Poll
23 votes (69.69%) | |||
3 votes (9.09%) | |||
4 votes (12.12%) | |||
1 vote (3.03%) | |||
3 votes (9.09%) | |||
2 votes (6.06%) | |||
1 vote (3.03%) | |||
1 vote (3.03%) | |||
No votes (0%) | |||
4 votes (12.12%) |
33 members have voted
Quote: OnceDearNice one Prozema. probably saved me $$$. thanks.
you are giving up too easy. There are six other captains you can try and bribe.
Wait, what if I'm lying?
Quote: prozemayou are giving up too easy. There are six other captains you can try and bribe.
Wait, what if I'm lying?
My comm's with Wizard are now a matter of record.
After a large JD or two, I offered him a silly sponsorship deal, conditional on someone stealing this round. That silly deal would have been good for the players in the next round and bad for my bankroll. Oh hum. with no steals, it's no deals.
Thanks for entertaining me.
Trust me it wasn't easy. Everyone originally wanted to steal because they thought everyone else was going to. Crazy sh*t. Thanks for sharing ONM.Quote: onenickelmiracleI was just kidding, hope everyone votes share. I know it wasn't easy the last round to pull it off.
Quote: OnceDearMy comm's with Wizard are now a matter of record.
After a large JD or two, I offered him a silly sponsorship deal, conditional on someone stealing this round. That silly deal would have been good for the players in the next round and bad for my bankroll. Oh hum. with no steals, it's no deals.
Thanks for entertaining me.
I think it's a major mistake to take this as a done deal until time is up.
Most people know it's not about the money.
Thanks. I never said it's a done deal. It's a nail biter for me, and judging by Axel's latest posts, he's not sure either.Quote: beachbumbabsI think it's a major mistake to take this as a done deal until time is up.
That's how it should be.
Everyone sharing all the time and cooperating like their lives depended on it is making the game boring.
Meanwhile, Forty other people don't care and are just waiting for their check. They don't even have to participate.
Quote: OnceDearThanks. I never said it's a done deal. It's a nail biter for me, and judging by Axel's latest posts, he's not sure either.
That's how it should be.
Everyone sharing all the time and cooperating like their lives depended on it is making the game boring.
Meanwhile, Forty other people don't care and are just waiting for their check. They don't even have to participate.
Those 40 people who are just waiting for their check and not participating should be disqualified. ;)
If that's right, there is only another week or two left in the game.
Does the big pool need to start talking about how we are going to manage the pot? I.e. I assume people can withdraw and take their cash or try to double up... Who is going to double us up and how?
Also, do we need to set rules on the ??? People who might want to join? I.e. if you have more than the pool average you are in?
IIRC, Last time we did this, we had a separate thread for the pool parlay.Quote: prozemaSo round 9 will be over tonight... Does anyone else recall the wizard saying this would be a 12 round game?
If that's right, there is only another week or two left in the game.
Does the big pool need to start talking about how we are going to manage the pot? I.e. I assume people can withdraw and take their cash or try to double up... Who is going to double us up and how?
Also, do we need to set rules on the ??? People who might want to join? I.e. if you have more than the pool average you are in?
I reckon we should give some thought to setting rules on the ??? people. I'll bring a list into this post, shortly. First order of business should get confirmation that they really are ??? and that I haven't missed any declarations.
Personally, I'm inclined to say that they should not be allowed to join the pooling, even if they have more than the average winnings and that only members of the big pool get the option to go forward into the parlay on an even footing.
We should aim to reduce or minimise Wizard's administrative issues of sending out funds.
Here's the list of those who I believe are NOT in the big sharing pool.
Please get any corrections to me ASAP
Member | Sharing? | round1 | round2 | round3 | round4 | round5 | round6 | round7 | round8 | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ayecarumba | No | $1.00 | $0.40 | $- | $1.00 | $0.40 | $0.67 | $2.86 | $0.67 | $6.99 |
Face | ??? | $0.40 | $0.40 | $1.00 | $- | $0.50 | $- | $3.57 | $0.83 | $6.70 |
DJTeddyBear | ??? | $0.40 | $0.40 | $- | $1.25 | $0.40 | $- | $3.57 | $0.67 | $6.69 |
OneNickelMiracle | ??? | $0.50 | $- | $1.25 | $1.00 | $0.40 | $- | $2.86 | $0.67 | $6.67 |
GWAE | small pool | $0.40 | $0.40 | $- | $1.00 | $0.40 | $0.67 | $2.86 | $0.83 | $6.56 |
DJATC | ??? | $- | $- | $- | $1.25 | $0.40 | $0.67 | $2.86 | $0.67 | $5.84 |
MidwestAP | ??? | $0.40 | $0.40 | $- | $1.00 | $0.40 | $- | $2.86 | $0.67 | $5.72 |
RS | small pool | $0.50 | $0.40 | $- | $- | $0.40 | $0.67 | $2.86 | $0.67 | $5.49 |
MaxPen | small pool | $- | $0.50 | $- | $- | $0.40 | $- | $3.57 | $0.83 | $5.30 |
SM777 | ??? | $- | $0.40 | $- | $- | $- | $0.67 | $2.86 | $0.67 | $4.59 |
Mission146 | small pool | $- | $- | $- | $- | $- | $- | $2.86 | $0.83 | $3.69 |
Boz | No-Show | $- | $- | $- | $- | $- | $- | $- | $- | $- |
HeyMrDJ | No-Show | $- | $- | $- | $- | $- | $- | $- | $- | $- |
Quote: OnceDearIIRC, Last time we did this, we had a separate thread for the pool parlay.
I reckon we should give some thought to setting rules on the ??? people. I'll bring a list into this post, shortly. First order of business should get confirmation that they really are ??? and that I haven't missed any declarations.
Personally, I'm inclined to say that they should not be allowed to join the pooling, even if they have more than the average winnings and that only members of the big pool get the option to go forward into the parlay on an even footing.
We should aim to reduce or minimise Wizard's administrative issues of sending out funds.
I'm flexible on all these topics. Maybe we just ask wizard to hold all pool funds until we figure it out?
I strongly disagree. All on this forum should know that it operates on Las Vegas time (Pacific Time Zone) If I and UKMikey can cope with that, then it's a bit lame to suggest that Floridians and East Coasters can't. If in doubt, send yourself a PM here and check the timestamp when it instantly arrives.Quote: NathanI personally think the vote should be due anytime TOMORROW since not everyone has the same time zone. For example, 9 PM Vegas time could mean 4 am in another Continent when people are sleeping. This was a real problem on another website where they ended a big thing. There was a mention of something like,"This will end at 3 PM Eastern Time on February 20th. ." To many people, 3 Pm Eastern Time is only 12 noon in their Time Zone and they complained they were in the middle of writing their decision, when boom, the big thing suddenly ended. They mentioned it ending the next day would have been ideal.
I do get a bee in my bonnet when people say 12am or 12pm or midnight on such a day, because AM means before 12 and pm means after 12, so 12am and 12pm are conventionally avoided and 23:59 is more explicit.*
* Yes, I know there are conventions, about which end of the day midnight is deemed to fall, but it's not internationally consistent.
Quote: OnceDear
Member Sharing? round1 round2 round3 round4 round5 round6 round7 round8 Total Boz No-Show $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- HeyMrDJ No-Show $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $-
Which reminds me. I'm still awaiting clarification on whether the no-shows and Bill Ryan should have been allocated any part of their stealing teams share of the prize for those rounds where they left before the vote.
In my table, I'v assumed 'no': Wizard's table assumes 'yes'
I understand that BillRyan surrendered his meagre share to the big pool and doesn't want anything back from it?
Quote: OnceDearQuote: OnceDear
Member Sharing? round1 round2 round3 round4 round5 round6 round7 round8 Total Boz No-Show $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- HeyMrDJ No-Show $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $-
Which reminds me. I'm still awaiting clarification on whether the no-shows and Bill Ryan should have been allocated any part of their stealing teams share of the prize for those rounds where they left before the vote.
In my table, I'v assumed 'no': Wizard's table assumes 'yes'
I understand that BillRyan surrendered his meagre share to the big pool and doesn't want anything back from it?
I'm sure it's not my call to make, but no golfer gets paid who doesn't finish the match.
Quote: OnceDear
Which reminds me. I'm still awaiting clarification on whether the no-shows and Bill Ryan should have been allocated any part of their stealing teams share of the prize for those rounds where they left before the vote.
In my table, I'v assumed 'no': Wizard's table assumes 'yes'
I understand that BillRyan surrendered his meagre share to the big pool and doesn't want anything back from it?
My understanding is that they should get the prize for any round that they started. I have no idea about anyone else, but in the case of BillRyan, he would get the prize for the round that he dropped out and I joined.
Quote: Mission146My understanding is that they should get the prize for any round that they started. I have no idea about anyone else, but in the case of BillRyan, he would get the prize for the round that he dropped out and I joined.
33 players are at a craps table whan the shooter, after establishing his point, walks away from his passline bet. What happens to his abandoned bet? I think the same should apply here.
Quote: prozemaI'm sure it's not my call to make, but no golfer gets paid who doesn't finish the match.
Quote: Mission146My understanding is that they should get the prize for any round that they started. I have no idea about anyone else, but in the case of BillRyan, he would get the prize for the round that he dropped out and I joined.
So... Opinions do vary and I'm not isolated in mine.
The two guys who never bothered to even vote, surely shouldn't expect anything? Did they even make it to the starting line by saying before the event that they would like to play?
Where BillRyan left, I allocated his share to the remaining members of his team from that round. Not a big issue as he expressly said he wasn't bothered about his winnings to that point.
I await Mike's final opinion on this and will adjust the results as needs be when he gets back to me. It mostly affects AyeCarumba and Prozema, to whom I allocate $1 each from round 1 having seized funds from HeyMrDJ and Boz.
I suppose I could look at when those latter two last logged in?
lol, it's a forums game. Let's borrow 5 figures of money from one another, pay it back, interest, cuts, etc, etc, and that's putting your money where your mouth is. A forum game, in which you're supposed to lie and steal, is not indicative of anything outside of the forums...Quote: AxelWolfTBH, I would take it very personally if anyone I elected captain choose to vote steal.
Most people know it's not about the money.
SO STEAL AWAY MY MINIONS!
(at least Axel is sweating... I got what I wanted out of this round =D ).
Quote: OnceDearIt mostly affects AyeCarumba and Prozema, to whom I allocate $1 each from round 1 having seized it from HeyMrDJ and Boz.
I suppose I could look at when those latter two last logged in?
No way... Just trust Ayecarumba and I. It's often better to ask forgiveness than to get premission.
Think of me like a miniature devil on you shoulder.
;-)
[AOL]Me too. [/AOL*]Quote: Romes(at least Axel is sweating... I got what I wanted out of this round =D ).
Me-sweating:
Me- getting what I wanted.
Steal for the deal $:o)
Oh and literally sweating... The UK is in the middle of a record breaking heatwave and dry spell. Reservoirs are very low and we have water usage restrictions. My lovely new lawn is dying and I'm not allowed to use a garden hose to water it.... Well, strongly discouraged by neighbours and legally banned from 5 August.
Jeez, I wish it would rain in England. We Brits love to talk complain about the weather.
*A very old trope, probably before your time ya young whippersnappers
Quote: prozemaNo way... Just trust Ayecarumba and I. It's often better to ask forgiveness than to get premission.
Think of me like a miniature devil on you shoulder.
;-)
Additional information to consider...
In theory, the closer I am to the top of the leaderboard the more incentive I have to cast a renegade steal vote to put myself on top!
Winning is so much fun.
When is the voting deadline for this round again?
I have no idea. So long as the money doesn't go to the house...Quote: Ayecarumba33 players are at a craps table whan the shooter, after establishing his point, walks away from his passline bet. What happens to his abandoned bet? I think the same should apply here.
You fail to realize there is no situation or outcome that makes it a loss for me.Quote: Romeslol, it's a forums game. Let's borrow 5 figures of money from one another, pay it back, interest, cuts, etc, etc, and that's putting your money where your mouth is. A forum game, in which you're supposed to lie and steal, is not indicative of anything outside of the forums...
SO STEAL AWAY MY MINIONS!
(at least Axel is sweating... I got what I wanted out of this round =D ).
$25... or was it $20 to discover who you can't trust will be good value to you Foxy.Quote: AxelWolfYou fail to realize there is no situation or outcome that makes it a loss for me.
I've paid far more for far less and still been happy.
Wasn't there another $1 on the table for anyone who steals? From RS IIRC
This has to be one of the funniest Split or steals ever.. Watch it from the start. You might need subtitles :o)Quote: AxelWolfYou fail to realize there is no situation or outcome that makes it a loss for me.
Quote: OnceDearI do get a bee in my bonnet when people say 12am or 12pm or midnight on such a day, because AM means before 12 and pm means after 12, so 12am and 12pm are conventionally avoided and 23:59 is more explicit.*
So do I! Midnight on the dot is supposed to be 12 AM, but few people know that. If you're going to have a deadline at midnight, please just make it 12:01 AM, to avoid confusion.
Quote: OnceDearQuote: OnceDear
Member Sharing? round1 round2 round3 round4 round5 round6 round7 round8 Total Boz No-Show $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- HeyMrDJ No-Show $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $- $-
Which reminds me. I'm still awaiting clarification on whether the no-shows and Bill Ryan should have been allocated any part of their stealing teams share of the prize for those rounds where they left before the vote.
In my table, I'v assumed 'no': Wizard's table assumes 'yes'
I understand that BillRyan surrendered his meagre share to the big pool and doesn't want anything back from it?
Yes, they get a share. As long as their name was listed at the beginning of the round, they are entitled to their share for the round. Makes my accounting easier.
Just figured out this might be a non-denial denial. Did you vote share?Quote: GWAEno faith.... This is a team game and I am a team guy. There is no I in team....
Quote: WizardYes, they get a share. As long as their name was listed at the beginning of the round, they are entitled to their share for the round. Makes my accounting easier.
Results have been revised to reflect Wizard's decision
I may not have time to explain the rules for round 10 tonight or at any time tomorrow, so I'll do it now. This will be entirely different from the previous rounds.
Round 10 Teams
Team | Leader | Followers | Number |
---|---|---|---|
1 | AxelWolf | Face, djatc, Mission146, miplet | |
2 | Jmarch79 | RS, SOOPOO, Keeneone, beachbumbabs | |
3 | Torghatten | Mikey75, DJTeddyBear, UKMark, MaxPen | |
4 | SM777 | troopscott, Dalex64, Romes, Joeman | |
5 | JohnnyQ | gamerfreak, PokerGrinder, PlayYourCardsRight, prozema | |
6 | OnceDear | Nathan, Ayecarumba, gordonm888 | |
7 | MidwestAP | onenickelmiracle, GWAE, Jufo81 |
Round 10 Rules
- Each team must submit an integer greater or equal to 1.
- The team that submits the lowest unique number shall win the pot.
- In the event no team submits a unique number, then nobody wins anything.
- The winning team wins $25.
Example:
Team | Number |
---|---|
1 | 1 |
2 | 13 |
3 | 2 |
4 | 1 |
5 | 7 |
6 | 2 |
7 | 523 |
Team 5 would win because they submitted the lowest unique number (7). Note how two teams picked 1 and two picked 2.
Deadline is 9 AM Vegas time, Tuesday, July 31.
Quote: WizardQuote: OnceDear
Which reminds me. I'm still awaiting clarification on whether the no-shows and Bill Ryan should have been allocated any part of their stealing teams share of the prize for those rounds where they left before the vote.
In my table, I'v assumed 'no': Wizard's table assumes 'yes'
I understand that BillRyan surrendered his meagre share to the big pool and doesn't want anything back from it?
Yes, they get a share. As long as their name was listed at the beginning of the round, they are entitled to their share for the round. Makes my accounting easier.
Not really sure why this would be ruled that way and I certainly don't want to deny BillRyan 2/5 of a ribeye unjustly. Would you chase someone down for an abandoned 40 cent spin on a slot? Even if their panties were all in a bunch over some trivial matter.;-)
I would think that it reverts to the replacement player that participated and completed the round/game that the prize was awarded for.
Quote: Wizard
Each team must submit an integer greater or equal to 1...
hehe...
Mission submitted “Share”
Here’s my thinking:
The first thing we have to do is make sure that the $25 goes out, so in order to do that, we have to make sure at least one team picks a unique number. We don’t want that team to sacrifice a chance of being the winning team, though.
1. There are seven teams, so I think that one of the teams with a leader in the main pool should declare and promise to pick the number, “Four.”
The reason why is that leaves six teams who all must pick either 1, 2 or 3. I guess they could pick a number greater than four, but they would automatically lose.
The six teams each get to pick 1, 2 or 3 and hope to be the only team to pick that number, while the team who picks four hopes that the six teams each duplicate each other on one of the three numbers.
No matter what happens, the $25 is guaranteed to go out. This also somewhat simplifies the number picking process.
2. Alternatively, the other six teams can just use random.org to generate a random number between 1-3 and pick that.
3. OR: All teams can use random.org and pick a number between 1-7. However, once that number is picked, it cannot be picked again. We can even have a disinterested third-party use random.org to assign the numbers to the teams. We can have them announce it all at once or one at a time.
In order for the $25 not to go squandered, we should publicly discuss our numbers, so we don't end up with all the teams picking the same numbers and risk the Wizard laughing at all of us, for not cooperating.
Quote: Mission146It’s a completely new game!
Here’s my thinking:
The first thing we have to do is make sure that the $25 goes out, so in order to do that, we have to make sure at least one team picks a unique number. We don’t want that team to sacrifice a chance of being the winning team, though.
1. There are seven teams, so I think that one of the teams with a leader in the main pool should declare and promise to pick the number, “Four.”
The reason why is that leaves six teams who all must pick either 1, 2 or 3. I guess they could pick a number greater than four, but they would automatically lose.
The six teams each get to pick 1, 2 or 3 and hope to be the only team to pick that number, while the team who picks four hopes that the six teams each duplicate each other on one of the three numbers.
No matter what happens, the $25 is guaranteed to go out. This also somewhat simplifies the number picking process.
2. Alternatively, the other six teams can just use random.org to generate a random number between 1-3 and pick that.
3. OR: All teams can use random.org and pick a number between 1-7. However, once that number is picked, it cannot be picked again. We can even have a disinterested third-party use random.org to assign the numbers to the teams. We can have them announce it all at once or one at a time.
Sounds good. Team 6 volunteers to pick 4
Quote: RomesTo me it's the inverse of one of the previous rounds, where we ALL STEAL except 1 team SHARE. This is going to essentially be an ALL SHARE with 1 team STEAL.
In order for the $25 not to go squandered, we should publicly discuss our numbers, so we don't end up with all the teams picking the same numbers and risk the Wizard laughing at all of us, for not cooperating.
One team can just promise to pick, “4,” and all other teams must pick a number between one and three.
The only thing that would need publicly discussed is who agrees to pick four.
Or, we can just have someone use Random.org to have someone assign numbers 1-7 to each team.
Quote: AyecarumbaSounds good. Team 6 volunteers to pick 4
Does OD agree to that?
Quote: Wizard...]
Example:
Team Number 1 1 2 13 3 2 4 1 5 7 6 2 7 523
Team 5 would win because they submitted the lowest unique number (7). Note how two teams picked 1 and two picked 2.
Do the submissions also have to be prime?
According to what the Wiz stated, no. Any integer 1 or greater.Quote: Ayecarumba...Do the submissions also have to be prime?
Axel got to have his fun picking captains during the present round, and I’m also on Axel’s team in this upcoming round. I think we should be the team to bite the bullet and pick the number, “Four.” I seriously doubt we win by doing so, but everyone else will get to have fun.
Quote: Mission146I think the, “One team picks four,” idea will maximize the fun for the most people trying to come up with a 1-3 strategy.
Axel got to have his fun picking captains during the present round, and I’m also on Axel’s team in this upcoming round. I think we should be the team to bite the bullet and pick the number, “Four.” I seriously doubt we win by doing so, but everyone else will get to have fun.
Why not just have team 4 pick 4.
Quote: MaxPenWhy not just have team 4 pick 4.
I don’t know. I feel like someone is biting a bullet to pick four. If three or more teams (except all six, obviously) pick the same number, then a unique number gets picked. The only way the team with number four wins is if it goes 2-2-2 or if all six pick the same number.
I guess three teams could spilt two numbers with one not getting picked at all.
Maybe just agree to a neutral third party who decides what team wins. Or, I could go on random.org with someone on FaceTime while making a video of it at a prescheduled time.
I've only just read the rules. It's been a long day for me and I've given no thought to strategy, except that we must take the $25. It looks like we'd struggle to not take it.Quote: Mission146Does OD agree to that?
I've plenty of time to mull it over. Looks like I'm a captain, so will obviously aim to conspire with other captains.
Meanwhile... looking forward to round 9 results.
Quote: WizardDeadline for round 10 is 9 AM Vegas time, Tuesday, July 31.
Be the first one to state "I'm taking 1 for sure." Anyone else taking it would be shooting themselves in the foot, because it would take both of you out for the running. Who has the balls to win?
Good thing you didn't pick me as a captain for this round, then...lol.
- Then split the $25 among the team that has the winner
- OR, Give the entire $25 to the winner.
We would all get the enjoyment of playing in this round. And strategy would be more infinitely more complex.
I'm bidding 3.
Good luck to all.
Quote: Mission146It’s a completely new game!
Here’s my thinking:
The first thing we have to do is make sure that the $25 goes out, so in order to do that, we have to make sure at least one team picks a unique number. We don’t want that team to sacrifice a chance of being the winning team, though.
1. There are seven teams, so I think that one of the teams with a leader in the main pool should declare and promise to pick the number, “Four.”
The reason why is that leaves six teams who all must pick either 1, 2 or 3. I guess they could pick a number greater than four, but they would automatically lose.
The six teams each get to pick 1, 2 or 3 and hope to be the only team to pick that number, while the team who picks four hopes that the six teams each duplicate each other on one of the three numbers.
No matter what happens, the $25 is guaranteed to go out. This also somewhat simplifies the number picking process.
2. Alternatively, the other six teams can just use random.org to generate a random number between 1-3 and pick that.
3. OR: All teams can use random.org and pick a number between 1-7. However, once that number is picked, it cannot be picked again. We can even have a disinterested third-party use random.org to assign the numbers to the teams. We can have them announce it all at once or one at a time.
Thanks Al Bundy but tour not quarterbacking a team