Poll
3 votes (7.69%) | |||
16 votes (41.02%) | |||
11 votes (28.2%) | |||
1 vote (2.56%) | |||
2 votes (5.12%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
1 vote (2.56%) | |||
3 votes (7.69%) | |||
2 votes (5.12%) | |||
5 votes (12.82%) |
39 members have voted
Quote: WizardWhat is the answer to this problem?
However, if we ignore the square root function for the moment (not sure if that's a legal operation, but say it is) and just multiply 4*9, then take the square root of that, the multiplication having wiped out the 2 negative values, then it's the square root of 36, or 6.
Quote: beachbumbabsQuote: WizardWhat is the answer to this problem?
I don't think it's possible to have a square root of a negative number, because any 2 negs multiplied are a positive number.
However, if we ignore the square root function for the moment (not sure if that's a legal operation, but say it is) and just multiply 4*9, then take the square root of that, the multiplication having wiped out the 2 negative values, then it's the square root of 36, or 6.
Sqrt{-4} * Sqrt{-9} = Sqrt{-4 * -9}
= Sqrt{36}
= ± 6
(I apologize if the character ± doesn't come through correctly. It is supposed to be the +/- symbol.)
Alternatively:
Sqrt{-4} * Sqrt{-9} = (Sqrt{4} * Sqrt{-1}) * (Sqrt{9} * Sqrt{-1})
= (±2 * i) * (±3 * i )
= ±6 * i^2
= ±6 * -1
= ±6
This leads to the poll answer of "Either 6 or -6", but I'm not certain that is correct. Senility can be a bitch.
2i * 3i or 2 * 3 * i * i or 2 * 3 * -1 = -6
I don't see how it could be 6, but it's late and I'm not going to work it out any more than once tonight
Quote: TomG
2i * 3i or 2 * 3 * i * i or 2 * 3 * -1 = -6
I don't see how it could be 6, but it's late and I'm not going to work it out any more than once tonight
multiply what ever is in the sq rt first and you get sq rt of 36, which could be either 6 or -6
(-4)^1/2 * (-9)^1/2 =
2i * 3i =
6i^2 =
6 * (-1)^1/2
Quote: RSi think:
(-4)^1/2 * (-9)^1/2 =
2i * 3i =
6i^2 =
6 * (-1)^1/2
something wrong going from line 3 to line 4
i^2 is already -1
Quote: WizardWhat is the answer to this problem?
Last edited by: davethebuilder on Apr 26, 2016Casino Enemy No.1
= √(-1)*(4)√(-1)*(9)
= √-1*√4*√-1*√9
= i*2*i*3
= 2i*3i
= (2i)*(3i)
= (2*3)*(i*i)
= 6*i²
= -6
Apologies - moderators, please hide this in a spoiler. (done...BBB)
I won't try to answer, as it throws me to think a negative times a negative is negative
Quote: WizardWhat is the answer to this problem?
√4 = ?
would the proper answer have been 2 or ±2 ?
(And yes, I finally found the √ character on my keyboard. Hope it comes through as a square root function symbol. I'm not sure that these extended characters always look the same to everyone.)
This was precisely my thinking...Quote: TomG
2i * 3i or 2 * 3 * i * i or 2 * 3 * -1 = -6
I don't see how it could be 6, but it's late and I'm not going to work it out any more than once tonight
√-9 = i√9 = 3i
Thus, you have i*2*i*3, which is the same as 2i*3i or 3*2*i^2...
i^2 = -1, thus, you have 3*2*-1 = -6
The easiest way, which shouldn't give much headache is to realize that this is the square root of (-4)(-9), or 36. The square root of 36 is, of course, +-6.
Alternatively, if you take the roots independently, you get (+-2i)(+-3i). Multiplying these, you'll get +-(-6), which is +-6.
(2i)2 = -4, but (-2i)2 = -4 as well.
Therefore, both 2i and -2i are square roots of -4, just as 2 and -2 are both square roots of 4.
Similarly, (3i)2 = -9, but (-3i)2 = -9 as well.
Therefore, both 3i and -3i are square roots of -9.
2i x 3i = -6
2i x (-3i) = 6
(-2i) x 3i = 6
(-2i) x (-3i) = -6
Therefore, the solutions are 6 and -6.
But I prefer math questions that have one correct answer, positive or negative.
And the end of a session the bankroll is up or down, I have not seen it be both, yet ;-)
Quote: CrystalMath
The easiest way, which shouldn't give much headache is to realize that this is the square root of (-4)(-9), or 36. The square root of 36 is, of course, +-6.
Alternatively, if you take the roots independently, you get (+-2i)(+-3i). Multiplying these, you'll get +-(-6), which is +-6.
Yay CM! I've missed you!
Taking the square root of each number gives you 2i * 3i = 6i2
Since i = sq. root of -1, i2 = -1, and 6 * -1 = -6
sqrt(-4) * sqrt(-9) =
sqrt(4) * sqrt(-1) * sqrt(-9) * sqrt(-1) =
+/- 2 * i * +/- 3 * i =
+/- 6 * -1 =
-/+ 6 =
6 or -6
Okay, Eliot, bring it on.
sqrt(-4) * sqrt(-9) =
sqrt(4) * sqrt(i) * sqrt(-9) * sqrt(i) = ....
I suspect he meant:
sqrt(-4) * sqrt(-9) =
sqrt(4) * sqrt(-1) * sqrt(9) * sqrt(-1) =
sqrt(4) * i * sqrt(9) * i = ....
But I shouldn't try to put words in his mouth.
Quote: RSi think:
(-4)^1/2 * (-9)^1/2 =
2i * 3i =
6i^2 =
6 * (-1)^1/2
Edit:
Should be:
6i^2 = 6 * i^2 = 6 * -1 = -6
-6
Not seeing how to get +6...?
-6.
I typically interpret the square root sign to mean only the positive root, so if you asked me for sqrt(25) I'd simply say 5, not "5 or -5." In this case I interpret it to mean the root with a positive sign associated, so I end up with 2i*3i = -6
Or you could pull out the negatives to change it to sqrt(4)*sqrt(-1)*sqrt(9)*sqrt(-1) = 2*i*3*i = -6.
Quote: DocI disagree with part of the Wizard's solution.
You're right.
Poor mathematical advice.Quote: MathExtremistand that meaning is "the principal square root". http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SquareRoot.html . The answer to the question as written is -6.
From Wolfram? Surely you jest.Quote: TheGrimReaper13Poor mathematical advice.Quote: MathExtremistand that meaning is "the principal square root". http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SquareRoot.html . The answer to the question as written is -6.
Nope:Quote: TheGrimReaper13Surely, you paraphrase.
Quote: Wolfram MathWorldFor example, the principal square root of 9 is , while the other square root of 9 is .
...
For example, using the imaginary unit i, the two square roots of -9 are . The principal square root of a number z is denoted (as in the positive real case) and is returned by the Wolfram Language function Sqrt[z].
The point is that if the problem had been asking for both square roots of -9, it would have been denoted . Then you can get to +/- 6.
Au contraire. I learned something there. The same assertion as to the meaning of that 'radical' sign is made here: https://www.mathsisfun.com/square-root.htmlQuote: TheGrimReaper13Poor mathematical advice.Quote: MathExtremistand that meaning is "the principal square root". http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SquareRoot.html . The answer to the question as written is -6.
Quote:Well the square root of 25 could be −5 or +5.
But when we use the radical symbol √ we only give the positive (or zero) result.
Example: What is √36 ?
Answer: 6 × 6 = 36, so √36 = 6
Based on that definition, fwiw, I believe the Wizards answer is uncharacteristically wrong!!!
The question isn't about, "any non-negative real number x... ."
Quote: TheGrimReaper13The question isn't about, "any non-negative real number x... ."
The question IS about a specific mathematical formula using very specific symbols such as the 'minus' sign '-' and the 'radical' sign '√' in a specific written order.
Just as the order of precedence is an explicit and integral part of Mathematics, so is the very explicit meanings and usage of those symbols.
I was not previously aware that the √ deliberately restricts the resolved square root to one of the two possible values, but I do accept that that is exactly what the definitions that I can locate are telling me.
I would SO LOVE to see Mike pop by to either confirm that his answer is incorrect, or else to dispute the assertion that he was wrong, citing definitions that go to the heart of the question.
Quote: DocI think that a number of the "solutions" shown behind spoilers have made the same assumption, and I am not sure whether it is correct. They seem to
assume that √X means "the positive square root of X", which is the way I have sometimes heard it used. If that is the case, then I am not sure what symbol is properly used for "the square root of X." If the question had simply been
√4 = ?
would the proper answer have been 2 or ±2 ?
(And yes, I finally found the √ character on my keyboard. Hope it comes through as a square root function symbol. I'm not sure that these extended characters always look the same to everyone.)
√4 = 2
√4 <> -2
Because, apparently, and remarkably the √ does not mean 'square root of' but does mean 'positive square root of'
Quote: OnceDearI would SO LOVE to see Mike pop by to either confirm that his answer is incorrect, or else to dispute the assertion that he was wrong, citing definitions that go to the heart of the question.
If the Wizard's answer (as amended by my earlier post) is incorrect, then I think it is only by the interpretation of the √symbol, as I questioned on page 2 & OnceDear quoted in another post above, and which has become a topic of discussion. If that really is the case, it certainly appears that MathExtremist and CrystalMath have taken opposite sides.
Quote: DocIf the Wizard's answer (as amended by my earlier post) is incorrect, then I think it is only by the interpretation of the √symbol, as I questioned on page 2 & OnceDear quoted in another post above, and which has become a topic of discussion. If that really is the case, it certainly appears that MathExtremist and CrystalMath have taken opposite sides.
It's indeed absolutely remarkable. I had never been aware of the interpretation of the √symbol to mean what I now determine it to mean, so up until this morning, I would have sided with Wizard. But such maths symbols only have one meaning. It's just a matter now of agreeing which and who's definition of that meaning has the greatest authority. Wikipedia and Wolfram define it but I acknowledge that they are not authoritative. DIN1302 might seem a place to start. . . . or ISO 80000-2 which in item number 2-9.11 has this to say ...
"The symbol √a should be avoided"
http://www.ise.ncsu.edu/jwilson/files/mathsigns.pdf
the square root of -4 has no solution by itself
the square root of -9 has no solution by itself
however, the square root of -4 times the square root of -9 does have a solution
?????????????
Quote: DocIf the Wizard's answer (as amended by my earlier post) is incorrect, then I think it is only by the interpretation of the √symbol, as I questioned on page 2 & OnceDear quoted in another post above, and which has become a topic of discussion. If that really is the case, it certainly appears that MathExtremist and CrystalMath have taken opposite sides.
I often learn things from MathExtremist.
I had no idea that I could not simply multiply the numbers under the radical before computing the square root. √-4 * √-9 does not equal √36, since one is positive and the other negative.
Quote: odiousgambitIf I can take away anything from this, may I ask if this conclusion is right?
the square root of -4 has no solution by itself
the square root of -9 has no solution by itself
however, the square root of -4 times the square root of -9 does have a solution
?????????????
ODG,
the square root of -4 has solution = (±4 x square root of -1) =±4i Unless you use the √ symbol which restricts us to +4i
If you are familiar with complex numbers where -1^0.5 has the value i ( or j in engineering parlance) then all is clear(er). But not everyone is familiar with complex numbers so don't beat yourself up about it if you are one of those people. Seldom relevant in a casino setting $:o)
Quote: MathExtremistThe point is that if the problem had been asking for both square roots of -9, it would have been denoted . Then you can get to +/- 6.
I must admit that this business of the primary square root is new to me. If I can take this as true, then my answer posted earlier would be wrong. Wikipedia backs up ME's position on this.
Quote: WikipediaEvery positive number a has two square roots: √a, which is positive, and −√a, which is negative. Together, these two roots are denoted ± √a (see ± shorthand). Although the principal square root of a positive number is only one of its two square roots, the designation "the square root" is often used to refer to the principal square root.
Don't bother. It's got no atmosphere.Quote: WizardI'll go.
____________
\ /
\ / 9
\ /
Solution is ONLY +3?
For it to be -3, there would have to be a minus '-' sign to the left of the funny shape (radical?)??
And for +/-3, it'd have to have a +/- sign in front of the radical?
Instead of 9, what if it's -9?
Answer can only be 3i, still? Something quoted above made it seem like it only counted or something if the number was positive..not sure if that means the number inside the radical must be positive....or if it's talking about the sign to the left of the radical?
"Principal Square RootQuote: TwoFeathersATLThere seems to still be some confusion on this, someone said it was 'common' in engineering circles. Are we still planning to send men/women to Mars? Have any of you volunteered to go?
The unique non-negative square root of a non-negative real number. For example, the principal square root of 9 is 3, although both -3 and 3 are square roots of 9.
The concept of principal square root cannot be extended to real negative numbers since the two square roots of a negative number cannot be distinguished until one of the two is defined as the imaginary unit, at which point +i and -i can then be distinguished. Since either choice is possible, there is no ambiguity in defining i as "the" square root of -1."
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PrincipalSquareRoot.html
What this amounts to is that imaginary numbers aren't inherently positive or negative. Like Hawking's concept of imaginary time with no beginning or end; like the extended complex numbers have -infinity = +infinity; like i^2 = +1 in the semi-quaternions.
Which leads us to the trouble with "cherry picking" math problems on gambling forums, or the internet, itself, for that matter.
"Since either choice is possible... ."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xi4kP_KGo9A
My middle initial.Quote: AxelWolfSince its imaginary I imagine you're missing an H.
Regarding the topic at hand, when I was in high school I was taught that sqrt(x^2) = +/- x. Were my teachers wrong or has the square root convention changed since the early 1980's?
p.s. How do you make the square root symbol?
Quote: Wizard...Regarding the topic at hand, when I was in high school I was taught that sqrt(x^2) = +/- x. Were my teachers wrong or has the square root convention changed since the early 1980's?...
I was taught in high school in the late 60s that real numbers have two square roots but that by convention the expression with the radical sign always evaluates to a positive or zero value, so √(x2) = |x|.
Quote: Wizardp.s. How do you make the square root symbol?
To make √, I cut and pasted it from Excel.
Quote: WizardPosts about going to Mars have been moved to WHO WILL VOLUNTEER TO GO TO MARS? (SPLIT-OFF).
Regarding the topic at hand, when I was in high school I was taught that sqrt(x^2) = +/- x. Were my teachers wrong or has the square root convention changed since the early 1980's?
p.s. How do you make the square root symbol?
On your keyboard type 221A then hit Alt and x at the same time.