Asswhoopermcdaddy
Asswhoopermcdaddy
  • Threads: 87
  • Posts: 566
Joined: Nov 30, 2009
February 6th, 2012 at 3:59:27 PM permalink
So the NJ lotto recently changed their rules and odds. Before you could buy a ticket for $1. Now it costs $2 to start.

According to the disclaimer, odds of hitting the jackpot drop from 1 in 195mm to 175mm.

The old field pick is 5 in a field of 59 and 1 in a field of 39.
The new field is pick 5 in a field of 59 and 1 in a field of 35.

Now, assuming you would normally buy $2 worth of powerball tickets, your odds off winning under the old method would be 2/195mm= 1 in 97.5mm.

Isn't this far worse now (based purely on hitting the jackpot and not caring about other miscellaneous lower denominated prizes)?

Now here's the biggest question, and the most interesting point of debate. If a person is only willing to buy a $2 worth of powerball tickets under the old method, when the jackpot is in excess of $150mm, how much does the jackpot have to be under the new method to get the same impact.

The way I was thinking about this was that under the old method, nothing really changes about the odds. The x factor is the "willingness to purchase". If you agree with the stated odds of 1 in 195mm and a starting jackpot at 150mm, is it fair to say that the relationship is pro-portional to the adjusted odds? Meaning that true odds for a $2 bet equates to 150mm/97.5mm= $1.53mm per odds. If so, then under the new rules, you would be willing to make a bet only when the jackpot is in excess of $267mm (1.53*175mm)?

What do you all think?
Ibeatyouraces
Ibeatyouraces
  • Threads: 68
  • Posts: 11933
Joined: Jan 12, 2010
February 6th, 2012 at 4:53:42 PM permalink
deleted
DUHHIIIIIIIII HEARD THAT!
rdw4potus
rdw4potus
  • Threads: 80
  • Posts: 7237
Joined: Mar 11, 2010
February 6th, 2012 at 6:12:15 PM permalink
Quote: Asswhoopermcdaddy


Now, assuming you would normally buy $2 worth of powerball tickets, your odds off winning under the old method would be 2/195mm= 1 in 97.5mm.



That's not how that works. Think about what'd it'd mean if you bought more tickets. If I buy 100 tickets, are my odds of winning really 1 in 195,000? The odds of winning on 1 of 2 tickets are approximately 1 in 195,000,000.
"So as the clock ticked and the day passed, opportunity met preparation, and luck happened." - Maurice Clarett
rdw4potus
rdw4potus
  • Threads: 80
  • Posts: 7237
Joined: Mar 11, 2010
February 6th, 2012 at 6:15:05 PM permalink
Quote: Ibeatyouraces

I thought that all the winning prize amounts were doubled. The JP does start at $20 million as opposed to $10 million.



The jackpot resets to $40MM now. And the 5+0 prize went up to $1MM (from $200,000). I think the 2+1 prize also adjusted, from $5 to $7 (or maybe that was 3+0?) Anyway, those two outcomes are both $7 now. And the 0+1 prize increased from $3 to $4.
"So as the clock ticked and the day passed, opportunity met preparation, and luck happened." - Maurice Clarett
cclub79
cclub79
  • Threads: 35
  • Posts: 1147
Joined: Dec 16, 2009
February 6th, 2012 at 6:29:59 PM permalink
Quote: rdw4potus

That's not how that works. Think about what'd it'd mean if you bought more tickets. If I buy 100 tickets, are my odds of winning really 1 in 195,000? The odds of winning on 1 of 2 tickets are approximately 1 in 195,000,000.



Why isn't it? Though it's 1 in 1,950,000 - you'd need to by 1000 tickets for 195,000 to 1. And to the OP, it's not the NJ Lottery that made the decision, it's the entire Powerball multi-state agency.
98Clubs
98Clubs
  • Threads: 52
  • Posts: 1728
Joined: Jun 3, 2010
February 6th, 2012 at 6:54:29 PM permalink
The real answer is in the form of a question... "What is the payout % presuming a $40million JP (cash payout!), and a $175million (cash) JP?

