Quote: TDVegasIt’s no more or less of a consequence than yours.
MD's reply renders your opinion inconsequential since you are not involved.
Don't you agree?
Quote: michael99000What does someone else playing Bacc with their own money have to do with proving that you’re a fraud ?
It demonstrates the strength of their convictions.
It's easy to claim someone is a fraud, but are you willing to put your money where your mouth is?
This guy is wagering 50+K a day, he is putting his money up.
What are you doing?
Quote: coachbellyIt demonstrates the strength of their convictions.
It's easy to claim someone is a fraud, but are you willing to put your money where your mouth is?
This guy is wagering 50+K a day, he is putting his money up.
What are you doing?
Lol you make zero sense.
I never said I’m a lifetime consistent winner at Bacc.
So what does the results of my own play have to do with proving this guy is a total fraud ?
My claim is that his methods are complete nonsense. Any proof of that, or that I’m wrong, would only have to involve witnessing his play
Quote: michael99000Lol you make zero sense.
I never said I’m a lifetime consistent winner at Bacc.
So what does the results of my own play have to do with proving this guy is a total fraud ?
My claim is that his methods are complete nonsense. Any proof of that, or that I’m wrong, would only have to involve witnessing his play. He has said he wins at baccarat by being able to predict the upcoming cards , many would enjoy witnessing that type of psychic ability
Quote: michael99000I never said I’m a lifetime consistent winner at Bacc.
But you are not challenging your winnings, you are challenging his.
He maintains that he can win by using his methods, and he risks his money to that end.
If you are convinced that he cannot win with those methods, then risk your money to prove your convictions.
Bet his dark side, or whatever you need to disprove his methods.
But this guy is playing to prove his claims...what are you doing?
Quote: michael99000My claim is that his methods are complete nonsense. Any proof of that, or that I’m wrong, would only have to involve witnessing his play
What is stopping you from witnessing his play?
The guy is playing in LV for the next month, he posts his intinerary every day.
Quote: coachbellyWhat is stopping you from witnessing his play?
The guy is playing in LV for the next month, he posts his intinerary every day.
Ridiculous. You can’t go and stalk the guy....asking some baccarat player “are you MDawg”...?
I highly doubt he would be amenable to that person.
Stop being ridiculous.
Quote: coachbellyBut you are not challenging your winnings, you are challenging his.
He maintains that he can win by using his methods, and he risks his money to that end.
If you are convinced that he cannot win with those methods, then risk your money to prove your convictions.
Bet his dark side, or whatever you need to disprove his methods.
But this guy is playing to prove his claims...what are you doing?
Playing by yourself and then posting about winning on gambling forums doesn’t prove anything.
Quote: coachbellyBut you are not challenging your winnings, you are challenging his.
He maintains that he can win by using his methods, and he risks his money to that end.
If you are convinced that he cannot win with those methods, then risk your money to prove your convictions.
Bet his dark side, or whatever you need to disprove his methods.
But this guy is playing to prove his claims...what are you doing?
coachbelly,
"Bet his dark side"???
I hope you realize that in Baccarat both the Player and Banker bets are -EV.
Hope this helps!
Dog Hand
Quote: TDVegasRidiculous. You can’t go and stalk the guy....I highly doubt he would be amenable to that
MDawg seems amenable...
Quote: MDawgIf you're saying that if someone scopes out the guy at the high limit tables wearing a fifty or hundred grand watch with a stack of chips in front of him and yells MDAWG! that that guy would not turn around and say, "Who the F. are you?" Well, yes, correct. There is such a person in Vegas for the next week or two playing heavily.