Poll
| 53 votes (68.83%) | ||
| 2 votes (2.59%) | ||
| 5 votes (6.49%) | ||
| 5 votes (6.49%) | ||
| 9 votes (11.68%) | ||
| 2 votes (2.59%) | ||
| 1 vote (1.29%) |
77 members have voted
Quote: lilredrooster.
Lebron averaged over 60% on his 2 point % in 5 different years while averaging points in the high 20s and once in the low 30s
that is fantastic and very rare for anybody other than a center - and unheard of for a high scorer such as that (other than Wilt)
I'm not knocking any of these players but Larry Bird was never even close to that - neither was MJ and neither was Magic - Wemby has not gone over 60% but he's gotten close
.
link to original post
Take Russell, Wilt, Kareem, Magic or Bird or GOAT-candidate-of-choice and make them 18 years old today with today's coaching, views on conditioning and modern sports science and medicine. They would be unbeatable monsters.
Karl-Anthony Towns. OG Anunoky. Mikal Bridges. Jalen Brunson. Landry Shamet.
Stefon Castle. De'Aaron Fox. Dylan Harper. Keldon Johnson.
Very intense game.
Kareem was totally awesome in just about every aspect of the game
he averaged 4 or more blocks per game in a couple of years
Wemby has been under 4 in all 3 of his years
they didn't keep track of blocks in Wilt's years until his final year
in that year at age 36 he averaged 5.4 blocks per game
many more blocks than either Kareem or Wemby
what a monster he was
Wilt and Kareem dunk on each other____________:)___________fun to watch
.
.
I’ll check on final score later…..
Sarcasm……
spurs had exactly 30 points in second half. Knicks 58Quote: SOOPOOThank God TV has an on off switch. No way I was gonna watch that disaster of a game with Knicks down 29, then 27 at the half. For them to win they’d have to hold the Spurs to what, 30 second half points? And that’s if they remember how to score. Free money too! Only had to lay 100-1 on Spurs. My $1k gets me a free $10!
I’ll check on final score later…..
Sarcasm……
link to original post
107-106 final
it was the greatest comeback in finals history
the Knicks were down by 29 in the 3rd quarter
De'Aaron Fox went for a layup with 12 seconds left that was blocked by OG Anunoby
all he had to do was run out the clock and the Spurs would have won
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ut2cbFUU6sE
and here's the tip in that won the game by OG Anunoby
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/4_IK2lfbJ6Q
wow - OG had the block and the winning tip in - just spectacular
.
Quote: lilredrooster.
it was the greatest comeback in finals history
the Knicks were down by 29 in the 3rd quarter
De'Aaron Fox went for a layup with 12 seconds left that was blocked by OG Anunoby
all he had to do was run out the clock and the Spurs would have won
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ut2cbFUU6sE
and here's the tip in that won the game by OG Anunoby
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/4_IK2lfbJ6Q
wow - OG had the block and the winning tip in - just spectacular
.
link to original post
I think the Fox angle is overblown. He would have been fouled a second later and need to make 2 free throws to go up 3. After watching Wemby clank two he probably thinks he makes that shot more often than he makes two free throws.
30 points in a half is historically dismal.
Quote: SOOPOOI think the Fox angle is overblown. He would have been fouled a second later and need to make 2 free throws to go up 3.
I disagree
he went right up in the guy's face trying to make a very difficult shot when they didn't necessarily need any more points to win
if it was an uncontested layup or dunk that would have been different
yes, he probably would have been fouled but he might have been able to run the clock down to 2 or 3 seconds making it harder for the Knicks to score
it was deserving of all of the criticism
it was a terrible play
.
Quote: billryanThere is plenty of blame to go around. I want the Spurs to win, and I enjoyed the first half enormously. About halfway through the third, I started to get a bad feeling. Surprisingly, I enjoyed the fourth quarter and am glad I witnessed such a historical game. San Antonio is a very young team, and hopefully, it will learn from this.
link to original post
Wemby who is supposed to lead the team had a bad night
he made only 9 of his 25 shots
only 2 of 8 on his 3 pointers and only 7 of 17 on his 2 pointers
and only 4 of 7 free throws
.
It was both a classically great effort by the Knicks and a stupid, poor performance by the Spurs.
I also question whether the Spurs have the stamina they should have -the kind of stamina the Knicks have. They consistently look tired in the 2nd half.
I don't think they can legally do that, as credit card agreements require a vendor to accept all Visa cards if they accept any.
Quote: DRichIn all five games of the Stanley Cup the team that was losing has came back to tie the game. I would guess that that is a first for the Stanley Cup.
link to original post
Huh? Just counting when a team down 1-0 scores next, that would be around half the time? So 1/2 to the 5th power is 1/32, or 3%. That’s not even counting 2-0 going to 2-2, or heck, 4-0 going to 4-4 which both happened in THIS series. There have been hundreds of Stanley Cup playoff series. Wanna change your guess?
(Too tedious to look up)
Agony using AI to help. They list 2015 Final as first 6 games meeting the criterion most recently.
Quote: SOOPOOQuote: DRichIn all five games of the Stanley Cup the team that was losing has came back to tie the game. I would guess that that is a first for the Stanley Cup.
link to original post
Huh? Just counting when a team down 1-0 scores next, that would be around half the time? So 1/2 to the 5th power is 1/32, or 3%. That’s not even counting 2-0 going to 2-2, or heck, 4-0 going to 4-4 which both happened in THIS series. There have been hundreds of Stanley Cup playoff series. Wanna change your guess?
(Too tedious to look up)
Agony using AI to help. They list 2015 Final as first 6 games meeting the criterion most recently.
link to original post
I will take your word for it. I was speaking specifically of the Stanley Cup series, not all playoff series. I just looked at the 2015 series and see I the first five games all determined by a single goal win and met the criteria. The sixth game was 2-0 so it did not. Did any Cup finals meet the criteria for all games?
Quote: DRichQuote: SOOPOOQuote: DRichIn all five games of the Stanley Cup the team that was losing has came back to tie the game. I would guess that that is a first for the Stanley Cup.
link to original post
Huh? Just counting when a team down 1-0 scores next, that would be around half the time? So 1/2 to the 5th power is 1/32, or 3%. That’s not even counting 2-0 going to 2-2, or heck, 4-0 going to 4-4 which both happened in THIS series. There have been hundreds of Stanley Cup playoff series. Wanna change your guess?
(Too tedious to look up)
Agony using AI to help. They list 2015 Final as first 6 games meeting the criterion most recently.
link to original post
I will take your word for it. I was speaking specifically of the Stanley Cup series, not all playoff series. I just looked at the 2015 series and see I the first five games all determined by a single goal win and met the criteria. The sixth game was 2-0 so it did not. Did any Cup finals meet the criteria for all games?
link to original post
They listed a four game sweep that did.
I’ve thought about this….. if you listed the best hockey players in the NHL, how far down the list until you get to a Hurricane or Golden Knight?
If you listed the best goalies, same question?
Quote: SOOPOOQuote: DRichQuote: SOOPOOQuote: DRichIn all five games of the Stanley Cup the team that was losing has came back to tie the game. I would guess that that is a first for the Stanley Cup.
link to original post
Huh? Just counting when a team down 1-0 scores next, that would be around half the time? So 1/2 to the 5th power is 1/32, or 3%. That’s not even counting 2-0 going to 2-2, or heck, 4-0 going to 4-4 which both happened in THIS series. There have been hundreds of Stanley Cup playoff series. Wanna change your guess?
(Too tedious to look up)
Agony using AI to help. They list 2015 Final as first 6 games meeting the criterion most recently.
link to original post
I will take your word for it. I was speaking specifically of the Stanley Cup series, not all playoff series. I just looked at the 2015 series and see I the first five games all determined by a single goal win and met the criteria. The sixth game was 2-0 so it did not. Did any Cup finals meet the criteria for all games?
link to original post
They listed a four game sweep that did.
I’ve thought about this….. if you listed the best hockey players in the NHL, how far down the list until you get to a Hurricane or Golden Knight?
If you listed the best goalies, same question?
link to original post
If we went historical Marc Andre Fleury might get a small number of mentions but even that would be stretching it. I can not think of a single current Golden Knight that I would have on my list.
Quote: DRichQuote: SOOPOOQuote: DRichQuote: SOOPOOQuote: DRichIn all five games of the Stanley Cup the team that was losing has came back to tie the game. I would guess that that is a first for the Stanley Cup.
link to original post
Huh? Just counting when a team down 1-0 scores next, that would be around half the time? So 1/2 to the 5th power is 1/32, or 3%. That’s not even counting 2-0 going to 2-2, or heck, 4-0 going to 4-4 which both happened in THIS series. There have been hundreds of Stanley Cup playoff series. Wanna change your guess?
(Too tedious to look up)
Agony using AI to help. They list 2015 Final as first 6 games meeting the criterion most recently.
link to original post
I will take your word for it. I was speaking specifically of the Stanley Cup series, not all playoff series. I just looked at the 2015 series and see I the first five games all determined by a single goal win and met the criteria. The sixth game was 2-0 so it did not. Did any Cup finals meet the criteria for all games?
link to original post
They listed a four game sweep that did.
I’ve thought about this….. if you listed the best hockey players in the NHL, how far down the list until you get to a Hurricane or Golden Knight?
If you listed the best goalies, same question?
link to original post
If we went historical Marc Andre Fleury might get a small number of mentions but even that would be stretching it. I can not think of a single current Golden Knight that I would have on my list.
link to original post
I’m talking this year. Not historical. I just looked up a top 10, which actually listed 12, and no Canes or VGKers.
That just doesn’t happen in the NBA as best I can recall. The star players are more important. Recently think Tatum, Jokic, SGA, LeBron, Curry, Leonard, etc…
BOTH the Canes and VGK are really good TEAMS. I don’t even think their goalies are considered top 10.
