Bring everything down after 1 hit.
Then an Initial Steep Regression... play with half the winnings.
Thoughts and suggestions?
Quote: rdw4potusWhat is your goal? What happens when/if you lose?
Limit exposure...increase winnings.
If you read my trip blogs you will find that last November I had a monster roll, got up over 6Gs and then tried my version of the quick hit.
$1040 or $1080 across. Take 2 hits or 4 rolls, and then down to $135 across.
I think I got to take it down once, I got one pay and lost, and I also lost $1080 with no pay, on the first throw by the shooter.
I was unlucky, but I still lost a major pile of money on one roll.
Numbers
You have a 16.7% chance of losing your $430 (7)
You have a 16.7% chance of no action (2,3,11,12)
You have a 66.6% chance of getting paid `$105.
I think you then plan on playing $64 across, and banking the remaining amount?
This will work, as long as you never lose that $430, but just as in my case, when it happens, and it will, you lose more than you are probably ahead.
I still think risking big money on one roll, and then regressing to play on the winnings could be a way to play. But you need to be very lucky to not lose the big bet. I certainly would not play this way with any money that is important to you.
If I get a good roll and get up again this weekend at Beau Rivage, I will be trying this again.
Quote: rdw4potusWhat is your goal? What happens when/if you lose?
I rob someone who has more money than brains...the same as the casino does. LOL
Quote: RaleighCraps
I think you then plan on playing $64 across, and banking the remaining amount?
This will work, as long as you never lose that $430, but just as in my case, when it happens, and it will, you lose more than you are probably ahead.
I still think risking big money on one roll, and then regressing to play on the winnings could be a way to play. But you need to be very lucky to not lose the big bet. I certainly would not play this way with any money that is important to you.
If I get a good roll and get up again this weekend at Beau Rivage, I will be trying this again.
$64 across is correct. I understand the risk but if I manage myself it could be a way to play.
I can't tell you how many times I put $30 each on the six and eight and when one of them hits (after x number of rolls) I throw down a dollar and regress each to $18.
From that point I need to press and spread... I honestly can't remember that being a money making strategy.
...by the way I made three trips down south last year and played a few sessions at the Beau Rivage...I like that Casino!
Thanks for your input.
Quote: imaginalPlace: 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10…$50 $75 $90 $90 $75 $50 = $430
Bring everything down after 1 hit.
Then an Initial Steep Regression... play with half the winnings.
Thoughts and suggestions?
It works most of the time. Just have a plan for still not being miserable when it doesn't work!
GOOD LUCK!!!
Here's an example..
Come out roll point us 8....
1st roll after comeout: skip
2nd roll: turn on bets.. This a committed roll.. Place bets no less than 100 bucks.. I.e 380 inside (100 on the 5 & 9 and 90 on the 6 & 8) or whatever you choose... You can't worry about winning or losing.. Just commit
3rd roll: hopefully you have hit one or two numbers if not it's okay.
4th roll: this is on you whether to take all bets down or continue.. Your money will be negative if you continue (meaning you will be trying to get back what place bets you have to get even), but if you come down with everything, you will already have a winning roll regardless
5th roll: all on you if you committed to the shooter or if you committed to banking your win..
Net profit between 100-400 and this just 5 rolls if he goes the distance like most people want, you already have the money out to hit big....
Now the flip side.... If the go out between the second third or fourth roll you lose what ever you put up... It's a chance but it's good...
I bet if you did a simulation of skipping the first roll and turning off bets after the 4th or 5th roll... You would come out big....
Does anybody have a program capable of this simulation
Starting bank roll 2000
400 on 4 place bets
Skip first roll after come out and turn off after 4 or 5 rolls
PSO's all day long my friendQuote: imaginalPlace: 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10…$50 $75 $90 $90 $75 $50 = $430
Bring everything down after 1 hit.
Then an Initial Steep Regression... play with half the winnings.
Thoughts and suggestions?
the average Roller goes between 8-9 rolls, including the come out roll.Quote: TheWolf713It's possible, just play between what I call the "low roll averages"...
Okay even though the dice are independent, the average Roller goes between 4-6 rolls...
Now they also do a lot of PSO as well, but has any ever done the math on the 3 and outs..
8.5 is the average number of rolls per shooter including the come out roll
the average length of a shooters hand (8.52551 or 1671/196 to be exact)
Yes, the math has been done (for the length of a shooters hand)
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/questions-and-answers/gambling/1886-world-records-in-craps/4/#post154846
The 3rd roll by the shooter (including the come out roll)
has the highest probability to 7out on,
followed closely by the 2nd roll and in 3rd place the 4th roll. [3,2,4]
6 rolls is the median length of a shooters hand.
(from the above link)
about ~50% (50.2789%) of all shooters will 7out by the 6th roll so the other half will get past the 6th roll.
If you tabulated the data from many shooters this is easily see.
The 35,000+ actual casino dice rolls in the Zumma Craps book, my 10,000+ casino rolls tracked and
computer simulations shows the math to be true.
For a small sample size like 100 shooters that could be true due to variance,Quote: TheWolf713I bet if you did, you would find that number to be significantly lower than the PSO.
but the more shooters, You would have lost your bet
Sounds good from reading the cover of the book.Quote: TheWolf713So all you have to do is commit for 2-3 rolls after that and you can make some pretty good money....
More later
By making (risking) so many bets on one roll,Quote: imaginalLimit exposure...increase winnings.
you really have just made one big Lay bet, risking more to win less.
The other side of the coin says...
One can easily increase winnings by lowering the losses.
If you want to risk the same $ on any one roll, make larger but fewer bets.
Split your total between the Place6 & P8 only and you can also win more because of the higher variance.
Don't sound right, but it works out.
Try it on for size
As an example: 1million Team A craps players vs. 1 million Team B craps players
Starting bankroll, $640
Goal: Winner = Double bankroll
or bust trying
Max 3,000 rolls
Which team will have the most winners?
TeamA: $64 across always working. (Avg bet per roll total $64)
They believe they will have more winners because they have more bets on any one roll that can win.
TeamB: Place $30 on Place 6 & Place 8 always working too (Avg bet per roll total $60)
probability of Team B doubling the starting bankroll: 40.65%
We know what team will win
Is it possible to add this into the equation....
20 shooters per session
No matter what time... when the person hits 2000... The session immediately ends.
On the order you posted there, shots till the seven out[3,2,4,] does that include the comeout roll as 1,or does the count start on the first roll after the comeout? I followed the link you posted but after a while it was obvious it was going to be easier to ask. I'm just about read out for the day. Would that make the #2 a pso or not? The #4 there after the #2, not sure I can ask this right but is that because there's fewer shooter's making it that far?
Yes, it does include the come out roll (cor), good point.Quote: petroglyphOn the order you posted there, shots till the seven out[3,2,4,]
does that include the come out roll as 1, or does the count start on the first roll after the come out?
It includes all their rolls in their hand.
For a shooter to 7out on his 3rd roll, including the cor
sequence #1: EPt, X, 7
sequence #2: Y, EPt, 7
(EPt = establishes a point
X = can be any # but the Point # or a 7
Y = #7 or #s 2,3,11,12)
YesQuote: petroglyphWould that make the #2 a pso or not?
22.788% is the probability of any shooter to 7out on the 2nd or 3rd roll beginning at his first roll.Quote: petroglyphThe #4 there after the #2, not sure I can ask this right but is that because there's fewer shooter's making it that far?
The chance of a shooter to 7out on exactly his 4th roll of his hand is 10.4766804%
so out of 100,000 lifetime shooters you bet on, about 10,476 on average
(or between 10,227.2 and 10,726.1 shooters)
would 7out on the 4th roll, if you kept track.
99% confidence interval
p-error: 10.2272226%
p+error: 10.7261382%
This will not be on a test)
added:
an example from the Zumma Craps dice roll book (actual casino dice rolls)
4,183 shooters total.
For a 95% confidence interval
(if we did this over 4,183 shooters many times,
95% of the time actual number of shooters that did 7out on exactly the 4th roll would be between
399.22 and 476.84 shooters (7out on exactly the 4th roll)
EV = 438
actual = 432
(within the interval and very close to exact EV)
The actual order from that Zumma Book: 3,2,4
here is some data
Length Count % or less count
2 448 10.71% 10.71% 448
3 520 12.43% 23.14% 968
4 432 10.33% 33.47% 1400
5 424 10.14% 43.61% 1824
6 333 7.96% 51.57% 2157
7 270 6.45% 58.02% 2427
8 241 5.76% 63.78% 2668
9 205 4.90% 68.68% 2873
10 184 4.40% 73.08% 3057
11 159 3.80% 76.88% 3216
12 142 3.39% 80.28% 3358
13 115 2.75% 83.03% 3473
14 98 2.34% 85.37% 3571
15 97 2.32% 87.69% 3668
16 79 1.89% 89.58% 3747
17 58 1.39% 90.96% 3805
18 44 1.05% 92.02% 3849
19 37 0.88% 92.90% 3886
20 39 0.93% 93.83% 3925
21 43 1.03% 94.86% 3968
22 24 0.57% 95.43% 3992
23 28 0.67% 96.10% 4020
24 21 0.50% 96.61% 4041
25 21 0.50% 97.11% 4062
26 15 0.36% 97.47% 4077
27 19 0.45% 97.92% 4096
28 8 0.19% 98.11% 4104
29 9 0.22% 98.33% 4113
30 9 0.22% 98.54% 4122
Good Luck
Thankyou for helping make that understandable!
And, I am glad that won't be on the test.
Petro
As you said this is over 4000 shooters... If we cut that variance down, I bet those numbers would change so much that people will say ,"why in the he'll haven't I played this way my whole life" .. Casins don't like it... Its really a hit and run approach.. And of course you won't get alot of comps... After doing this a couple of sessions, you'll always have the money to pay for everything you need..
The data above pretty much shows why the 3rd roll is the is the most optimal roll to start your betting...the 2nd roll is a guaranteed 10 percent.. That guarntee is higher over time because it does not change.. but eliminating that PSO (never betting on it) you are also cutting your loses by 10 percent over time because you have completely eliminated the 2nd roll... You will never be victim to a PSO again. That is a HUGE feat.... It would literally be a butterfly effect..
.But the 3rd roll is a determining factor of a roll... Would you not take those odds
At the worst (absolutely worst) it comes at 23%
But at it's best, it's a whopping 77-87%!!!! that's dam near guaranteed money...
It might not be popular, but this data proves that even over time, it's a sweet spot for money..
not trying to be a jerk here but are you saying you have cracked the game of craps?Quote: TheWolf713Thanks 7 craps...the data was very insightful... And it does show two sides of the spectrum... In one column it's show it as being the highest at 12 percent... But if the seven doesn't come it's the second lowest at 23 %... So if there is a 77% chance that the 7 will not come on the third roll... And from 4-6 rolls are all plus 50%... And at the 6th roll it goes back to the advantage of the house that the 7 is more likely to come (51% and rising)... So if you can see that perspective it technically makes that way of betting a profitable way of playing...
As you said this is over 4000 shooters... If we cut that variance down, I bet those numbers would change so much that people will say ,"why in the he'll haven't I played this way my whole life" .. Casins don't like it... Its really a hit and run approach.. And of course you won't get alot of comps... After doing this a couple of sessions, you'll always have the money to pay for everything you need..
The data above pretty much shows why the 3rd roll is the is the most optimal roll to start your betting...the 2nd roll is a guaranteed 10 percent.. That guarntee is higher over time because it does not change.. but eliminating that PSO (never betting on it) you are also cutting your loses by 10 percent over time because you have completely eliminated the 2nd roll... You will never be victim to a PSO again. That is a HUGE feat.... It would literally be a butterfly effect..
.But the 3rd roll is a determining factor of a roll... Would you not take those odds
At the worst (absolutely worst) it comes at 23%
But at it's best, it's a whopping 77-87%!!!! that's dam near guaranteed money...
It might not be popular, but this data proves that even over time, it's a sweet spot for money..
Quote: treetopbuddynot trying to be a jerk here but are you saying you have cracked the game of craps?
Lol , oh no no no.... I'm not that arrogant lol... It's just an option for some people to look into. I just see people standing at tables for hours teetering on their money.. I just wanted to throwthat perspective out there...
But the math favors it and at a table of only 16 guys that you physically can see, it can't be a bad idea... Even if you don't believe the concept will work just look at the percentage of PSOs you will dismiss.. That stat alone is a butterfly effect to success... Cutting 10 percent of your losses over time by not betting the 2nd roll...
if you wait until #3 to bet and get wacked by the 7 it's still going to feel like a PSO........hey, your trying, can't fault you for that....Quote: TheWolf713Lol , oh no no no.... I'm not that arrogant lol... It's just an option for some people to look into. I just see people standing at tables for hours teetering on their money.. I just wanted to throwthat perspective out there...
But the math favors it and at a table of only 16 guys that you physically can see, it can't be a bad idea... Even if you don't believe the concept will work just look at the percentage of PSOs you will dismiss.. That stat alone is a butterfly effect to success... Cutting 10 percent of your losses over time by not betting the 2nd roll...
Quote: treetopbuddyif you wait until #3 to bet and get wacked by the 7 it's still going to feel like a PSO........hey, your trying, can't fault you for that....
yes, you are correct, but it's just the risk you have to take... It's a commitment that is mathematically better over time then jumping out there on the second roll..
