Read more: http://www.myfoxdc.com/story/24418581/nevadas-biggest-casinos-lose-135b-in-2013#ixzz2q6UpCrIa
Follow us: @myfoxdc on Twitter | myfoxdc on Facebook
Read more: http://www.myfoxdc.com/story/24418581/nevadas-biggest-casinos-lose-135b-in-2013#ixzz2q6V9dt9C
Follow us: @myfoxdc on Twitter | myfoxdc on Facebook
Gambling revenue was up at a higher percentage (double) than the total revenue increased. Maybe figuring out how to get more gambling action would help fix things????
Bean counters focus on beans. Casinos need to focus on gambling. Las Vegas has a lot of things that take some time away from gambling, but I am there mainly to...gamble.... I can see shows, look at the pretty colors, etc. elsewhere. There is nowhere else that I can get the variety of places to gamble that I can in Las Vegas.
...that is just me, though...
Quote: AZDuffmanat some point they will have to admit the Wynn-supercasino-boom of 1989-2005 is no more.
Seems to me we realize that already. When was the last time anyone started a new casino from scratch?
Quote: WizardSeems to me we realize that already. When was the last time anyone started a new casino from scratch?
speaking of which, anyone know of updates to the Echelon super casino that used to be the Sarhara?
Quote: 100xOddsspeaking of which, anyone know of updates to the Echelon super casino that used to be the Sarhara?
That doesn't count as "from scratch" in my opinion, but just driving past there I see construction going on.
Quote: 100xOddsspeaking of which, anyone know of updates to the Echelon super casino that used to be the Sarhara?
Here's a recent news article:
http://www.reviewjournal.com/business/business-press/remakes-properties-work-resorts-world-expected-enliven-las-vegas-strip-14
The new project on the Echelon site (which replaced the Stardust) is Resorts World. Construction is planned to begin this year.
The Sahara is projected to reopen this year as SLS Las Vegas.
Quote: WizardSeems to me we realize that already. When was the last time anyone started a new casino from scratch?
I was thinking more broadly than that. Not just the casino owners but townspeople in general.
Like in Rochester, NY where Kodak and Xerox once were the lifeblood but after the early 1980s they were in a permanent decline. It took until digital cameras were everywhere for the locals to accept fully that life would be changed forever. Sooner or later Vegas locals will have to start and get new business lines to start up.
Question is, did the metro area grow beyond what it should have and will it ever support such a large population absent the tourist economy?
By the way, Atlantic City is also in serious decline right now because they focused entirely on gambling and now Pennsylvania has their own casinos so tourists don't visit as much. AC never built up other entertainment options as part of their resorts and now they are paying the price.
Quote: gpac1377Here's a recent news article:
http://www.reviewjournal.com/business/business-press/remakes-properties-work-resorts-world-expected-enliven-las-vegas-strip-14
The new project on the Echelon site (which replaced the Stardust) is Resorts World. Construction is planned to begin this year.
The Sahara is projected to reopen this year as SLS Las Vegas.
oh wow.. so the echelon mega casino is the stardust/Frontier site.
and the Saraha is being converted into a mega casino by a different coglamerate.
so 2 new mega casinos opening in vegas soon.
hopefully they don't turn out to be a Revel.
Quote: 100xOddsoh wow.. so the echelon mega casino is the stardust/Frontier site.
and the Saraha is being converted into a mega casino by a different coglamerate.
so 2 new mega casinos opening in vegas soon.
hopefully they don't turn out to be a Revel.
It still doesn't seem like to me, there is the business there to support 2 new big mega casinos. Either wishful thinking and their throwing money away, or I don't know what I'm talking about.
Quote: AZDuffman
Question is, did the metro area grow beyond what it should have and will it ever support such a large population absent the tourist economy?
That question can be asked about almost any city. St Louis was smaller than only NYC, Philadelphia, and Brooklyn in 1870.
Buffalo was once a top 10 city.
For the most part people largely forsook the deserts of the world prior to the 20th century. Now they flock to them.
It's a shame they didn't move harder on Space Tourism. Vegas is a much more logical place than Truth or Consequences, New Mexico.
Quote: pacomartin
For the most part people largely forsook the deserts of the world prior to the 20th century. Now they flock to them.
Because if you have all the water and A/C you want the desert becomes a mostly nice place to live. I have a buddy in Buffalo who insists it will rise again because of its access to plenty of water. By now it and Rochester were supposed to be the metroplex DFW became. Its not even close.
Which brings me back to Vegas. If you think about it, there is little reason to have a big metro area there. St Louis was and is huge because it sits on both land and water that are natural interchanges. New York is a natural and still hue port--if you eat a chocolate bar made in NY the beans came through it.
Vegas should probably be most closely associated with Phoenix in some ways. Killer heat in the desert, cropped up because there is enough water nearby to sustain people but not great for commercial navigation. But Phoenix became a more diverse economy while Vegas did not. Will "another Phoenix" be supported?
My take is if the USA did not have Vegas we would need to invent it. DiNero's voice over in the beginning of "Casino" is correct about it being a morality car wash second chance place. Most places do not want all the wild behavior that can happen in Vegas. Nations need an "anything (almost) goes imperial morality-free city" in some ways, even if reality is not quite that. Vegas is a sort of pressure relief valve, go blow off steam then come back to life.
But such a place may only need half or less the population they have now.
When was the last time they had to?Quote: WizardSeems to me we realize that already. When was the last time anyone started a new casino from scratch?
Now if they want a big new super casino its got to be WAY out in the desert with all the support services and employees commuting.
Cheaper to reshuffle.
Besides.... what new "theme" would you like to start with? City Center did the "No Theme Mega Box" ... it didn't work.
Whats the theme: See Arab dollars swallow Vegas?
Lake Tahoe ... I know that the lake is suffering, that all the rich nudists live in Incline Village and that the poorer nudists share about eleven different areas there.... but why do the casinos suffer. Sure they won't allow nudity but aren't nudists the highest spending demographic there is in the USA? (No, Paco... I can't find a source for it, but I will try to). Nudists were number one and professional artists were the second ... this is from a survey I read eons ago and wish I could find again. It tracked long term real estate growth with dominant demographic data.