rxwine
rxwine
  • Threads: 209
  • Posts: 12166
Joined: Feb 28, 2010
May 11th, 2011 at 12:43:12 AM permalink
Quote:

Welfare recipients nationwide would be barred from using their government-issued debit cards at casinos, strip clubs and liquor stores under a bill to be introduced Wednesday by leaders of the U.S. Senate Finance Committee.

A co-sponsor of the measure says he was inspired by the fact that nearly $5 million in cash benefits issued in California and meant to help struggling families feed and clothe their children, was spent or withdrawn from ATMs at casinos and poker rooms between January 2007 and May 2010.

Tens of thousands of dollars in Temporary Aid for Needy Families assistance was accessed or spent with the debit cards at Los Angeles-area strip clubs in the same period.

The Times last year detailed all of those transactions, prompting immediate changes in the state's network of ATMs that accept Electronic Benefit Transfer cards.

The cards, which provide recipients access to federal as well as state cash, were also used in tourist destinations, including the Las Vegas Strip, a remote Hawaiian island that is home to two Four Seasons resorts and on cruise ships leaving from ports around the globe.



here
There's no secret. Just know what you're talking about before you open your mouth.
EvenBob
EvenBob
  • Threads: 441
  • Posts: 28576
Joined: Jul 18, 2010
May 11th, 2011 at 12:57:55 AM permalink
Back in the 80's, when I was in the taxi business, we took food stamps all the time instead of money. If the fare was $10, we'd take $15 in stamps. They weren't really stamps, they were books of coupons that looked like money. Never had any problem using them, nobody ever asked for ID. That was the point of taking 15 for 10, there was a possibility you couldn't cash them.
"It's not called gambling if the math is on your side."
FleaStiff
FleaStiff
  • Threads: 265
  • Posts: 14484
Joined: Oct 19, 2009
May 11th, 2011 at 1:10:42 AM permalink
And I think food stamps couldn't be used on booze or imported products or other stuff like that which probably caused more to administer that it was worth. It shows where the poor spend their money. They are going to gamble anyway, so what is the use of passing laws about it.
EvenBob
EvenBob
  • Threads: 441
  • Posts: 28576
Joined: Jul 18, 2010
May 11th, 2011 at 1:13:14 AM permalink
Before the ATM like cards that took the place of fake money, you could only spend the stamps on food, nobody else accepted them. But the cards are blind, they don't know where they're being used, apparently.
"It's not called gambling if the math is on your side."
FleaStiff
FleaStiff
  • Threads: 265
  • Posts: 14484
Joined: Oct 19, 2009
May 11th, 2011 at 1:25:57 AM permalink
Quote: EvenBob

you could only spend the stamps on food, nobody else accepted them.

There has always been a black market in food stamps and often someone will hang about a grocery store trying to convert various food stamps or voucher like things into cash so they can buy booze or cigarettes with it.

I don't know the cost of programming the computers to block out casinos but its foolish. ATMs are often in jails for bail bonds, want to ban that too? Standing there trying to tell a welfare recipient to spend wisely seems rather foolish. If they were wise and controlled impulses, they wouldn't be on welfare.
odiousgambit
odiousgambit
  • Threads: 326
  • Posts: 9557
Joined: Nov 9, 2009
May 11th, 2011 at 3:36:32 AM permalink
Years ago I knew of little corner grocery stores that would routinely exchange food stamps for cash for exactly 50% of the value. They would sometimes make the transaction right in front of me, which was pretty bold if you ask me.
the next time Dame Fortune toys with your heart, your soul and your wallet, raise your glass and praise her thus: “Thanks for nothing, you cold-hearted, evil, damnable, nefarious, low-life, malicious monster from Hell!”   She is, after all, stone deaf. ... Arnold Snyder
weaselman
weaselman
  • Threads: 20
  • Posts: 2349
Joined: Jul 11, 2010
May 11th, 2011 at 3:47:59 AM permalink
This is not about food stamp cards. You cannot use food stamps at casinos as it is, they can only be (legally) used for food. Food stamp cards are actually better than those "coupon books" from the past, because you cannot use them to, say, pay for your taxi. They are only accepted by (some) grocery stores and supermarkets, and only in payment for food purchases.

The debit cards in question provide access to real money accounts where the government deposits aid money for the recipient monthly. The recipient is free to spend it however he pleases. If they ban the use of the cards inside casino, all that is needed from the client is to walk out, and find an ATM outside.
"When two people always agree one of them is unnecessary"
FleaStiff
FleaStiff
  • Threads: 265
  • Posts: 14484
Joined: Oct 19, 2009
May 11th, 2011 at 3:56:42 AM permalink
Quote: weaselman

If they ban the use of the cards inside casino, all that is needed from the client is to walk out, and find an ATM outside.

Right, but then some politician wouldn't get his name and photo in the paper for sponsoring the bill and someone's brother in law wouldn't get the contract for reprogramming the computer system. Its a publicity stunt ... as are most laws.
Mosca
Mosca
  • Threads: 191
  • Posts: 4140
Joined: Dec 14, 2009
May 11th, 2011 at 7:08:03 AM permalink
Or it could be like it was before they had cards; they got a check, cashed it, and went to the casino. Not a whole lot you can do about human nature. People are usually poor for a reason.
A falling knife has no handle.
FarFromVegas
FarFromVegas
  • Threads: 7
  • Posts: 878
Joined: Dec 10, 2010
May 11th, 2011 at 7:23:38 AM permalink
Quote:

The cards, which provide recipients access to federal as well as state cash, were also used in tourist destinations, including the Las Vegas Strip, a remote Hawaiian island that is home to two Four Seasons resorts and on cruise ships leaving from ports around the globe.




I don't have a problem with this part. Many workers in tourists destinations don't earn enough to live in those destinations. I've read about the hotel housekeepers and waiters in Aspen living in tents because there is no affordable housing there for them.
Each of us is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts. Preparing for a fight about your bad decision is not as smart as making a good decision.
gofaster87
gofaster87
  • Threads: 3
  • Posts: 445
Joined: Mar 19, 2011
May 11th, 2011 at 7:32:14 AM permalink
.....
Knuckleball3
Knuckleball3
  • Threads: 7
  • Posts: 98
Joined: Nov 30, 2010
May 11th, 2011 at 8:09:38 AM permalink
No matter what laws are set in place to prevent the welfare receivers from abusing the monies they receive, there will always be ways for them to find ways around them even if it means getting 50 cents to $1. The only thing that will solve the abuse of welfare money, is to cut out all welfare checks, food stamps, etc.
"In the poker game of life, women are the rake" Edward Norton (Rounders)
FleaStiff
FleaStiff
  • Threads: 265
  • Posts: 14484
Joined: Oct 19, 2009
May 11th, 2011 at 9:54:35 AM permalink
Quote: gofaster87

Its government help to feed a person and their family, not a free for all on junk food.

Junk food from 7-11 is pretty much their normal diet.
Knuckleball3
Knuckleball3
  • Threads: 7
  • Posts: 98
Joined: Nov 30, 2010
May 11th, 2011 at 10:00:41 AM permalink
Quote: FleaStiff

Junk food from 7-11 is pretty much their normal diet.



True story.
"In the poker game of life, women are the rake" Edward Norton (Rounders)
thecesspit
thecesspit
  • Threads: 53
  • Posts: 5936
Joined: Apr 19, 2010
May 11th, 2011 at 1:08:42 PM permalink
Quote: gofaster87

In Vegas, most 7-11's accept food stamps. They aren't stamps though, they look like a debit card. I see people buying candy bars and energy drinks all the time. Its bullshit. Its government help to feed a person and their family, not a free for all on junk food.



The problem is, if the market is the king, they people should be free to spend money however they choose; BUT with a social safety net (however low) there's going to be people who rely on the state. So we have this odd state where we have a market led cash payment, but a statist safety net which is neither fish nor fowl and has the worst of either system. What would be the response if welfare handouts were direct benefits of food and shelter (e.g. n choice or limited choice in the goods given out) with direct control of the person's life (which a hard-core statist approach would give)? Or the opposite where there is no welfare at all?

I don't know how hard/easy it is to fall onto welfare in the US. I've been on unemployment benefit in the UK for very short periods after losing jobs. I don't think I was on welfare because I was stupid or careless with my money. I would have survived in the short time without the money, but I had no idea it was going to be such a short period of time.
"Then you can admire the real gambler, who has neither eaten, slept, thought nor lived, he has so smarted under the scourge of his martingale, so suffered on the rack of his desire for a coup at trente-et-quarante" - Honore de Balzac, 1829
AZDuffman
AZDuffman
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 13886
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
May 11th, 2011 at 4:37:16 PM permalink
Quote: EvenBob

Back in the 80's, when I was in the taxi business, we took food stamps all the time instead of money. If the fare was $10, we'd take $15 in stamps. They weren't really stamps, they were books of coupons that looked like money. Never had any problem using them, nobody ever asked for ID. That was the point of taking 15 for 10, there was a possibility you couldn't cash them.



Maybe you got mad at me? Back in the 80s I was a cashier and my boss was very strict on asking for the food stamp ID. And it was a "food stamp ID" as any other ID did not show you could use the stamps. People would whine 10 times a day how "we were the only store that asked for it." The other thing was if they were out of the book. Without the book it was a nogo, unless they were using $1s which were given as soft change. Hard change (coins) were given as regular coins.

It was sick how the stamps were spent. Rule was if was meant for a human to eat, or seeds for food, you could use them. Only exception was "prepared" food. People loaded up on junk food with them all the time. Many had so much WIC vouchers they forgot to use them, that is another story tho.
All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others
gofaster87
gofaster87
  • Threads: 3
  • Posts: 445
Joined: Mar 19, 2011
May 11th, 2011 at 5:12:19 PM permalink
.....
Toes14
Toes14
  • Threads: 18
  • Posts: 455
Joined: May 6, 2010
May 11th, 2011 at 7:26:07 PM permalink
Quote: FleaStiff

They are going to gamble anyway, so what is the use of passing laws about it.



No reason to make it easier for them to do that. Make it a little more difficult to circumvent the system, and maybe you'll see a small percentage of them stop.

I'm actually amazed that this wasn't restricted from the start.
"Bite my Glorious Golden Ass!" - Bender Bending Rodriguez
FleaStiff
FleaStiff
  • Threads: 265
  • Posts: 14484
Joined: Oct 19, 2009
May 12th, 2011 at 8:57:31 AM permalink
Huffington article today on state's unemployment benefits being paid via junk-fee-laden debit cards that although still cheaper than a check cashing service for those without a bank account are annoying and expensive for the newly unemployed who have bank accounts.

"Of the 40 states that have switched from paper checks to prepaid debit cards, 22 states' cards charge ATM fees, 24 charge balance inquiry fees, and 28 charge inactivity fees. The cards in Arkansas, Idaho, Nebraska, Ohio, and Oregon come with overdraft fees ranging from $10 to $20."
Mikemyers
Mikemyers
  • Threads: 0
  • Posts: 1
Joined: May 27, 2013
May 27th, 2013 at 1:47:51 AM permalink
In regards with the welfare abuse, welfare recipients took out cash at bars, liquor stores, X-rated video shops, hookah parlors and even strip clubs, where they presumably spent their taxpayer money on lap dances rather than diapers, a Post investigation found. Ebt cardholders will no longer be allowed to withdraw welfare funds at automated teller machines in liquor stores, casinos or strip clubs if Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives get their way.
Article source: Welfare card withdrawals still occur at strip clubs, bars
FleaStiff
FleaStiff
  • Threads: 265
  • Posts: 14484
Joined: Oct 19, 2009
May 27th, 2013 at 5:16:15 AM permalink
Booze, lapdances and drugs instead of diapers.... I sure can't blame them!
FleaStiff
FleaStiff
  • Threads: 265
  • Posts: 14484
Joined: Oct 19, 2009
May 29th, 2013 at 3:49:12 AM permalink
The debit cards probably work for bail so why not for gambling? We see people on food stamps trying to convert some of them to cash so as to get drugs so its not unusual to see someone on some sort of welfare want to buy in at the blackjack table on the day the various checks are issued.
djatc
djatc
  • Threads: 83
  • Posts: 4477
Joined: Jan 15, 2013
May 29th, 2013 at 3:57:23 AM permalink
In the spirit of this thread:

swipe yo debt (its free)
"Man Babes" #AxelFabulous
1BB
1BB
  • Threads: 18
  • Posts: 5339
Joined: Oct 10, 2011
November 12th, 2013 at 6:26:08 AM permalink
Quote: FleaStiff

Junk food from 7-11 is pretty much their normal diet.



A couple of young girls about 11 or 12 years old were on their way to school this morning and stopped at the gas station as I was getting gas. I ended up behind them in line and couldn't help notice what one of these children purchased with an EBT card. Energy drinks, Cheetos and candy bars to the tune of $26 and change. She swiped the card and they were on their way, no doubt to get to school in time to throw their nutritious free lunch in the trash. Maddening and sad for several reasons.
Many people, especially ignorant people, want to punish you for speaking the truth. - Mahatma Ghandi
aceofspades
aceofspades
  • Threads: 366
  • Posts: 6506
Joined: Apr 4, 2012
November 12th, 2013 at 6:47:09 AM permalink
A friend of mine works at a state run shelter wherein welfare families stay for free (the state pays the facility $56/night)...these people are also on food stamps and also receive cash monthly. The people routinely ask if room service is available. Moreover, one of these people just leased a Mercedes. As she informed my friend who manages the place "I have free rent and free food - I might as well put the $800 cash I get each month towards something nice for myself". I say we cut off all aid and let everyone work for what they have.
1BB
1BB
  • Threads: 18
  • Posts: 5339
Joined: Oct 10, 2011
November 12th, 2013 at 6:58:13 AM permalink
Hear, hear.
Many people, especially ignorant people, want to punish you for speaking the truth. - Mahatma Ghandi
100xOdds
100xOdds
  • Threads: 638
  • Posts: 4257
Joined: Feb 5, 2012
November 12th, 2013 at 7:02:12 AM permalink
Quote: aceofspades

A friend of mine works at a state run shelter wherein welfare families stay for free (the state pays the facility $56/night)...these people are also on food stamps and also receive cash monthly. The people routinely ask if room service is available. Moreover, one of these people just leased a Mercedes. As she informed my friend who manages the place "I have free rent and free food - I might as well put the $800 cash I get each month towards something nice for myself". I say we cut off all aid and let everyone work for what they have.



welfare is limited to 5yrs lifetime.
and they have to go thru a jobs course.

obviously, u can still game the system.

but if u want reform, I want to start with farm substidies!
Craps is paradise (Pair of dice). Lets hear it for the SpeedCount Mathletes :)
AZDuffman
AZDuffman
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 13886
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
November 12th, 2013 at 7:50:26 AM permalink
Quote: 100xOdds

welfare is limited to 5yrs lifetime.
and they have to go thru a jobs course.



Rick Santorum said it best on this when he said the best "jobs course" is send them to McDonald's or Wal-Mart and let them learn about showing up on-time, clean, and sober. Seriously, the best training in how to keep a job is to work an entry-level job.
All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others
boymimbo
boymimbo
  • Threads: 17
  • Posts: 5994
Joined: Nov 12, 2009
November 12th, 2013 at 9:03:01 AM permalink
The question is however, why work at McDonald's/Walmart (where they will not hire you full time, they have to pay benefits) and earn $11,000/year (30 hrs/week) when you can sit at home for nothing and watch reality shows all day long and/or work under the table for cash?

That's why I think you have to set up minimum wage to a higher $. My socialist mind thinks that you still have to provide welfare benefits to those in need yet find enough space between basic needs and entry level job to make the entry level job worthwhile. And close up the holes in welfare to reduce free cash to a minimum. Yeah, there will be abuses on a debit card good at grocery stores only. You can only limit Credit/Debit card purposes by store class, so there will be ways to abuse.

If you're on welfare and earning equivalent $5/hour, then a jump to $7.25/hour just isn't worth it. A jump to $10/hour - $11/hour would be worth it. Raise the minimum wage. It will also raise the cost of fast food and other low margin items which will help out the obese who might consider cooking at home using vegetables over the .69 cent items at Taco Smell and enable small businesses to be able to compete with big box.
----- You want the truth! You can't handle the truth!
AZDuffman
AZDuffman
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 13886
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
November 12th, 2013 at 9:24:03 AM permalink
Quote: boymimbo

The question is however, why work at McDonald's/Walmart (where they will not hire you full time, they have to pay benefits) and earn $11,000/year (30 hrs/week) when you can sit at home for nothing and watch reality shows all day long and/or work under the table for cash?



The answer should be simple, so you can eat. If the gap between welfare and MW is not enough it is because welfare is too high, not because mw is too low.


Quote:

If you're on welfare and earning equivalent $5/hour, then a jump to $7.25/hour just isn't worth it. A jump to $10/hour - $11/hour would be worth it. Raise the minimum wage. It will also raise the cost of fast food and other low margin items which will help out the obese who might consider cooking at home using vegetables over the .69 cent items at Taco Smell and enable small businesses to be able to compete with big box.



*sigh* Why do we need to punish businesses because too many people refuse to work? And how is the higher mw going to help a small business by raising their labor costs? Raising mw just means fewer low skilled workers will find any job at all, this has been proven time and time again.
All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others
Beethoven9th
Beethoven9th
  • Threads: 75
  • Posts: 5072
Joined: Jul 30, 2012
November 12th, 2013 at 9:54:53 AM permalink
Quote: boymimbo

The question is however, why work at McDonald's/Walmart (where they will not hire you full time, they have to pay benefits) and earn $11,000/year (30 hrs/week) when you can sit at home for nothing and watch reality shows all day long and/or work under the table for cash?

That's why I think you have to set up minimum wage to a higher $.


You just argued against this statement in the first paragraph. Companies avoid offering health benefits by cutting workers' hours. Likewise, they will avoid paying out more $$$ per hour by cutting the number of employees!
Fighting BS one post at a time!
boymimbo
boymimbo
  • Threads: 17
  • Posts: 5994
Joined: Nov 12, 2009
November 12th, 2013 at 10:01:48 AM permalink
You would assume that McDonald's and Walmart are already optimized to have a minimum number of employees, wouldn't you think. Both companies spend billions of dollars on optimizing its supply and production chain. They do the same with their workforce as well. That's capitalism at its finest.

Where in your right mind do you think McDonald's/Walmart/home depot would hire any more than they need? If the minimum wage goes up, McDonald's and Walmart's only choice is to raise prices, not lay off staff. They are already at a minimum staffing complement and minimal wage costs. If all of a sudden, a state decided to lower its minimum wage from $7.25 to $6.00 would Walmart pay their employees $1.25 less and hire 20% more workers? No. They would lower their wages to their employees and in turn lower prices to its consumers and not hire one more soul.

And I will always differ when it comes to welfare. Welfare exists to help the needy. In my opinion, it should exist to provide basic shelter, heat, and food to its recipients (and health care), and no more. Changing the gap between minimum wage and welfare so that there would exist a marked difference in the quality of life would take more people off welfare and into the workforce. Or at least they would be competing with the undocumented workers, illegal immigrants, or aliens, whatever you want to call them.
----- You want the truth! You can't handle the truth!
aceofspades
aceofspades
  • Threads: 366
  • Posts: 6506
Joined: Apr 4, 2012
November 12th, 2013 at 10:03:43 AM permalink
We already live in a socialist system. Capitalism would weed out the weak - including every single one of those companies that were "too big to fail" years ago. If a company can no longer hack it in the market, they deserve to be out of said market.
Beethoven9th
Beethoven9th
  • Threads: 75
  • Posts: 5072
Joined: Jul 30, 2012
November 12th, 2013 at 10:07:42 AM permalink
Quote: boymimbo

If the minimum wage goes up, McDonald's and Walmart's only choice is to raise prices, not lay off staff.


Yeah, just like their only choice was to provide health insurance, not cut workers' hours. lol
Fighting BS one post at a time!
AZDuffman
AZDuffman
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 13886
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
November 12th, 2013 at 10:09:57 AM permalink
Quote: boymimbo

If all of a sudden, a state decided to lower its minimum wage from $7.25 to $6.00 would Walmart pay their employees $1.25 less and hire 20% more workers? No. They would lower their wages to their employees and in turn lower prices to its consumers and not hire one more soul.



Not likely as most WMT employees make more than minimum wage. But if wages went down they might indeed hire more people. For example, if they have more registers open they can get more customers checked out in a shorter amount of time, leading more people to stop by more often.

Quote:

And I will always differ when it comes to welfare. Welfare exists to help the needy. In my opinion, it should exist to provide basic shelter, heat, and food to its recipients (and health care), and no more. Changing the gap between minimum wage and welfare so that there would exist a marked difference in the quality of life would take more people off welfare and into the workforce. Or at least they would be competing with the undocumented workers, illegal immigrants, or aliens, whatever you want to call them.



Welfare was never supposed to be more than a short to mid term solution. But the problem is people keep with this attitude of, "well, minimum wage doesn't pay enough to live on." It never was meant for that. If you are beyond high school and all you can qualify for and find is a minimum wage job then you have made bad choices in life. Why do I have to keep subsidizing people who refuse to work their way up in life?
All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others
boymimbo
boymimbo
  • Threads: 17
  • Posts: 5994
Joined: Nov 12, 2009
November 12th, 2013 at 10:13:57 AM permalink
If the number of workers (supply) was a premium and WMT could not hire part-name because the supply was too low they would likely restructure its staff to provide benefits to its most valuable employees. That's not a problem.

Health benefits are a $3-$5 /hr benefit with a cost of $6-$10K per EE, which is why it's important to lower the costs of health care overall so that companies can hire full-time workers with little penalty.

Quote: wiki

On October 26, 2005, a Walmart internal memo sent to the firm's Board of Directors advised trimming over $1 billion in health care expenses by 2011 through measures such as attracting a younger, implicitly healthier work force by offering education benefits.[84] The memo also suggested giving sedentary Walmart staffers, such as cashiers, more physically demanding tasks, such as "cart-gathering," and eliminating full-time positions in favor of hiring part-time employees who would be ineligible for the more expensive health insurance and several policy proposals which may violate the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.[84] The memo also accused Walmart's lower paid employees of abusing emergency room visits, "possibly due to their prior experience with programs such as Medicaid," whereas such visits may actually be due to the reduced ability of uninsured or underinsured people to make timely appointments to see a regular physician.[84] Critics point to this internal memo as evidence that Walmart purports to be generous with its employee benefits, while in reality the company is working to cut such benefits by reducing the number of full-time and long-term employees and discouraging supposedly unhealthy people from working at Walmart....

...
In 2011, Walmart stopped providing health insurance for part-time employees working under 24 hours per week.[92] In 2013, health insurance benefits will not be available to employees who work fewer than 30 hours per week. Experts in labor and health care observed that the change will shift the burden of providing health care for Walmart employees to the federal government, as eligibility for Medicaid has been expanded under Obamacare.

----- You want the truth! You can't handle the truth!
boymimbo
boymimbo
  • Threads: 17
  • Posts: 5994
Joined: Nov 12, 2009
November 12th, 2013 at 10:24:49 AM permalink
Quote: AZDuffman

Not likely as most WMT employees make more than minimum wage.



Walmart employees don't make much. Let's compare Walmart (Sam's Club) to CostCo.

Average wage at Walmart (all employees) $10.11/hr. Average wage at Costco: $17/hr. At Costco, 82% have health insurance coverage and pay 8% of premiums, while at WalMart, less than half do and they pay 33% of premiums. Staff turnover at CostCo is 17% compared to 44%/year at WalMart. Both companies are extremely profitable. Which company would you rather work for?

Quote: AZDuffman

Welfare was never supposed to be more than a short to mid term solution. But the problem is people keep with this attitude of, "well, minimum wage doesn't pay enough to live on." It never was meant for that.



It shouldn't be meant for that. But people gravitate to that because it's easy to do so.


Quote: AZDuffman

Why do I have to keep subsidizing people who refuse to work their way up in life?



Because there are plenty of people who did not have the same opportunities as you, have mental health issues, have self-esteems, did not have the same luck as you, or are just too damned lazy. They still deserve to live. And would you rather see them on the streets fouling up your inner cities. Oh, many of them already do.
----- You want the truth! You can't handle the truth!
AZDuffman
AZDuffman
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 13886
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
November 12th, 2013 at 10:38:48 AM permalink
Quote: boymimbo



Average wage at Walmart (all employees) $10.11/hr. Average wage at Costco: $17/hr. At Costco, 82% have health insurance coverage and pay 8% of premiums, while at WalMart, less than half do and they pay 33% of premiums. Staff turnover at CostCo is 17% compared to 44%/year at WalMart. Both companies are extremely profitable. Which company would you rather work for?



I would rather work at Costco, most people would rather work at Costco. This is why Costco offers more money, to get the pick of the litter as far as employees goes. WMT clearly has made a choice to offer less for a lesser employee. This is how a free market works.


Because there are plenty of people who did not have the same opportunities as you, have mental health issues, have self-esteems, did not have the same luck as you, or are just too damned lazy. They still deserve to live. And would you rather see them on the streets fouling up your inner cities. Oh, many of them already do.



Low self-esteem? BOO-HOO-HOO, get to work! They already foul the inner-cities. And ask anyone who deals with welfare recipients and they will agree that as a group they are very rude and demanding, thinking they are "owed" everything. Welfare is supposed to be a safety net, not a hammock.
All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others
boymimbo
boymimbo
  • Threads: 17
  • Posts: 5994
Joined: Nov 12, 2009
November 12th, 2013 at 10:45:18 AM permalink
Then why is it a hammock? What makes it a hammock over a safety net? What cause people to get off of the hammock and get to work? And why am I not in a hammock (I'm on a couch, working from home, and considering taking the rest of the afternoon to play Pai Gow).
----- You want the truth! You can't handle the truth!
AZDuffman
AZDuffman
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 13886
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
November 12th, 2013 at 10:49:13 AM permalink
Quote: boymimbo

Then why is it a hammock? What makes it a hammock over a safety net?



Well, for starters when you live in a 3 bedroom townhouse with all the latest TV and other electronic equipment, and all kinds of other goodies that is a hammock.

Again, what causes people to get out of the hammock and get to work? Start taking away the goodies.
All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others
LarryS
LarryS
  • Threads: 67
  • Posts: 1410
Joined: Feb 26, 2011
November 12th, 2013 at 1:02:41 PM permalink
evidence to me that the welfare system is broke.

Look at other countries poor people are skinny, living in modest shelter, with modest amenities,

Here...look at the people on our welfare lines....many are FAT. many have smart phones, many have at least basic cable ay home. and many can even afford to buy lottery tickets daily.

minimum wage jobs at big companies should be looked on as an entry level position. There is alot of turnover, so if you stay AND if you are a good worker, good communication skills, good attendance and work record....you have a real good chance of moving up in pay rate.

So for the people giving excuses that people on welfare dont have incentive to work at walmart because they get the same amount sitting at home.......that is a bogus excuse. Everyone starts at entry level in their paricular jobs no one is going to give people a handlout in the job market. Everyone has to earn their step up in salary.

People who can work who sit home and collect welfare thinking one day someone is going to knock on their door and offer them a managerial job having no prior experience are just lazy. They have to go out and prove themselves as cashiers and lower paying jobs.

meanwhile they have their smart phone, cable, and bags and bags of chips to sit and eat while watching Maury.

I am not saying to take away the basics,,,, but as long as they are given all the comforts of home that hard working people have.....laziness will prevail
boymimbo
boymimbo
  • Threads: 17
  • Posts: 5994
Joined: Nov 12, 2009
November 12th, 2013 at 1:25:16 PM permalink
LarryS, +1. It is a bonus excuse, but if it works for them, then why not. Put it this way. I stay at home, have my "smartphone", have my basic cable, and can eat and drink and get laid once in while, how does that differ from me? I eat better. I have a car. I can go on trips from time to time. I have a better cable package. But is that worth the 2,000 hours, 20 year career and university education to experience that delta experience?

I don't know.

A smartphone is what, $25/month? Basic cable is $30/month? Any structured welfare plan will give enough cash to afford those things.

And there are plenty of people who have poor communications skills and are not good workers. If all of a sudden I was deprived of my $60/hr job and was forced to work at Walmart / McDonalds to $10/hr I'd be awfully unmotivated to work. And there are plenty of people who were say, in manufacturing making $50K/year with a skillset that wasn't transferrable with a good pension plan. There are millions of uneducated Americans who fit this bill, who have good jobs despite the lack of education. Everyone can't go to college. Colleges don't have the infrastructure. They get laid off, and the best they can do is make $7.25 an hour working nights at the local gas station. The best they can EVER hope for without re-education is what, $10/hour. Woot!

Of all of the people working for Walmart, how many of them are going to advance to the next tier from $7/hr to $10/hr? I'm waiting for the success stories of the Walmart story who started at the bottom and worked their way up to Sr. Vice President.
----- You want the truth! You can't handle the truth!
AZDuffman
AZDuffman
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 13886
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
November 12th, 2013 at 1:44:37 PM permalink
Quote: boymimbo



And there are plenty of people who have poor communications skills and are not good workers. If all of a sudden I was deprived of my $60/hr job and was forced to work at Walmart / McDonalds to $10/hr I'd be awfully unmotivated to work. And there are plenty of people who were say, in manufacturing making $50K/year with a skillset that wasn't transferrable with a good pension plan. There are millions of uneducated Americans who fit this bill, who have good jobs despite the lack of education. Everyone can't go to college. Colleges don't have the infrastructure. They get laid off, and the best they can do is make $7.25 an hour working nights at the local gas station. The best they can EVER hope for without re-education is what, $10/hour. Woot!




If the best you can do is $7-10 an hour then you have made many bad choices in life. Yes, you may need to get some re-education but welcome to earth. I am sure there were some buggy-whip craftsmen that had to learn to work on automobiles. The motivated ones did, the unmotivated ones, well the world needs ditch-diggers, too.


Quote:

Of all of the people working for Walmart, how many of them are going to advance to the next tier from $7/hr to $10/hr? I'm waiting for the success stories of the Walmart story who started at the bottom and worked their way up to Sr. Vice President.




I would say most can move to the $10 tier. In fact I would say it is next to impossible not to move up if you stick around and apply yourself. In a company the size of WMT or MCD there should be plenty of things you can move up to. There will always be more unmotivated folks than motivated.
All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others
boymimbo
boymimbo
  • Threads: 17
  • Posts: 5994
Joined: Nov 12, 2009
November 12th, 2013 at 1:56:58 PM permalink
WMT has a 1 year employee turnover of 44%. (95% over five years). That's damned high. Think of all of the retraining cost for replacements.
----- You want the truth! You can't handle the truth!
rxwine
rxwine
  • Threads: 209
  • Posts: 12166
Joined: Feb 28, 2010
November 12th, 2013 at 1:59:58 PM permalink
Even if every single person was employed, no unemployment at all, the workforce would be pyramidal. All restaurants, Wal*mart whatever would all need this large base of low wage workers with a few managers at the top. No matter how many jobs you create, it's just more pyramids.

It doesn't function with all bosses and owners. You can create a million more Walmarts and you need even more low wage workers.

So you either starve the bottom or pay them enough.

Perhaps the exception is everyone becomes self employed. I'm not sure how well that would work though. Still need UPS and truck drivers, and grocer trucks carrying food and stock handlers.
There's no secret. Just know what you're talking about before you open your mouth.
boymimbo
boymimbo
  • Threads: 17
  • Posts: 5994
Joined: Nov 12, 2009
November 12th, 2013 at 2:14:22 PM permalink
The thing is, like Costco, you can choose how much to pay your workers and therefore dictate what quality of life you want to have. Because you are offering a higher starting point than competitors, you get more applicants and can hire people with a higher skill set. You get better workers, on average, who are more loyal and are happy with their job because they are living above the poverty line.

It's fine if you are living at home with mommy or with three roommates at college and making $7.25/hr. But if you're a 45 year old dude or chick who's lost their job because of outsourcing, where does that $7.25 / hr put you. First thing i'm doing is collecting all of my unemployment benefits at a higher wage. For example, if I lose my job today, my EI benefits pay me about $12.50/hr, more than minimum wage. I'd milk that while taking under the table work. Then i'm looking at retraining programs.
----- You want the truth! You can't handle the truth!
AZDuffman
AZDuffman
  • Threads: 240
  • Posts: 13886
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
November 12th, 2013 at 2:33:22 PM permalink
Quote: boymimbo

But if you're a 45 year old dude or chick who's lost their job because of outsourcing, where does that $7.25 / hr put you. First thing i'm doing is collecting all of my unemployment benefits at a higher wage. For example, if I lose my job today, my EI benefits pay me about $12.50/hr, more than minimum wage. I'd milk that while taking under the table work. Then i'm looking at retraining programs.



And that is what motivated people do. A big gripe I and many people had with the "99ers" in the USA is that in 99 weeks you should be able to find *something.* You could even get an Associate Degree in 99 weeks. If you look for work for 99 weeks and can still only get $7.25 per hour, what is wrong with this picture?

Nothing stands still in an economy, if you are off-shored you need to find something else.
All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others
Beethoven9th
Beethoven9th
  • Threads: 75
  • Posts: 5072
Joined: Jul 30, 2012
November 12th, 2013 at 3:21:58 PM permalink
Quote: AZDuffman

Welfare is supposed to be a safety net, not a hammock.

Yep, when the poor people in this country are fat, that's a good indication that it's a hammock, not a safety net.


Quote: boymimbo

But if you're a 45 year old dude or chick who's lost their job because of outsourcing, where does that $7.25 / hr put you.

So? Life is tough, and EVERYBODY goes through rough patches. Doesn't mean the government needs to get involved in every single instance.
Fighting BS one post at a time!
LarryS
LarryS
  • Threads: 67
  • Posts: 1410
Joined: Feb 26, 2011
November 12th, 2013 at 9:03:57 PM permalink
no one says these 7.50/hr jobs are supposed to support a family. They are either temp jobs for highschool or college kids to make extra cash for books and pizza or date night....or primary jobs for people that stay while the highschool and college kids turn over. The people who stay have great ability to get promoted internally, or get a job elsewhere for more money based on experience.

If someone has limited skills, like they work for the local coal mine, and then the mine closes....it was up to them all along to recognize that they had limited skills and prepare for the future. They had the ability to take night courses and expand their horizons.

As far as smart phones and cable costing "only 100 dollars" a month.....Who says people on welfare should have this sort discretionary spending money.

I wonder how many people would get off of welfare if the govt paid for their utilities, rent, medical directly. Allowed a certain amount of funds for household furnishings and appliances(making people responsible to make these items last). And give people enough food stamps to buy food (no junkfood allowed)...just cheese, meats, fish, and grain products like pasta or bread. And the govt didnt give people the money to buy twinkies, kfc, lottery tickets, cell phones, cable....you dont need these things to live. With an antennae people can get 6 local stations for free and be connected with the world, All the local stations are sufficient to keep people abreast of whats going on in their community and notify people of any pending disasters. Basic cable is not a neccessity. Smart phones are not a neccessity. A bucket of KFC is not a necessity. Going to the movies is not a necessity. If you want all these things, get money from a relative that can help you out or get a job/

its the bleeding hears that says...its only 100 dollars for cable and smart phones each month.....well hell I would love for someone to give me an extra 100 dollars each month .....who wouldnt want that.....but who pays for it....100 extra dollars for millions and millions of people.

really is it up to the govt to give you money to buy your kid a video game for christmas???is that what a govt is for? Is that why we pay taxes? I am all for getting people the neccessities so they can get thru a rough patch.....but I am not in to paying for their entertainment movies, video games, dvd players etc
  • Jump to: