai Gow in EZ Pai Gow.
I think it works out to approximately the same house edge as regular commission Pai Gow tiles.
The wizard has the Fox-wood’s way, however I used to play in London where they seemed to have fewer exceptions. I suspect they got rid of it because the other Players used to chat about how many Teens and Days, and sometimes other tiles, presumably enabling them to play differently if no Teens/Days out.
Another direction of renovation is to make Pai Gow Tiles face-up.
Quote: aceside
Another direction of renovation is to make Pai Gow Tiles face-up.
link to original post
I like this idea, it could speed up the game and ease worries of collusion.
Quote: acesideA common problem with all these Pai Gow games is that the push rate at 40% is too high. Casino table games are meant to be a fight to resolve win or loss. Just like the push rate of blackjack is about 8%, and that of Ultimate Texas Hold’em poker is about 3%.
Another direction of renovation is to make Pai Gow Tiles face-up.
link to original post
Nope. The player edge without a rule change in ‘face up tiles’ would be ginormous. Hence whatever rule change would be needed to maintain a house edge would seem too off putting to make the game enticing for those that play already.
of the Low hand.
Someone may even be able to find an Ante/Raise mechanism like UTH.
Quote: acesideImaging that the High hand wager is up to two times of the Low hand wager, what would be the new house way? Could you please consider this math problem?
link to original post
Not that it can’t be done, but must be quite a complex problem. And certainly interesting! But in real world play it would slow the game even more with the dealer having to either pay/push/or take 3 bets (side bet added) each hand from each player.
The house way and optimal player strategies would be FAR different from present strategies.
*You could mandate that all bets be made in multiples of $20, thus eliminated the quarter. Tables might also use special $20 chips.
*You could eliminate the tiles and replace them with cards depicting the tiles. These could be quickly shot out of an ASM in groups of four and thus eliminate the lengthy shuffle process.
*You could make it a punto banco game with the ASM shooting out a banker and a single player hand. These would both be set in the house way with the players wagering on which hand will win or that they'll push.
Obviously, traditional players won't like losing their physical tiles, much less their ability to set them. Still, if it means more placements in more casinos...
Another way to go might be to simply offer the game on a multiplay video machine, along with stuff like video poker and Keno. It would be like the one over at WoV except for real money. Players could then play at their own pace and the machine could (if needed) patiently teach them the game.
Many years ago (I was in Viejas the night Arizona Diamondbacks won world series, so it's 2001!) I did a long trip via every casino back then, to collect casino chips from San Diego, via many places including Tuscon, Cripple Creek, Black Hawk, Las Vegas, before heading to LA. So it might have been Sycuan where I saw it.

