Quote: strictlyAPI watched this over the course of 3 days. And took a picture as well- does anyone know the odds http://i.imgur.com/9SMCxsu.jpg
1 in 290 billion. No big deal, happens every day.
there is a huge deal made with calling upstairs when it hits and the suits come over anyway- kinda stupid on a 50-1 payout but still
still have never seen it that high
Quote: aceofspadesSomeone must either be lying or misremembering this incident.
Now you're getting it. No way this happened.
Quote: aceofspadesSomeone must either be lying or misremembering this incident.
Somebody must be lying, math anomalies
never happen in real life.
Dealers make mistakes all the time.
Any number of explanations are much, much, much more likely. Here are some:
1. Software error with the display
2. Dealer error
3. Software or hardware error with the card shuffler
4. This picture was photoshopped
5. Cheating
6. Forgetting to press the reset button after a payout
7. The casino intentionally lying, trying to lure customers who think a q-high is "due."
8. The hand counter is not adding correctly. It might be counting each hand as 10 hands.
9. The display was "hacked."
10. The decks they are playing with are missing queens and the shuffler is missing the fact that they are missing.
so do electronics, allll the timeeQuote: AxiomOfChoiceDealers make mistakes all the time.
I ask Roulette Dealers if the spins shown really were what happened when a rare event appears to have happened and every time,
no, I mean, every time they say "NO"
They are quick to add "Many times the spin doubles up."
But it is left there as proof
if you accept everything as truth what you read and see
see see see
this was in the news a few years ago
I have seen so many of these
If I had a dollar for every one I've seen...
Sally
Quote: phendricks1 in 290 billion. No big deal, happens every day.
I am getting 1 in 266.6 billion:
(0.982357^1478)^(-1)
Same for Q-high pai gow. Something simpler to explain it.
Quote: dwheatleyThe 7 19s in a row is at least on the scale of e-10, so one in 10 billion. I vote mechanical error.
Same for Q-high pai gow. Something simpler to explain it.
I just find it funny that people see a display like this and the first thing that they think is that it really happened. That should be pretty much the last explanation on your list.
Just like I hit two royals within 6 hands like ten years ago
Quote: strictlyAPThe roulette happens all the time when games are closed - it's pretty common- I'm not swearing for anything except that the photo was real- I watched the meter go up over the course of couple days but there may be some other explanation it also is 100 percent true that it could have been that once in 266 billion-
Just like I hit two royals within 6 hands like ten years ago
LOL... "just like".
Those two events are so many orders of magnitude apart it's not even funny. Once you hit a royal (and, with the amount of VP you play, you will hit a lot of royals) hitting another once within 6 hands will happen once every 7000 times or so.
You think that 7000 is "just like" 266 billion? Do you understand how large that number is?
While it's true that it's "possible" that it happened, just about any other explanation that you can think of (including that this conversation is all a massive hallucination on your part) are much, much, much more likely.
I never noticed that.Quote: strictlyAPThe roulette happens all the time when games are closed - it's pretty common-
I have seen it happen when the ball has been spun
and every Dealer has told me the same.
I do not really pay any attention to closed Roulette tables unless it is being opened.
The wait time for an independent event like a RoyalQuote: strictlyAPJust like I hit two royals within 6 hands like ten years ago
is just a geometric distribution where the highest probability after one event waiting for the event again (success) = 1
in other words
the roll of a 7 with 2d6
The 7 just rolled
what roll has the highest probability of being the very next 7.
The answer is the next roll
Same exactly with a Royal at VP. could see this is true after playing trillions^trillions*trillions of hands at VP
well, let a (super) computer do it for you if you do not have the time
the wait time
what Tommy?
"the waiting is the hardest part"
Sally
buts you only considered 1478 handsQuote: sodawaterI am getting 1 in 266.6 billion:
(0.982357^1478)^(-1)
I am 100% certain that that casino has dealt at last 3000 hands and the chance of that run is WAY easier
over 3000 hands dealt
1 in 9,572,890,046.24
this is close to Grandma Pat's monster 154 Craps hand!
Go Granny Go!!!
see
how I dids it in Excel Excel
remember
e^-A = 1/e^A
buts if that casino has dealt 10,000 hands the chance of at least 1 such streak =
1 in 1,761,637,070.65
a slam dunk!
see
Sally
Quote: mustangsally1 in 1,761,637,070.65
a slam dunk!
Indeed, that is exactly the probability that I will ever be able to slam dunk a basketball.
Quote: AxiomOfChoiceIndeed, that is exactly the probability that I will ever be able to slam dunk a basketball.
So your saying ya got a shot? :)
Quote: AxiomOfChoiceIndeed, that is exactly the probability that I will ever be able to slam dunk a basketball.
Just get one of those goals that adjust from 7 to 10 feet. I bet you can do it on 7 feet. It's fun as shit.
or a chanceQuote: rainmanSo your saying ya got a shot? :)
Guys, when the girl looks into your eyes
she could be yours
1 out of a million happens every day (earth time too)
But for a queen high not to happen for the dealer in over 1,400 hands, uh, I don't think so. Taught Dealer training on EZ Pai Gow, with a "Now, remember to reset the counter, guys...." [Dealer: "wuw?...Oh, yeah, okay..."]