Am I reading this right?
May 12th, 2010 at 1:00:32 PM
permalink
I think I read where the wizard never plays the pair plus (or dont most of the time) on three card poker... and I think I rememb er him saying that in three card poker the best ratio option for ante vs PP bet to be all on ante.
https://wizardofodds.com/houseedge this part of his site shows a lower house edge on the pairplus then the ante/raise- is this particuler page a misprint?
https://wizardofodds.com/houseedge this part of his site shows a lower house edge on the pairplus then the ante/raise- is this particuler page a misprint?
"Although men flatter themselves with their great actions, they are not so often the result of a great design as of chance." - Francois De La Rochefoucauld
May 12th, 2010 at 1:34:14 PM
permalink
Quote: Malaruis this particuler page a misprint?
Yes. Thank you for bringing it to my attention. That was based on the old liberal 1/4/6/30/40 pay table, which is no longer the standard. While I appreciate the correction, I would prefer that error reports be sent to me directly via the contact form.
"My life is spent in one long effort to escape from the commonplace of existence. These little problems help me to do so." -- Sherlock Holmes
May 12th, 2010 at 2:30:50 PM
permalink
So the older pay table on pairplus actually was a better bet then the reguler ante? This makes me ask was the pairplus considered a side bet or actually ment as two compleatly seperate games in one. I know tis advertised as two games so to speak but I thought the pairplus bet was actually and technically a side bet which should have always have had a lower house edge.
also sorry for posting it here- wasnt sure how to bring it up- but now you got me on a tangent on the same subject. :)
also sorry for posting it here- wasnt sure how to bring it up- but now you got me on a tangent on the same subject. :)
"Although men flatter themselves with their great actions, they are not so often the result of a great design as of chance." - Francois De La Rochefoucauld
