Rybka Cheats
I love to play chess against computers ... OK, I'm basically addicted ... Fruit and Crafty take me to the cleaners every time ... Now I know why Rybka is so good.
--Ms. D.
silly
This current issue is about plagiarizing the programming it seems.
Not so fast ...Quote: mustangsallyLeibniz and Newton were the first I believe. hehe
Newton Vs. Leibniz
Obviously the first to plagiarize was John who copied ancient myths on savior archetypes in his story of Jesus.
Fun fun fun link
Quote: DorothyGaleHow can a computer chess program cheat, you might ask? This has to be the biggest chess scandal since the K-K match.
Rybka Cheats
I love to play chess against computers ... OK, I'm basically addicted ... Fruit and Crafty take me to the cleaners every time ... Now I know why Rybka is so good.
--Ms. D.
Gah, 90% of computer code is borrowing on the patterns of other code anyways, that's how software improves over time.
Quote: WizardA bit off topic, sorry, but is there any comparable poker championship for computers?
Start with the U of Alberta site.
http://poker.cs.ualberta.ca/
Nice find Ms.DQuote: DorothyGaleHow can a computer chess program cheat, you might ask? This has to be the biggest chess scandal since the K-K match.
Rybka Cheats
I love to play chess against computers ... OK, I'm basically addicted ... Fruit and Crafty take me to the cleaners every time ... Now I know why Rybka is so good.
--Ms. D.
After doing some reading about the subject, seems IF Rybka was NOT 'winning' no one would bother about the code issues.
Like the US getting involved in wars in countries where oil is produced and not in countries where bananas are aplenty...
Quote: DorothyGaleHow can a computer chess program cheat, you might ask? This has to be the biggest chess scandal since the K-K match.
The program doesn't cheat, it's the coder who was (allegedly) at fault.
Well, yes, you are right, in the sense that no program for anything can ever cheat -- given that all such programs are only following the code of the designer, ergo it is always the designer who is unethical in some fashion, not his program.Quote: P90The program doesn't cheat, it's the coder who was (allegedly) at fault.
I personally thought the anthropomorphic wording was clever of me. Guess you didn't.
--Ms. D.
Quote: DorothyGaleWell, yes, you are right, in the sense that no program for anything can ever cheat -- given that all such programs are only following the code of the designer, ergo it is always the designer who is unethical in some fashion, not his program.
Cheating is acting against set rules or gaining an unfair advantage over a competitor. In that sense, if the program is coded to do that then the program is cheating.
Quote:I personally thought the anthropomorphic metaphor was clever. Guess you didn't.
It would have flown a lot farther, but maybe not better, in an Isaac Asimov board. You'd have been lectured on the Frankenstein Complex, too ;)