Down and out at Intertops

Quote: Nathan

Isn't that the way to block banned people's access? For example, I am permanently banned at another website for starting a thread that seened like a good idea in my head but came off as potentially really awful in The Admin's point of view and in hindsight I could see why I was banned. When I refreshed about an hour later to see how well my "good idea," thread took off, I got basically only a blank screen with the message saying,"You have been permanently banned," I had to go into incognito mode to see that my "good idea in my head, awful as an actual thread" had been completely deleted. That website blocks IP so that banned members basically only see a "Banned," message.

Not exactly something to boast about on an internet forum

Quote: darkoz

Not exactly something to boast about on an internet forum

said the guy who........

Quote: AxelWolf

said the guy who........

That was Fremont Street.

I zipped right on by

Quote: darkoz

Not exactly something to boast about on an internet forum

I wasn't exactly boasting, I was saying what happened to me is what the online Casino who still gave self excluded addicted Gamblers access to the online Casino should have done. They should give self excluded addicted Gamblers basically nothing but a blank screen saying something like,"You are denied access since you are on the self exclusion list."

My bad. I should have just said they should block ACCESS completely, not IP. For example, that other website that I am permanently banned from blocks banned Members' ACCESS completely.

regardless to the issues discussed here , past year intertops at his mood , confiscate wins if , u take the bonus plus depo and bet it all in one 2 or 3 hits ,and then finish the rollover on the slots . in short they enforce the not allowed games and the 10 max bet .

by the way does anyone knows how the owners escape prosecution from the united states ? since in 2006 they had microgaming, and after the american enforcment act , microgaming canseled her license to intertops over that , so intertops switched to rtg and continue to sell all possible gambling products to the us market . wasnt any one from the owner/employees caught ??

Quote: ekheart

regardless to the issues discussed here , past year intertops at his mood , confiscate wins if , u take the bonus plus depo and bet it all in one 2 or 3 hits ,and then finish the rollover on the slots . in short they enforce the not allowed games and the 10 max bet .

by the way does anyone knows how the owners escape prosecution from the united states ? since in 2006 they had microgaming, and after the american enforcment act , microgaming canseled her license to intertops over that , so intertops switched to rtg and continue to sell all possible gambling products to the us market . wasnt any one from the owner/employees caught ??

I'm having a slight problem understanding your first paragraph.


Basically, they got Mike and others on a technicality. My understanding, intertops wasn't enforcing that rule in the first place, however, they should have been. So, people were getting away with it for a long time. But technically the players were breaking the rules at the time.(?) I think it's fairly obvious that Intertops was allowing players to use wallet transfers and get bonuses because they thought it was a benefiting them. It doesn't really matter if something's making a new deposit, or using their wallet. Other than the fact that they want as much of your worm money as possible in your account for many obvious reasons. I would assume these are the two main factors: It gives them cash to pay out players, they have complete control over more of your money.

Most of the bonuses nowadays are designed where you have almost absolutely no chance of winning. How the hell you going to overcome at 10-15% advantage over thousands of spins playing normally?So, It would seem logical if someone's never making deposits, yet they're able to keep on buying bonuses that would be a good indication that player is not not losing money, unless of course they made some significant deposit from the beginning that just hasn't run out yet.

Once intertops figured out they were being taken advantage of they decided to call back up the rule.(?)
In my opinion, everyone was trying to play an angle I'm both sides. The casino should have negotiated Fair resolution. Not sure if it was worth damaging their reputation over this, but whatever.

Now my question is, if in fact you make a NEW deposit each time and take a bonus.(not transferring from your wallet) and never go over $10 Max bet, will they honor the bonuses and allow you to cash out? If so, nothing's changed other than that being more of a pain in the ass who constantly make deposits and cash-outs.

I'm still slightly skeptical regarding the math to all this, it doesn't seem to work out to be that good of
value. Skeptical on the overall HA on their slots, and, no one can seem to to come up with the average amount someone will actually end up wagering overall with the bonus using their method. I was only taking a look at 100% bonuses certainly 150 or 200% bonus would be an entirely different story. Perhaps there was much more of those then I realized.

I can't argue with the consistent overall results and that's all that really matters.

p.s. I don't think this is really hurt their reputation at all whatsoever they're still being highly advertised everywhere reality I think the only thing it's done is deter online Advantage Players. That's a win for the Casino.