Thread Rating:

Dantheman
Dantheman
  • Threads: 19
  • Posts: 53
Joined: Apr 21, 2015
April 21st, 2015 at 7:57:54 PM permalink
I was playing around with different variations of martingale recently.
I worked out that if your first bet is 1 unit and you increase your second bet to anything more than 2 units (for example 4) then continue to double for say upto 3 more attempts (5 step) until winning or busting, it is approx 3 times more profitable and only costs approx twice as much as a 5 step standard martingale on a bust.
Eg
1,2,4,8,16 = 1 unit win each win, 31 unit loss each bust
1,4,8,16,32 = 3 unit win each win, 61 unit loss each bust

Can someone explain why this isnt a winning strategy?
Not interested in smart alec comments cheers
sabre
sabre
  • Threads: 3
  • Posts: 1172
Joined: Aug 16, 2010
April 21st, 2015 at 8:08:21 PM permalink
Can you explain why this is a winning strategy?
DJTeddyBear
DJTeddyBear
  • Threads: 210
  • Posts: 11062
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
April 21st, 2015 at 8:10:43 PM permalink
Unless I missed something, all you did was skip one step. As a result, when (if) you finally win, you win three units instead of one.

Big deal.

Martingales don't work because, sooner or later, you'll hit a string of bad luck where the next bet is either greater than the table limit, or exceeds your bankroll.
I invented a few casino games. Info: http://www.DaveMillerGaming.com/ ————————————————————————————————————— Superstitions are silly, childish, irrational rituals, born out of fear of the unknown. But how much does it cost to knock on wood? 😁
mustangsally
mustangsally
  • Threads: 25
  • Posts: 2463
Joined: Mar 29, 2011
April 21st, 2015 at 8:17:47 PM permalink
Quote: Dantheman

1,4,8,16,32 = 3 unit win each win, 61 unit loss each bust

Can someone explain why this isnt a winning strategy?

say you bet on a fair coin flip at Sally's Casino

your first bet is on A side (A and Z are the bets)
you WIN!

you won 1 cuz ur 1st bet was only 1
not 3
that happens 50% of the time

now
you must calculate your average bet
for the game you wants to play in a casino
and you will C the light

have fun and win!
Sally
I Heart Vi Hart
AxelWolf
AxelWolf
  • Threads: 170
  • Posts: 22694
Joined: Oct 10, 2012
April 21st, 2015 at 8:20:25 PM permalink
Quote: DJTeddyBear

Unless I missed something, all you did was skip one step. As a result, when (if) you finally win, you win three units instead of one.

Big deal.

Martingales don't work because, sooner or later, you'll hit a string of bad luck where the next bet is either greater than the table limit, or exceeds your bankroll.

BUT What if, is the next question.
♪♪Now you swear and kick and beg us That you're not a gamblin' man Then you find you're back in Vegas With a handle in your hand♪♪ Your black cards can make you money So you hide them when you're able In the land of casinos and money You must put them on the table♪♪ You go back Jack do it again roulette wheels turinin' 'round and 'round♪♪ You go back Jack do it again♪♪
rudeboyoi
rudeboyoi
  • Threads: 27
  • Posts: 2001
Joined: Mar 28, 2010
April 21st, 2015 at 8:21:44 PM permalink
1, 3, 7, 15, 31. You win a unit a hand as long as you don't bust and you only lose 57 units when you bust.
Dantheman
Dantheman
  • Threads: 19
  • Posts: 53
Joined: Apr 21, 2015
April 21st, 2015 at 8:27:30 PM permalink
So theres basically 3 outcomes
1) win after a win = 1
2) win after a loss of less then 5 in a row = 3
3) lose 5 bets in a row = -61

I know losing 5 bets or more in a row is common but im only interested in multiples of 5 eg 5,10,15,20
as for example 6 losses in a row then a win would mean i bust once (-61) and win after a loss once (+3)
How do I find out the probability of losing exactly 5 times in a row (-61), 10 times in a row -122), 15 in a row (-183)
and so on?
AxelWolf
AxelWolf
  • Threads: 170
  • Posts: 22694
Joined: Oct 10, 2012
April 21st, 2015 at 8:28:19 PM permalink
Quote: Dantheman

I was playing around with different variations of martingale recently.
I worked out that if your first bet is 1 unit and you increase your second bet to anything more than 2 units (for example 4) then continue to double for say upto 3 more attempts (5 step) until winning or busting, it is approx 3 times more profitable and only costs approx twice as much as a 5 step standard martingale on a bust.
Eg
1,2,4,8,16 = 1 unit win each win, 31 unit loss each bust
1,4,8,16,32 = 3 unit win each win, 61 unit loss each bust

Can someone explain why this isnt a winning strategy?
Not interested in smart alec comments cheers

Because you are playing a -EV game.

If it worked casinos would not let you do it.

Teams would simply over run casinos with monster bankrolls.
♪♪Now you swear and kick and beg us That you're not a gamblin' man Then you find you're back in Vegas With a handle in your hand♪♪ Your black cards can make you money So you hide them when you're able In the land of casinos and money You must put them on the table♪♪ You go back Jack do it again roulette wheels turinin' 'round and 'round♪♪ You go back Jack do it again♪♪
AxelWolf
AxelWolf
  • Threads: 170
  • Posts: 22694
Joined: Oct 10, 2012
April 21st, 2015 at 8:33:05 PM permalink
Quote: Dantheman

So theres basically 3 outcomes
1) win after a win = 1
2) win after a loss of less then 5 in a row = 3
3) lose 5 bets in a row = -61

I know losing 5 bets or more in a row is common but im only interested in multiples of 5 eg 5,10,15,20
as for example 6 losses in a row then a win would mean i bust once (-61) and win after a loss once (+3)
How do I find out the probability of losing exactly 5 times in a row (-61), 10 times in a row -122), 15 in a row (-183)
and so on?

How many examples of 10 or more do you want? Go though a casino and look at digital table game tally boards like roulette black/red even/odd You will have no problem seeing 10 or more.
♪♪Now you swear and kick and beg us That you're not a gamblin' man Then you find you're back in Vegas With a handle in your hand♪♪ Your black cards can make you money So you hide them when you're able In the land of casinos and money You must put them on the table♪♪ You go back Jack do it again roulette wheels turinin' 'round and 'round♪♪ You go back Jack do it again♪♪
Dantheman
Dantheman
  • Threads: 19
  • Posts: 53
Joined: Apr 21, 2015
April 21st, 2015 at 8:49:48 PM permalink
Deleted
Dantheman
Dantheman
  • Threads: 19
  • Posts: 53
Joined: Apr 21, 2015
April 21st, 2015 at 9:19:57 PM permalink
Quote: mustangsally

say you bet on a fair coin flip at Sally's Casino

your first bet is on A side (A and Z are the bets)
you WIN!

you won 1 cuz ur 1st bet was only 1
not 3
that happens 50% of the time

now
you must calculate your average bet
for the game you wants to play in a casino
and you will C the light

have fun and win!
Sally



Would the avg win be approx 2?
Half the time win 1 unit half the time win 3 units (1+3)/2
surrender88s
surrender88s
  • Threads: 20
  • Posts: 291
Joined: Jun 23, 2013
April 21st, 2015 at 9:32:28 PM permalink
My math may be wrong here, but I'll give it a shot. if we assume that you are playing a fair coin-slip game paying 1:1, probability of winning at each flip:

1: 50%
2: 25%
3: 12.5%
4: 6.25%
Lose 5 in a row: 6.25%

Payouts at each round are: 1,3,3,3,-61

EV of 1: 0.5
EV of 2: 0.75
EV of 3: 0.375
EV of 4: 0.1875
EV of lose 5 in a row: -3.8125

Expected loss of this system is a loss of 2.75 per "round", which is playing until you win OR lose 5 times.

The expected gain or loss of flat-betting is 0. The more "levels" you play martingaling, the lower the chance of hazard, and the bigger the hazard.
"Rule No.1: Never lose money. Rule No.2: Never forget rule No.1." -Warren Buffett on risk/return
surrender88s
surrender88s
  • Threads: 20
  • Posts: 291
Joined: Jun 23, 2013
April 21st, 2015 at 9:34:46 PM permalink
EV of regular martingale with payouts as 1,1,1,1,-31:

EV of 1: 0.5
EV of 2: 0.25
EV of 3: 0.125
EV of 4: 0.0625
EV of lose 5 in a row: -1.9375

Expected loss of this system is a loss of 1.05 per "round", which is playing until you win OR lose 5 times.
"Rule No.1: Never lose money. Rule No.2: Never forget rule No.1." -Warren Buffett on risk/return
surrender88s
surrender88s
  • Threads: 20
  • Posts: 291
Joined: Jun 23, 2013
April 21st, 2015 at 9:39:14 PM permalink
Quote: Dantheman

I was playing around with different variations of martingale recently.
I worked out that if your first bet is 1 unit and you increase your second bet to anything more than 2 units (for example 4) then continue to double for say upto 3 more attempts (5 step) until winning or busting, it is approx 3 times more profitable and only costs approx twice as much as a 5 step standard martingale on a bust.
Eg
1,2,4,8,16 = 1 unit win each win, 31 unit loss each bust
1,4,8,16,32 = 3 unit win each win, 61 unit loss each bust

Can someone explain why this isnt a winning strategy?
Not interested in smart alec comments cheers



To answer your question directly, yes, you triple your wins if you win. Yes, you double your hazard if you lose. Triple is more than double, right? ... well... at first that makes sense, but it's really your brain fooling you. Tripling 1 is 3, so a magnitude of 2 change. Doubling ~30 is 60, a magnitude change of 30. Doubling the big loss is way worse than winning 2 more a few times. Cheers.
"Rule No.1: Never lose money. Rule No.2: Never forget rule No.1." -Warren Buffett on risk/return
Dantheman
Dantheman
  • Threads: 19
  • Posts: 53
Joined: Apr 21, 2015
April 22nd, 2015 at 12:31:41 AM permalink
Quote: surrender88s

To answer your question directly, yes, you triple your wins if you win. Yes, you double your hazard if you lose. Triple is more than double, right? ... well... at first that makes sense, but it's really your brain fooling you. Tripling 1 is 3, so a magnitude of 2 change. Doubling ~30 is 60, a magnitude change of 30. Doubling the big loss is way worse than winning 2 more a few times. Cheers.



Thats what is confusing me-
If it is still going to lose with the same frequency as the standard martingale, doesnt the extra amount in wins before that happens mean it is better?
Dieter
Administrator
Dieter
  • Threads: 16
  • Posts: 6109
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
April 22nd, 2015 at 4:19:54 AM permalink
Quote: Dantheman

Thats what is confusing me-
If it is still going to lose with the same frequency as the standard martingale, doesnt the extra amount in wins before that happens mean it is better?



Like every other martingale variant, it works great until you can't place a big bet.

When you can't place a big bet - either due to table limit or bankroll constraint - you've lost a big chunk of money, and that is quite hard to recover from, even winning 3 units at a time.
May the cards fall in your favor.
RS
RS
  • Threads: 62
  • Posts: 8626
Joined: Feb 11, 2014
April 22nd, 2015 at 4:29:09 AM permalink
Systems (that don't work) are the worst thing. It's sad to see. I see players all the time, they're tracking the amount of rolls people get on the dice, or what numbers they're hitting, or the time it takes between each roll -- whatever their system is. And others do this sh** where they press, martingale, decrease, parlay, whatever their bets because they think they have some magical system.

These people spend hours a day (daily) in a casino with some losing system. They treat it like it's a job. They've figured out how much $$$ they think they should be making per roll/shooter/hour/day whatever. But they THINK they're gonna be winners.


With that being said, do what you want with your money -- the casino will be glad to take it from you.
ThatDonGuy
ThatDonGuy
  • Threads: 122
  • Posts: 6740
Joined: Jun 22, 2011
April 22nd, 2015 at 7:13:58 AM permalink
Quote: Dantheman

Thats what is confusing me-
If it is still going to lose with the same frequency as the standard martingale, doesnt the extra amount in wins before that happens mean it is better?


Actually, if "lose" means "reach the point where you can't make the next bet necessary," then losing will happen more often if you bet more because the amounts you bet after each number of losses are larger as well.

Compare the examples, and assume your bankroll is 1500:
"Normal" Martingale: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024; after 10 losses, you are behind 2047
"1-4" Martingale: 1, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64. 128. 256, 512, 1024; after only 9 losses, you are behind 2045
And don't even think about going to the ATM and "temporarily borrowing" the money for your next mortgage payment, under the assumption that "I'll win it back eventually."
Remember the words of Oscar Madison (that's Quincy Oscar Madison, not the new Chandler one): "There's no such thing as a sure thing; that's why they call it gambling." ("Pro wrestling is fixed, right? There's no possible way Vince McMahon lets Brock Lesnar beat Undertaker at WrestleMania...")
TwoFeathersATL
TwoFeathersATL
  • Threads: 37
  • Posts: 3616
Joined: May 22, 2013
April 22nd, 2015 at 7:55:14 AM permalink
Now we are wrestling? I must have missed something... I'll go back and try again. 2F
Youuuuuu MIGHT be a 'rascal' if.......(nevermind ;-)...2F
Kavouras
Kavouras
  • Threads: 5
  • Posts: 52
Joined: Apr 22, 2014
April 22nd, 2015 at 4:03:41 PM permalink
The problem is that half of the time you will win 1 unit yet overall risk almost double bankroll. This balances out the 3 unit wins.
http://www.Roulette30.com
mustangsally
mustangsally
  • Threads: 25
  • Posts: 2463
Joined: Mar 29, 2011
April 22nd, 2015 at 4:31:50 PM permalink
Quote: Dantheman

Would the avg win be approx 2?
Half the time win 1 unit half the time win 3 units (1+3)/2

no
you lose 1/32 of the time so the avg win is a weighted average
cuz u win 31/32

I gets 61/31 or 1.967741935 (rounded) for the avg win
(I bet 3.4 cents one wants to see the math on that one)

so you lose 1 time in 32 tries
-61
and win 1.967741935 31 times
all on average of course
1.967741935 * 31 = 61

a wash (ding! i am worth millions and still have to do my own laundry)

just like a regular Marty 5 step
you lose 1 time in 32 tries
-31
and win 1 (avg win = 1) 31 times
all on average of course
hey, echo

but good luck finding a 50/50 game in a real casino
the games are not fair there (by definition that is)
Sally
I Heart Vi Hart
surrender88s
surrender88s
  • Threads: 20
  • Posts: 291
Joined: Jun 23, 2013
April 22nd, 2015 at 9:04:49 PM permalink
thanks Sally- I left out the last chance of winning so I erroneously doubled the risk of hazard in my calculations. I never checked my work in elementary school math either :-P
"Rule No.1: Never lose money. Rule No.2: Never forget rule No.1." -Warren Buffett on risk/return
Dantheman
Dantheman
  • Threads: 19
  • Posts: 53
Joined: Apr 21, 2015
April 22nd, 2015 at 10:01:08 PM permalink
Ok yes i have a better understanding now thank you for explaining
  • Jump to: