lilredrooster
lilredrooster
  • Threads: 232
  • Posts: 6553
Joined: May 8, 2015
Thanked by
odiousgambitlildevilLucyonenickelmiracle
February 23rd, 2019 at 6:38:34 AM permalink
from the article:

"At long last, SCOTUS has put a federal check on states’ multimillion-dollar civil asset forfeiture schemes"

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/02/supreme-court-rules-against-civil-forfeitures-rbg-timbs.html

Please don't feed the trolls
unJon
unJon
  • Threads: 14
  • Posts: 4592
Joined: Jul 1, 2018
February 23rd, 2019 at 8:04:46 AM permalink
Quote: lilredrooster

from the article:

"At long last, SCOTUS has put a federal check on states’ multimillion-dollar civil asset forfeiture schemes"

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/02/supreme-court-rules-against-civil-forfeitures-rbg-timbs.html



It’s a good first step. Not yet a game changer though. It’s application of the “no excessive fines” provision of the 8th amendment to the States. States can still seize like they do today as long as the seizure isn’t an excessive fine. For sure it’s another argument that the defendants can use to get their possessions back, but it’s the same paradigm and we will see how jurisprudence develops around what constitutes an “excessive” fine.
The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong; but that is the way to bet.
  • Jump to: