Poll
1 vote (16.66%) | |||
1 vote (16.66%) | |||
1 vote (16.66%) | |||
1 vote (16.66%) | |||
3 votes (50%) | |||
1 vote (16.66%) | |||
1 vote (16.66%) | |||
1 vote (16.66%) | |||
3 votes (50%) | |||
3 votes (50%) |
6 members have voted
(x2 - 15x + 55)(x2 -9x + 20) = 1
Beer to the first correct answer and solution. As always, no searching and use spoiler tags.
The question for the poll is how many solutions are there?
x = 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
For real numbers a and b, ab = 1 if:
(1) a = 1 -> x2 - 15x + 55 = 1 -> (x - 6)(x - 9) = 1 -> x = 6, 9
(2) b = 0 -> x2 - 9x + 20 = 0 -> (x - 4)(x - 5) = 0 -> x = 4,5
(3) a = -1 and b is even
a = -1 -> x2 - 15x + 55 = -1 -> (x - 7)(x - 8) = 0 -> x = 7,8
x = 7 -> b = 72 - 9 * 7 + 20 = 6, which is even, so x = 7 is valid
x = 8 -> b = 82 - 9 * 8 + 20 = 14, which is even, so x = 8 is valid
Quote: ThatDonGuy
x = 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
For real numbers a and b, ab = 1 if:
(1) a = 1 -> x2 - 15x + 55 = 1 -> (x - 6)(x - 9) = 1 -> x = 6, 9
(2) b = 0 -> x2 - 9x + 20 = 0 -> (x - 4)(x - 5) = 0 -> x = 4,5
(3) a = -1 and b is even
a = -1 -> x2 - 15x + 55 = -1 -> (x - 7)(x - 8) = 0 -> x = 7,8
x = 7 -> b = 72 - 9 * 7 + 20 = 6, which is even, so x = 7 is valid
x = 8 -> b = 82 - 9 * 8 + 20 = 14, which is even, so x = 8 is valid
Congratulations. beer++; to you.
On a related note, where is the flaw in this logic:
(-1)^2 = 1
ln(-1)^2 = ln(1)
2*ln(-1) = 0
ln(-1) = 0
pi*i = 0
exp(pi*i) = exp(0)
-1 = 1
ln(-1)^2 = ln(1)
2*ln(-1) = 0
The sides in the first line (above) are only equivalent because the squaring removes the - sign. 1 is unique because squaring the positive or negative of it doesn't raise the value. Any other value instead of 1 would not square to the same value. ie (-2)^2 = 4, not 2.
So, subtracting the +1 when bringing it to the left side, when exponents are a multiplication, not additive, operation leaving a net -1, is an erroneous rearrangement of the values.
Quote: WizardQuote: ThatDonGuy
x = 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
For real numbers a and b, ab = 1 if:
(1) a = 1 -> x2 - 15x + 55 = 1 -> (x - 6)(x - 9) = 1 -> x = 6, 9
(2) b = 0 -> x2 - 9x + 20 = 0 -> (x - 4)(x - 5) = 0 -> x = 4,5
(3) a = -1 and b is even
a = -1 -> x2 - 15x + 55 = -1 -> (x - 7)(x - 8) = 0 -> x = 7,8
x = 7 -> b = 72 - 9 * 7 + 20 = 6, which is even, so x = 7 is valid
x = 8 -> b = 82 - 9 * 8 + 20 = 14, which is even, so x = 8 is valid
Congratulations. beer++; to you.
On a related note, where is the flaw in this logic:
(-1)^2 = 1
ln(-1)^2 = ln(1)
2*ln(-1) = 0
ln(-1) = 0
pi*i = 0
exp(pi*i) = exp(0)
-1 = 1
You can’t do the log of a negative number.
Quote: gamerfreakBased on the title of this thread, I thought the answer might be 8675309
Ooh! So did I! I just thought it would be too weird to say so.
Wait. Yep. It is. :-p
The natural log is not a single-valued function when extended to the complex plane, so the "facts" you have used to manipulate and evaluate the log function are fake news.Quote: Wizardln(-1) = 0
Read all about it here (together with more samples of computations like yours):
http://scipp.ucsc.edu/~haber/ph116A/clog_11.pdf
Quote: gamerfreakBased on the title of this thread, I thought the answer might be 8675309
It almost was
Quote: RSYou can’t do the log of a negative number.
Sure you can.
log(-x) = log(x) + n*pi*i, where n is an odd integer.
Your homework is to prove Euler's formula: e^(bi) = cos(b) + i*sin(b)
It's not where n is "an" odd integer, it is where n is "all" odd integers. You can choose a particular region to define it for convenience, but when/if it wraps, your computation will be foiled.Quote: WizardSure you can.
log(-x) = log(x) + n*pi*i, where n is an odd integer.
Your homework is to prove Euler's formula: e^(bi) = cos(b) + i*sin(b)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riemann_surface#/media/File:Riemann_surface_log.svg
I think this is a very esoteric point about Riemann surfaces on which to base a conundrum such as the one you posted.
Or x=$200Quote: gamerfreakBased on the title of this thread, I thought the answer might be 8675309
Quote: WizardSure you can.
log(-x) = log(x) + n*pi*i, where n is an odd integer.
Your homework is to prove Euler's formula: e^(bi) = cos(b) + i*sin(b)
Use Taylor's Theorem (don't ask me to prove that...)
The nth derivative of ex with respect to x is ex
By Taylor's theorem (with respect to x = 0), ebi = 1 + bi + (bi)2 / 2! + (bi)3 / 3! + ...
= (1 + b2i2 / 2! + b4i4 / 4! + b6i6 / 6!+ ...)
+ (bi / 1! + b3i3 / 3! + b5i5 / 5! + b7i7 / 7! + ...)
= (1 - b2 / 2! + b4 / 4! - b6 / 6! + ...) + i (b - b3 / 3! + b5 / 5! - b7 / 7! + ...)
Again by Taylor's theorem, cos b (with respect to 0) = 1 - b2 / 2! + b4 / 4! - b6 / 6! + ...,
and sin b (with respect to 0) = b - b3 / 3! + b5 / 5! - b7 / 7! + ...),
which means cos b + i sin b = (1 - b2 / 2! + b4 / 4! - b6 / 6! + ...) + i (b - b3 / 3! + b5 / 5! - b7 / 7! + ...) = ebi
Quote: ThatDonGuy
Use Taylor's Theorem (don't ask me to prove that...)
The nth derivative of ex with respect to x is ex
By Taylor's theorem (with respect to x = 0), ebi = 1 + bi + (bi)2 / 2! + (bi)3 / 3! + ...
= (1 + b2i2 / 2! + b4i4 / 4! + b6i6 / 6!+ ...)
+ (bi / 1! + b3i3 / 3! + b5i5 / 5! + b7i7 / 7! + ...)
= (1 - b2 / 2! + b4 / 4! - b6 / 6! + ...) + i (b - b3 / 3! + b5 / 5! - b7 / 7! + ...)
Again by Taylor's theorem, cos b (with respect to 0) = 1 - b2 / 2! + b4 / 4! - b6 / 6! + ...,
and sin b (with respect to 0) = b - b3 / 3! + b5 / 5! - b7 / 7! + ...),
which means cos b + i sin b = (1 - b2 / 2! + b4 / 4! - b6 / 6! + ...) + i (b - b3 / 3! + b5 / 5! - b7 / 7! + ...) = ebi
Very good. Actually, I meant the homework assignment for RS, but I doubt very highly he would have even started on it. Hopefully he will carefully go over your answer before claiming you can't take the log of a negative number.
New question: What is ln(degeneres)?
Quote: WizardNew question: What is ln(degeneres)?
Er, is calling an openly LGBTQ person "what" a moderatable offense?
Oh, and if we can't get a Spring Fling together, I have June 16-20 penciled in for Vegas.
Kazi yako ya nyumbani ni kuthibitisha formula ya Euler: e ^ (bi) = cos (b) + i * sin (b)Quote: billryanSadly, I'd understand this thread equally well if the whole thing was in Swahili.
Quote: ThatDonGuyEr, is calling an openly LGBTQ person "what" a moderatable offense?
Hmmm. I didn't think of it that way. How about this wording: solve for x where x=ln(degeneres).