Poll

10 votes (100%)
No votes (0%)
No votes (0%)

10 members have voted

RonC
RonC
  • Threads: 40
  • Posts: 4874
Joined: Jan 18, 2010
February 4th, 2011 at 9:06:56 AM permalink
Incumbents generally get the nomination of their party. There are circumstances that sometimes cause the party to go with another candidate.

These polls and discussions are interesting but we'll need to renew them along the way as things change. At this point, the only "real" candidate for the democrats is the President. The question is...do you think that will change? If you think he will be challenged, who will challenge him? Do they have a chance at success?

Will Hillary Clinton wait until 2016 since the Vice President may not be a strong candidate (if at all)?

So many questions to be answered over the next couple of years...

(sorry for the spelling error...I can't fix it now...)
SFB
SFB
  • Threads: 2
  • Posts: 203
Joined: Dec 20, 2010
February 4th, 2011 at 9:13:59 AM permalink
Barack will be the nominee.

And he will win.

Put $100 on it.

SFB
ItsCalledSoccer
ItsCalledSoccer
  • Threads: 42
  • Posts: 735
Joined: Aug 30, 2010
February 4th, 2011 at 9:16:16 AM permalink
Obama will get it. If Carter can get it in 1980, Obama will get it here, and things aren't (yet) quite as bad now as they were then. There's still, what, a year before the first primaries are held, and anything can happen.

But yeah, if you still have a house, bet it on Obama to get the nod.
RonC
RonC
  • Threads: 40
  • Posts: 4874
Joined: Jan 18, 2010
February 4th, 2011 at 9:21:18 AM permalink
At this point, my money would be on the President being the candidate, too. I am hearing more about the recovery strengthening and his shift towards the center will also help.

I'm not as sure about him winning but I would say that he still has the advantage in the general election, too. The incumbency is a huge obstacle to overcome.
Nareed
Nareed
  • Threads: 373
  • Posts: 11413
Joined: Nov 11, 2009
February 4th, 2011 at 10:30:38 AM permalink
Quote: RonC

The incumbency is a huge obstacle to overcome.



Indeed. It proved a formidable obstacle for Jimmy Carter.

Republicans should urge a big-name Democrat, possibly Hilalry, to challenge Obama in the primaries. No better way to weaken a sitting president. Again, ask Mr. Carter.
Donald Trump is a fucking criminal
RonC
RonC
  • Threads: 40
  • Posts: 4874
Joined: Jan 18, 2010
February 4th, 2011 at 10:44:04 AM permalink
Quote: Nareed

Indeed. It proved a formidable obstacle for Jimmy Carter.

Republicans should urge a big-name Democrat, possibly Hilalry, to challenge Obama in the primaries. No better way to weaken a sitting president. Again, ask Mr. Carter.



True enough...it CAN be an obstacle for the President when he is as badly regarded as Jimmy Carter was. In many cases, though, it works in favor of a President who is "doing okay"...

I would like to see Hillary run. The President would have to defend an actual record this time as opposed to running on a thin resume last election. I am thinking Hillary will hold out until 2016...
mkl654321
mkl654321
  • Threads: 65
  • Posts: 3412
Joined: Aug 8, 2010
February 4th, 2011 at 11:41:57 AM permalink
Obama will not face a serious challenge in 2012. The right wing will bring in a candidate that favors mandatory prayer in schools, the removal of all women from public employment, the televised whipping and beheading of blasphemers, and the formation of a new government agency whose function is to obliterate the environment (the EDA). The electorate, while not being thrilled with the incumbent, will be even less thrilled with the alternative, especially when televised debates show that challenging candidate pontificating and raving, getting all puffy-eyed and red in the face.

For that reason, I think that even if Obama sinks to single digits in approval ratings, the Demos will still nominate him in 2012. The Republicans will be tossing the Democrats a softball, so he would be a 2000-1 favorite.

This is too bad. The whole mess would otherwise be kind of interesting.
The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one. The happiness of credulity is a cheap and dangerous quality.---George Bernard Shaw
RonC
RonC
  • Threads: 40
  • Posts: 4874
Joined: Jan 18, 2010
February 4th, 2011 at 11:55:14 AM permalink
Quote: mkl654321

Obama will not face a serious challenge in 2012. The right wing will bring in a candidate that favors mandatory prayer in schools, the removal of all women from public employment, the televised whipping and beheading of blasphemers, and the formation of a new government agency whose function is to obliterate the environment (the EDA). The electorate, while not being thrilled with the incumbent, will be even less thrilled with the alternative, especially when televised debates show that challenging candidate pontificating and raving, getting all puffy-eyed and red in the face.

For that reason, I think that even if Obama sinks to single digits in approval ratings, the Demos will still nominate him in 2012. The Republicans will be tossing the Democrats a softball, so he would be a 2000-1 favorite.

This is too bad. The whole mess would otherwise be kind of interesting.



Really? Wow. I'll not say anything more; what I want to say would get me suspended.

Thanks for adding the ridiculous to the discussion...
mkl654321
mkl654321
  • Threads: 65
  • Posts: 3412
Joined: Aug 8, 2010
February 4th, 2011 at 12:01:46 PM permalink
Quote: RonC

Really? Wow. I'll not say anything more; what I want to say would get me suspended.

Thanks for adding the ridiculous to the discussion...



Oh, go ahead--say it anyway.

And if what I said was "ridiculous", why do you think the Demos would NOT nominate our Glorious Leader? (Presumably, you disagree with the "ridiculous" notion that Obama would be a shoo-in against whatever Republican candidate is nominated.)
The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one. The happiness of credulity is a cheap and dangerous quality.---George Bernard Shaw
Nareed
Nareed
  • Threads: 373
  • Posts: 11413
Joined: Nov 11, 2009
February 4th, 2011 at 12:15:50 PM permalink
Quote: RonC

True enough...it CAN be an obstacle for the President when he is as badly regarded as Jimmy Carter was. In many cases, though, it works in favor of a President who is "doing okay"...



If Obama's not doing "ok" by mid-2012, he'll make Walter Mondale's landslide defeat look good.

Quote:

I would like to see Hillary run. The President would have to defend an actual record this time as opposed to running on a thin resume last election. I am thinking Hillary will hold out until 2016...



It would be the height of disloyalty for Hillary to run against her former boss. I don't thik she'll run unless Obama doesn't. The chance that Obama won't run is just sligthly higher than the chance the Earth will switch the direction it spins on its axis.
Donald Trump is a fucking criminal
pacomartin
pacomartin
  • Threads: 649
  • Posts: 7895
Joined: Jan 14, 2010
February 4th, 2011 at 12:38:06 PM permalink
No serious contender will run against Obama in the primary.

Thirty years ago Ted Kennedy ran against Carter in the primary and won 12 states, but I couldn't see that happening in 2 years.
  • Jump to: