November 8th, 2015 at 6:15:46 AM
permalink
Could anyone tell me the probability of having a 1, 2 and 3 all spin before a 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 or 9 spins? And could those probabilities be broken down further, to include if the 1 would spin last of the 3 ones? Thanks in advance.
November 8th, 2015 at 6:19:53 AM
permalink
Quote: allinriverkingCould anyone tell me the probability of having a 1, 2 and 3 all spin before a 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 or 9 spins? And could those probabilities be broken down further, to include if the 1 would spin last of the 3 ones? Thanks in advance.
Yes they could. There are a lot of smart math guys who could do that here.
I expect that exactly zero of them want to, and one of them (at least) will, and after they do, nobody will be any better off.
There is no math that you can learn that will reduce the cost of playing roulette without reducing the amount that you bet on it.
There is one exception to that rule, and that would be if you happen to like to play ( 0, 00, 1, 2, 3 ) In this case, it's better to make a lower percentage cost bet. All the others are the same.
Roulette is one of the simplest games in the casino and if you don't understand the math of roulette, you have no business doing math trying to improve your chances to win at any game in the casino.
Some people consider all gambling a regressive tax on the mentally inept and/or math-challenged.
I don't. But for roulette, I have to make an exception.
Do yourself a favor and quit gambling and find a less expensive and more satisfying hobby. That's my advice.
aahigh.com
November 8th, 2015 at 6:46:04 AM
permalink
Quote: allinriverkingCould anyone tell me the probability of having a 1, 2 and 3 all spin before a 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 or 9 spins? And could those probabilities be broken down further, to include if the 1 would spin last of the 3 ones? Thanks in advance.
Your second part of the question is easy. It is 3 times whatever you figure out for the answer to the main question.
The probability of having a 1, 2 or 3 spin before the six other numbers is 3 in 9. Once that has happened the probability of having one of the two remaining numbers spin before your 6 bad numbers is 2 in 8. Once that has happened the probability of the last number spinning before your 6 bad numbers is 1 in 7.
So.... 3/9 x 2/8 x 1/7 = 1/84, or approximately 1.2%
If you require '1' to be the last number, it is then 1/252, or approximately 0.4%
I hope one of the real math guys can tell me if I did this right!.
November 8th, 2015 at 7:42:38 AM
permalink
Thanks Soopoo,
I thought that might be the way, I also thought at first
3/6×2/6×1/6=6/216=1/36=2.78%
I thought that might be the way, I also thought at first
3/6×2/6×1/6=6/216=1/36=2.78%
November 8th, 2015 at 8:49:05 AM
permalink
I'm reading Q1 as all of 1 2 and 3 have to spin before any 4 thru 9 (but repeats of 1 2 or 3 are allowed). The chances are 3/9 * 2/8 * 1/7 = 1 / 84. The chances of the 1 being last are, by symmetry, 1 in 3; hence Q2 = 1 / 252. So yes I agree with the answer above.Quote: allinriverking...the probability of having a 1, 2 and 3 all spin before a 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 or 9 spins?....the 1 would spin last of the 3 ones?...
November 8th, 2015 at 10:26:48 AM
permalink
My interpretation of the question is what is the probability that the numbers 1, 2, and 3 will all be spun within x spins. Here is my answer:
The general formula for this kind of question is:
Pr(A and B and C) = Pr(A) + Pr(B) + Pr(C) - Pr(A and B) - Pr(A and C) - Pr(B and C) + Pr(A and B and C)
Spins | single-zero | double-zero |
---|---|---|
3 | 0.000118 | 0.000109 |
4 | 0.000455 | 0.000420 |
5 | 0.001091 | 0.001009 |
6 | 0.002094 | 0.001939 |
7 | 0.003518 | 0.003261 |
8 | 0.005404 | 0.005016 |
9 | 0.007785 | 0.007234 |
10 | 0.010684 | 0.009937 |
15 | 0.033231 | 0.031066 |
20 | 0.068639 | 0.064476 |
25 | 0.114718 | 0.108254 |
30 | 0.168563 | 0.159750 |
35 | 0.227272 | 0.216265 |
40 | 0.288292 | 0.275379 |
45 | 0.349548 | 0.335089 |
50 | 0.409453 | 0.393835 |
55 | 0.466865 | 0.450467 |
60 | 0.521017 | 0.504191 |
65 | 0.571445 | 0.554501 |
70 | 0.617922 | 0.601122 |
75 | 0.660393 | 0.643951 |
80 | 0.698930 | 0.683016 |
85 | 0.733693 | 0.718435 |
90 | 0.764897 | 0.750386 |
95 | 0.792791 | 0.779086 |
100 | 0.817638 | 0.804773 |
The general formula for this kind of question is:
Pr(A and B and C) = Pr(A) + Pr(B) + Pr(C) - Pr(A and B) - Pr(A and C) - Pr(B and C) + Pr(A and B and C)
"For with much wisdom comes much sorrow." -- Ecclesiastes 1:18 (NIV)
November 10th, 2015 at 9:36:42 AM
permalink
Quote: Wizard
Pr(A and B and C) = Pr(A) + Pr(B) + Pr(C) - Pr(A and B) - Pr(A and C) - Pr(B and C) + Pr(A and B and C)
You mean P(A or B or C) on the left hand side.
In this case it's easiest to take 1 minus the probability of not getting all 3, so that would be
P(A and B and C) = 1 - P(A' or B' or C')
where the ' means not.
= 1 - [P(A') + P(B') + P(C') - P(A' and B') - P(A' and C') - P(B' and C' ) + P(A' and B' and C')
Since A,B and C have the same probability here, this is
1 - [3*P(A') - 3*P(A' and B') + P(A' and B' and C')]
With N the total numbers (37 for European and 38 for American), and s= number of spins, this is
1 - [3*((N-1)/N)^s - 3*((N-2)/N)^s + ((N-3)/N)^s].
And picking a random ones, like N = 38 and s = 10, it looks like that agrees with what you computed.