April 7th, 2011 at 8:57:56 PM
permalink
Hi,
A question open to anyone.
What would the odds of the dealer and player each hitting a mini-royal in '3 card poker' with 1, 6 or 8 decks.
I'm asking because I think it would be a pretty good side bet if the house was willing to stump up a decent payback.
A question open to anyone.
What would the odds of the dealer and player each hitting a mini-royal in '3 card poker' with 1, 6 or 8 decks.
I'm asking because I think it would be a pretty good side bet if the house was willing to stump up a decent payback.
April 8th, 2011 at 1:27:13 AM
permalink
Pretty sure TCP is only ever played with 1 deck.
But the odds would be astronomical. Too high to be a good side bet.
But the odds would be astronomical. Too high to be a good side bet.
http://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-topic/general/10042-woes-black-sheep-game-ii/#post151727
April 8th, 2011 at 3:44:07 AM
permalink
Three card poker.
Odds of a mini-royal = 0.000136. (.0136%)
squared = ~0.000000018 or about 1 in 54,065,744
Not one in a million, one in 54 million.
quick & dirty.
Odds of a mini-royal = 0.000136. (.0136%)
squared = ~0.000000018 or about 1 in 54,065,744
Not one in a million, one in 54 million.
quick & dirty.
Beware of all enterprises that require new clothes - Henry David Thoreau. Like Dealers' uniforms - Dan.
April 8th, 2011 at 7:48:48 AM
permalink
Quote: PaigowdanThree card poker.
Odds of a mini-royal = 0.000136. (.0136%)
squared = ~0.000000018 or about 1 in 54,065,744
Not one in a million, one in 54 million.
quick & dirty.
Exactly. The payout could be 50million to 1. But who would play it? They could just offer $1000 to all players at the table if this ever occurs, and it would probably reduce the house edge by 0.0001%?
http://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-topic/general/10042-woes-black-sheep-game-ii/#post151727
April 8th, 2011 at 2:54:56 PM
permalink
The hands are dependent, no? Wouldn't the odds change slightly since the removal of the cards making up one of the royals improves the chances for the second?
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication - Leonardo da Vinci
April 8th, 2011 at 3:39:23 PM
permalink
Quote: AyecarumbaThe hands are dependent, no? Wouldn't the odds change slightly since the removal of the cards making up one of the royals improves the chances for the second?
That occured to me, also, and I think you are correct. But Dan did say "quick & dirty."
April 8th, 2011 at 3:51:03 PM
permalink
I get the odds of 1 mini royal at 12/52 x 2/51 x 1/50 or, 1 in 5525
Once you have one mini royal the odds of a second one are 9/49 x 2/48 x 1/47, or 1 in 6141.333
So the odds of 2 minis using 2 defined hands (dealer's and yours) are 1 in 33,930,865 (rounded)
This is all assuming a single deck game.
Once you have one mini royal the odds of a second one are 9/49 x 2/48 x 1/47, or 1 in 6141.333
So the odds of 2 minis using 2 defined hands (dealer's and yours) are 1 in 33,930,865 (rounded)
This is all assuming a single deck game.
April 9th, 2011 at 12:57:31 AM
permalink
Thanks so much.
April 11th, 2011 at 5:41:25 AM
permalink
A seat at the 3 Card Poker table offers two separate games to play. You are usually allowed to play either one or both games at the same times, but some casinos will require to play either one or both games at the same time, but casinos will require you to play both while others will make only one option-able. The two games are Three Card Ante/Play, where you compete against the dealer and Pair Plus that has different bonus payouts for 3 card poker hands of one pair or better. To get more information you may get reference from here http://www.jokeronlinecasino.com' rel='nofollow' target='_blank'>http://www.jokeronlinecasino.com"]http://www.jokeronlinecasino.com
April 11th, 2011 at 5:49:23 AM
permalink
First mini-royal is 4/combin(52,3). Second mini-royal is 3/combin(49,3). The probability of two mini-royals is (4*3)/(combin(52,3)*combin(49,3)) = 1-in-33930866.6666....Quote: SOOPOOI get the odds of 1 mini royal at 12/52 x 2/51 x 1/50 or, 1 in 5525
Once you have one mini royal the odds of a second one are 9/49 x 2/48 x 1/47, or 1 in 6141.333
So the odds of 2 minis using 2 defined hands (dealer's and yours) are 1 in 33,930,865 (rounded)
This is all assuming a single deck game.
Just thought that this might be a more intuitive calculation.
--Ms. D.
"Who would have thought a good little girl like you could destroy my beautiful wickedness!"
July 9th, 2011 at 9:33:35 AM
permalink
A new way to express odds of an event taking place: Caesars has that One Million Dollar TCP Six Card bet.
They didn't indicate anything about house edge or odds or whatnot, they just said that their mathematician friends had told them they would most likely be paying out that million dollars three times a year. So I wonder: three days out of 365, then take all their tables for all shifts that day, then take the average Hands Per Hour for that day and eventually you could work your way to a pretty good estimate. Or perhaps "this bet should pay off big three times a year" is a good, if somewhat novel, way of expressing the odds of an event taking place.
I wonder which is a more sensible and understandable way of expressing it since many of the players will be ignorant of both the game and mathematics and also might be a bit soused as well?
They didn't indicate anything about house edge or odds or whatnot, they just said that their mathematician friends had told them they would most likely be paying out that million dollars three times a year. So I wonder: three days out of 365, then take all their tables for all shifts that day, then take the average Hands Per Hour for that day and eventually you could work your way to a pretty good estimate. Or perhaps "this bet should pay off big three times a year" is a good, if somewhat novel, way of expressing the odds of an event taking place.
I wonder which is a more sensible and understandable way of expressing it since many of the players will be ignorant of both the game and mathematics and also might be a bit soused as well?