Around 1:52pm et
Have you felt an earthquake?
I live in Brooklyn
edit: centered in Virginia
I checked with my neighbor in the adjacent condo, and he didn't feel anything. A few minutes later, his wife called to say she had been sitting on her bed, felt the motion, and saw cabinets in her bedroom moving.
First TV news here says 5.8 on the R scale and located SW of DC.
Edit: Brooklyn to Charlotte seems like a rather large area for people to be feeling a quake.
Nothing damaged at first thought it was a big truck going down the road. That dosn't happen often and trucks have shaken the house before.
edit: I think I was closer, 50 miles or so
My wife is in an office in a shopping mall a few miles from here. It's on the top floor of the mall. The building shook a LOT, and the office's phone service is out. She's unsure if it's just them or the entire building. But she and the other people in her office are doing the right thing: Freaking out.

This US Geological Service Latest Earthquakes in the World web page is kept up to date and lists the earthquakes in the last 7 days. It's a LONG list.
The first thing it shows is that there was an after-shock, 2.8 magnitude, near the first quake, but very near the surface.
[edit] Make that the second thing. A quake in the south Pacific was recorded while I was writing the above post.
Quote: DJTeddyBearYa know what? Earthquakes are a LOT more common than the average person would believe.
Of course. But most are so light you don't notice them without instruments.
Quote:The first thing it shows is that there was an after-shock, 2.8 magnitude, near the first quake, but very near the surface.
As someone on a first name basis with seismic activity, let me be the first to tell you that anything under 4.0 is beneath contempt :P
Quote: DocTo follow up on my earlier comment, I am 500 or 600 miles from NYC as the crow flies. Do folks who are that far apart from each other typically feel movement from the same quake? My only experience has been with quakes that are only "felt" very close to the center, within maybe 100 miles, with the more distant detection requiring instrumentation. What is typical for something of this scale?
Because the earthquake was shallow, and the east coast is not interrupted by mountain ranges, this earthquake was felt a long way. Much further than your typical West Coast earthquake.
Virginia has not had an earthquake of this magnitude in 100 years, and this one is 150 miles closer to the ocean than the one last century. It is very unusual to say the least. The last earthquake of this magnitude in VA was in 1897, which is very close in time to the mega earthquake in New Madrid MO in 1895.
Admittedly the reaction was probably a bit much, but people are not as jaded as they are on the West Coast. A lot of people assumed terrorist attacks.
Similarly if you look at damage contours from two earthquakes of similar magnitude, a repeat of the New Madrid earthquake from the 19th century would be far more expensive and cost more lives. The rivers would flood (a problem not expected in Southern California).

USGS estimates that a repeat of the New Madrid earthquake would be, far and away, the most expensive earthquake in US history.
No damage, but commuting home sucked royally today. I waited at work an extra 90 mins before even trying to get home.
-B
Edit: I guess there was, but compared to the big ones there, 6.6 is nothing.
I just though up a forest analogy, but I'm at work and should pretend to be working :P
So today I could not come back to work from lunch because as I did there was a fire evacuation when someone burned their lunch in a toaster oven.
An hour later the county workers said, "we have to evacuate, there was an earthquake or something." I was like WTF, are you kidding around?
I will leave it to some of the better stat people as to the odds of having your building evacuated twice in the same day for different reasons.
Quote: avargovI thought the New Madrid quakes were in 1811-12. Was there another smaller quake there in 1895?
Edit: I guess there was, but compared to the big ones there, 6.6 is nothing.
The smaller quake in 1895 was in fact the largest to hit the same seismic zone since the big one in 1811. Since it happened so long, it is very speculative about what Richter level the 1811 quake was. It was certainly at least a 7.4 .
However the damage contours were designed to show how much larger an area the 1895 quake would affect, compared to the costly 1994 Northridge quake. But even in 1895 the area was still lightly populated.
A repeat of the 1811 earthquake would be the costliest earthquake in American history. In addition to the size of the area affected, unlike California, very few buildings are built to any kind of earthquake design code.
A population density map can be misleading since LA or San Francisco is so much larger than Memphis, St Louis,Nashville, Louisville or the Ohio cities. But all of them could be affected, whereas the California earthquakes only affect part of the city.