Thread Rating:

Poll

25 votes (49.01%)
16 votes (31.37%)
7 votes (13.72%)
4 votes (7.84%)
12 votes (23.52%)
3 votes (5.88%)
6 votes (11.76%)
5 votes (9.8%)
12 votes (23.52%)
10 votes (19.6%)

51 members have voted

Ace2
Ace2
  • Threads: 33
  • Posts: 2839
Joined: Oct 2, 2017
January 19th, 2026 at 11:07:33 AM permalink
Quote: ThatDonGuy


I'll go with the obvious answer: I expect him to be on the sidewalk.

Since the sidewalk runs north-south, the distance from the sidewalk will be the difference between the number of steps east and the number of steps west. However, since these are equally likely with each step, the expected number of steps east equals the expected number of steps west.

For that matter, since the expected number of steps north equals the number of steps south, I expect him to be at his starting location.


link to original post

Disagree
It’s all about making that GTA
Ace2
Ace2
  • Threads: 33
  • Posts: 2839
Joined: Oct 2, 2017
January 20th, 2026 at 1:47:08 PM permalink
Quote: Ace2

Here’s another easy one:

A drunkard starts walking on a straight sidewalk that runs north-south. His goal is to walk northward, but for each step he’s equally likely to go one foot directly north, south, east or west.

After 10,000 steps, how far off the sidewalk would you expect him to be?

Closed form solutions only.
link to original post

The answer is (10,000/π)^.5 =~ 56.419 steps from the sidewalk. That’s technically an approximation though a very accurate one. The formula comes from integrating the normal curve times x from zero to infinity then multiplying times two. This gives the expected distance from the mean.

The exact answer (shown to ten digits) of 56.41825312 can be obtained via Markov chain, though that’s not a closed form solution.

If you were to start searching for the drunkard, the best place to start would be at the sidewalk since you don’t know which side of it he’s on, but you’d be an average of ~56 steps away from it when you found him. The chance of him being on the sidewalk is <1%
It’s all about making that GTA
charliepatrick
charliepatrick
  • Threads: 39
  • Posts: 3124
Joined: Jun 17, 2011
January 20th, 2026 at 2:41:16 PM permalink
The issue of where to start to search can be an issue in Orienteering. The concept of the sport is you're given a map of, typically, a forest and you have to find a series of controls. Let's say you're trying to find a point on a footpath that runs East-West but is due North of where you are. You're good at following a compass heading but have an in-built error, so the point you reach on the footpath follows a normal curve. Assuming you're trying to pick the fastest option, I suspect your optimal choice is to aim towards one side, say slightly West of North, and then turn East when you reach the footpath. At some stage you recognise your likely error and need to turn back on yourself. etc. (In the original puzzle you could only be whole degrees out and never greater than 4SDs.)
ThatDonGuy
ThatDonGuy
  • Threads: 133
  • Posts: 7570
Joined: Jun 22, 2011
January 21st, 2026 at 6:32:44 AM permalink
Quote: Ace2

The answer is (10,000/π)^.5 =~ 56.419 steps from the sidewalk. That’s technically an approximation though a very accurate one. The formula comes from integrating the normal curve times x from zero to infinity then multiplying times two. This gives the expected distance from the mean.

The exact answer (shown to ten digits) of 56.41825312 can be obtained via Markov chain, though that’s not a closed form solution.
link to original post


Technically, an approximation isn't one either.

The closest to a "closed form solution" that I got was this:
Each step has probability 1/4 of adding 1 to the number of steps to the left of the sidewalk, 1/4 of subtracting 1, and 1/2 of keeping it the same.
Let (m, n, 10,000 - (m + n)) represent the number of steps to the left, the number to the right, and the number forward/backward, with each one being >= 0 and <= 10,000.
The number of steps away from the sidewalk is |m - n|, and the probability of that particular triple is C(10,000, m) C(10,000 - m, n) (1/4)^10,000, or C(10,000, m) C(10,000 - m, n) / 2^20,000.
The solution is the sum over all m from 0 to 10,000 of (the sum over all n from 0 to (10,000 - n) of ( |m - n| C(10,000, m) C(10,000 - m, n) ) ), divided by 2^20,000.
However, I could not find a way to simplify that.
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
  • Threads: 1540
  • Posts: 27966
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
January 24th, 2026 at 12:31:06 AM permalink
I get a lot of simple math problems on my Facebook feed. Usually there is a strong consensus on the answer, but this one is split about 50/50.


-62-36


-72
"My life is spent in one long effort to escape from the commonplace of existence. These little problems help me to do so." -- Sherlock Holmes
davethebuilder
davethebuilder
  • Threads: 10
  • Posts: 82
Joined: Jan 11, 2015
January 24th, 2026 at 1:10:35 AM permalink
Quote: Wizard

I get a lot of simple math problems on my Facebook feed. Usually there is a strong consensus on the answer, but this one is split about 50/50.


-62-36


-72

link to original post



The placement of brackets can alter the answer, however, since the question did not include these, they can still be used but should not alter the context of the question.
My answer would be:

- 6² - 36
= - (6 * 6)-36
= - 36 - 36
= - 72

An alternate solution using brackets is:
(-6 * -6) - 36
= 0
Casino Enemy No.1
AutomaticMonkey
AutomaticMonkey
  • Threads: 20
  • Posts: 1407
Joined: Sep 30, 2024
January 24th, 2026 at 1:15:39 AM permalink
Quote: Wizard

I get a lot of simple math problems on my Facebook feed. Usually there is a strong consensus on the answer, but this one is split about 50/50.


-62-36


-72

link to original post



It's ambiguous enough, but a minus sign in front of a numeral with nothing else in front of the minus sign I have never seen used to indicate other than just that it's a negative number, while a minus sign between two numbers indicates subtraction. On the other hand if it was -x2-36, where x=6 or -6, I'd probably say -72 too.
ThatDonGuy
ThatDonGuy
  • Threads: 133
  • Posts: 7570
Joined: Jun 22, 2011
January 24th, 2026 at 6:51:22 AM permalink
Quote: Wizard

I get a lot of simple math problems on my Facebook feed. Usually there is a strong consensus on the answer, but this one is split about 50/50.


-62-36


-72

link to original post


Wizard is correct
Exponent comes before unary minus; this makes it -(62) - 36 = -36 - 36 = -72
DogHand
DogHand
  • Threads: 3
  • Posts: 2416
Joined: Sep 24, 2011
January 24th, 2026 at 1:45:43 PM permalink
From the bastion of all human knowledge, Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations



Thus, state the convention you are using to decide whether exponentiation or unary minus has precedence.

Dog Hand
  • Jump to: