I think a line reflecting his real chances would be something like Reid minus-120, because of the power of incumbency and his fundraising ability. However, the betting marketplace would probably swing that line to the other side because of his high negatives and the fact that many so-called pundits have written him off.
It's a good thing this kind of action is illegal, but if it were legal, I would've bet big bucks on Reid to win back when he was trailing 20-plus points in the polls.
Quote: nyuhoosierIf you were an oddsmaker taking action on political races, how would you set the line on Harry Reid's reelection as Senate majority leader? He's been trailing badly in the polls for months to Candidate TBD (no clear frontrunner on the GOP side), but a recent poll discussed on Politico shows him drawing closer.
I think a line reflecting his real chances would be something like Reid minus-120, because of the power of incumbency and his fundraising ability. However, the betting marketplace would probably swing that line to the other side because of his high negatives and the fact that many so-called pundits have written him off.
It's a good thing this kind of action is illegal, but if it were legal, I would've bet big bucks on Reid to win back when he was trailing 20-plus points in the polls.
Incumbency has been a huge LIABILITY this year, more than I've seen since in my lifetime. You are seeing popular incumbents of both parties squeaking through primaries with 55-65% when they normally win them with 90%, and some are losing. But that's a debate for another day. You CAN "bet" on who will win races, go to www.intrade.com They set contracts for who will win all the Senate races (and other political props)...the winner expires at 100 when the race is over, all losers expire at 0. SO you probably could have gotten Reid at around 20 when he was in deep trouble. The nice thing is, you can buy and sell before races are finished. You should definitely check it out. Some blogs think campaigns dump money in the market to make their candidates look stronger, but Intrade prices are not the kind of thing that CNN reports on regularly, so it's not like they are really shaping a narrative...
I still say to bet on Obama in 2012.