Quote: Ahigh
As shown above, double click the word "pwned" and it will turn the same color blue )
This is where I nodded off..
Quote: EvenBobIt goes way down in the morning,
than rallies in the last 15 min. Down
15% today. It looks like a not very
serious game.
I posted links to discussions about stocks on this forum. Did you not infer properly that your questions were off topic.
Let me be explicit, then, your questions are off topic. This is about the discussion for the suspension list, is it not?
How about we stay on topic and maybe you can do your own google searches too, champion of post-counts.
Quote: AhighI think there's a thread on investing.
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/off-topic/off-topic/20631-what-are-your-investing-thoughts/
Here it is again for you, Bob. This is where they are talking about investments. Over here on this thread members are talking about suspensions and the rules and stuff like that. Not stocks or random questions that google could answer if you had the true motivation to learn rather than to post nonsense to the forum.
Quote: EvenBobI don't consider posting about your stock
to be nonsense. I thought you would explain
why it goes up and down every day like
a roller coaster.
That is not a very intelligent question at all. I'm not going to answer it because you would need to be more knowledgeable than you have already demonstrated in order to be able to understand the answer WHICH IS ON THE DAMN INTERNET ALREADY.
So hopefully that's a good enough answer for you.
You're not the only one on here asking stupid questions that there are answers for on the internet already.
But you've got more posts on this forum than everyone else, that's for sure.
Why not think about other people?
That's my question. Do you enjoy wasting other people's time?
Do you enjoy making other people unhappy?
How about answering those questions honestly.
I think you should be suspended for a lack of caring, frankly, of other people, and certainly of other people's valuable time.
That's just my opinion, and the TOS do not require that you care about anyone.
But I'm curious if there is anyone for you, honestly. You sound like you are really suffering from being lonely if I were just to make a wild ass guess.
Why do you wast your time engaging with him? If you believe he's just hating on you you're feeding him. It's as if you enjoy the drama.Quote: AhighThat is not a very intelligent question at all. I'm not going to answer it because you would need to be more knowledgeable than you have already demonstrated in order to be able to understand the answer WHICH IS ON THE DAMN INTERNET ALREADY.
So hopefully that's a good enough answer for you.
You're not the only one on here asking stupid questions that there are answers for on the internet already.
But you've got more posts on this forum than everyone else, that's for sure.
Why not think about other people?
That's my question. Do you enjoy wasting other people's time?
Do you enjoy making other people unhappy?
How about answering those questions honestly.
I think you should be suspended for a lack of caring, frankly, of other people, and certainly of other people's valuable time.
That's just my opinion, and the TOS do not require that you care about anyone.
But I'm curious if there is anyone for you, honestly. You sound like you are really suffering from being lonely if I were just to make a wild ass guess.
Quote: AxelWolfWhy do you wast your time engaging with him? If you believe he's just hating on you you're feeding him. It's as if you enjoy the drama.
I don't think he's targeting me or anyone. I think he's completely ignorant of the negative effects that he has on people who actually spend time answering his ridiculously stupid questions.
The reason I answered them in such great detail is just to demonstrate how ignorant his responses would be.
Accomplished.
Just a side note, I reciprocate his lack of caring: IE, I don't care about his posts at all, and I only answer them for entertainment. I have lost all hope for him learning anything at all, frankly.
Quote: WizardofnothingHaving worked on Wall Street for years , bin bashing this penny stock is absurd, most penny stocks have crazy percentage volatility , the percentage means very little with sticks this low. You still have to have market makers and a spread on the buy and sell- ie bid and ask , you see this percentage moves partly because of this.
Moved
Quote: EvenBobNow this is a good answer.
Oh, and of course we know this to be true because you can tell a good answer from a bad one with all that knowledge you have there.
Often times you will see penny stocks double daily from 1 cent to 2 cents but it's not real because of you went to sell the bid would be the overruling price so the ask would be meaningless
Didn't (don't) you have EB blocked? Why'd you change?Quote: AhighOh, and of course we know this to be true because you can tell a good answer from a bad one with all that knowledge you have there.
Quote: WizardofnothingGold penny stocks are a different situation entirely - I could explain for days- and I'm not taking either side just stating penny stocks are usually spread like this if they are not commodity based like gold. Check out my favorite stock Rambus Nasdaq rmbs back in the day I bought it at 27 and it was back and forth above 70 for multiple weeks and months
Often times you will see penny stocks double daily from 1 cent to 2 cents but it's not real because of you went to sell the bid would be the overruling price so the ask would be meaningless
Both of you guys, there are rules about staying on topic. So unless you're wanting to talk about EB getting suspended for veering off topic, I'd suggest to take it to another thread?
Quote: teddysDidn't (don't) you have EB blocked? Why'd you change?
Oh, yeah, I still have him blocked. His posts are so insightful that even if all of his posts were removed from the site, I'd probably spend two week mining Google's cache's to get all that valuable content all packaged up together for a lifetime of enjoyment.
Quote: WizardofnothingExcuse me?????
Rule #7, buddy.
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/info/rules/2-forum-rules/#post37215
Quote: WizardofnothingI was explaining something in response to a comment in this thread. I had no horse in this race but to be honest the way you are talking and adding the buddy into this comment you do not come across as even close to ceo material. You come across as crass
I know you didn't intend for that to be an insult. But if you were to say that *I* was crass, I think that is an insult, and you're treading dangerously close to making an insult in my direction.
I was recently suspended for violation of the TOS. That's why I'm talking here.
And EB is violating the TOS by bringing up NTGL stock over and over after being warned that the subject is off topic.
You got caught in the middle, and I don't mean to be crass, I just want the enforcement of the TOS to not be biased against me or biased for anyone else.
I think that by my understanding of the TOS, both you and EvenBob are due for an admin to weigh in if you guys are both hijacking this thread to talk about stocks and potentially treading dangerously close to insulting the President (not CEO) of NanoTech Gaming at the same time between the two of you while you talk and continue to discuss about being reminded about hijacking threads.
It's quite possible that EvenBob's knowledge of the TOS and the forum gives him an advantage that he can get away with what seems like a violation to me, but he knows better than anyone the rules because that's his expertise -- bending the rules to get other people to pay attention to him in a way that doesn't result in any action to suspend or nuke him.
So far, you have no meaningful reputation on this forum either way, but your screen name indicates that you are not long for this ride at all. I hesitate to even address you your lifespan on this forum seems intrinsically limited by your choice of screen names.
Quote: WizardofnothingNot trying. To fight so I'll apologize I was only trying to help, didn't expect you to be offended by my original help
I'm not offended and don't worry. This is just one of many of EvenBob's games to waste his (and others') time.
I hope he is suspended. He earned it was warned days ago that talk of NTGL stock is off topic for this thread.
I've already been successfully persuaded that talking about my company is not compatible with the TOS.
But being subjected to EB's clear violation of the TOS while also asking stupid questions about stocks is really just a demonstration of how much EB can get away with from my view and not be subject to discipline.
Quote: AhighHe earned it was warned days ago that talk of NTGL stock is off topic for this thread.
.
Please point to that post, I don't remember a
mod warning me about anything. I didn't
start this discussion, we often veer off topic
in this thread.
Quote: EvenBobPlease point to that post, I don't remember a
mod warning me about anything. I didn't
start this discussion, we often veer off topic
in this thread.
I warned you. I never said that an admin warned you.
I didn't report you, and I expect that nobody else reported you.
It was a kind gesture to warn you before there was trouble.
My interpretation was that you wanted trouble because you kept on in spite of my warning.
AND HELL NO I AM NOT GOING TO GIVE YOU A DAMN LINK
Do your own damn work!
It's your good standing in question, not mine.
Quote: AhighI warned you. I never said that an admin warned you..
If there was a warning every time this
thread went off topic, all there would
be is warnings.
Thanks for looking out for me, buddy.
I agree it's oftentimes off topic. But obviously you're using it to take jabs at Ahigh and his company. Perhaps a new thread specifically talking about his stock would be more appropriate.Quote: EvenBobIf there was a warning every time this
thread went off topic, all there would
be is warnings.
.
Quote: AxelWolfI agree it's oftentimes off topic. But obviously you're using it to take jabs at Ahigh and his company. Perhaps a new thread specifically talking about his stock would be more appropriate.
Well, if someone were to get suspended over the banter, it would suddenly be relevant and on topic again!
It's a long shot.Quote: DodsferdWell, if someone were to get suspended over the banter, it would suddenly be relevant and on topic again!
Quote: AxelWolfPerhaps a new thread specifically talking about his stock would be more appropriate.
I'm moving my posts to that thread.
No rule seven worries there, gentlemen.
Quote: MrVI just started an appropriate thread.
No rule seven worries there, gentlemen.
Thanks to both yourself, AHigh, and EvenBob. The SL thread is long enough without going through pages of posts on unrelated topics.
Quote: DrawingDeadI think the owners are missing a bet by not monetizing the thread through something like a separate IPO spinoff of it. Just the suspension thread. Suspension.com or somesuch. Folks could suspend up a storm with endless discussion of suspensions over discussion of suspensions about... never mind the 'about' part. Who needs to pretend to be about anything? I have great faith in folks ability to simmer and percolate along and create suspension-worthy attention-seeking kerfluffles without actually being about or really connected to anything. Provoking scads of reply-to-the-retort-to-the-rejoinder originally about whoevenknowswhat, with new post notifications generating endless quadrazillions of page views, albeit perhaps all from the same six people. It'll be huge, even if perhaps not easy to market for display ads. Certain kinds of niche pharmaceuticals, maybe.
Man, you've hit on an idea!
An new ad included with every post in this thread.
1BB would serve a real purpose for the site with his #1 posting spot on this thread.
Oh boy! Why did you have to poke the bear?Quote: rxwineMan, you've hit on an idea!
An new ad included with every post in this thread.
1BB would serve a real purpose for the site with his #1 posting spot on this thread.
Quote: AxelWolfOh boy! Why did you have to poke the bear?
I don't know. You know you shouldn't, but you just gotta do it sometimes.
Quote: rxwineI don't know. You know you shouldn't, but you just gotta do it sometimes.
I'm all about supporting this site and I always have been.
But I would also agree that the TOS are set up for quite a bit of OVERHEAD and what I would call WASTE related to discussions that have very little actual REAL WORLD VALUE.
Is there a rule that you can't insult the forum itself? I may have redact that!
There are some people who would like to see NTGL succeed, for example. But apparently this forum is more concerned about TOS violations than it is what I personally feel is groundbreaking progress on making casinos not suck total ass for people who have a brain in their head.
I mean besides the cheap food and table games.
You have now given him a perfect example of how innocent he is, yet people troll/bait him as he's innocently minding his own business.Quote: rxwineI don't know. You know you shouldn't, but you just gotta do it sometimes.
As if this isn't the case for much of the entire internetQuote: Ahigh
But I would also agree that the TOS are set up for quite a bit of OVERHEAD and what I would call WASTE related to discussions that have very little actual REAL WORLD VALUE.
.
Quote: AxelWolfYou have now given him a perfect example of how innocent he is, yet people troll/bait him as he's innocently minding his own business.
On the particular issue in question, he has been impervious to dozens of people mentioning the same odd obsession. So, in effect, I don't think it matters. I sure haven't seen any recognition that there is any problem on his side of it, just everyone else.
Five more posts that add absolutely nothing to this thread or the forum. Instead of making these jejune posts time after time, how about adding something of substance? Just once try to understand the purpose of this thread and comment accordingly. Just once give your opinion on a suspension.
I'd love to hear your thoughts on the last four suspensions. What do you think about TwofeathersATL's suspension? What about Ahigh, Exoter175 and Kentry? Try to be original and not say it's just the internet or life isn't fair or it's only a few days. Can you do that? Can you put a good spin on Kentry's 7 day suspension?
Yes, I have the most posts in this thread and they all pertain to the subject. None are insulting, baiting or mean spirited. Doesn't every thread have a top poster?
Innocently minding my own business, Axel? How innocent I am? Sometimes I don't understand some of the things you post. It's not you it's me. Everyone else understands you but I can be a little slow. Everyone certainly understands exactly what you gentlemen are up to and they have a name for that.
But I'm "quirky".
Don't really think I understood fully the nukes of Redjohn/Bloodoil or Kneegrows.
Anyone want to venture a guess as to who they might have been previously?
Maybe the first was just two accts for one member, that's what the list implies.
Guessing sock puppet is a new incarnation. Never said that member name out loud till after the nuke.
Sometimes I am so very slow....
Maybe if you've never been suspended you're just a damn goodie two shoes ;-)
Quote: TwoFeathersATLI like discussing the Suspension list, an interesting insight into web based group dynamics.
But I'm "quirky".
Don't really think I understood fully the nukes of Redjohn/Bloodoil or Kneegrows.
Anyone want to venture a guess as to who they might have been previously?
Maybe the first was just two accts for one member, that's what the list implies.
Guessing sock puppet is a new incarnation. Never said that member name out loud till after the nuke.
Sometimes I am so very slow....
Maybe if you've never been suspended you're just a damn goodie two shoes ;-)
Redjohn and Bloodoil were both reincarnations of Buzzard, previously nuked.
Kneegrows was another reincarnation of Sonuvabish, previously nuked.
Both have at least 1/2 dozen past ID's. Sock puppet is slang for a new name made by an old member, not the name of an old member.
Quote: TwoFeathersATLI like discussing the Suspension list.
I like illustrating it.
Quote: beachbumbabsRedjohn and Bloodoil were both reincarnations of Buzzard, previously nuked.
Kneegrows was another reincarnation of Sonuvabish, previously nuked.
Both have at least 1/2 dozen past ID's. Sock puppet is slang for a new name made by an old member, not the name of an old member.
I am somewhat familiar with both 'old' names. Have been back and read some of their posts under a number of different names if I didn't catch them when they were posted. I noticed when GJ guessed Buzzard? on 10/29 (had to go back to find the date ). Also noted when 1BB asked if this incarnation was another resurrected Buzzard after the nuke. Just never saw any firm answers.
I thought I understood the slang 'sock puppet' but sometimes it is used and sometimes it is not. Wondered if it was a special term for the worst of the bad, or something.
Thx for your response.
<edit> saw AHigh's illustration, creative.
Quote: beachbumbabsRedjohn and Bloodoil were both reincarnations of Buzzard, previously nuked.
Makes me wonder if we would have similar results from nuking EvenBob, another long time member of the site with a similar history to Buzzard.
Quote: AhighMakes me wonder if we would have similar results from nuking EvenBob, another long time member of the site with a similar history to Buzzard.
EvenBob has put up with everything the forum has to offer; Buzzard went off the rails. Not much to compare to date. EB knows the lines and stays within them. There are other people who jump off the rails fairly regularly. I consider those people more likely to make up "sock puppets" if they were sent away than EB.
...but who knows?
Quote: RonCEvenBob has put up with everything the forum has to offer; Buzzard went off the rails. Not much to compare to date. EB knows the lines and stays within them. There are other people who jump off the rails fairly regularly. I consider those people more likely to make up "sock puppets" if they were sent away than EB.
...but who knows?
Buzzard introduced himself and shook my hand after he received a free pass for G2E 2014. There are other differences, too. I think I was just thinking more in terms of contribution/post-count ratios rather than how offensive one was compared to the other.
Quote: AhighI am one of three people at the company who creates our games and math models and graphics. I also have an assistant (that makes a fourth) who helps me with the day-to-day tasks. Every person on my team knows that I post here and they know what I post and they stand behind me. Today our market cap is 3,451,552.35 for those four employees or approximately $862K in market cap per employee on average. This is almost exactly four times the low of July just a few weeks ago.
If you have a problem with me on the forum or my principles or what I stand for or if you just think we are going to go out of business, I suggest that you short the stock and put your money where your mouth is! Contrary to what one poster on this forum asserted, you can short penny stocks, and if you can't figure it out, there's a link I can give you called "let me google that for you" that can show you how to do it.
Why don't you align your finances with your statements? Are you hedging so you can either cash in or blame someone else for your losses? Sounds like less of a plan than figuring out what you think is going to happen and aligning your finances to that outcome. But that's just my opinion. I have been wrong about what's going to happen and I lost and I couldn't blame anyone but myself. I've never gone long on a stock and then talked smack about the CEO or other leader. That's just me. I went long on IGT and defended Patti Hart years ago, and I regret that. But at least I was arguing in line with my position (I sold before I lost on that one).
I really get annoyed with people who buy $10 worth of stock so they can spew out damaging statements towards my company in the name of shaking fists at the company or performance of any of the employees at the company. Personally I think that's low class, but I know for a fact there are people doing it because ALMOST NOBODY IS TRADING NTGL but everyone seems to have some bull crap to say about what they think of it.
As far as it relates to this thread, it should be known that my posting here as the President of NanoTech Gaming is a direct result of the terms of service disallowing me from having the same protections for my identity that everyone else here enjoys. I would be posting anonymously except that I am disallowed by the TOS from doing that.
Any harm that comes to NanoTech Gaming as a result of my posting from this day forward may be an indirect result of my inability to post here anonymously.
However, I don't have anything to hide, and I'm pretty sure that anyone doing due diligence on my character is going to figure out that "Ahigh == [my legal name]" pretty quick and be able to search the internet on "Ahigh" and find me. So it's not like I see the anonymous hiding routine to be particularly effective. I'm pretty sure more than one person knows who ME is who (anyone else who's a "professional") is and others on this forum who are in the industry.