Poll
![]() | 3 votes (37.5%) | ||
![]() | 5 votes (62.5%) |
8 members have voted
I only play baccarat, just to keep things simple.
I have played aggressively like Martingale, playing Dragon 7 bonus on all hands and everything a player on tilt does and as expected lost badly. Then I decided not to play at all and concentrated on work and brought back peace in life.
A year back I wanted to play again and decided only if I'm able to win consistently on paper, I'll hit back the real tables. So I decided to play Baccarat on Wizard Of Odds. Initially as expected won and then lost patience and lost again. Stopped for another six months and started again Last November and almost played daily and kept track of everything in an excel file. Now I'm sitting at a profit of 150K+ as of today(Beware I still had big losing days).
Now I started thinking seriously that "I'm ready for the actual table"
Now I want to consider all factors before going to play, so please let me know is Baccarat beatable on Wizard Of Odds demo play?
Link To Excel
Quote: BacaMacaNow I want to consider all factors before going to play, so please let me know is Baccarat beatable on Wizard Of Odds demo play?
Link To Excel
link to original post
I highly doubt the game is flawed. It was created by the genius programmer JB. However, I am all the way confident the Martingale can't beat any game with a house edge. If you've beaten the WoO game, it's probably due to simple good luck and a small sample size.
Also if you have a way of knowing, even rarely, what the first card coming out will be or even might be.
Quote: MDawgYou should be able to gain an advantage for most any card game if you are capable of tracking every card that has been played, and knowing every card that is left in the deck, and being able to process what that means for that particular game.
Also if you have a way of knowing, even rarely, what the first card coming out will be or even might be.
link to original post
The latter is much more powerful in baccarat. If only it were easy to do.
Quote: WizardQuote: MDawgYou should be able to gain an advantage for most any card game if you are capable of tracking every card that has been played, and knowing every card that is left in the deck, and being able to process what that means for that particular game.
Also if you have a way of knowing, even rarely, what the first card coming out will be or even might be.
link to original post
The latter is much more powerful in baccarat. If only it were easy to do.
link to original post
Is it just not easy, or is it almost and practically impossible?
Quote: GenoDRPh
Is it just not easy, or is it almost and practically impossible?
link to original post
https://ictnews.org/archive/atlantic-city-casino-sues-players-who-won-15-million-on-unshuffled-deck/
It is always good to keep an eye open for opportunity.
Quote: DieterQuote: GenoDRPh
Is it just not easy, or is it almost and practically impossible?
link to original post
https://ictnews.org/archive/atlantic-city-casino-sues-players-who-won-15-million-on-unshuffled-deck/
It is always good to keep an eye open for opportunity.
link to original post
Interesting story. There are conflicting reports that the casino agreed to pay the winnings, or that the judge ordered the winnings returned to the casino. Which leads me to a question:
Let's say the same situation happens again the next (first!) time I play baccarat. I sit down, buy in and place my bet. The cards start coming out, not in random order, but in some type or order that makes it readily apparent to an attentive observer that the game isn't fair and the cards come out in a predictable and repeatable pattern.
What are my legal obligations? Do I have an affirmative duty to immediately inform the casino that game isn't fair, and advantages the player? Must I immediately stop playing, so as to not be accused of cheating or otherwise have to forfeit my winnings?
Quote: GenoDRPhQuote: DieterQuote: GenoDRPh
Is it just not easy, or is it almost and practically impossible?
link to original post
https://ictnews.org/archive/atlantic-city-casino-sues-players-who-won-15-million-on-unshuffled-deck/
It is always good to keep an eye open for opportunity.
link to original post
Interesting story. There are conflicting reports that the casino agreed to pay the winnings, or that the judge ordered the winnings returned to the casino. Which leads me to a question:
Let's say the same situation happens again the next (first!) time I play baccarat. I sit down, buy in and place my bet. The cards start coming out, not in random order, but in some type or order that makes it readily apparent to an attentive observer that the game isn't fair and the cards come out in a predictable and repeatable pattern.
What are my legal obligations? Do I have an affirmative duty to immediately inform the casino that game isn't fair, and advantages the player? Must I immediately stop playing, so as to not be accused of cheating or otherwise have to forfeit my winnings?
link to original post
I am not your lawyer.
Some thoughts:
The casino often provides pencils and scorecards to baccarat players; this means that they want you to try and figure things out and make predictions about the next hand.
If the casino chooses to deal from stacked decks without shuffling, I think that is on them.
Quote: DieterQuote: GenoDRPhQuote: DieterQuote: GenoDRPh
Is it just not easy, or is it almost and practically impossible?
link to original post
https://ictnews.org/archive/atlantic-city-casino-sues-players-who-won-15-million-on-unshuffled-deck/
It is always good to keep an eye open for opportunity.
link to original post
Interesting story. There are conflicting reports that the casino agreed to pay the winnings, or that the judge ordered the winnings returned to the casino. Which leads me to a question:
Let's say the same situation happens again the next (first!) time I play baccarat. I sit down, buy in and place my bet. The cards start coming out, not in random order, but in some type or order that makes it readily apparent to an attentive observer that the game isn't fair and the cards come out in a predictable and repeatable pattern.
What are my legal obligations? Do I have an affirmative duty to immediately inform the casino that game isn't fair, and advantages the player? Must I immediately stop playing, so as to not be accused of cheating or otherwise have to forfeit my winnings?
link to original post
I am not your lawyer.
Some thoughts:
The casino often provides pencils and scorecards to baccarat players; this means that they want you to try and figure things out and make predictions about the next hand.
If the casino chooses to deal from stacked decks without shuffling, I think that is on them.
link to original post
I simple "I don't know" would've sufficed, but since you went there...
The article you posted, which I assume you read and am familiar with, states that the casino had a legal obligation under state law to provide a "fair game" and they did not. If the player discovers an unfair game, are they obligated to inform the casino? One judge said the game was valid, even though it wasn't fair. Another judge said the game was invalid because it wasn't fair. Then the case settled.
The question remains.
Quote: GenoDRPhQuote: DieterQuote: GenoDRPhQuote: DieterQuote: GenoDRPh
Is it just not easy, or is it almost and practically impossible?
link to original post
https://ictnews.org/archive/atlantic-city-casino-sues-players-who-won-15-million-on-unshuffled-deck/
It is always good to keep an eye open for opportunity.
link to original post
Interesting story. There are conflicting reports that the casino agreed to pay the winnings, or that the judge ordered the winnings returned to the casino. Which leads me to a question:
Let's say the same situation happens again the next (first!) time I play baccarat. I sit down, buy in and place my bet. The cards start coming out, not in random order, but in some type or order that makes it readily apparent to an attentive observer that the game isn't fair and the cards come out in a predictable and repeatable pattern.
What are my legal obligations? Do I have an affirmative duty to immediately inform the casino that game isn't fair, and advantages the player? Must I immediately stop playing, so as to not be accused of cheating or otherwise have to forfeit my winnings?
link to original post
I am not your lawyer.
Some thoughts:
The casino often provides pencils and scorecards to baccarat players; this means that they want you to try and figure things out and make predictions about the next hand.
If the casino chooses to deal from stacked decks without shuffling, I think that is on them.
link to original post
I simple "I don't know" would've sufficed, but since you went there...
The article you posted, which I assume you read and am familiar with, states that the casino had a legal obligation under state law to provide a "fair game" and they did not. If the player discovers an unfair game, are they obligated to inform the casino? One judge said the game was valid, even though it wasn't fair. Another judge said the game was invalid because it wasn't fair. Then the case settled.
The question remains.
link to original post
The gaming commissions usually require the casinos to deal a fair game and redeem chips.
The laws usually prohibit players from cheating by past-posting (placing late bets) or moving cards from one hand to another (hand mucking).
I am not aware of a rule where the player is required to tell the house that the game is vulnerable.
Quote: GenoDRPhQuote: DieterQuote: GenoDRPhQuote: DieterQuote: GenoDRPh
Is it just not easy, or is it almost and practically impossible?
link to original post
https://ictnews.org/archive/atlantic-city-casino-sues-players-who-won-15-million-on-unshuffled-deck/
It is always good to keep an eye open for opportunity.
link to original post
Interesting story. There are conflicting reports that the casino agreed to pay the winnings, or that the judge ordered the winnings returned to the casino. Which leads me to a question:
Let's say the same situation happens again the next (first!) time I play baccarat. I sit down, buy in and place my bet. The cards start coming out, not in random order, but in some type or order that makes it readily apparent to an attentive observer that the game isn't fair and the cards come out in a predictable and repeatable pattern.
What are my legal obligations? Do I have an affirmative duty to immediately inform the casino that game isn't fair, and advantages the player? Must I immediately stop playing, so as to not be accused of cheating or otherwise have to forfeit my winnings?
link to original post
I am not your lawyer.
Some thoughts:
The casino often provides pencils and scorecards to baccarat players; this means that they want you to try and figure things out and make predictions about the next hand.
