Best blackjack bonuses

ponyboy
ponyboy
ponyboy
  • Threads: 21
  • Posts: 119
Joined: Apr 28, 2011
May 3rd, 2011 at 5:53:02 AM permalink
which is more favorable to the house?

forget any other rules being in place or how many decks ect. which one is more favorable in general 2 to 1 for suited blackjacks and 1 to 1 for unsuited, or 3 to 2 on all?
miplet
miplet
miplet
  • Threads: 5
  • Posts: 2111
Joined: Dec 1, 2009
May 3rd, 2011 at 6:13:36 AM permalink
Quote: ponyboy

which is more favorable to the house?

forget any other rules being in place or how many decks ect. which one is more favorable in general 2 to 1 for suited blackjacks and 1 to 1 for unsuited, or 3 to 2 on all?


3 to 2 for all is better for the player. 3 to 1 suited and 1 to 1 unsuited would be the same as 3 to 2 for all.
“Man Babes” #AxelFabulous
DorothyGale
DorothyGale
DorothyGale
  • Threads: 40
  • Posts: 639
Joined: Nov 23, 2009
May 3rd, 2011 at 6:29:01 AM permalink
Quote: miplet

3 to 2 for all is better for the player. 3 to 1 suited and 1 to 1 unsuited would be the same as 3 to 2 for all.

In single deck, there are 16 ways to make a suited blackjack and 48 ways to make an unsuited bj. Thus the total "coin out" for blackjack if it pays 3-to-1 suited and 1-to-1 unsuited is:

3*16 + 1*48 = 96.

If blackjack pays 3-to-2, then there are 64 ways to make a blackjack, so the total coin out for blackjack is:

64*(3/2) = 96.

Just thought I'd add my 96 cents.

--Dorothy
"Who would have thought a good little girl like you could destroy my beautiful wickedness!"
rdw4potus
rdw4potus
rdw4potus
  • Threads: 80
  • Posts: 7237
Joined: Mar 11, 2010
May 3rd, 2011 at 7:14:38 AM permalink
Quote: ponyboy

which is more favorable to the house?

forget any other rules being in place or how many decks ect. which one is more favorable in general 2 to 1 for suited blackjacks and 1 to 1 for unsuited, or 3 to 2 on all?



Just add the payments on a "to 1" basis: (1+1+1+2)/4 suits=5/4=1.25 (2.5 to 2) < 1.5 (3 to 2)
"So as the clock ticked and the day passed, opportunity met preparation, and luck happened." - Maurice Clarett
DJTeddyBear
DJTeddyBear
DJTeddyBear
  • Threads: 207
  • Posts: 10992
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
May 3rd, 2011 at 7:15:50 AM permalink
Since we determined that 3:1 suited and 1:1 nonsuited is the same as 3:2, to the original question: 3:2 is better than 2:1 suited and 1:1 non-suited.


But I'll address it, using Dorothy's formula, and compare it to 6:5.

2*16 + 1*48 = 80

64 * ( 6/5 ) = 76.8

Therefore, 2:1 suited and 1:1 non-suited is better than 6:5 - but not much.

For the record, 7:5 would be better than 2:1 suited:

64 * ( 7/5 ) = 89.6
I invented a few casino games. Info: http://www.DaveMillerGaming.com/ ————————————————————————————————————— Superstitions are silly, childish, irrational rituals, born out of fear of the unknown. But how much does it cost to knock on wood? 😁
buzzpaff
buzzpaff
buzzpaff
  • Threads: 112
  • Posts: 5328
Joined: Mar 8, 2011
May 3rd, 2011 at 10:18:06 AM permalink
Quote: DorothyGale

In single deck, there are 16 ways to make a suited blackjack and 48 ways to make an unsuited bj. Thus the total "coin out" for blackjack if it pays 3-to-1 suited and 1-to-1 unsuited is:

3*16 + 1*48 = 96.

If blackjack pays 3-to-2, then there are 64 ways to make a blackjack, so the total coin out for blackjack is:

64*(3/2) = 96.

Just thought I'd add my 96 cents.

--Dorothy



I'll add my 48 cents. If we are still in Kansas, is it possible the man behind the curtain is Dorothy Gale ???
RSS Feed
  • Jump to: