Thread Rating:
Poll
7 votes (87.5%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
1 vote (12.5%) | |||
1 vote (12.5%) | |||
1 vote (12.5%) |
8 members have voted
I must start serving my four-day suspension today and wanted to make this announcement before turning myself in to WoV jail. I will be happy to entertain all comments and suggestions upon my release on Monday.
The question for the poll is what is your overall opinion?
Wouldn't you know it, as a matter of fact I had trouble figuring out what you meant at first.
I recommend instead of the simple "1%, 5%, 25% bad luck" category you change that to "extremely bad luck", "very bad luck", "somewhat bad luck" ... and have a preceding paragraph explaining these categories as pertains to standard deviation. Similar change to the 'good luck' spots of course.
You already are throwing in the idea of standard deviation, so if you're trying not to baffle some people it's already too late?
edit: OK so you already have a preceding section that explains. However, I would still make these changes and for the explanation section, relate it to standard deviation as well as what you have there.
that should be "losing this much" methinks. Or something. There's just something not clear with these explanations.Quote:1 in 100 bad luck (meaning the chances of winning this much or more is 99%).
Quote: Ace2How come no craps? Pass/DP with and without odds
Good suggestion. I thought about it, but there are so many ways to play craps that I hate to list just one.
Quote: odiousgambitThere's just something not clear with these explanations.
I struggled with how to word what I'm trying to say in plain simple English. I try to avoid the word "luck" as much as I can, but thought it was a simple word that conveyed randomness the general public would understand.
Let's say that in any given game, the chances of losing $12,345.67 or more is 1%. How would you phrase that into a sentence, where the monetary amount is a calculated field.
Quote: WizardI struggled with how to word what I'm trying to say in plain simple English. I try to avoid the word "luck" as much as I can, but thought it was a simple word that conveyed randomness the general public would understand.
Let's say that in any given game, the chances of losing $12,345.67 or more is 1%. How would you phrase that into a sentence, where the monetary amount is a calculated field.
"1% chance you will lose this..."
Quote: Ace2How come no craps? Pass/DP with and without odds
Okay, Ace, I added pass with 3-4-5x, in your honor.
Quote: mwalz9"1% chance you will lose this..."
Not bad, not bad. I just changed the wording to reflect that. Thank you.
yes, I think you have to use this word, after thinking about who you are trying to reachQuote: WizardI struggled with how to word what I'm trying to say in plain simple English. I try to avoid the word "luck" as much as I can, but thought it was a simple word that conveyed randomness the general public would understand.
I like my previous suggestion, "extremely bad luck", "very bad luck", "somewhat bad luck" but naturally we like our own ideas. Your current solution will workQuote:Let's say that in any given game, the chances of losing $12,345.67 or more is 1%. How would you phrase that into a sentence, where the monetary amount is a calculated field.
couldn't this be misinterpreted? seems to me it should progress back down till you get to 1% yet againQuote:99% chance to win this much or less
Quote: odiousgambitcouldn't this be misinterpreted? seems to me it should progress back down till you get to 1% yet again
I'm not sure I see your point. Can you expand on it?
Did I miss something? Why were you suspended?Quote: WizardI must start serving my four-day suspension today
But based on some of your recent hiking / climbing tweets, does a scheduled suspension while youre basically off the grid anyway even count? 🤪
to me it suggests the player has a 99% chance to win big money and only a 1% chance to lose big money when actually they are similar in probability, not 99% versus 1%Quote: WizardI'm not sure I see your point. Can you expand on it?