It's all in the way you perceive it.. You can say "get wacked on the third" or you can say "I didn't get wacked on the PSO".. furthermore I wish there was a way to determine the stats of a 3 and out that immediately followed a PSO....it would probably be super low
There's was some live data of session on the forum I'll try to find it and show it as an example
For the very next two shooters.Quote: TheWolf713furthermore I wish there was a way to determine the stats of a 3 and out that immediately followed a PSO....it would probably be super low
(counts all rolls of a shooters hand)
1st shooter 7out on 2nd roll: 0.111111111
then 2nd shooter 7out on 3rd roll: 0.116769547
(or reversed, out on 3rd roll followed by out on 2nd roll)
we multiply the two probabilities = 0.01297 or
1 in 77 sets of 2 shooters
If we look at the probability of any shooter to 7out on either the 2nd or 3rd roll
= 22.7880658436%
So over the next (say) 20 shooters, or any set of 20 shooters,
99.4329% chance of having at least 1 shooter going out on his 2nd or 3rd roll
96.0852% chance of having at least 2 shooters going out on his 2nd or 3rd roll
86.6990% chance of having at least 3 shooters going out on his 2nd or 3rd roll
70.0778% chance of having at least 4 shooters going out on his 2nd or 3rd roll
49.2293% chance of having at least 5 shooters going out on his 2nd or 3rd roll
So it is basically a coin flip to see 4 or less or 5 or more
relatively big numbers by expectation
Quote: 7crapsFor the very next two shooters.
(counts all rolls of a shooters hand)
1st shooter 7out on 2nd roll: 0.111111111
then 2nd shooter 7out on 3rd roll: 0.116769547
(or reversed, out on 3rd roll followed by out on 2nd roll)
we multiply the two probabilities = 0.01297 or
1 in 77 sets of 2 shooters
If we look at the probability of any shooter to 7out on either the 2nd or 3rd roll
= 22.7880658436%
So over the next (say) 20 shooters, or any set of 20 shooters,
99.4329% chance of having at least 1 shooter going out on his 2nd or 3rd roll
96.0852% chance of having at least 2 shooters going out on his 2nd or 3rd roll
86.6990% chance of having at least 3 shooters going out on his 2nd or 3rd roll
70.0778% chance of having at least 4 shooters going out on his 2nd or 3rd roll
49.2293% chance of having at least 5 shooters going out on his 2nd or 3rd roll
So it is basically a coin flip to see 4 or less or 5 or more
relatively big numbers by expectation
Good data.. I'll be back to give the reply in About an hour.. Gotta go to target.
He something that would probably make this look a little more interesting...
http://www.pulcinientertainment.com/info/s.jpg
Here's a old post from the forum a live play.... Even if you do not keep betting with the shooter, over 40 rolls you would still be up.
This is without even going with the long rolls... If you went with one, you would already have reached a win goal of a profit.. (hit and run)
In this data, more than likely i would have been gone after the second roller or perhaps The 22 roll. (I just leave after decent rolls.. I feel that is about as good as it will get. And if you are betting right your profit will show.) no need to stick around
This is just an example in small setting of what I mean
But what happend if you came to the table after the 2nd shooter, as did many at that table?Quote: TheWolf713Here's a old post from the forum a live play....
Even if you do not keep betting with the shooter, over 40 rolls you would still be up.
This is without even going with the long rolls... If you went with one, you would already have reached a win goal of a profit.. (hit and run)
In this data, more than likely i would have been gone after the second roller or perhaps The 22 roll. (I just leave after decent rolls.. I feel that is about as good as it will get. And if you are betting right your profit will show.) no need to stick around
This is just an example in small setting of what I mean
This was a session I and a friend of mine played at the Golden Nugget downtown
a few years back.
There was a total of 40 shooters.
The graph shows the time series.
Each number shows what roll they 7nd out on.
Shooter #2 went out on his 26th roll, nice. More players coming to the table. The table is getting hot!
But the very next 5 shooters all went out before a 6th roll. Ugh.
Many players left the table after that, they were busted. Did they leave too soon?
They had no way of knowing what was going to happen next. They said the table was too cold.
Was it cold between shooter #8 and shooter#22? Could you make money on those shooters?
I hope so, without seeing the actual rolls.
Of course, any set of 40 shooters will have a different distribution.
One never knows what comes next from the next shooter.
There was only one DI and this table. He had not one of the hands of length 10 or more as I remember.
here are the dice rolls and some stats on that session
shooter #1
cor 8,6,9,9,5,7,out (6,#)
shooter #1 6 roll hand
1 # COR
0 # Point Wins
0 # Fire Bets
0,1 shooter score: pass,miss
4 # Place Hits
shooter #2
cor 11,win (1,#)
cor 10,8,9,8,3,9,6h,10,win (8,#)
cor 4,2,3,4,win (4,#)
cor 8,9,5,6,10,8,win (6,#)
cor 11,win (1,#)
cor 10,8,10,win (3,#)
cor 9,5,7,out (3,#)
shooter #2 26 roll hand
7 # COR
4 # Point Wins
3 # Fire Bets
6,1 shooter score: pass,miss
11 # Place Hits
shooter #3
cor 6,5,3,5,7,out (5,#)
shooter #3 5 roll hand
1 # COR
0 # Point Wins
0 # Fire Bets
0,1 shooter score: pass,miss
2 # Place Hits
shooter #4
cor 8,3,7,out (3,#)
shooter #4 3 roll hand
1 # COR
0 # Point Wins
0 # Fire Bets
0,1 shooter score: pass,miss
0 # Place Hits
shooter #5
cor 5,7,out (2,#)
shooter #5 2 roll hand
1 # COR
0 # Point Wins
0 # Fire Bets
0,1 shooter score: pass,miss
0 # Place Hits
shooter #6
cor 6,7,out (2,#)
shooter #6 2 roll hand
1 # COR
0 # Point Wins
0 # Fire Bets
0,1 shooter score: pass,miss
0 # Place Hits
shooter #7
cor 6,8h,7,out (3,#)
shooter #7 3 roll hand
1 # COR
0 # Point Wins
0 # Fire Bets
0,1 shooter score: pass,miss
1 # Place Hits
shooter #8
cor 6,8,12,8,10,9,7,out (7,#)
shooter #8 7 roll hand
1 # COR
0 # Point Wins
0 # Fire Bets
0,1 shooter score: pass,miss
4 # Place Hits
shooter #9
cor 6,12,9,6,win (4,#)
cor 10,3,8h,4h,7,out (5,#)
shooter #9 9 roll hand
2 # COR
1 # Point Wins
1 # Fire Bets
1,1 shooter score: pass,miss
3 # Place Hits
shooter #10
cor 6,9,6h,win (3,#)
cor 5,6,3,9,8h,7,out (6,#)
shooter #10 9 roll hand
2 # COR
1 # Point Wins
1 # Fire Bets
1,1 shooter score: pass,miss
4 # Place Hits
shooter #11
cor 8,8h,win (2,#)
cor 7,win (1,#)
cor 10,8,4,8h,10,win (5,#)
cor 10h,8,9,7,out (4,#)
shooter #11 12 roll hand
4 # COR
2 # Point Wins
2 # Fire Bets
3,1 shooter score: pass,miss
5 # Place Hits
shooter #12
cor 8,8,win (2,#)
cor 8,7,out (2,#)
shooter #12 4 roll hand
2 # COR
1 # Point Wins
1 # Fire Bets
1,1 shooter score: pass,miss
0 # Place Hits
shooter #13
cor 6,5,2,8,9,4h,3,6,win (8,#)
cor 8,7,out (2,#)
shooter #13 10 roll hand
2 # COR
1 # Point Wins
1 # Fire Bets
1,1 shooter score: pass,miss
4 # Place Hits
shooter #14
cor 7,win (1,#)
cor 6,10,11,12,6h,win (5,#)
cor 3,crap out (1,#)
cor 7,win (1,#)
cor 6,11,5,12,10h,4,5,8,7,out (9,#)
shooter #14 17 roll hand
5 # COR
1 # Point Wins
1 # Fire Bets
3,2 shooter score: pass,miss
6 # Place Hits
shooter #15
cor 11,win (1,#)
cor 9,7,out (2,#)
shooter #15 3 roll hand
2 # COR
0 # Point Wins
0 # Fire Bets
1,1 shooter score: pass,miss
0 # Place Hits
shooter #16
cor 3,crap out (1,#)
cor 7,win (1,#)
cor 9,6h,4,9,win (4,#)
cor 7,win (1,#)
cor 10,10,win (2,#)
cor 6,6,win (2,#)
cor 2,crap out (1,#)
cor 6,6,win (2,#)
cor 7,win (1,#)
cor 6,7,out (2,#)
shooter #16 17 roll hand
10 # COR
4 # Point Wins
3 # Fire Bets
7,3 shooter score: pass,miss
2 # Place Hits
shooter #17
cor 9,5,9,win (3,#)
cor 2,crap out (1,#)
cor 9,7,out (2,#)
shooter #17 6 roll hand
3 # COR
1 # Point Wins
1 # Fire Bets
1,2 shooter score: pass,miss
1 # Place Hits
shooter #18
cor 2,crap out (1,#)
cor 6,7,out (2,#)
shooter #18 3 roll hand
2 # COR
0 # Point Wins
0 # Fire Bets
0,2 shooter score: pass,miss
0 # Place Hits
shooter #19
cor 11,win (1,#)
cor 6,8,7,out (3,#)
shooter #19 4 roll hand
2 # COR
0 # Point Wins
0 # Fire Bets
1,1 shooter score: pass,miss
1 # Place Hits
shooter #20
cor 5,5,win (2,#)
cor 10,5,11,6,6,9,8,4,7,out (9,#)
shooter #20 11 roll hand
2 # COR
1 # Point Wins
1 # Fire Bets
1,1 shooter score: pass,miss
6 # Place Hits
shooter #21
cor 5,7,out (2,#)
shooter #21 2 roll hand
1 # COR
0 # Point Wins
0 # Fire Bets
0,1 shooter score: pass,miss
0 # Place Hits
shooter #22
cor 10h,4h,5,9,9,11,12,10h,win (8,#)
cor 7,win (1,#)
cor 9,6,5,11,6,11,8,8,8h,9,win (10,#)
cor 4,9,9,6,9,11,9,7,out (8,#)
shooter #22 27 roll hand
4 # COR
2 # Point Wins
2 # Fire Bets
3,1 shooter score: pass,miss
15 # Place Hits
shooter #23
cor 11,win (1,#)
cor 9,6,4,7,out (4,#)
shooter #23 5 roll hand
2 # COR
0 # Point Wins
0 # Fire Bets
1,1 shooter score: pass,miss
2 # Place Hits
shooter #24
cor 9,10,2,3,5,6,8,8,7,out (9,#)
shooter #24 9 roll hand
1 # COR
0 # Point Wins
0 # Fire Bets
0,1 shooter score: pass,miss
5 # Place Hits
shooter #25
cor 7,win (1,#)
cor 6,5,5,7,out (4,#)
shooter #25 5 roll hand
2 # COR
0 # Point Wins
0 # Fire Bets
1,1 shooter score: pass,miss
2 # Place Hits
shooter #26
cor 10h,8,7,out (3,#)
shooter #26 3 roll hand
1 # COR
0 # Point Wins
0 # Fire Bets
0,1 shooter score: pass,miss
1 # Place Hits
shooter #27
cor 2,crap out (1,#)
cor 12,crap out (1,#)
cor 7,win (1,#)
cor 7,win (1,#)
cor 5,7,out (2,#)
shooter #27 6 roll hand
5 # COR
0 # Point Wins
0 # Fire Bets
2,3 shooter score: pass,miss
0 # Place Hits
shooter #28
cor 11,win (1,#)
cor 4h,11,7,out (3,#)
shooter #28 4 roll hand
2 # COR
0 # Point Wins
0 # Fire Bets
1,1 shooter score: pass,miss
0 # Place Hits
shooter #29
cor 9,10,7,out (3,#)
shooter #29 3 roll hand
1 # COR
0 # Point Wins
0 # Fire Bets
0,1 shooter score: pass,miss
1 # Place Hits
shooter #30
cor 5,10,6,2,4,3,5,win (7,#)
cor 6,9,4,7,out (4,#)
shooter #30 11 roll hand
2 # COR
1 # Point Wins
1 # Fire Bets
1,1 shooter score: pass,miss
5 # Place Hits
shooter #31
cor 7,win (1,#)
cor 9,7,out (2,#)
shooter #31 3 roll hand
2 # COR
0 # Point Wins
0 # Fire Bets
1,1 shooter score: pass,miss
0 # Place Hits
shooter #32
cor 4h,8,6,7,out (4,#)
shooter #32 4 roll hand
1 # COR
0 # Point Wins
0 # Fire Bets
0,1 shooter score: pass,miss
2 # Place Hits
shooter #33
cor 11,win (1,#)
cor 9,10,8,9,win (4,#)
cor 5,4,7,out (3,#)
shooter #33 8 roll hand
3 # COR
1 # Point Wins
1 # Fire Bets
2,1 shooter score: pass,miss
3 # Place Hits
shooter #34
cor 7,win (1,#)
cor 7,win (1,#)
cor 10h,7,out (2,#)
shooter #34 4 roll hand
3 # COR
0 # Point Wins
0 # Fire Bets
2,1 shooter score: pass,miss
0 # Place Hits
shooter #35
cor 5,8,6,5,win (4,#)
cor 9,4h,6,12,4h,11,7,out (7,#)
shooter #35 11 roll hand
2 # COR
1 # Point Wins
1 # Fire Bets
1,1 shooter score: pass,miss
5 # Place Hits
shooter #36
cor 8h,8h,win (2,#)
cor 9,6,9,win (3,#)
cor 7,win (1,#)
cor 3,crap out (1,#)
cor 10h,12,3,4h,11,6h,11,8h,9,6h,9,7,out (12,#)
shooter #36 19 roll hand
5 # COR
2 # Point Wins
2 # Fire Bets
3,2 shooter score: pass,miss
7 # Place Hits
shooter #37
cor 4,6,11,5,6,6,2,4,win (8,#)
cor 12,crap out (1,#)
cor 5,12,6,9,8,7,out (6,#)
shooter #37 15 roll hand
3 # COR
1 # Point Wins
1 # Fire Bets
1,2 shooter score: pass,miss
7 # Place Hits
shooter #38
cor 7,win (1,#)
cor 7,win (1,#)
cor 11,win (1,#)
cor 5,3,8,5,win (4,#)
cor 9,7,out (2,#)
shooter #38 9 roll hand
5 # COR
1 # Point Wins
1 # Fire Bets
4,1 shooter score: pass,miss
1 # Place Hits
shooter #39
cor 3,crap out (1,#)
cor 7,win (1,#)
cor 6,6,win (2,#)
cor 9,12,5,11,9,win (5,#)
cor 10,5,5,7,out (4,#)
shooter #39 13 roll hand
5 # COR
2 # Point Wins
2 # Fire Bets
3,2 shooter score: pass,miss
3 # Place Hits
shooter #40
cor 7,win (1,#)
cor 9,7,out (2,#)
shooter #40 3 roll hand
2 # COR
0 # Point Wins
0 # Fire Bets
1,1 shooter score: pass,miss
0 # Place Hits
I will always tell people what happens before you came to the table is of zero concern... If you started immediately at shooter #3 and left after shooter 22, you would still have a profit.... Based on of what was rolled and the method of putting down place bets (wherever you seen fit to). It is highly possible to have left with a profit. Just looking and using the data you have presented .. Leaving is always the best part of this scenario..
Even though this is just one random occurrence, this is pretty similar to a normal day at a table... We always speak on the extreme (super bad tables, or super great tables) but the play I'm speaking on is effective in the most normal conditions... (if there are any "normal conditions" in craps lol) this is just my humble opinon.. I really do appreciate your data and comments..
Just doing the math, me just putting up 4 place bets during these rolls, it is Easy to be up 1500-2500 after shooter 22
I probably already have a few sims like this.Quote: TheWolf713Here's an example..
Come out roll point us 8....
1st roll after comeout: skip
2nd roll: turn on bets.. This a committed roll.. Place bets no less than 100 bucks.. I.e 380 inside (100 on the 5 & 9 and 90 on the 6 & 8) or whatever you choose... You can't worry about winning or losing.. Just commit
3rd roll: hopefully you have hit one or two numbers if not it's okay.
4th roll: this is on you whether to take all bets down or continue.. Your money will be negative if you continue (meaning you will be trying to get back what place bets you have to get even), but if you come down with everything, you will already have a winning roll regardless
5th roll: all on you if you committed to the shooter or if you committed to banking your win..
Does anybody have a program capable of this simulation
Starting bank roll 2000
400 on 4 place bets
Skip first roll after come out and turn off after 4 or 5 rolls
I did a few on what I think you want. ( you will be disappointed if I understand the system)
You are saying once there is a new shooter, do not bet on his first 2 rolls (including his first come out roll)
Only the 3rd and 4th rolls of his hand (maybe the 5th - maybe is hard to simulate)
Shooter#1, roll 1,2, no bets working
rolls 3,4 work bets
rolls 5 and until 7out off wait til next shooter.
Option
Shooter#1, roll 1,2,no bets working
3,4 and 5 work bets
rolls 6 and until 7out off wait til next shooter.
or are you not betting any come out roll for any shooter?
Example: 6,6 two rolls just went by. a point winner
the next roll is the same shooter's 3rd roll and a come out roll
Do you bet now?
I would guess so as the dice do not know or even care it is a come out roll.
It is the shooter's 3rd roll
If you wants, update your method, and
I update my sims and post the results for your 20 shooter sessions and the session above (the 40 shooter)
I did a few sims already on the above methods
(betting on only roll 3,4 (or 3,4 and 5) per shooter)
Quote: 7crapsI probably already have a few sims like this.
I did a few on what I think you want. ( you will be disappointed if I understand the system)
You are saying once there is a new shooter, do not bet on his first 2 rolls (including his first come out roll)
Only the 3rd and 4th rolls of his hand (maybe the 5th - maybe is hard to simulate)
Shooter#1, roll 1,2, no bets working
rolls 3,4 work bets
rolls 5 and until 7out off wait til next shooter.
Option
Shooter#1, roll 1,2,no bets working
3,4 and 5 work bets
rolls 6 and until 7out off wait til next shooter.
or are you not betting any come out roll for any shooter?
Example: 6,6 two rolls just went by. a point winner
the next roll is the same shooter's 3rd roll and a come out roll
Do you bet now?
I would guess so as the dice do not know or even care it is a come out roll.
It is the shooter's 3rd roll
If you wants, update your method, and
I update my sims and post the results for your 20 shooter sessions and the session above (the 40 shooter)
I did a few sims already on the above methods
(betting on only roll 3,4 (or 3,4 and 5) per shooter)
Yes that's pretty much the gist off it...Off for 1 & 2 (the come and first roll)... On for 3-4 maybe 5 sometimes... I know it won't be as accurate but the numbers would be good to see...
It would be different in live play because, actually being at the table would factor in a better decision... I would never just play straight down.. Im more of a asymmetric player...
I appreciate it..
You put up a humungous amount and it is "at risk"... no matter what your hopes and expectations are, that very next roll can be a layout-clearing "Seven Out".
"430 Across" may make you feel brave and happy but every now and then: ... Up Jumps The Devil.
Make a big bet and the very next thing out of the stickman's mouth is Seven Out. It happens. You may not get that first hit much less the second one you were secretly going to try for too.
Quote: FleaStiffThe house edge applies to each and every roll.
You put up a humungous amount and it is "at risk"... no matter what your hopes and expectations are, that very next roll can be a layout-clearing "Seven Out".
"430 Across" may make you feel brave and happy but every now and then: ... Up Jumps The Devil.
Make a big bet and the very next thing out of the stickman's mouth is Seven Out. It happens. You may not get that first hit much less the second one you were secretly going to try for too.
"The move that will cause you to lose will be the exact same move that will make you win"
"Success will only come to the Fearless..there are only two types.. The ones smart enough to know the risk and accept it, and the Dumb ones who don't care about it"-
I don't know which one I am.. But I know this, I will be in the car before the smart guy understands it... Lol just joking
Here is a link to my webpage showing the Event Logs forQuote: TheWolf713Yes that's pretty much the gist off it...Off for 1 & 2 (the come and first roll)... On for 3-4 maybe 5 sometimes... I know it won't be as accurate but the numbers would be good to see...
the 40 shooter session talked about in the above posts.
always betting roll 3,4 (left column)
and always betting rolls 3,4 and 5 for each shooter.
Not one doubled up but came close to a $3k target, starting with $2k
Easy to read and follow
http://www.pulcinientertainment.com/info/test-shooter-1a.html
sim results for your 2k stake, $100 bets*4 and 20 shooter & $4k bankroll target sessions.
(I used $102 place6&8 and $100 Buy 5and 9 vig paid on win only)
The same ratio would apply with starting bankroll of:
$1k and $50 bets
$500 and $25 bets
$100 and $5 bets
Betting on 2 rolls and down per shooter
48% sessions ended up
16.2% ended between $3k and a high of $4143
3.7% Doubled the starting bankroll
average loss per sessions (87)
20% ended below $1k
9% ended below $100
4% busted, no cash for a taxi ride home
Betting on 3 rolls and down per shooter
47% sessions ended up
21% ended between $3k and a high of $4143
8.5% Doubled the starting bankroll
average loss per sessions (98)
26% ended below $1k
14.4% ended below $100
6.4% busted, no cash for a taxi ride home
Good Luck
With that being said... When someone can put in a instinct program into the data... I'll go with it... The computer will do exactly what we tell it to do, but it won't know when to take the risk.. For example, on the Shooter 22, the computer can't use a instinct to keep playing... That is an example of a win that probably would not be calculated..
Question: when you say 48 percent ended up, you mean with the win correct?
I really appreciate you for running the data...
One more note... In real play I honestly would have left after shooter 2... Instinct probably would have kicked in.. Unlike most guys in the casino,, I have no problems leaving after 5-20 mins..
But you can program into the computer a "trigger" something tells you at some point to keep betting on this shooter.Quote: TheWolf7137craps thanks for the data... I wouldn't do what most people do and try argue with numbers.. Numbers don't lie...
With that being said... When someone can put in a instinct program into the data... I'll go with it... The computer will do exactly what we tell it to do, but it won't know when to take the risk.. For example, on the Shooter 22, the computer can't use a instinct to keep playing... That is an example of a win that probably would not be calculated..
He made 10 rolls.
Maybe he makes it to 20, or something to that.
Some shooters him before did not. It started to not look good. Quick outs.
A few before also did. Is he going further?
Bet he does. Put something out there at least $22 in right, you have a profit from this guy.
Easier to say a shooter can make it to a 20 roll hand after he has made it to 10 compared to only making it to 4 rolls.
Yep. At least more than they started withQuote: TheWolf713Question: when you say 48 percent ended up, you mean with the win correct?
I also added if you had started from shooter #3.Quote: TheWolf713One more note... In real play I honestly would have left after shooter 2... Instinct probably would have kicked in.. Unlike most guys in the casino,, I have no problems leaving after 5-20 mins..
This session was early morning and the only reason it got full was the happy 4 players or so
(I was one) that cheered for shooter #2. That drew a crowd and more players.
So many did start with shooter #3.
I added it to the end of the web page
Enjoy Playing Craps!
Good Luck
That's pretty cool.. Thanks
Okay, can you try it with a 3000 bankroll.. Still betting 3-4 off and then add a trigger of 12 rolls (start on 13) at 800 on 4 place bets for only 2 rolls...
I know it sounds crazy but this is something that would happen randomly...