If the casino chooses to deal from stacked decks without shuffling, I think that is on them.
link to original post
I simple "I don't know" would've sufficed, but since you went there...
The article you posted, which I assume you read and am familiar with, states that the casino had a legal obligation under state law to provide a "fair game" and they did not. If the player discovers an unfair game, are they obligated to inform the casino? One judge said the game was valid, even though it wasn't fair. Another judge said the game was invalid because it wasn't fair. Then the case settled.
The question remains.
link to original post
We could do without your snooty replies.
Quote: KevinAAQuote: GenoDRPhQuote: DieterQuote: GenoDRPhQuote: DieterQuote: GenoDRPh
Is it just not easy, or is it almost and practically impossible?
link to original post
https://ictnews.org/archive/atlantic-city-casino-sues-players-who-won-15-million-on-unshuffled-deck/
It is always good to keep an eye open for opportunity.
link to original post
Interesting story. There are conflicting reports that the casino agreed to pay the winnings, or that the judge ordered the winnings returned to the casino. Which leads me to a question:
Let's say the same situation happens again the next (first!) time I play baccarat. I sit down, buy in and place my bet. The cards start coming out, not in random order, but in some type or order that makes it readily apparent to an attentive observer that the game isn't fair and the cards come out in a predictable and repeatable pattern.
What are my legal obligations? Do I have an affirmative duty to immediately inform the casino that game isn't fair, and advantages the player? Must I immediately stop playing, so as to not be accused of cheating or otherwise have to forfeit my winnings?
link to original post
I am not your lawyer.
Some thoughts:
The casino often provides pencils and scorecards to baccarat players; this means that they want you to try and figure things out and make predictions about the next hand.
If the casino chooses to deal from stacked decks without shuffling, I think that is on them.
link to original post
I simple "I don't know" would've sufficed, but since you went there...
The article you posted, which I assume you read and am familiar with, states that the casino had a legal obligation under state law to provide a "fair game" and they did not. If the player discovers an unfair game, are they obligated to inform the casino? One judge said the game was valid, even though it wasn't fair. Another judge said the game was invalid because it wasn't fair. Then the case settled.
The question remains.
link to original post
We could do without your snooty replies.
link to original post
We could, but nothing else got an answer to my question. I will, of course, file your objection in the appropriate place.
I have something going on now. I can’t elaborate on the details but that’s what the casino told me, that I had an obligation to tell them per the terms and conditions.Quote: Dieter
The gaming commissions usually require the casinos to deal a fair game and redeem chips.
The laws usually prohibit players from cheating by past-posting (placing late bets) or moving cards from one hand to another (hand mucking).
I am not aware of a rule where the player is required to tell the house that the game is vulnerable.
link to original post
Quote: SandybestdogI have something going on now. I can’t elaborate on the details but that’s what the casino told me, that I had an obligation to tell them per the terms and conditions.Quote: Dieter
The gaming commissions usually require the casinos to deal a fair game and redeem chips.
The laws usually prohibit players from cheating by past-posting (placing late bets) or moving cards from one hand to another (hand mucking).
I am not aware of a rule where the player is required to tell the house that the game is vulnerable.
link to original post
link to original post
If you're ever able to talk, I'm fascinated to hear some of the story.
Quote: DieterQuote: SandybestdogI have something going on now. I can’t elaborate on the details but that’s what the casino told me, that I had an obligation to tell them per the terms and conditions.Quote: Dieter
The gaming commissions usually require the casinos to deal a fair game and redeem chips.
The laws usually prohibit players from cheating by past-posting (placing late bets) or moving cards from one hand to another (hand mucking).
I am not aware of a rule where the player is required to tell the house that the game is vulnerable.
link to original post
link to original post
If you're ever able to talk, I'm fascinated to hear some of the story.
link to original post
Me, too! Also, I hope it works out in your favor…
Quote: ayla74108That’s quite a journey you’ve had with baccarat, respect for the discipline to track everything in detail. Demo play like Wizard of Odds can be useful for practice, but the real table always brings in variance, emotions, and limits that demos can’t fully capture. Consistency and bankroll management will matter much more once you step in.
link to original post
You have been randomly *ahem* selected for a soul check.
Alice likes to put cream in her coffee. What is Alice's name?
Wizard, I've been wondering about your soul checks in this age of smarter robots. Google AI responded to your question with, "The riddle "Alice likes to put cream in her coffee. What is Alice's name?" is a trick question. Alice's name is Alice, and the rest of the sentence is irrelevant information meant to distract you from the obvious answer. "Quote: WizardQuote: ayla74108That’s quite a journey you’ve had with baccarat, respect for the discipline to track everything in detail. Demo play like Wizard of Odds can be useful for practice, but the real table always brings in variance, emotions, and limits that demos can’t fully capture. Consistency and bankroll management will matter much more once you step in.
link to original post
You have been randomly *ahem* selected for a soul check.
