BenJammin
BenJammin
  • Threads: 49
  • Posts: 134
Joined: Nov 1, 2009
December 15th, 2010 at 8:17:07 PM permalink
S17@ $25 handX60HPH 6 decks House Take? .28% Strip Props (house edge BJ survey)

H17@ $5 handX60HPH No RSA No DAS but...1deck .30% Downtown

$25 X 60 1500 X .28 = $42hr

$5 X 60 $300 X .30= $9hr

How far is my math off?

So, it's costing you $33 an hour to have the privilege of S17 and DAS?
Member In Good Standing!
rdw4potus
rdw4potus
  • Threads: 80
  • Posts: 7237
Joined: Mar 11, 2010
December 15th, 2010 at 8:29:41 PM permalink
Your math is pretty good. But I think the comparison might be a little more fair if you assumed the same bet amount in both scenarios. So, a $42/hr loss on the strip and a $45 loss downtown.

I'd look at it this way:
If you want to play for $5: give up the S17, RSA, and DAS and play downtown. If you want to play for $25: find a S17, RSA, DAS table on the strip (or elsewhere). But if you want to play for $5, do not go to the strip and play for $25 just to get the little rules advantages.

And, I guess, if you can take the atmosphere, play for $5 at Bighorn. Their rules are pretty awesome. H17, double any 2 or 3 cards, DAS (no 3 card doubles after split), unlimited splitting, RSA, late surrender.
"So as the clock ticked and the day passed, opportunity met preparation, and luck happened." - Maurice Clarett
PapaChubby
PapaChubby
  • Threads: 11
  • Posts: 496
Joined: Mar 29, 2010
December 16th, 2010 at 5:47:02 AM permalink
Why are you playing blackjack in the first place? Are you just throwing away the house advantage for the privilege of playing? When I play, I want an opportunity to win some money.

Let's say I want an opportunity to win $100 during this hour of play.

The standard deviation of the strip game is $25 x 1.14 x sqrt(60) = $221. With the house advantage of -$42, a $100 win is a (100 - (-42))/221 = 0.64 sigma condition. The likelihood that I will win over $100 is 26%.

The standard deviation of the downtown game is $5 x 1.14 x sqrt(60) = $44. Probably less because the 1.14 factor includes DAS. With the house advantage of -$9, a $100 win is a (100 - (-9))/44 = 2.48 sigma condition. The likelihood that I will win at least $100 during an hour of play is 0.6%
FleaStiff
FleaStiff
  • Threads: 265
  • Posts: 14484
Joined: Oct 19, 2009
December 16th, 2010 at 6:03:51 AM permalink
Quote: BenJammin

$25 X 60 1500 X .28 = $42hr
$5 X 60 $300 X .30= $9hr


For those who wish to be as precise as possible, here are a few nits to pick:

Its not only amount of money bet that should be compared, but:

TIME since the RATE of play is generally thought to be Faster on the Strip than it is Downtown.

Also, you are using the Comp tables to determine Hands Per Hour and those figures are thought by me to be obsolete figures that were originally rounded off so casino personnel could to easier and therefore quicker math. So an ultra-purist statistician might want to look at actual rate of play in present day games versus historical figures that were probably not all that accurate at the time and may not be at all accurate at the present time.

Sorry to throw such money-wrenches into the mix, but . . . .
dm
dm
  • Threads: 14
  • Posts: 699
Joined: Apr 29, 2010
December 16th, 2010 at 10:42:11 AM permalink
Quote: PapaChubby

Why are you playing blackjack in the first place? Are you just throwing away the house advantage for the privilege of playing? When I play, I want an opportunity to win some money.

Let's say I want an opportunity to win $100 during this hour of play.

The standard deviation of the strip game is $25 x 1.14 x sqrt(60) = $221. With the house advantage of -$42, a $100 win is a (100 - (-42))/221 = 0.64 sigma condition. The likelihood that I will win over $100 is 26%.

The standard deviation of the downtown game is $5 x 1.14 x sqrt(60) = $44. Probably less because the 1.14 factor includes DAS. With the house advantage of -$9, a $100 win is a (100 - (-9))/44 = 2.48 sigma condition. The likelihood that I will win at least $100 during an hour of play is 0.6%




Well, why are you playing blackjack? You have a much higher probability of winning $100 on one bet at roulette, even double zero.
Guess you just wanted to criticize someone. I thought his post made a lot of sense.
PapaChubby
PapaChubby
  • Threads: 11
  • Posts: 496
Joined: Mar 29, 2010
December 16th, 2010 at 10:58:33 AM permalink
Quote: dm

Well, why are you playing blackjack? You have a much higher probability of winning $100 on one bet at roulette, even double zero.
Guess you just wanted to criticize someone. I thought his post made a lot of sense.



Wasn't intending to be critical. Just trying to add some perspective in terms of the reason for playing. If your intent is to minimize house edge, don't sit at the table in the first place. From my perspective, the house edge is the fee that you pay to gamble, and gambling involves variance.

The original poster implied that the downtown game, even with worse rules, is a more desirable game simply because the house edge per hour is less. I disagree. Let's play a game where I take a dime from you every hand. You cannot win anything or lose anything. At the end of an hour, I'll only have taken $6. Is this a better game?
benbakdoff
benbakdoff
  • Threads: 17
  • Posts: 448
Joined: Jul 13, 2010
December 16th, 2010 at 2:27:50 PM permalink
Quote: BenJammin

S17@ $25 handX60HPH 6 decks House Take? .28% Strip Props (house edge BJ survey)

H17@ $5 handX60HPH No RSA No DAS but...1deck .30% Downtown

$25 X 60 1500 X .28 = $42hr

$5 X 60 $300 X .30= $9hr

How far is my math off?

So, it's costing you $33 an hour to have the privilege of S17 and DAS?



Kudos. It's nice to see someone do a little homework before playing. If you look around the strip, you can find those .28% HE games at $10 minimums. They were at Mandalay Bay and Monte Carlo all summer and were still there the last time I checked which was the end of September. I have no reason to believe they've changed. That would knock the loss down although I think the 60 hands per hour estimate is a little low.
PapaChubby
PapaChubby
  • Threads: 11
  • Posts: 496
Joined: Mar 29, 2010
December 16th, 2010 at 3:12:10 PM permalink
Quote: BenJammin

S17@ $25 handX60HPH 6 decks House Take? .28% Strip Props (house edge BJ survey)

H17@ $5 handX60HPH No RSA No DAS but...1deck .30% Downtown

$25 X 60 1500 X .28 = $42hr

$5 X 60 $300 X .30= $9hr

How far is my math off?

So, it's costing you $33 an hour to have the privilege of S17 and DAS?



BTW, you slipped a decimal place. $1500 x .28% = $4.20 per hour, and $300 x .30% = $0.90 per hour. So it's only costing you $3.30/hr to get the much larger variance of the strip game.
BenJammin
BenJammin
  • Threads: 49
  • Posts: 134
Joined: Nov 1, 2009
December 17th, 2010 at 9:48:54 PM permalink
Quote: PapaChubby

BTW, you slipped a decimal place. $1500 x .28% = $4.20 per hour, and $300 x .30% = $0.90 per hour. So it's only costing you $3.30/hr to get the much larger variance of the strip game.



Ok that's what I was looking for. Thanks. RU sure? How do the casinos stay in business?

I once a had a secretary that typed over a hundred words a minute but she made one mistake.
Member In Good Standing!
benbakdoff
benbakdoff
  • Threads: 17
  • Posts: 448
Joined: Jul 13, 2010
December 18th, 2010 at 4:08:14 AM permalink
Quote: BenJammin

Ok that's what I was looking for. Thanks. RU sure? How do the casinos stay in business?

I once a had a secretary that typed over a hundred words a minute but she made one mistake.



Here's another way to look at it. At a house edge of .28% you will lose 28 cents for every $100 wagered playing perfect basic strategy over time. Stand behind any table and see how long it takes for someone to play less than optimally.Not long at all and up goes the house edge. Now watch for over betting as risk of ruin claims another victim. No problem for the casino, there is always someone to fill that seat and repeat the process.

Now stand behind any table and wait for someone to play perfect basic strategy. Not close to perfect, not cherry picking, but perfect basic strategy. What's that? Still waiting?

As long as they have an edge the casinos will do just fine.
  • Jump to: