An over-simplified estimate of the probability would require the bettor to double down until reaching the table maximum and would traditionally require about 9 victories in a row (1 in 512 odds) to achieve such a feat (and that assumed 50/50 odds or no house advantage), but I believe the probablity is actually much smaller assuming the player continues to bet only 2% of their bankroll and would theoretically fall into risk of ruin in the majority of cases well before achieving the desired results.
Lots of examples exist of the probabilities of defined outcomes to certain confidence levels, but I cannot seem to locate one that permits me to adjust the bankroll to such a low amount.
Any assistance that anyone could offer would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Walt
Looks like 2 years ago you had the same thought in your first thread.Quote: WaltFalesAny assistance that anyone could offer would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Walt
if you are just asking about the probability of turning $2k into $100k
(a 98K win goal) by flat betting $2k, the basic Gambler's Ruin formula
would work just fine
(also turning 1 unit into 50 units would be the same ratios)
I get 1.1756485%
or about 1 in 85.06 would be successful using a house edge of 1%
even money wager
with a player win probability of 49.5%
(you did not ask about any specific casino bets)
(say a covered box with 1000 poker chips in it.
495 of them are RED in color, the other 505 are black and
if you reach in and draw a RED chip without looking you win)
here is a link to a simulator
http://www.math.usu.edu/~koebbe/gr/gamblersruin/gamblersruin.html
wikipedia also has an article on this concept
here is an example
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/questions-and-answers/math/1360-chance-of-winning-10-units-before-losing-10-units-with-plain-bet-at-non-even-games/#post129741
also,
the average number of games played for success or ruin can also be calculated
with a different formula
http://catlin.casinocitytimes.com/article/calculating-a-hold-percentage-1230
but it really is a highly skewed result.
41.22 trials
some games can last for a very long time
hope this helps
or you give a very specific example using a current casino game too
if that is really what you are trying to ask.
Your first paragraph seems to ask about some kind of loss rebate
added: it also reads about betting a maximum amount up to a house limit (Bold Play)
that requires a different approach using a spreadsheet or some code like in R
Good luck
from your first thread
Would you mind sharing the math/model?
Back of the envelope math would suggest that odds are about 1:400 if you doubled-up until reaching max bet of around $15K or so (and that assumed 0% house advantage), so I was inititally anticipating that the actual likelihood would be much lower than the 1.8% you calculated."
(these all assume no time limit)
The 1.8% is with no house limit.
I get with a 1% HE, even money bet
> prob # Probability of reaching goal
[1] 0.0188238
> 1/prob
[1] 53.12423
with a $15k house limit
> prob # Probability of reaching goal
[1] 0.002610805
> 1/prob
[1] 383.0236
Just a 0% bet (a fair bet)
the chance to turn $2k into $100k is just 2k/100k or 2%
with no house limit
with the same 15k limit max bet
> prob # Probability of reaching goal
[1] 0.002852183
> 1/prob
[1] 350.6087
The point being that gathering all of your resources is something that few people do when gambling.
There is the one chap who did this to bet on roulette. But most people never gamble their last dollar, and instead are merely gambling up to their ATM withdrawal limit, credit card limit, or home-equity-line-of-credit limit, or whatever depending on their level of degeneracy.
Said another way it's much more likely for someone who's last $2,000 is their last $2,000 for the day instead of a homeless man who finds $2,000 and that's truly the only thing of value that the person has at all.
Until you factor that in, $2,000 to $100,000 happens less than once every 50 times someone tries according to the math. Use knowledge of math and you can get pretty close to 50, especially if you target something really close to a 50-to-1 payoff.
My $5 to $2,000 story is just an example, and in reality I can't count it as meaning anything at all; which is the point of the story really.
Quote: WaltFalesI am attempting to find a public/free model that would help me better understand the probability a person could achieve a certain win threshold (i.e. $100,000) with a very small bankroll (i.e. $2,000 or approximately 2% of the desired ending total win/bankroll) in order to prove that providing a player with a small, yet immediate, discount or allowance (such as airfare) after a large loss provides the player with but a miniscule chance of recoverying the loss and breaking even.
