aceofspades
aceofspades
  • Threads: 366
  • Posts: 6506
Joined: Apr 4, 2012
March 19th, 2014 at 12:35:26 PM permalink
State Senate approves VLT's for NY airports. (I like how the article states "Video Lottery Terminals a.k.a slots" lol )

Article
BleedingChipsSlowly
BleedingChipsSlowly
  • Threads: 23
  • Posts: 1034
Joined: Jul 9, 2010
March 19th, 2014 at 1:03:41 PM permalink
Quite different:

What Is the Difference between Video Lottery Terminals and Slot Machines?
“You don’t bring a bone saw to a negotiation.” - Robert Jordan, former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia
tringlomane
tringlomane
  • Threads: 8
  • Posts: 6284
Joined: Aug 25, 2012
March 19th, 2014 at 1:15:59 PM permalink
Unless NY law changes for the airport, you would much rather play in NY airports than McCarran at least, NY mandates a 90% long-term payout, the highest I have ever heard of. What's annoying about New York is that video poker also is predetermined so strategies and probabilities of video poker do not apply on their VLT machines.
Nareed
Nareed
  • Threads: 373
  • Posts: 11413
Joined: Nov 11, 2009
March 19th, 2014 at 1:39:46 PM permalink
I thought this was about gates and landing slots...
Donald Trump is a fucking criminal
hook3670
hook3670
  • Threads: 38
  • Posts: 436
Joined: May 17, 2011
March 19th, 2014 at 1:41:48 PM permalink
Not all VLT's are class II. Maryland calls their slots VLT's(Delaware may also) and they are regular class III slots and video poker. They did it to help the referendum pass.
AcesAndEights
AcesAndEights
  • Threads: 67
  • Posts: 4300
Joined: Jan 5, 2012
March 19th, 2014 at 4:43:15 PM permalink
Can someone explain to me the disdain for VLTs, outside of the context of Video Poker?

From the VP angle, I totally get it. The game may look like Video Poker, but it's not dealt from a real deck, it's impossible to figure out the return percentage, there's no real strategy (the fairy comes and fixes your hand if you throw away a winner), etc. etc.

But compared to a regular slot machine, nothing about the VLT mechanism vs. an independent RNG machine inherently hurts or harms the players, as far as I can tell. A VLT game could be structured such that the RTP (return to player) of an average bet is 99% just as easily as an RNG machine could be programmed with an RTP of 80%. I understand that with the VLT approach, depending on specific implementation, the percentage might vary and not be constant from one hand to the next, depending on the pool of remaining "tickets." But that doesn't seem to be a negative on its face...in fact it might even be a positive, since VLTs might actually be "due" in the ploppy-understood sense, unlike a traditional slot.

Is it just that VLTs tend to be programmed with lower returns in general?
"So drink gamble eat f***, because one day you will be dust." -ontariodealer
BleedingChipsSlowly
BleedingChipsSlowly
  • Threads: 23
  • Posts: 1034
Joined: Jul 9, 2010
March 19th, 2014 at 5:22:45 PM permalink
Perhaps variance plays a role in why states prefer Class II VLT's. An RNG CLass III slot might have a "bad day" as far as the state is concerned and award too much in returns. As I understand it, the state is guaranteed their pound of flesh with Class II VLT operations. That is, the state isn't gambling on their returns!

Edit: Added closing comment.
“You don’t bring a bone saw to a negotiation.” - Robert Jordan, former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia
Lemieux66
Lemieux66
  • Threads: 24
  • Posts: 1226
Joined: Feb 16, 2014
March 19th, 2014 at 5:33:59 PM permalink
Quote: AcesAndEights

Can someone explain to me the disdain for VLTs, outside of the context of Video Poker?

From the VP angle, I totally get it. The game may look like Video Poker, but it's not dealt from a real deck, it's impossible to figure out the return percentage, there's no real strategy (the fairy comes and fixes your hand if you throw away a winner), etc. etc.

But compared to a regular slot machine, nothing about the VLT mechanism vs. an independent RNG machine inherently hurts or harms the players, as far as I can tell. A VLT game could be structured such that the RTP (return to player) of an average bet is 99% just as easily as an RNG machine could be programmed with an RTP of 80%. I understand that with the VLT approach, depending on specific implementation, the percentage might vary and not be constant from one hand to the next, depending on the pool of remaining "tickets." But that doesn't seem to be a negative on its face...in fact it might even be a positive, since VLTs might actually be "due" in the ploppy-understood sense, unlike a traditional slot.

Is it just that VLTs tend to be programmed with lower returns in general?



It's a Genie!
10 eyes for an eye. 10 teeth for a tooth. 10 bucks for a buck?! Hit the bad guys where it hurts the most: the face and the wallet.
Nareed
Nareed
  • Threads: 373
  • Posts: 11413
Joined: Nov 11, 2009
March 19th, 2014 at 5:50:42 PM permalink
Quote: AcesAndEights

But compared to a regular slot machine, nothing about the VLT mechanism vs. an independent RNG machine inherently hurts or harms the players, as far as I can tell.



It might.

I don't know how they work, so maybe I'm all wrong. But in some lotteries there is a set number of prizes of varying amounts (think scratch cards, for example). If VLT slots operate that way, it means there is just one jackpot, say, per period of time, ten second prizes, and so on. Whereas on a regular, random slot machine in Vegas, the odds of hitting a jackpot are the same for every pull.
Donald Trump is a fucking criminal
MathExtremist
MathExtremist
  • Threads: 88
  • Posts: 6526
Joined: Aug 31, 2010
March 19th, 2014 at 6:24:33 PM permalink
Quote: BleedingChipsSlowly

Perhaps variance plays a role in why states prefer Class II VLT's. An RNG CLass III slot might have a "bad day" as far as the state is concerned and award too much in returns. As I understand it, the state is guaranteed their pound of flesh with Class II VLT operations. That is, the state isn't gambling on their returns!

Edit: Added closing comment.


FYI, electronic pull-tab VLTs are not Class II. They are Class III, but that's only relevant when a tribal gaming operation runs them anyway because IGRA only applies to tribal gaming. In New York, the VLTs are regulated by the state, and the state can make whatever rules it wants.

Edit: I just read that article about the purported difference between slots and VLTs. It is very wrong.
"In my own case, when it seemed to me after a long illness that death was close at hand, I found no little solace in playing constantly at dice." -- Girolamo Cardano, 1563
BleedingChipsSlowly
BleedingChipsSlowly
  • Threads: 23
  • Posts: 1034
Joined: Jul 9, 2010
March 19th, 2014 at 7:08:45 PM permalink
Quote: MathExtremist

I just read that article about the purported difference between slots and VLTs. It is very wrong.


The WoO site has about the same information posted as part of Ask the Wizard: Non-Casino Games - FAQ under the question beginning with In New York state they have Video Lottery Terminals (VLT’s) at off-track betting spots.: VLT’s are glorified pull-tab games. There is a predetermined pool of outcomes. Also wrong? if so, in what way?
“You don’t bring a bone saw to a negotiation.” - Robert Jordan, former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia
AxiomOfChoice
AxiomOfChoice
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 5761
Joined: Sep 12, 2012
March 19th, 2014 at 7:14:25 PM permalink
Well, slots have a pre-determined pool of outcomes, too (there are finitely many combinations of reel stops). The difference is that, with slots, the drawing is done with replacement, and with VLTs it is done without replacement and occasional refreshing of the pool.

I'm not sure how I feel about the VLT system. There is definitely something that I don't like about it, but I can't put my finger on it. It just doesn't work how I feel that it is "supposed" to work.
BleedingChipsSlowly
BleedingChipsSlowly
  • Threads: 23
  • Posts: 1034
Joined: Jul 9, 2010
March 19th, 2014 at 7:21:17 PM permalink
Quote: Nareed

It might... If VLT slots operate that way, it means there is just one jackpot, say, per period of time, ten second prizes, and so on. Whereas on a regular, random slot machine in Vegas, the odds of hitting a jackpot are the same for every pull.



Quote: AxiomOfChoice

I'm not sure how I feel about the VLT system. There is definitely something that I don't like about it, but I can't put my finger on it. It just doesn't work how I feel that it is "supposed" to work.



I think Nareed nailed it.
“You don’t bring a bone saw to a negotiation.” - Robert Jordan, former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia
MathExtremist
MathExtremist
  • Threads: 88
  • Posts: 6526
Joined: Aug 31, 2010
March 19th, 2014 at 7:40:14 PM permalink
Quote: BleedingChipsSlowly

The WoO site has about the same information posted as part of Ask the Wizard: Non-Casino Games - FAQ under the question beginning with In New York state they have Video Lottery Terminals (VLT’s) at off-track betting spots.: VLT’s are glorified pull-tab games. There is a predetermined pool of outcomes. Also wrong? if so, in what way?


No, that part is correct -- about the NY state games. But pull-tab VLTs aren't Class II; they don't have anything to do with tribal gaming necessarily, as they're operated both by NY state and WA tribal, among others; they are not "preprogramed (sic) to payout at specific times"; and they are not all linked together playing from the same pool of outcomes.

The following paragraph conflates the operation of actual Class II bingo-based games with the operation of pull-tab based Class III games:
Quote:

VLTs are usually equated more with games like bingo, pull-tabs, scratch-offs, or lotto than they are with slot machines. This is because there are a pre-determined number of winners, and players are competing with each other for a prize rather than against the house. There is also not necessarily a winner in each game.


That's just a mess. And it also doesn't distinguish between finite-pool pull-tab VLTs in NY with RNG-based VLTs in, say, Oregon, West Virginia, Rhode Island, or Delaware. In fact, the VLT games in a vast majority of jurisdictions that regulate them would be called "slot machines" in Nevada or New Jersey. I can drive five minutes from my house and play real, RNG-driven video poker on an Oregon Lottery VLT.
"In my own case, when it seemed to me after a long illness that death was close at hand, I found no little solace in playing constantly at dice." -- Girolamo Cardano, 1563
AxiomOfChoice
AxiomOfChoice
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 5761
Joined: Sep 12, 2012
March 19th, 2014 at 7:54:30 PM permalink
In case people aren't aware, the distinction between class II gaming and class III gaming is that in class II gaming the players play against each other, and the house takes a cut (like in poker or bingo) and in class III gaming the game is played against the house.

For pull-tab type games, though, I don't really see a distinction.
BleedingChipsSlowly
BleedingChipsSlowly
  • Threads: 23
  • Posts: 1034
Joined: Jul 9, 2010
March 19th, 2014 at 8:07:08 PM permalink
Quote: AxiomOfChoice

... For pull-tab type games, though, I don't really see a distinction.


Wouldn't the pull-tab type games be a special case where previous results influence future EV? If a particular machine has been played all day without a significant payout, would that mean it's "more due," something that doesn't apply to RNG machines?

Thanks for the answer, MathExtremist, and a tip of my hat to you for using "conflate!"
“You don’t bring a bone saw to a negotiation.” - Robert Jordan, former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia
AxiomOfChoice
AxiomOfChoice
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 5761
Joined: Sep 12, 2012
March 19th, 2014 at 8:24:27 PM permalink
Quote: BleedingChipsSlowly

Wouldn't the pull-tab type games be a special case where previous results influence future EV? If a particular machine has been played all day without a significant payout, would that mean it's "more due," something that doesn't apply to RNG machines?



What I meant was, I don't see the difference between class II VLT and class III VLT (is there such a thing as class III VLT?)
BleedingChipsSlowly
BleedingChipsSlowly
  • Threads: 23
  • Posts: 1034
Joined: Jul 9, 2010
March 19th, 2014 at 8:41:01 PM permalink
Quote: AxiomOfChoice

What I meant was, I don't see the difference between class II VLT and class III VLT (is there such a thing as class III VLT?)


I get from what's been posted and referenced in this thread that Class II VLT's have a finite set of results. Each wager gets you one of those results, and the particular result is then no longer available from the pool. Periodically the pool is refreshed with an additional batch of possible results. The state/tribe knows that if the entire pool is sold they will have an exact, known profit since composition of the prize pool is known. Obviously, there is no incentive for the state/tribe to stop taking wagers even when the pool has little to no EV for the buyers. Class III VLT's employ an RNG selection from a pay/probability table, but prizes awarded do not change the EV for the next wager. It is possible that the state/tribe will take a loss on a particular machine, but like other games they rely on the long-term return to mean results and, of course, the "house edge." That's how I understand the difference. I could be wrong!
“You don’t bring a bone saw to a negotiation.” - Robert Jordan, former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia
AxiomOfChoice
AxiomOfChoice
  • Threads: 32
  • Posts: 5761
Joined: Sep 12, 2012
March 19th, 2014 at 9:56:10 PM permalink
Quote: BleedingChipsSlowly

I get from what's been posted and referenced in this thread that Class II VLT's have a finite set of results. Each wager gets you one of those results, and the particular result is then no longer available from the pool. Periodically the pool is refreshed with an additional batch of possible results. The state/tribe knows that if the entire pool is sold they will have an exact, known profit since composition of the prize pool is known. Obviously, there is no incentive for the state/tribe to stop taking wagers even when the pool has little to no EV for the buyers. Class III VLT's employ an RNG selection from a pay/probability table, but prizes awarded do not change the EV for the next wager. It is possible that the state/tribe will take a loss on a particular machine, but like other games they rely on the long-term return to mean results and, of course, the "house edge." That's how I understand the difference. I could be wrong!



Sorry, what I meant was, I don't see the difference between class II pull-tabs and class III pull-tabs. Are class-III pull-tabs an oxymoron?
MathExtremist
MathExtremist
  • Threads: 88
  • Posts: 6526
Joined: Aug 31, 2010
March 19th, 2014 at 10:02:36 PM permalink
Quote: AxiomOfChoice

What I meant was, I don't see the difference between class II VLT and class III VLT (is there such a thing as class III VLT?)


It's the opposite; there really isn't such a thing as a Class II VLT; those are usually called "bingo machines" or. Class II games are those that are operated by tribes without needing a tribal-state compact. Pull-tab or finite-pool VLTs are Class III. That was the holding of several Fed. Circuit cases in the early 90s after tribes, who were naturally trying to get away with as much slot-like gameplay as they could after IGRA but without compacting, were experimenting with lots of different permutations of EGM gameplay. It's a fascinating history, one I recently had occasion to research in great detail. The bottom line is that EGMs using central determination and finite pools (video pull-tabs) are all Class III under IGRA:
http://openjurist.org/14/f3d/633/cabazon-band-of-mission-indians-v-national-indian-gaming-commission-j

Also, while there's a pretty narrow and well-defined category of games that fall under the "Class II" moniker, based as it is on federal statute, the "VLT" label applies to many different types of games. One common thread is that a state or provincial lottery, as opposed to a private gaming enterprise, is typically responsible for authorizing and monitoring VLTs. RNG-driven games in Oregon or Delaware are "video lottery terminals" while the same games in Nevada would be "slot machines." The RNG and math models may be exactly the same, but in Nevada the casino is doing the back-office accounting while in Oregon it's the state lottery. On the other hand, video pull-tab games (that look like slots) in New York are also called VLTs. And in Washington tribal locations, where the gaming machines are hooked up to a central-determination system made by the same vendor (MGAM) as in New York, the machines are instead called "TLS" - Tribal Lottery System. http://www.wsgc.wa.gov/tribal/tribal-lottery-system.aspx
"In my own case, when it seemed to me after a long illness that death was close at hand, I found no little solace in playing constantly at dice." -- Girolamo Cardano, 1563
tringlomane
tringlomane
  • Threads: 8
  • Posts: 6284
Joined: Aug 25, 2012
March 20th, 2014 at 12:17:59 AM permalink
Class II is more like electronic bingo as ME mentioned. Ironically, I hit the top payout on a class II game ("Texas Tea" in an Alabama racino - now closed because Alabama sucks) before I hit the top payout in a RNG-driven slot ("Goosin' Around" at Majestic Star in Indiana). With the former big win, I technically hit 22 bingo numbers in some random pattern within 48 calls or something like that. The game just displayed 5 "Texas Tea" symbols for me. The help page also listed all the winning bingo combinations. If I collected all of the info and did the math right with a computer, I could have calculated the return from the help page data.
AcesAndEights
AcesAndEights
  • Threads: 67
  • Posts: 4300
Joined: Jan 5, 2012
March 20th, 2014 at 7:54:30 AM permalink
Well now I'm totally confused. Good thing I don't really care.
"So drink gamble eat f***, because one day you will be dust." -ontariodealer
  • Jump to: