Poll
1 vote (1.72%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
14 votes (24.13%) | |||
39 votes (67.24%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
1 vote (1.72%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
1 vote (1.72%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
2 votes (3.44%) |
58 members have voted
There are two coins in a bag. One is white on one side and black on the other. The other is white on both sides.
You randomly draw one coin, and observe one side only, which is white.
What is the probability the other side of that coin is white?
Please put solutions in
There are only 2 coins and by flipping the selected coin over once (1 time) you now have created a 1 in 2 chance that the other side is white.
I know you posted this one a while back but it was a bit different, with heads and tails and one coin having two heads or something like this. I didn't remember the answer which is why I am participating here and giving my honest guess.
You have an equal chance of seeing A, B, or C.
If it is A or B, the other side is white; if it is C, the other side is black. 2/3.
Quote: WizardThis is by far the most controversial problem on my mathproblems. I don't post it here because I don't know the answer, but for the edification and education of the rest of the forum.
There are two coins in a bag. One is white on one side and black on the other. The other is white on both sides.
You randomly draw one coin, and observe one side only, which is white.
What is the probability the other side of that coin is white?
Please put solutions in.Have a nice day
You should rephrase that second sentence.
But here's the
2/3. There are three coin-sides that are white, and black appears on the other side on only one of them. Therefore white appears on the other two sides.
This is equivalently demonstrated, but perhaps more intuitively, with a four-sided top (e.g. a dreidel) with three white sides and one black side. What are the chances that a spin of such a top, if it lands on a white side, has a white side face down? The same logic as above applies: there are three ways for a white side to land face-up, and in two of those, another white side will be face down.
The equivalence between the two coins and the four-sided top is as follows: label the black side of the coin 1 and the opposite white side 3. Label the white/white coin 2/4. Then label the black side of the top 1 and the other three sides 2/3/4.
"I am Jerry Logan"
lol
I think you are wrong and this is why...Quote: MathExtremistBut here's the
2/3. There are three coin-sides that are white, and black appears on the other side on only one of them. Therefore white appears on the other two sides.
This is equivalently demonstrated, but perhaps more intuitively, with a four-sided top (e.g. a dreidel) with three white sides and one black side. What are the chances that a spin of such a top, if it lands on a white side, has a white side face down? The same logic as above applies: there are three ways for a white side to land face-up, and in two of those, another white side will be face down.
The equivalence between the two coins and the four-sided top is as follows: label the black side of the coin 1 and the opposite white side 3. Label the white/white coin 2/4. Then label the black side of the top 1 and the other three sides 2/3/4.
Demonstration:
Coin 1
White Side
X
Black Side
still remaining
Coin 2
White Side
X
White Side
still remaining
See, once we select 1 coin and we see that it is white, the only options we have left are that the other side is either black or white. 1 white out of 2 options remain.
Quote: WizardWhat is the probability the other side of that coin is white?
This sounds familiar so if I get it right, it's not because of any genius. It's probably rotting in some memory bank in my brain somewhere. Let's see if I can pull it out intact.
White Heads/White Tails
White Tails/White Heads
White/Black
Black/White
We discard all possibilities that have us draw the black side of the coin so:
White Heads/White Tails
White Tails/White Heads
White/Black
Black/White
That leaves three allowed possibilities:
White Heads/White Tails
White Tails/White Heads
White/Black
So the answer is 2/3
You left out one important item HBQuote: HotBlondeI think you are wrong and this is why...
When you have selected 1 coin the other coin is now disregarded and has no part in this any more. The other coin has now been eliminated and we're talking about just the one coin. Since we know both coins have one side that is always going to be white (and this is what we ended up observing when we selected a coin showing the white side) we now know that it is only a 50/50 chance that the other side is either going to be black or it's going to be white. Which is why the answer is 1/2.
Demonstration:
Coin 1
White Side
X
Black Side
still remaining
Coin 2
White Side
X
White Side
still remaining
See, once we select 1 coin and we see that it is white, the only options we have left are that the other side is either black or white. 1 white out of 2 options remain.
Quote: HotBlonde
See, once we select 1 coin and we see that it is white, the only options we have left are that the other side is either black or white. 1 white out of 2 options remain.
If the dreidel example didn't convince you, let's color the sides. Instead of white, white, white, and black, make it red, yellow, blue, and black. Except you don't know which of the colors are on the opposite side of the black side, and there's a gremlin in the bag that repaints the three colors after each turn. The question is now:
You reach into a bag and pull out a coin, colored side up. What is the probability that the other side is colored?