An over-simplified estimate of the probability would require the bettor to double down until reaching the table maximum and would traditionally require about 9 victories in a row (1 in 512 odds) to achieve such a feat (and that assumed 50/50 odds or no house advantage), but I believe the probablity is actually much smaller assuming the player continues to bet only 2% of their bankroll and would theoretically fall into risk of ruin in the majority of cases well before achieving the desired results.
Lots of examples exist of the probabilities of defined outcomes to certain confidence levels, but I cannot seem to locate one that permits me to adjust the bankroll to such a low amount.
Any assistance that anyone could offer would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Walt
Just remember when Parlaying your Bets 100% you're just giving the Casino that many parleys to win their money back including your original. if you parley 25.00 13 times, you will have your 100,000.00
but this is very hard to do.
I try to parley at least 30% after every win or if my bank roll is fat I will Parley 50% after every win.
Baccarat is a good choice for Casino game offering best 50/50 odds.
Have fun!
Quote: wrobersonThis reminds me of the time I turned 20 bucks into 2500 over a 23 day period.
2500 in 23 days, OMG!!!!
I just did that much over the last two days of playing baccarat.
no you start with 25x that amount.Quote: varmenti2500 in 23 days, OMG!!!!
I just did that much over the last two days of playing baccarat.
I got up, got showered and dressed, and went to work.
Here is Michael Bluejay's system for winning $1,000,000. It is readily and publicly available on his website.
but the lol was interrupted by the man posting in this thread himself.
Quote: GWAELOL I was fully ready to write. Why use all 2k on a bet when you can play banker and player at the same time and win 100k in about 6 weeks.
but the lol was interrupted by the man posting in this thread himself.
Sometimes it worth it to educate on a Game of Chance before attempting to "Get your feet wet" those who don't educate will just be Losers before even stepping foot in a Gaming floor. Especially those who don't know The Game of Baccarat.
Quote: varmentiEspecially those who don't know The Game of Baccarat.
Exactly! Like those folks who bet banker and player at the same time:-)
Quote: speedycrapHow???
Back in the day the Natives greeted their social introductions by saying the word "How" as another way of saying "Hello"
"How" speedycrap The thread OP is requesting "Probability to Win $100,000 with a $2,000 starting bankroll"
If anyone on here could answer this then they would be out doing it. You actually have to "Risk" and "Put that 2000.00 Bankroll in Action" in order to make your $100,000.00 Do keep in mind when you have a game of choice, you need to calculate "How" fast you want to make that 100,000. this is very important.
if you want to make it over night, then "LUCK" will have to come into play. PROBABILITY is it's possible but Highly unlikely to ever be achieved.
if you want to learn some skills then yes "It's doable" but takes time and Professional skill. PROBABILITY is Possible and Highly Likely to achieve your goal many times over.
If you are a fan of Intuition, then simply pick a favorite Game of Chance and play by "Gut Feeling" there are many gamblers that play this way. PROBABILITY is it's possible but Highly unlikely to ever be achieved let alone repeated.
I have my own style involving Aggressive betting (Let the Casino Profits Ride for a Long Run and risking a very small Percentage of my bank roll)
a good way for you to start would be to cut your bankroll in to two equal parts and build your fortune on 1 part of your bank roll. Having a backup is very smart approach.
I began supporting myself solely from blackjack play in march 2004, with a bankroll of $4300. :-) Playing red chip level in Atlantic City, I made $32 grand my first 3 years.....that's a total of 32 grand....11,000, 9600, 12,000 respectively. I was 21 years old at the time and lived VERY minimally, single, roommate situation, no car. I could and did live off of $600 - $700 per month. Problem was, I couldn't grow my bank grow much. Finally, year 4, I hit a bit of positive variance which allowed me to grow my bankroll a bit and start moving up in stakes.
I no longer have my exact figures for those early years, but year 4, I made $25 to $30 grand and then year 5, my first 50+ grand year. So it was sometime during year 5, that I hit six figures and can say that I turned $4300 into $100,000. Now in year 10, I can say I turned $4300 into over $500,000. :-) Sometime in the next 4-5 years, I hope to be able to say that I turned $4300 into a million dollars. :-) This was actually my original 10 year plan, but those first 3 years and just growing my bankroll to a point that I could begin to move up in stakes, was a much bigger 'hurdle' than I anticipated. But I eventually got there. :-)
Quote: kewlj$2000...no, but I turned $4300 into $100,000. Took me 5 years though....lol.
I began supporting myself solely from blackjack play in march 2004, with a bankroll of $4300. :-) Playing red chip level in Atlantic City, I made $32 grand my first 3 years.....that's a total of 32 grand....11,000, 9600, 12,000 respectively. I was 21 years old at the time and lived VERY minimally, single, roommate situation, no car. I could and did live off of $600 - $700 per month. Problem was, I couldn't grow my bank grow much. Finally, year 4, I hit a bit of positive variance which allowed me to grow my bankroll a bit and start moving up in stakes.
I no longer have my exact figures for those early years, but year 4, I made $25 to $30 grand and then year 5, my first 50+ grand year. So it was sometime during year 5, that I hit six figures and can say that I turned $4300 into $100,000. Now in year 10, I can say I turned $4300 into over $500,000. :-) Sometime in the next 4-5 years, I hope to be able to say that I turned $43 into a million dollars. :-) This was actually my original 10 year plan, but those first 3 years and just growing my bankroll to a point that I could begin to move up in stakes, was a much bigger 'hurdle' than I anticipated. But I eventually got there. :-)
kewlj,
I had gotten the general impression that you were doing this for a living from your other posts, but this is really interesting detail about your progression over time. Thanks for posting it, and I wish you much positive variance! I think it's especially neat you've found a partner (re: other posts where you mention that) with whom you can share this lifestyle; that's got to make it much more fun.
Quote: kewlj$2000...no, but I turned $4300 into $100,000. Took me 5 years though....lol.
I began supporting myself solely from blackjack play in march 2004, with a bankroll of $4300. :-) Playing red chip level in Atlantic City, I made $32 grand my first 3 years.....that's a total of 32 grand....11,000, 9600, 12,000 respectively. I was 21 years old at the time and lived VERY minimally, single, roommate situation, no car. I could and did live off of $600 - $700 per month. Problem was, I couldn't grow my bank grow much. Finally, year 4, I hit a bit of positive variance which allowed me to grow my bankroll a bit and start moving up in stakes.
I no longer have my exact figures for those early years, but year 4, I made $25 to $30 grand and then year 5, my first 50+ grand year. So it was sometime during year 5, that I hit six figures and can say that I turned $4300 into $100,000. Now in year 10, I can say I turned $4300 into over $500,000. :-) Sometime in the next 4-5 years, I hope to be able to say that I turned $4300 into a million dollars. :-) This was actually my original 10 year plan, but those first 3 years and just growing my bankroll to a point that I could begin to move up in stakes, was a much bigger 'hurdle' than I anticipated. But I eventually got there. :-)
That's a really cool and inspiring story. I hope to do the same but probably on VP or something where I don't have to interact with people as much. Looking at some of those table game stories where people hate each other so much that they will throw away money to spite others doesn't sound very fun lol. Going to start much lower as well(maybe 300). The first 3 years I will stick to quarters, then after that maybe expand. I don't want to make a million but having a 2-3 year life cushion in case things go pear-shaped wouldn't be a bad fallback. Plus all the free food and fun that comes with being a full time player.
How to win $100,000 at a table game with a $10 bet
please vote when there
Quote: 7crapsInteresting how the MB article went from turning $10 into $1 millionQuote: MoscaI got up, got showered and dressed, and went to work.
Here is Michael Bluejay's system for winning $1,000,000.
It is readily and publicly available on his website.
to just $10 into $100k with a house limit
Here is what I get
A bit different from his sim results
and I did add in a few Roulette bets (MB thought against it)
these are calculated
(I guess I could PM MB about this
to help him out with his web page data)
using Bold Play
(highest probability of hitting a target in the shortest amount of time.
Craps odds not included
as per the SN Ethier paper 'Improving on Bold Play at Craps" shows this to be the best)
Bet what is needed to hit target goal (or max bet allowed) or go all-in trying
Turn $10 into $100,000
with a max bet of $50,000
*1 in* results
0 Roulette - 1# straight-up: 10,853.08
00 Roulette - 1# straight-up: 11,753.04
Bac Banker: 11,809.54
Bac Player: 12,059.84
Craps Don't Pass: 12,122.74
Craps Pass Line: 12,142.1
0 Roulette - even money bets: 14,528.4
Craps 30 to 1 bet: 15,649.35
00 Roulette - even money bets: 20,908.66
Roulette bets sure look sweet here.
MB also says this:
"That improves our chances to 1 in 125,926 for baccarat and 1 in 128,110 for craps.
(You can't easily calculate that, ..."
Sure one can
(I just removed the 't)
And it is quite easy
(as easy or easier as running a sim IMO)
In Excel one can get very accurate results to say 2 to 3 decimal places
with very little effort and simple math.
Turning Excel into some code to run in R for example
lifesaver (time saver too, happy I found it)
it (R code) was done by BruceZ over at 2+2 and matches perfectly with my Excel results
(with way less effort, that I like a lot)
R is a free programbr = 10 # Starting Bankroll
goal = 1000000 # Target bankroll
odds = 1 # Payoff Odds
p = (244/495) # P(win bet) Pass Line Craps
max_bet = 5000000 # Table max - No max just make higher than goal
prob = 0
p_fail = 1
count = 0
while ( (br >= 1) & (br < goal) & (count < 1000) ) {
# Compute probabity of completing parlay up
bet = min(br,max_bet)
consec = 0
while (br + bet*odds <= goal) {
br = br + bet*odds
consec = consec + 1
bet = min(br,max_bet)
}
p_parlay = p^consec
# Compute probability of reaching goal
bets = 0
if (br < goal) {
while ( min(br,max_bet) >= ceiling((goal-br)/odds) ) {
br = br - ceiling((goal-br)/odds)
bets = bets + 1
}
}
p_goal = ifelse(bets, 1-(1-p)^bets, 1)
delta = p_fail*p_parlay*p_goal
prob = prob + delta
p_fail = p_fail*p_parlay*(1-p)^bets
count = count + 1
}
prob # Probability of reaching goal
1/prob
delta
count
here is another one for those 1/37 or 1/36 type of bets
with a greater accuracy one can changepdoub = function(br,goal,max_bet,pwin,odds,thresh,prob=1) {
if (br < 1 | prob < thresh) return(0)
bet = ceiling((goal-br)/odds) # bet needed to reach goal
limit = min(br,max_bet) # limit = max bet possible
if ( bet < limit )
pwin + (1-pwin)*pdoubb(br-bet,goal,max_bet,pwin,odds,thresh,prob*(1-pwin))
else
pwin*pdoubb(br+odds*limit,goal,max_bet,pwin,odds,thresh,prob*pwin) + (1-pwin)*pdoubb(br-limit,goal,max_bet,pwin,odds,thresh,prob*(1-pwin))
}
require(compiler)
pdoubb = cmpfun(pdoub)
system.time(p <- pdoubb(10,100000,50000,0.49317517,1,0.0000000001))
p
1/p
Pass Line Craps,
Baccarat Player and Banker bets.