100 Tickets that used to cost $100 now cost $200. A Wheel-players lament.
Some people need to reimagine their thinking.
Asswhoopermcdaddy
Asswhoopermcdaddy
  • Threads: 87
  • Posts: 566
Joined: Nov 30, 2009
February 6th, 2012 at 9:58:02 PM permalink
Quote: Ibeatyouraces

I thought that all the winning prize amounts were doubled. The JP does start at $20 million as opposed to $10 million.



JP are doubled, but many players will not buy a powerball ticket unless the jackpot is much higher. As per this example, a person does not buy a ticket unless the jackpot is 150mm under the old strategy. What would the new benchmark be under the new odds?

I assume mathematically you would weight the odds. Do you agree?
Asswhoopermcdaddy
Asswhoopermcdaddy
  • Threads: 87
  • Posts: 566
Joined: Nov 30, 2009
February 6th, 2012 at 10:02:15 PM permalink
Quote: rdw4potus

That's not how that works. Think about what'd it'd mean if you bought more tickets. If I buy 100 tickets, are my odds of winning really 1 in 195,000? The odds of winning on 1 of 2 tickets are approximately 1 in 195,000,000.



How can the odds of winning not change if you have more tickets? If you play every possible combination, you're guaranteed to win, though at a substantial loss.

The number of tickets purchased impact the odds.

Purchased Combinations*# of ways they can appear in no dependent order / Total number of combinations =~ probability.

In your example, let's do something simpler. I have a six-sided die. You can buy a ticket with the numbers 1 through 6 written on it. The probability of any # being rolled is 1/6. You go and buy 2 distinct tickets. Your probability of winning is now 2/6 = 1/3.
ahiromu
ahiromu
  • Threads: 112
  • Posts: 2107
Joined: Jan 15, 2010
February 7th, 2012 at 12:00:43 AM permalink
I have a weakness for these high jackpot games. I always like to do the math myself so even if the jackpot gets up to $200 million I know it's still a bad deal. The following math is something most of us could do, but I'm bored. I took the odds directly from the powerball website.

So I calculated the return on all the prizes EXCEPT the jackpot two ways because with so many numbers it's easy to make an inputting mistake.

First, dividing each of the wins by 2 to convert it to a $1 ticket:
500/5154+5/649+50/19100+50/12000+3.5/360+3.5/706+2/110.81+2/55.41=.18
Second, all returns by just the chance to win:
1000000/5153633+10000/648976+100/19088+100/12245+7/360+7/706.4+4/110.8+4/55.42=.36

The expected value of everything except the jackpot is 36 cents for every two dollar ticket, or .18 cents to the dollar. Therefore you need to recover the rest of the 82% ($1.64) from the jackpot. The Wizard analyzed an old version and got around the same value, so this about what the return should be.


1 in 175,223,510 wins the jackpot
$2=.36+J*(1/175223510)
J=287 million

This is before taxes or the annuity. In my opinion, both should be considered.

Currently the jackpot is 250 million with an immediate payment of 156. This comes out to an adjusted jackpot value of .624*(Jackpot won).

.624*(Jackpot won)=287*10^6
(Jackpot won)=460*10^6

We'll call this "Jpa" for "Jackpot post-annuity". So Jpa=460 million

The taxes part is much more difficult to calculate, mainly because I don't know of any loopholes and I've heard you can setup a trust or something. Let's assume they just take a flat 25% and your lawyers can get you out of anything else. Now "Jpa" will be divided by .75 to find your take-home.

.75*x=460 * 10^6
x = 613 million

So by my calculations, when you see the powerball reach 600 million it starts to become an advantage play... but more than likely you'll be having fun with that .18 EV on everything but the jackpot.

If you assume "everything but the jackpot" is the same at .18 EV...

1=.18+x*(1/195,249,054)
Used to start at 160 million.

Ok so about 1.8 times higher with the new rules.
Its - Possessive; It's - "It is" / "It has"; There - Location; Their - Possessive; They're - "They are"
  • Jump to: