TIA.
(a) on the 1-2-4-5 corner;
(b) between the 2 and the 5;
(c) on the 2-3-5-6 corner;
(d) between the 4 and the 5;
(e) on the 5;
(f) between the 5 and the 6;
(g) on the 4-5-7-8 corner;
(h) between the 5 and the 8;
and (i) on the 5-6-8-9 corner?
That is for the inside bets onlyQuote: thecesspitFull complete. That is the phrase I've heard.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roulette#Full_completes.2Fmaximums
to include all the outside bets also, I have never seen a term for it, not that there isn't one
It is not in Roulette Xtreme, so I do not know
For example, a complete bet on 17, with a $1000 unit, would be equivalent to this set of straight-up bets:
$2000 on 13
$4000 on 14
$2000 on 15
$6000 on 16
$12000 on 17
$6000 on 18
$2000 on 19
$4000 on 20
$2000 on 21
Is this correct?
I hope you found your answer. More interested in why?Quote: teliotYes, that's it! Thanks.
Is this correct?
12 units on the 17 would pay 35*12= 420 units
A complete pays 392 units for a #17 hit
392/35 will not work out
even if you add the outside bets, that adds only 7 units to the win
added: Ah, 4 units on each outside bet does work.
Got it
ZCore13
Yeah that should work.Quote: Zcore13Shouldn't you have some on Black and Odd also?
ZCore13
But with a max bet of 1 unit straight-up one could certainly bet more than 4 units on an outside number to arrive at his 420 unit payoff.
I am more interested on the why behind the question
In reality, I do not think the casino actually places these bets on the layout as shown in my photo.
Never watched this type of action before.
I am researching loss rebate advantage play on roulette similar to the analysis I completed for Don Johnson on blackjack.Quote: 7crapsI am more interested on the why behind the question
Quote: 7crapsYeah that should work.
But with a max bet of 1 unit straight-up one could certainly bet more than 4 units on an outside number to arrive at his 420 unit payoff.
I am more interested on the why behind the question.
It's how a high roller can exceed the house maximum for a given number. There isn't much reason to make a full complete bet if you're not already maxed out on the number you want - the payoff is always better for a straight up bet than anything else.
Edit: never mind, I think I answered a different question than you were asking...
Quote: teliotI am researching loss rebate advantage play on roulette similar to the analysis I completed for Don Johnson on blackjack.
Have you related the full story about your experience with Johnson anywhere?
Quote: teliotFor example, a complete bet on 17, with a $1000 unit, would be equivalent to this set of straight-up bets:
$2000 on 13
$4000 on 14
$2000 on 15
$6000 on 16
$12000 on 17
$6000 on 18
$2000 on 19
$4000 on 20
$2000 on 21
Thank you ... what would a complete bet on 17 be with a $5.00 unit?
That is a little more my style than what you've depicted.
I know that for some reason 17 is a popular number, indeed I believe it is the most popular number to be bet, but is this because it is somewhat visually in the middle of the table or because it is arithmetically in the middle of what is available even though it is physically just one slot of many on the wheel and there is no particular "start", "middle" or "end" to a wheel.
Divide every value above by 200.Quote: FleaStiffThank you ... what would a complete bet on 17 be with a $5.00 unit?
$10 on 13, 15, 19, 21
$20 on 14,20
$30 on 16,18
$60 on 17
$200 total bet.