$10 into $1 million using Bold Play
Bet what is needed to hit target goal (or max bet allowed) or go all-in trying
Martingale time to start with (10,20,40,80,160,etc) until
hitting the house limit if there is one
Craps Pass Line bet, no odds
> br = 10 # Starting Bankroll
> goal = 1000000 # Target bankroll
> odds = 1 # Payoff Odds
> p = (244/495) # P(win bet) Pass Line Craps
> max_bet = 5000000 # Table max - for No table max make value higher than goal
>
> prob # Probability of reaching goal
[1] 7.84834e-06
> 1/prob
[1] 127,415.5
> delta
[1] 0
> count
[1] 1000
> br = 10 # Starting Bankroll
> goal = 1000000 # Target bankroll
> odds = 1 # Payoff Odds
> p = (244/495) # P(win bet) Pass Line Craps
> max_bet = 50000 # Table max
>
> prob # Probability of reaching goal
[1] 2.538923e-10
> 1/prob
[1] 3,938,678,208
> delta
[1] 0
> count
[1] 1000
> br = 10 # Starting Bankroll
> goal = 1000000 # Target bankroll
> odds = 1 # Payoff Odds
> p = 0.49317517 # P(win bet) Bac Player
> max_bet = 5000000 # Table max
>
> prob # Probability of reaching goal
[1] 7.915218e-06
> 1/prob
[1] 126,338.9
> delta
[1] 0
> count
[1] 1000
> br = 10 # Starting Bankroll
> goal = 1000000 # Target bankroll
> odds = 1 # Payoff Odds
> p = 0.49317517 # P(win bet) Bac Player
> max_bet = 50000 # Table max
>
> prob # Probability of reaching goal
[1] 2.579181e-10
> 1/prob
[1] 3,877,199,356
> delta
[1] 0
> count
[1] 1000
> br = 10 # Starting Bankroll
> goal = 1000000 # Target bankroll
> odds = 19/20 # Payoff Odds
> p = 0.50682483 # P(win bet) Banker in Baccarat
> max_bet = 5000000 # Table max
>
> prob # Probability of reaching goal
[1] 8.134146e-06
> 1/prob
[1] 122,938.5
> delta
[1] 0
> count
[1] 1000
>
> br = 10 # Starting Bankroll
> goal = 1000000 # Target bankroll
> odds = 19/20 # Payoff Odds
> p = 0.50682483 # P(win bet) Banker in Baccarat
> max_bet = 50000 # Table max
>
> prob # Probability of reaching goal
[1] 2.466564e-10
> 1/prob
[1] 4,054,223,093
> delta
[1] 0
> count
[1] 1000
lots of MLB and Football this weekend
anyone can and should check my results
Have fun
Turning $10.00 into a million. Would one think it would be easier to do a Short term (Full Season) Parley in Sports Betting by simply analyzing the "Best bang for the Buck" wagers.
or take 100.00 and divide it up between 10 top Handy Cappers and ask them to parley your 10.00 and try for 17 wins in a row at 1 to 1 Odds giving you 1.3 million Minus the Commissions for services.
If you hit 1 in 10 then you are a Millionaire.
if you lose all 10 then you lose a hundred bucks
and if you win more than 1 out of the 10 then get excited, you are a "Multi-Millionaire"
In the game of Baccarat you can take 25.00 chip and hope to hit those tables that run 16 in a row cashing in 1.5 million in just 1 hr of your time.
Quote: WaltFalesI am attempting to find a public/free model that would help me better understand the probability a person could achieve a certain win threshold (i.e. $100,000) with a very small bankroll (i.e. $2,000 or approximately 2% of the desired ending total win/bankroll) in order to prove that providing a player with a small, yet immediate, discount or allowance (such as airfare) after a large loss provides the player with but a miniscule chance of recoverying the loss and breaking even.
Not sure what you are looking for. On a zero-HE game the probability of turning $2k into $100k is 2%. On a positive house edge game the probability is lower. How much lower depends on bet selection and betting strategy a player follows. Usually the higher variance approach has better rate of success (but all still below 2%).
Notice that any kind of discount or allowance - especially on losses - heavily favours the high variance approach to a point that the success rate can be *above* 2% (making it a desaster for the house).
LOL, Mosca!Quote: MoscaI recently turned NOTHING into $2500.
I got up, got showered and dressed, and went to work.
We're not trying to hear that, see? :)
Quote: teddysLOL, Mosca!
We're not trying to hear that, see? :)
Hehe, I know. It takes a certain mindset to want to be a gambler, just like it takes a certain mindset to be in sales. I wouldn't trade, and neither would the gambler. It's a fair split, I'd say. Respect all around.
Quote: wrobersonThis reminds me of the time I turned 20 bucks into 2500 over a 23 day period.
It reminds me of the time I turned 2500 bucks into 20 over a 23-hour period. But, free drinks!