Alice likes to put cream in her coffee. What is Alice's name?
link to original post
Maybe what is more telling is the way a bot will 'just go away' , not actually interested in the topic. It is a puzzle to me why someone tests these things here Turing-wise
Quote: WizardQuote: MDawg
You should be able to gain an advantage for most any card game if you are capable of tracking every card that has been played, and knowing every card that is left in the deck, and being able to process what that means for that particular game.
Also if you have a way of knowing, even rarely, what the first card coming out will be or even might be.
The latter is much more powerful in baccarat. If only it were easy to do.
the 2 links, one from the Wizard, and one from Eliot Jacobson, give more info on how to gain an edge when a card in positions one thru six is known
https://wizardofodds.com/games/baccarat/appendix/9/
https://www.888casino.com/blog/edge-sorting/baccarat-the-known-card#:~:text=The%20edges%20obtainable%20from%20a,Knowledge%20of%20card%205%3A%208.973%25
.
Baccarat(like BJ), in theory, can be beat if you have the patience to wait for a shoe to come into a positive count. Any game that isn't on a shuffle machine has some small potential for a patient gamer to make a fortune off of, just due to the way finite outcomes works in reality. In practice, you'd be at the casino at one table NOT playing for tens of hours a day, which no casino would allow you to do, but you'd also need at least 1 player playing during that time so they slowly work through a shoe.
If you have a natural 8, already holding one, you should win approximately 81% of the time.
Sure enough I was dealt a face and an 8, a Natural 8 expecting to get paid. And then the dealer turned over a freakin' 7 and 2 for the Bank - that approximately 9% of the time that you lose to a 9 with a natural 8. Where was the face card for the Bank?? Similar thing happen to me several years ago, where I got the expected 8, lost to a 9, to the limit. In that case the face cards / tens came as expected but the dealer got a NINE and a face.
You remember those times.
"Few players recall big pots they have won, strange as it seems, but every player can remember with remarkable accuracy the outstanding tough beats of his career."
But, over time if you play hard on those advantage hands you will and do clean up.
Typically such "sure things" (that aren't always so sure) will come up different ways during a shoe, not always having to do with knowing what the first card will be, might just have to do with deck composition and what has come and what is left. You just have to hit each opportunity the same way, equally hard, can't let up, and over the course you should win.
Not for the weak at heart but plugging away, seizing every AP opportunity, does pay off. You do need the bankroll to survive the bad runs and I have had some huge losses on sessions before. For someone like me there are better, easier ways to make the big bucks but I get a bang out of beating the casino and getting comp'ed at the same time, it is a unique and special thrill and feeling.
Quote: WizardQuote: BacaMacaNow I want to consider all factors before going to play, so please let me know is Baccarat beatable on Wizard Of Odds demo play?
Link To Excel
link to original post
I highly doubt the game is flawed. It was created by the genius programmer JB. However, I am all the way confident the Martingale can't beat any game with a house edge. If you've beaten the WoO game, it's probably due to simple good luck and a small sample size.
link to original post
What has happened to AdministratorJP? JP has gone MiA since 2020 during the WuHan virus attacks , which killed 7 million people
Quote: ArmageddenQuote: WizardQuote: BacaMacaNow I want to consider all factors before going to play, so please let me know is Baccarat beatable on Wizard Of Odds demo play?
Link To Excel
link to original post
I highly doubt the game is flawed. It was created by the genius programmer JB. However, I am all the way confident the Martingale can't beat any game with a house edge. If you've beaten the WoO game, it's probably due to simple good luck and a small sample size.
link to original post
What has happened to AdministratorJP? JP has gone MiA since 2020 during the WuHan virus attacks , which killed 7 million people
link to original post
I don't think I saw JB online much since about 2014.
Sometimes streaks go for 15 or 20 hands in a row and that is what this system targets
-Start with betting $100 on player
-Win $100, Balance $200
-Win $100, Balance $300
-Win $100, Balance $400... wow three player in a row
-Win $200, Balance $600
-Win $400, Balance $1000
-Win $800, Balance $1800
-Win $1000, Balance $2800
-Win $1000, Balance $3800... wow eight player streak I am rich
-Win $1000, Balance $4800
-Win $1500, Balance $6300
-Win $2000, Balance $8300
-Win $2000, Balance $10300
-Win $2000, Balance $123000
-Lose $2000, Balance $103000... wow that was what, thirteen in a row?
