NOT SO FAMOUS LAST WORDS
they filled in 2008. Like I said, just sad.. "
Quote: Buzzard" They couldn't fill a stadium 1/4 the size of the one
they filled in 2008. Like I said, just sad.. "
You really miss him, don't you?
Quote: 1BBOpinionated? Stubborn? Curmudgeonly? Yes, yes and yes. Politically correct? Refreshingly not. Come on back EvenBob!
Oh.
I wasn't sure
who you were talking
about.
Quote: boymimboOh.
I wasn't sure
who you were talking
about.
Well done boymimbo!
How about this one, "I'm going to run a blacksheep contest..."
Just as sure that his name is not even Bob.
Or maybe he makes a good amount of money and is to busy trying to hide it before Obama gets the GOP to cave into his greedy call that the "Rich" pay more in taxes.
Quote: BuzzardBut he did raise some valid points about pizza. Just because you did not agree , that does not make them valueless.
You misunderstand Buzz. I very much agree that his posts had value. That is what I meant by "tough to replace".
Quote: midwestgbBob was the straw that stirred our collective drink. RIP.
That is a good way to put it.
Bob last logged in on November 6th. Who knows, maybe he chose to give himself a "one-month break" from the forum and we'll see him tomorrow (December 6th).
I am worried about him. Oh, I know, how much worry can you muster when you don't really know somebody?
Still.
Quote: odiousgambitI am worried about him. Oh, I know, how much worry can you muster when you don't really know somebody?
Still.
Worry not. EB's alive and well, still posting as of today, just not here.
My personal opinion is that I kinda think he's done with WoV. He's a Roulette guy, and claiming to win Roulette's never been accepted here. Other than that, he was always stirring up conversation about many different things, but that's been lightly forbidden as of late. If no one wants to talk about your game of choice, you're not "allowed" to talk about what you want, and the other site doesn't yet have the crowd to make a good, long conversation, you move on.
I think he moved on. Damn shame, too. He was one of my favorite posters and I miss him already.
If ya can't lick'em... strap one on.
Quote: avargovMy only hope is that he was at least enough of a gentleman to wrap himself in the shower curtain before he put his toe on the trigger. Those things tend to get messy.
Yes, and if he offed himself in a casino: the one true way to judge his worth as a fellow is whether he'd left a generous tip for the maid / clean up crew.
Perhaps he didn't think that I was kidding. I just noticed that I neglected to put the smiley face on this post.Quote: s2dbakerNo Bob, you have it all wrong. It's revenge against whitey! Move to another country now before we show up with our Obama Phones and Cadillacs that we buy with our welfare checks and and steal your collection of rare gold coins that you bought from Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck's advertiser. Flee!! Flee!!
Muhahahahaha!!!!!
Quote: FaceWorry not. EB's alive and well, still posting as of today, just not here.
Glad to hear. I have many friends of Bob's persuasion and we coexist just fine.
'Make sure you have a different opinion and people will talk about you.'
He made all these grand and glorious statements, more than predictions, guarantees, and when proven wrong, rather than stand up like a man, he took the path of the bully and scampered home to hide. (if I can't win, I am not going to play) Again, I say good riddance. But in reality, I suspect he isn't gone at all, just cowering in the corner. He is reading the site, either anonymously or posting under a new name, that we haven't yet recognized. So EB, this is for you. :)
Quote: EvenBobThe early voting is the exact opposite of what it was in 2008. It was Obama 52-46 at this time
in 08, its 52-46 Romney in 2012. Ignore it, I'm sure its meaningless.
WRONG!
Quote: EvenBobLatest from Rasmussen:
Ohio: Romney 50% Obama’s 48%.
Iowa: Romney 49%, Obama 48%
Wisconsin: Romney 49% Obama 49%
WRONG! WRONG! WRONG!
Quote: EvenBobYes. If you notice, Rasmussen doesn't jump all over the board. Thats how accurate polls work.
They move like glaciers one way or the other. But in the end, they're always the most accurate.
WRONG!
Quote: EvenBobIf its 50/50, its really 52 Romney and 48 Obama because the undecideds ALWAYS break 80% for the challenger.
WRONG!
Quote: EvenBobCaddell worked for Carter, Morris for Clinton in 92. Trippi worked for Teddy Kennedy's campaign in the last 70's. Rove worked in Nixon's 1972 campaign. They've all been active for decades.
Yet some snot nosed 34 yr old who never worked on any campaign is the 'expert'. Unbeliveable anybody even listens to him. Scary.
lol!
Quote: EvenBob
I bring up the Colorado prof's who have used their model to correctly predict every presidential election since 1980, and I'm told, 1980? Thats it? Big deal, thats nothing. Yet Nate Silver calls ONE election right, and he's a Lib god. You can't make this stuff up, folks.
WRONG! And no you can't make this stuff up. lol
Quote: EvenBobGuess we'll find out Tuesday, huh. The talk will talk and the bullshit will run and hide
under the bed..
And so you have!
Do I detect a trace of jealousy somewhere on this thread ?
Quote: MoosetonThis has got to be the most childish thread on this website.
Then I suggest you not view this video of why the Republicans lost !
http://www.hulu.com/watch/431777
Quote: kewljI say good riddance. This person was nothing more than an internet bully. I say that not because I have a different political view than him, I say it because his whole agenda was to be confrontational and combative. If you said the sky is blue, he would say, no it's green. If you then said, you are right, it is green, he would then switch and say it was blue. He would push people, insulting them and putting them down, but doing so in a way to circumvent the rules of the site. He actually boasted about this in a post.
He made all these grand and glorious statements, more than predictions, guarantees, and when proven wrong, rather than stand up like a man, he took the path of the bully and scampered home to hide. (if I can't win, I am not going to play) Again, I say good riddance. But in reality, I suspect he isn't gone at all, just cowering in the corner. He is reading the site, either anonymously or posting under a new name, that we haven't yet recognized. So EB, this is for you. :)Quote: EvenBobThe early voting is the exact opposite of what it was in 2008. It was Obama 52-46 at this time
in 08, its 52-46 Romney in 2012. Ignore it, I'm sure its meaningless.
WRONG!Quote: EvenBobLatest from Rasmussen:
Ohio: Romney 50% Obama’s 48%.
Iowa: Romney 49%, Obama 48%
Wisconsin: Romney 49% Obama 49%
WRONG! WRONG! WRONG!Quote: EvenBobYes. If you notice, Rasmussen doesn't jump all over the board. Thats how accurate polls work.
They move like glaciers one way or the other. But in the end, they're always the most accurate.
WRONG!Quote: EvenBobIf its 50/50, its really 52 Romney and 48 Obama because the undecideds ALWAYS break 80% for the challenger.
WRONG!Quote: EvenBobCaddell worked for Carter, Morris for Clinton in 92. Trippi worked for Teddy Kennedy's campaign in the last 70's. Rove worked in Nixon's 1972 campaign. They've all been active for decades.
Yet some snot nosed 34 yr old who never worked on any campaign is the 'expert'. Unbeliveable anybody even listens to him. Scary.
lol!Quote: EvenBobI bring up the Colorado prof's who have used their model to correctly predict every presidential election since 1980, and I'm told, 1980? Thats it? Big deal, thats nothing. Yet Nate Silver calls ONE election right, and he's a Lib god. You can't make this stuff up, folks.
WRONG! And no you can't make this stuff up. lolQuote: EvenBobGuess we'll find out Tuesday, huh. The talk will talk and the bullshit will run and hide
under the bed..
And so you have!
Gee Kewlj, don't you think you're being a little tough on Bob?
Quote: BuzzardDon't you know kewlj and EvenBob are one and the same ? I had Wiz verify the IP address. You will not see them show up as being on line at the same time. REALLY !
What does it matter?
Quote: iluvdisco33What does it matter?
I never said it mattered.
Quote: BuzzardDon't you know kewlj and EvenBob are one and the same ? I had Wiz verify the IP address. You will not see them show up as being on line at the same time. REALLY !
Really? I wonder if wizard would weigh in on this, since it is completely false.
Quote: s2dbakerGee Kewlj, don't you think you're being a little tough on Bob?
No I don't think I was being a little tough on Bob. I like Bob. Disagree with just about everything he says and stands for politically, but on many other topics I enjoy his posts and am sure I have learned some things from him.
He participated in the political discussions and quite forcefully I might add, insisting things he was saying and/or felt were fact, more than just his opinion. Many friendly little discussion involved. I thought it was really "crappy" of him to just disappear and say oh I don't want to play anymore when things didn't go his way and he was proven wrong. It was very 3rd grade of him. And now he has resurfaced and wants to participate again, which is fine. He has made it clear he won't comment on the past discussions and I still think that is "crappy" of him. And while I have lost respect for him, I am respecting that decision, so I haven't brought it up. I have moved on. Even sent him a message welcoming him back.
