Thread Rating:
Interesting article
Sorry for your headaches dan. Hope it gets resolved
Good luck fighting for your money.
I wasn't gonna post it here because I honestly don't know if this is good or bad. I mean, on the surface it sounds bad, but...? So why air potentially dirty laundry?
But now that it's posted here, I'll add my best wishes. Good luck with this Dan!
Regarding the $15K seeming like a low number: This isn't like a personal injury lawsuit where you can claim millions for all sorts of 'pain and suffering' and such. This is merely one company suing another company over a paperwork and payment dispute. OK, It's something of a David & Goliath sort of thing, but maybe by asking for a reasonable amount, it can get settled quickly.
Don't let them take advantage of you!
ZCore13
You read about these type cases usually about music royalties that go back decades, because the victims are usually deceived or sold out and it seems so here. If they're lying about the machines, maybe they're lying about the tables too. Shameful how wicked these big companies are lying, cheating and stealing like they tend to do. Wish they would break up all these mergered companies.
Asking for $15 k? The legal fee can easily be $10 k....
Depending on how long the dispute goes, you're off by at least an order of magnitude.Quote: UCivanHow did one find out how many placements of his game are out there? He has to visit many casinos and take pictures. Casinos wont tell and from time to time, they move game in and out.....
Asking for $15 k? The legal fee can easily be $10 k....
http://nevadainsurancelaw.com/expect-nevada-justice-court-jurisdiction-increases-10000-15000-january-2017/
No.Quote: RomesI scanned the article, so forgive me if I'm getting this wrong... but is Dan basically saying the casino isn't paying them properly for their licence on the game??
He's saying ScientificGames (ShuffleMaster) isn't paying and/or not reporting properly.
Dan, perhaps you didn't adhere to one of their "unwritten" but well "understood" rules?
I read Dan praised casinos, but not and never "distributors". He was let go from one distributor after having invented some of their games. That is, distributor need sales (on the payroll) not inventors (on the payroll).....Quote: RomesEh, for the sake of pure irony I'm gonna go ahead and count that... The guy that praises the casino industry for always doing the 'right' thing, getting the shaft from a major player in the casino industry...
Dan, perhaps you didn't adhere to one of their "unwritten" but well "understood" rules?
I don't agree with Dan's point of view on AP play, but a contract is a contract.
Just like the implied contract I have with the casino: to only use my brain to decide how to play blackjack.
Philosophical differences aside, he deserves to get paid. Hope it works out.
Distributors need sales, sure. But they also need something to sell. Toward that end, Dan was doing a fine job. There's probably more to the "let go" story than meets the eye, as there are at least two sides to every story.Quote: UCivan... He was let go from one distributor after having invented some of their games. That is, distributor need sales not inventors.....
ZCore13
Quote: UCivanI read Dan praised casinos, but not and never "distributors". He was let go from one distributor after having invented some of their games. That is, distributor need sales (on the payroll) not inventors (on the payroll).....
Distributors fill a role, but it is the casinos who are at the forefront where players met the product. In my book, I had fine words for all distributors and their products, as well as for the many individual game inventors and their products, discussing here many good products and mentioning all by name.
I'm on fine terms with Galaxy, friendly with many there. I completed what they needed, and left on good terms. To the best of my knowledge, they didn't hire, place, or fill the position; they're getting the stuff out and are doing well. Once having a full portfolio of offerings, they need to spend on producing sales, maintenance and distributing from that point. Most distributors promote the acquired/leased products many independents do.
Quote: DJTeddyBearNo.
He's saying ScientificGames (ShuffleMaster) isn't paying and/or not reporting properly.
Well, the filing and cdc article said the claims and positions, actually, but the filing originated from my company.
Quote: RomesEh, for the sake of pure irony I'm gonna go ahead and count that... The guy that praises the casino industry for always doing the 'right' thing, getting the shaft from a major player in the casino industry...
Dan, perhaps you didn't adhere to one of their "unwritten" but well "understood" rules?
Say it ain't so, with the gaming industry being so reputable and all. How can this be?
Yeah, I"m gonna side with the distributor. They seem nice and have never wronged me... So that means they could never wrong anyone else. Dan must have been doing something he 'had a hunch' they didn't like and they were probably within their right to act as they did.Quote: UCivanI read Dan praised casinos, but not and never "distributors". He was let go from one distributor after having invented some of their games. That is, distributor need sales (on the payroll) not inventors (on the payroll).....
(does this sound silly? ...that's how all of us feel every time he sticks up for the casino industry mistreating counters/AP's)