Quote: WizardQuote: ayla74108That’s quite a journey you’ve had with baccarat, respect for the discipline to track everything in detail. Demo play like Wizard of Odds can be useful for practice, but the real table always brings in variance, emotions, and limits that demos can’t fully capture. Consistency and bankroll management will matter much more once you step in.
link to original post
You have been randomly *ahem* selected for a soul check.
Alice likes to put cream in her coffee. What is Alice's name?
link to original post
Ann B. Davis?
Alice worked for a famous family, name them.
Quote: DieterQuote: GenoDRPhQuote: DieterQuote: GenoDRPhQuote: DieterQuote: GenoDRPh
Is it just not easy, or is it almost and practically impossible?
link to original post
https://ictnews.org/archive/atlantic-city-casino-sues-players-who-won-15-million-on-unshuffled-deck/
It is always good to keep an eye open for opportunity.
link to original post
Interesting story. There are conflicting reports that the casino agreed to pay the winnings, or that the judge ordered the winnings returned to the casino. Which leads me to a question:
Let's say the same situation happens again the next (first!) time I play baccarat. I sit down, buy in and place my bet. The cards start coming out, not in random order, but in some type or order that makes it readily apparent to an attentive observer that the game isn't fair and the cards come out in a predictable and repeatable pattern.
What are my legal obligations? Do I have an affirmative duty to immediately inform the casino that game isn't fair, and advantages the player? Must I immediately stop playing, so as to not be accused of cheating or otherwise have to forfeit my winnings?
link to original post
I am not your lawyer.
Some thoughts:
The casino often provides pencils and scorecards to baccarat players; this means that they want you to try and figure things out and make predictions about the next hand.
If the casino chooses to deal from stacked decks without shuffling, I think that is on them.
link to original post
I simple "I don't know" would've sufficed, but since you went there...
The article you posted, which I assume you read and am familiar with, states that the casino had a legal obligation under state law to provide a "fair game" and they did not. If the player discovers an unfair game, are they obligated to inform the casino? One judge said the game was valid, even though it wasn't fair. Another judge said the game was invalid because it wasn't fair. Then the case settled.
The question remains.
link to original post
The gaming commissions usually require the casinos to deal a fair game and redeem chips.
The laws usually prohibit players from cheating by past-posting (placing late bets) or moving cards from one hand to another (hand mucking).
I am not aware of a rule where the player is required to tell the house that the game is vulnerable.
link to original post
Casino's never deal a fair game all their games are rigged. In a scenario where there is verbiage trying to obligate
you into telling them why they're making mistakes that favor you I would elect to play dumb.
Quote: ArmageddenWhat has happened to AdministratorJP? JP has gone MiA since 2020 during the WuHan virus attacks , which killed 7 million people
link to original post
I don't know what I'm at liberty to say, but I think he is okay and just lost interest in all things gambling.
I have been winning for a very long time in the Wiz's free bac game by combining a worthless betting system with a worthless bet selection system
exactly how I have done it:
D'Alembert system - initial bet $25 continue until then end of the shoe unless I lose at bet level $65 which means a large loss of usually about $350 at which time I end playing that shoe
I have increased or decreased my bet size by just $5.00 after each loss or win
Bet selection system: bet on the last result hoping for a long streak
the largest win for one shoe is usually around $225 - many smaller wins in between
not claiming it actually is a winning method - I just started doing it for fun
I guess I've just been lucky - but as I said I've been doing it for a very long time
I haven't kept exact stats on everything - playing this way I'm now up about $2,400
I've tried many different kinds of things on this game before and have never won like this - I've always lost
it's very surprising
.
Quote: odiousgambitMaybe what is more telling is the way a bot will 'just go away' , not actually interested in the topic. It is a puzzle to me why someone tests these things here Turing-wise
link to original post[/link
I assume the point is to see if it is, in fact, someone who is merely interested in posting the minimum number of posts (I think it's 10 here) to be allowed to post links in threads. A person who is doing this probably isn't going to go back to their posts to see if there were any replies.
AdminJP confirmed Patient Zero for novel wuhan-based SARS-like virus...Quote: WizardQuote: ArmageddenWhat has happened to AdministratorJP? JP has gone MiA since 2020 during the WuHan virus attacks , which killed 7 million people
link to original post
I don't know what I'm at liberty to say, but I think he is okay and just lost interest in all things gambling.
link to original post
The plot thickens.