Quote: SOOPOO
BOTH the Canes and VGK are really good TEAMS. I don’t even think their goalies are considered top 10.
I am not a believer that the Golden Knights are a really good team. They have played very well their last 20 games or so.
Quote: DRichQuote: SOOPOO
BOTH the Canes and VGK are really good TEAMS. I don’t even think their goalies are considered top 10.
I am not a believer that the Golden Knights are a really good team. They have played very well their last 20 games or so.
link to original post
And yet here they are, in the Stanley Cup Finals, and better teams and better players are watching from home after their round of golf.
Wemby had another poor or mediocre game
The Spurs star managed 19 points on 7-of-19 shooting, including going just 1-for-6 from 3-point range. He had 14 rebounds, but just five in the second half, and all five of his blocks came in the first half. He committed two turnovers. Wemby averaged 25 p.p.g. for the season
this is Wemby's 3rd year with no Title to his name
I wonder if he at some point begin to take criticism for not winning it all as did Wilt
Wilt was in the NBA for 9 years before winning a Title with the 6ers
he took a tremendous amount of crticism from pundits saying he wasn't a team player, etc.
many pundits said Bill Russell was better than him because Russell had all those Titles, but Russell's stats were not even close to Wilt's
it was very unfair imo - a team is many players - not just one deserving of all the credit or all of the blame
I would guess that if Wemby goes many years with no Title, he too will face undeserving criticism since he is also a dominant player
Jalen Brunson had a fabulous game 5 - he scored 45 points shooting 14 of 27 from the field along with 3 assists and 2 steals - very niche
.
Late in the game, I was thinking of how much I loved the Knicks winning in the spring of 1973, and could I imagine 50-plus years later I would be rooting against them.
Congratulations to the Knicks for a hard-fought and well-deserved title, and kudos to the Spurs. It's rare for such a young team to gel well enough to make a run to the finals. The Spurs management handed out sunglasses to the team, as they look to their future.
you have a point but I think more is expected of Wemby than the others you mentioned because of his size - 7'4"
very tall Centers are expected to be dominant
it's still too early but if there are many more years without a Title I kind of expect it
but as I stated - I don't think it would be justified
.
As for Wemby being a failure for not winning the Larry O’Brien Trophy? A load of hogwash. Jordan didn’t win one until his 7th year. It took Giannis into his 8th year to win his – to date-only one. Same with the Joker. There are myriad elite players who took several seasons to win even one title, and some are in the Hall of Fame without even that. Give the dude some slack. But I agree that he didn’t play to his stat line in the Finals.
Let the off-season trade rumors begin!
I think the Spurs need to trade for a veteran Center that will allow Wemby to play forward. With players like Harper and Bryant in the wings, SA has plenty of trade material
Magic won as a rookie, but the Lakers were great before he joined them. The Lakers had the #1 pick because they swindled the Jazz out of it.
Tim Duncan won early, but his draft position was the result of David Robinson missing the season.
Kobe won early, but he joined a championship team.
Kareem won, but only after the team traded for Oscar Robertson.
Who is the greatest of that group? Only Wingo won a championship.
And of course although a very good player, who considers 7 time champion Robert Horry an all time great?
Quote: SOOPOOKarl Malone. Charles Barkley. John Stockton. Patrick Ewing. Steve Nash. Elgin Baylor. Allen Iverson. Reggie Miller. Dominique Wilkins. Harthorne Wingo.
Who is the greatest of that group? Only Wingo won a championship.
And of course although a very good player, who considers 7 time champion Robert Horry an all time great?
link to original post
my point was that centers, especially 7 footers, are the ones that tend to get the most criticism and much of it is undeserved
talented 7 foot + Centers carry high expectations - they're expected to be very dominant
Patrick Ewing is a perfect example
I believe he got much more criticism than the others you mentioned
from Espn:
"Yes, Patrick Ewing faced significant criticism for never winning an NBA championship, with his lack of a ring often used by critics to diminish his legacy and place him below other all-time great centers.
The Criticism
Missing the Elite Tier:
Because championships define legacy in the eyes of many, critics and media members (such as analysts at ESPN) frequently placed Ewing on a tier below centers like Hakeem Olajuwon, Shaquille O'Neal, and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar.
Playoff Shortcomings:
Ewing was criticized for specific missed opportunities, such as the infamous Game 7 loss against the Indiana Pacers in 1995 and John Starks' brutal 2-for-18 shooting performance in Game 7 of the 1994 NBA Finals against the Houston Rockets."
.
Wingo was recruited to Wake Forest( I think) but didn't make the academic grades needed. He played for a small school, but couldn't afford it and dropped out. He moved to NYC and played pickup games before signing with a semi-pro league in Harlem. Two years later, he made the Knicks and was beloved. Between his name and gangly frame, he was a big hit and became nearly as popular as Phil "Action" Jackson off the bench. It's a shame he didn't live to see this title.
What I am uncertain about is why the younger team was also the more tired team.