This is exactly the same problem. Does your answer change?
If there were three coins that were white on both sides and one coin that was black on both sides, then having drawn a white coin, the probability of drawing another white coin is 2/3.
The probability of drawing a coin white side up is 3/4, having done that, you've eliminated one White side and one possibility, leaving 2/3.
Aw, phewy! :-PQuote: WizardI forgot that I posted this before. Evidently this is a bright group, as the majority are right.
- edit - Oops
Quote: WizardThis is by far the most controversial problem on my mathproblems. I don't post it here because I don't know the answer, but for the edification and education of the rest of the forum.
There are two coins in a bag. One is white on one side and black on the other. The other is white on both sides.
You randomly draw one coin, and observe one side only, which is white.
What is the probability the other side of that coin is white?
Please put solutions in.Have a nice day
I think To make the puzzle more fun and more difficult, the question may be put down as:
There are 3 coins in a bag. One is white on one side and black on the other. The other 2 is white on both sides.
You randomly draw one coin, and observe one side only, which is white.
What is the probability the other side of that coin is white?
Question.... A woman has two children, (not identical twins). One of them is a boy, what are the odds that the other one is a boy? Of course the answer is 1/3, but you can imagine that virtually everyone you ask will blurt out 1/2.
I finally figured it out in a way that I understand, to get the answer of 2 in 3.
You pull a coin with the white side facing up out of the bag.
you are either looking at:
the only white side of the white/black coin. the bottom is black.
one white side of the white/white coin. the bottom is white.
the other white side of the white/white coin. the bottom is white.
Quote: SOOPOOOn August 8, 2010, I proposed essentially this very question, which is my favorite 'simple problem'. I titled the thread, SIMPLE PROBLEM. It goes something like this.... Assumption... boys and girls are born with equal frequncies.
Question.... A woman has two children, (not identical twins). One of them is a boy, what are the odds that the other one is a boy? Of course the answer is 1/3, but you can imagine that virtually everyone you ask will blurt out 1/2.
That's because the question can be interpreted in different ways. If, by "one of them is a boy," you are referring to a specific child (e.g. the older of the two), then the answer is 1/2. This is what causes the Monty Hall Problem to be so confusing - the intended answer assumes that, when you say, "Monty opens a door and shows (something besides the grand prize)," his choice of door was arbitrary (to be sure it would not be the prize) and not random.
Also, when you say, "One of them is a boy," it can be inferred that "only one of them is a boy," in which case the answer is zero.
Quote: ThatDonGuyThat's because the question can be interpreted in different ways. If, by "one of them is a boy," you are referring to a specific child (e.g. the older of the two), then the answer is 1/2. This is what causes the Monty Hall Problem to be so confusing - the intended answer assumes that, when you say, "Monty opens a door and shows (something besides the grand prize)," his choice of door was arbitrary (to be sure it would not be the prize) and not random.
Also, when you say, "One of them is a boy," it can be inferred that "only one of them is a boy," in which case the answer is zero.
I don't know why you would think when I say 'one of them is a boy' that would in any way infer I was talking about a specific child. Quite the opposite, that is why I specifically used the words I did. And if I meant the facts to be that "only' one of them was a boy, I would have used the word 'only'.
I stand by the question.... and the answer....
Quote: MrCasinoGamesI think To make the puzzle more fun and more difficult, the question may be put down as:
There are 3 coins in a bag. One is white on one side and black on the other. The other 2 is white on both sides.
That is the way many people tell it. However, it is easy to eliminate the all-black coin as a possibility. Adding it seems to be unnecessarily adding useless information.
Quote: SOOPOOQuestion.... A woman has two children, (not identical twins). One of them is a boy, what are the odds that the other one is a boy? Of course the answer is 1/3, but you can imagine that virtually everyone you ask will blurt out 1/2.
It is asked that way a lot too. Actually, it is a slightly different problem. Both can still be solved simply using Bayes.
If you go this way I think you should make it more clear it is a random woman drawn out of the population of all women with two children, except those with two girls.
Quote: WizardI think you should make it more clear it is a random woman drawn out of the population of all women with two children, except those with two girls.
I would say that the answer is 1/2 if you don't specify that statement.
Quote: pacomartinI would say that the answer is 1/2 if you don't specify that statement.
Isn't it technically neither 1/2 nor 1/3 but based on the actual gender split at the time the question is being asked? It's a qualitatively different question than the coin question. In the coin question, you know the whole population. But in the child question, you're assuming that the probabilities for a woman having two children (in order) are p(boy,girl) = p(girl,boy) = p(girl,girl), which is almost certainly not true.
To play the lawyer: it does not say how you choose the side you observe. Everybody assumed it was at random. But it could be a "Monty Hall"-like problem, where the operator deliberately chooses the white side to show to you, in the event you drew the bicolor coin.Quote: WizardYou randomly draw one coin, and observe one side only, which is white.
Then the answer is not the same.
Quote: kubikulannTo play the lawyer: it does not say how you choose the side you observe. Everybody assumed it was at random. But it could be a "Monty Hall"-like problem, where the operator deliberately chooses the white side to show to you, in the event you drew the bicolor coin.
Then the answer is not the same.
You sound like the kind of annoying frequentist statisticians who are never satisfied with anything I write when asking a probability question. They will never concisely explain how to correctly ask a question, but send pages and pages explaining why a simple statement was in error.
???Quote: WizardYou sound like the kind of annoying frequentist statisticians who are never satisfied .
Sorry if I upset you.
I don't mean any harm. Just thinking out loud, developing an interesting question in new directions.
Your statement is in no way "in error". I'm just pointing to the fact that there are two possibilities. This is, by the way, the reason why many people have difficulties in grasping the Monty Hall problem: they assume Monty draws at random.
I am VERY SATISFIED with everything you write. And hurt that you have felt hurt. You make me think, and I just share it with you.
Quote: kubikulannI am VERY SATISFIED with everything you write. And hurt that you have felt hurt. You make me think, and I just share it with you.
Sorry if my tone wasn't clear. I wasn't annoyed at all. I thought you were deliberately being argumentative in a lawyerly kind of way, so I responded in jest. No hard feelings at all.
I like the 1/2 answer.
Once the coin is drawn and white is seen ( a 3/4 chance), then that probability is done. If it is carried on to determine the color of the other side it leads to the 2/3 answer. I feel that these are separate events.
It is a bit like looking at two coins tossed, seeing one is heads and asking what is the chance that the other is heads? Is it 1/2 because each throw is independent, or is it 1/3 chance, because HH has 1/4 for two coins tossed and TT can be ruled out. I feel it is 1/2 because once given information about one result they become separate events.
Basically the drawing and seeing white has one probability, and then the color of the opposite side (once white seen) becomes a separate and independent probability.
To calculate the second probability I can ask which coin was chosen? Is it White with white or White with Black (only two coins in bag) so 1/2 is my answer.
The 2/3 answer implies that there are 2/3 ways to draw the white/white coin and only 1/3 ways to draw the white/black coin from a bag?
Quote: 1call2manyI know this is an old thread that probably no one cares about anymore, but I liked it and want to throw in my 2 cents.
I like the 1/2 answer.
Once the coin is drawn and white is seen ( a 3/4 chance), then that probability is done. If it is carried on to determine the color of the other side it leads to the 2/3 answer. I feel that these are separate events.
It is a bit like looking at two coins tossed, seeing one is heads and asking what is the chance that the other is heads? Is it 1/2 because each throw is independent, or is it 1/3 chance, because HH has 1/4 for two coins tossed and TT can be ruled out. I feel it is 1/2 because once given information about one result they become separate events.
Basically the drawing and seeing white has one probability, and then the color of the opposite side (once white seen) becomes a separate and independent probability.
To calculate the second probability I can ask which coin was chosen? Is it White with white or White with Black (only two coins in bag) so 1/2 is my answer.
The 2/3 answer implies that there are 2/3 ways to draw the white/white coin and only 1/3 ways to draw the white/black coin from a bag?
This is a conditional probability problem.. i.e. given one piece of infomation.. what can i infer?
it would be easy to confirm the 2/3 answer experimentally. Since this is a gambiling site this is my experiment.
bet $1
draw a coin and flip it if the black side shows the bet pushes. If the coin flip is white.. check the otherside.. you win 3:2 if it is black. and you lose if it is white.
This would be a bad bet.. fair odds would be 2:1. This is the kindof situation that we are trying to describe with the p(w|w)=2/3 answer.
I'm not sure i understand your experiment, you said "draw a coin and flip it". Did you mean look at it and only flip if it was white?
Quote: 1call2manyI may try it experimentally.
I'm not sure i understand your experiment, you said "draw a coin and flip it". Did you mean look at it and only flip if it was white?
draw the coin and flip it regardless.. if it is face up black that is a push. put the coin back in the bag and draw one of the two again.
if it lands face up white.. look at the other side of the coin and resolve the bet. white=lose black=pay. then put the coin back in the bag and draw again.
The results were B first 29, W first 71, W Flipside 51, B Flipside 20
The results are quite clear that I (and other 1/2 proponents) are wrong. Black was viewed first 29/100, close to the expected 1/4. Of the 71 times that white was seen first white was seen on the flip side 51/71 to blacks 20/71, pretty close to the 2/3 answer for flip side white. It became obvious as the trials went on that flip side black was difficult to get as there was only really a 1/4 chance of getting it (20/100 experimentally) because I had a 1/2 chance of choosing the W/B coin and then another 1/2 chance the W is up.
Quote: 1call2many
To calculate the second probability I can ask which coin was chosen? Is it White with white or White with Black (only two coins in bag) so 1/2 is my answer.
The 2/3 answer implies that there are 2/3 ways to draw the white/white coin and only 1/3 ways to draw the white/black coin from a bag?
This is an awesome thread!
The problem is you don't know which coin was chosen---
You could be looking at side 1 of the white/white coin. = other side is white
You could be looking at side 2 of the white/white coin. = other side is white
You could be looking at side 1 of the white/black coin. = other side is black
2 out of 3 will be white.
It took me a little to fully grasp this concept. Thanks to all for explaining their thoughts. Kudos on doing the experiment Icall2many.
The question asked:
You randomly draw one coin and observe one side only which is white. What is the probabilty that the other side of that coin is white? [My emphasis.]
The question many posters thnk was asked but was not:
If you randomly draw a coin and observe one side only as white, what is the probability the other side will be white?
1/1 (given) x 1/2 (two coins) = 50%
3/4 (white sides) x 2/3 (white sides) = 6/12 = 50% chances you would see two white sides chosen randomly
There is never a 2/3 chance of anything.
I present logic to the contrary in my post above, under the question not asked that many thought was.Quote: SonuvabishThere is never a 2/3 chance of anything.
Quote: BleedingChipsSlowlyI present logic to the contrary in my post above, under the question not asked that many thought was.
I read it, but I don't agree. If you are saying you pull both coins out and look only at one, which is always white, then randomly guess which one of three sides is white, then there is a 2/3 chance you are right. Regardless, your thinking is obviously superior to most of the forum!
Quote: JoePloppyThis is an awesome thread!
The problem is you don't know which coin was chosen---
You could be looking at side 1 of the white/white coin. = other side is white
You could be looking at side 2 of the white/white coin. = other side is white
You could be looking at side 1 of the white/black coin. = other side is blackI'm a bigot
Dude, you think there is a greater than 67% chance you chose a random coin out of 2 possible coins? If I have an all white quarter, and a quarter painted white only on heads, and i randomly choose 1, what are the chances I will flip two black tails in a row?
Quote: SonuvabishQuote: JoePloppyThis is an awesome thread!
The problem is you don't know which coin was chosen---
You could be looking at side 1 of the white/white coin. = other side is white
You could be looking at side 2 of the white/white coin. = other side is white
You could be looking at side 1 of the white/black coin. = other side is blackI'm a bigot
Dude, you think there is a greater than 67% chance you chose a random coin out of 2 possible coins? If I have an all white quarter, and a quarter painted white only on heads, and i randomly choose 1, what are the chances I will flip two black tails in a row?
I think you need to reread the question, dude. And for the record, 2/3 is LESS than 67%
Perfencly fine, I'm not always right. Thank you for taking the time to read what I wrote.Quote: SonuvabishI read it, but I don't agree.
I am smart enough to know that that is not true. Several forum members could kick my ass, logically speaking, standing on one foot with one hand tied behind their back. If it's any solice I had to think long and hard about this problem. Actually, the basic logic was presented in another thread I posted to involving the probabilty that a second child would be a boy. Anyway, having spent some time teaching I do think I have a knack for presenting problems in a way that fosters insight.Quote: SonuvabishRegardless, your thinking is obviously superior to most of the forum!
Ok, big boy, let's you and me have it out. At the bar. No pythons, no pit bulls. Smoke if you would like. $100 buyin to make it interesting. We use a sack with two coins, one white on both sides, the other black on one side and white on the other. For each round you wager $3 and I wager $5. An impartial chimp draws one of the coins and slaps it down on the table. If the upside is black it's a push. If the upside is white the flip side decides the winner. If the flip side is white I win your $3. I f the flip side is black you get my $5. Are you in?
No controversy, I'm just a kind old soul that wants to give away my money.Quote: RSIt's 1/2. How is this controversial?