Yes, that's right. Woodbine is another that does that.Quote: lilredroostercorrect me if i'm wrong Dead, but NYRA tracks are among very few if there are any others who break the change down to the dime instead of the 20 cent point. i.e. a place bet on a favorite might pay $3.90 whereas at most if not all other tracks it would pay $3.80. if a player bets favorites or place and show over time this can amount to a significant difference.
W/P/S Results @WO - Race 1 Sun Mon 5/22/17:
Case in Point......... $8.10 $4.70 $3.40
D's Double Eagle.. -------- $5.60 $3.50
Sparklin Bright ...... -------- ------- $5.30
I get it now, stud career . Belmont champion children. Needs to be thoroughly examined, extreme vetting. Validation is worth as much as invalidation if correct.
http://www.mysteryvouchers.com/belmontpark/register.aspx
I highly doubt any of us even live close enough to go, but you never know.
This will be Sonneteer's eighth maiden race. Placido will be actually #10, blinkers on, only one race under belt, in third, but at 5.5 furlongs. Haven't checked all the horses out yet, but think I'm gambling on old Placido $5 win bet, which is almost like not betting.
Lots of good races there Saturday.
Quote: onenickelmiracleHeir Jordan, never a threat, so sorry. Thankfully I forgot to bet compulsively on that one.
Well, we've tried poly and grass, now it's time for dirt!
Quote: DrawingDeadOut of American Heiress with Chicago connections, at least he does deserve an honorable mention in the "cleverly named horse" category. There must be an Eclipse Award given out for that, right?
That's the only award he'll ever be up for...
Like you mentioned, the partnership group is based out of Chicago, and that's one of the ways they tried to attract investors.
I need them Thursdays before the first race if anyone is handicapping the races anyways. Have to be there before the first race and be there after the last race to claim if I should win. Two people max right now, I would recruit slot ploppies if there were more than two of the usual suspects interested, but not one yet.Quote: onenickelmiracleIf you want a job handicapping, this is your chance. Local casino has a handicapping contest for Belmont races. I will use the picks you give me, and if I win, will give you $25 by Amazon gift card. Need two sets of picks, so there are two jobs available. PM me for details. Might likely be a low turnout.
Quote: onenickelmiracle...if I win, will give you $25 by Amazon gift card. Need two sets of picks...
Okay then 1 x $0.05, here ya go:Quote: onenickelmiracle...I would recruit slot ploppies if there were more than two of the usual suspects interested, but not one yet.
1. Your new medication will have a prescription number on the label. Whatever it is, all of them do; it will be a long number. In case you wondered what that was for, it has a very special hidden meaning, and here it is: Take the last number, and that is your selection for the first race, the next to last number is the selection for the second race, etc, for all of them until you run out of races.
2. Since you apparently need more that one batch of selections, for the second bunch use these here: http://www.kristpicks.com/ Of course there are thousands of these "picks" of incalculable value plastered all over the web every day, so what is one to do to pick the right free picks? But I consulted with the almost always occasionally somewhat reliable Madame Fatima, the proprietoress of Fatima’s World Famous Massage, Tarot Card, and Numerology Studio on East Tropicana (the one discretely tucked away right behind Juan & Miguel’s 24 hr used auto parts store) and she says out of all those valuable free picks on the internetz, this one is way overdue to hit some Belmont races now more than others.
You’re welcome, and I’ll let you know where to send my $25 later, after you get rich.
I'm sure I can read a program with past performances, but would have to pay for them, and my opinions from reading a program won't be very good. Maybe not very good is what is needed to win the contest, because the first criteria is the number of wins, then the mythical payout, but probably not. It will take a few hours of work in addition to my time being locked in before races start and being at the track when races finished. I thought it would be better to not spend my time prognosticating and let someone more experienced try that is already doing that and would never be able to show up anyways, so win-win.Quote: FinsRuleI don't quite get the point. Why aren't you just making the picks?
I already visited the site. I figured it would be easy enough to pick mostly chalk and throw in a few wrenches, but my wrenches might be darts. I might not even bother going there to enter the way it looks now. Is that all these things are, choosing a horse out of the top five odds, winner is someone that gambles on a heavy once or twice? I have no idea how many people will be playing, guess around 50 or more. Not sure how many are just playing numbers out before the start.Quote: DrawingDeadOkay then 1 x $0.05, here ya go:
1. Your new medication will have a prescription number on the label. Whatever it is, all of them do; it will be a long number. In case you wondered what that was for, it has a very special hidden meaning, and here it is: Take the last number, and that is your selection for the first race, the next to last number is the selection for the second race, etc, for all of them until you run out of races.
2. Since you apparently need more that one batch of selections, for the second bunch use these here: http://www.kristpicks.com/ Of course there are thousands of these "picks" of incalculable value plastered all over the web every day, so what is one to do to pick the right free picks? But I consulted with the almost always occasionally somewhat reliable Madame Fatima, the proprietoress of Fatima’s World Famous Massage, Tarot Card, and Numerology Studio on East Tropicana (the one discretely tucked away right behind Juan & Miguel’s 24 hr used auto parts store) and she says out of all those valuable free picks on the internetz, this one is way overdue to hit some Belmont races now more than others.
You’re welcome, and I’ll let you know where to send my $25 later, after you get rich.
http://www.pressofatlanticcity.com/news/press/casinos_tourism/betting-on-races-already-run-tracks-eye-new-source-of/article_d65a9ba9-55d5-54ca-bfe6-5d56abc79f5a.html
Tracks have been talking about this as long as I remember, I think it's stupid. Without being able to watch a race, there is no entertainment. Either way seems like having your way with a robot, it has nothing to lose by saying yes, so no fun, unfulfilling, you're not really being accepted.Quote: lilredroosterbetting on racing machines. historical racing. i wonder what their takeout is. i'd like to know more about this. kind of interesting.
http://www.pressofatlanticcity.com/news/press/casinos_tourism/betting-on-races-already-run-tracks-eye-new-source-of/article_d65a9ba9-55d5-54ca-bfe6-5d56abc79f5a.html
IMO, they are slot machines that are not called slot machines in order to try to get them into tracks in a lot of jurisdictions where slot machines are not allowed to compete with the proliferation of new "Indian" (*ahem*cough*cough*) casinos. But those promoting them will say otherwise; the amounts of payouts are determined by the winner of whatever "race" the machine has randomly selected, and those obscure randomly selected "historical" race payouts had odds that were parimutually determined when they were originally run. So, they are said to be parimutual wagering, on races.Quote: lilredroosterbetting on racing machines. historical racing. i wonder what their takeout is. i'd like to know more about this. kind of interesting.
http://www.pressofatlanticcity.com/news/press/casinos_tourism/betting-on-races-already-run-tracks-eye-new-source-of/article_d65a9ba9-55d5-54ca-bfe6-5d56abc79f5a.html
A lot of details are not publicly known, so far as I've been able to find in my reading about them. What I have found in court battles over these "don't cal them slots" slots, is that they do contain a random number generator. The extent of the RNG's effect is not entirely clear from the public information I've read from those legal disputes. The supposed information to make them a "game of skill" amounts to some graphs about starters in the "race" shown on the screen before the winning cherry or lemon, er, make that a virtual pony, is picked. The linked article says "Idaho and Texas pulled the plug after trials." The plug was pulled in Idaho & Texas when they were determined to be slot machines dressed up under a different name, in jurisdictions/locations where the law did not allow those.
Like slot machines, the house hold is opaque. But I previously found a local press account that quoted the gross total of the machine betting reported at one Kentucky track that has had them (approximately $700,000) along with the number of machines installed (350) there (at one of the smaller tracks - I forget which one) and the house take per machine ($166). From that and my back of napkin arithmetic I got a "don't call them slots" hold of a little more than 8%, which I guess would be roughly consistent with a gross take vs. coin-in figure common on many slots that are called slots. But I wouldn't want to claim this single snapshot result is an accurate reflection of long-range expectation, or to generalize from it.
I agree. But stupid is rather popular. And doesn't require reading stuff, or take 30 minutes between races.Quote: onenickelmiracle<SNIP>...I think it's stupid.
Quote: lilredroosterbetting on racing machines. historical racing. i wonder what their takeout is. i'd like to know more about this. kind of interesting.
http://www.pressofatlanticcity.com/news/press/casinos_tourism/betting-on-races-already-run-tracks-eye-new-source-of/article_d65a9ba9-55d5-54ca-bfe6-5d56abc79f5a.html
Nothing new about this (well, except maybe that this version sounds like it's pari-mutuel rather than one player at a time) - there were machines in the 1980s that had quarter horse races on laserdiscs, and the bettor was shown just the post positions and odds.
Is there any information other than handicapper's odds available before the race? Does somebody make money selling past performance charts for these? Then again, if that information was available, how hard would it be to develop a database of races so you could determine the winner in advance?
Final verdict - Waste of time.
Quote: FinsRuleLet's talk about the Belmont instead
"Historical Racing" discussion should be moved to this thread.
I keep hearing people get fooled by closers thinking they'll run long distances good, but it's not true. Senior investment was bolting faster than the rest when he was closing I know. I was thinking of SA but after awhile forgot about him. Senior investment was 5.5 length behind iirc, behind two horses not in this race, but the distance still.Quote: ontariodealerwatch for senior investment.....looks like he'll run all day.
http://www.brisnet.com/brisnet_promos/BelmontStakes17.pdf
I have handicapped the race. It is pretty wide open with the removal of Classic Empire. Meantime should be on the lead (with M. Smith as a plus), but the longer distance and the additional 10 lbs (from his Peter Pan runner up) have me concerned. Lookin At Lee has the class and has been competitive in the top class events. Patch has the most upside IMO. He is lightly raced, should enjoy the distance, gets his maiden winning jockey back onboard (Johnny V), and has a pressing style to stay connected from the outside post with Meantime.
As FinsRule mentioned, Epicharis has a foot issue. His connections would certainly love a chance at the added NYRA (Japan) bonus for winning the Belmont Stakes...
I will likely wager very little on Belmont Saturday. Probably just one Daily Double:
Belmont Stakes (Race 11) #12 - Patch, #6 - Lookin At Lee, #9 - Meantime
with (Race 12) #3 - Revved Up
GLTA
Quote: FinsRuleEpicharis is hurt. He's not getting my money.
from an abc news report:
"The vet treating the horse cited "possible foot" as the issue."He looked a little different favoring his right front yesterday afternoon, so we treated his hoof and gave him bute," trainer Kiyoshi Hagiwara said Thursday through a translator. "It looks like it's getting better and I think there is no problem running him in the race. We still have time, so we will give him the best care we can."
can't believe his connections are going to run a hurting horse. their sick. i hope karma is a real thing for them.
1. What a crappy edition of the Belmont.
2. I have nothing cooking in this mess o' hash.
3. Multiplier has an exceptionally ideal pedigree profile for winning... the Champagne Stakes for two year-olds in October going one turn in a juvenile season, and then being retired by about June of the sophomore (3 y/o) year.
4. After squinting at the prospective field to the point of hallucination, I was getting intrigued by Epicharis. For about fifteen minutes; then he got off the airplane. To me, the Epi-saga has now become quite disturbing. Apparently "posse of vain stubborn reckless irresponsible douchebags" translates very well into Japanese. And so does the bullsheeting "it was just what we wanted he's doing great" trainer-speak.
5. I don't think I want to watch it live. Immediately after the 10th at Belmont I think I'll be better off heading for a poker room or a buffet or some combination thereof, and if I hear nobody died due to a catastrophic breakdown in the race, I'll catch it on my DVR later.
Good luck.
Just dont play it and give me half. It's a 24% takeout the P4, P5 is 15%.Quote: FinsRuleBel 8 - $.50 P4 - 1, 2, 5, 6 / 5, 7, 9, 12 / 3, 4, 9 / 7, 9, 10, 12 = $96
Quote: DrawingDead
1. What a crappy edition of the Belmont.
Good luck.
Editing mine.
So Secretariat's Belmont Stakes record is not in jeopardy this weekend?
I still find the race interesting and certainly watchable. I kinda hope Meantime wins easy on the front end and Twisted Tom is nowhere close to a top 5 finish. A little punishment for C. Brown (and connections) not running Timeline in this one. Does wanting that make me bad person?
No, I'm sure that would not be nearly enough to get the job done, so grudge harder.Quote: KeeneoneDoes wanting that make me bad person?
I took some figurative deep breaths, borrowed some extra courage to bet it very hard, and rang the cash register (and juiced up my smirking smugness quotient) in a big way in this in 2014...
...and still haven't quite stopped feeling entitled to something like that setup. Ah, with the same result in the photo, of course.
All answers are right answers today. That could happen.Quote: FinsRule$2 Exacta - Twisted Tom / All
Go Smith go.