Thread Rating:

Ahigh
Ahigh
Joined: May 19, 2010
  • Threads: 86
  • Posts: 5049
December 9th, 2015 at 5:50:55 PM permalink
For the record, it's quite a leap in my opinion that NTEK would attempt to hold the patent away from NTGL in any malicious way.

NTGL and NTEK are amicable towards one another, and everyone knows that the patent was developed and submitted by NTGL employees (me & STV).

Any suggestion to the contrary is personally offensive and bordering on a personal attack IMO of how NTGL is being run.

I am not responsible for the business sorts of questions like this any longer (IE: not going to reply to suggestion for what I do here), and I believe we will have a full-time IR department to deal with these sorts of questions.

But can we stay on technical subjects here related to "inventions" as this is on the "Game Inventor's" board not the investment or business board.

It's both insulting and off-topic to veer towards conversations like this IMO on this thread.

Maybe someone has the acumen to ask a question about how the patent works instead of who owns it. MAYBE?
AxelWolf
AxelWolf
Joined: Oct 10, 2012
  • Threads: 115
  • Posts: 12741
December 9th, 2015 at 6:02:06 PM permalink
Honestly I think it was a valid question and I found it interesting. Someone (Drich?) had a valid suggestion but I'm sure you have already thought about all that.

Perhaps this isn't the right thread for this type of question, however neither is talk about nerdy-cycles (-;


Edit.

Drich: You should try to get NTEK to assign the patent to NTGL so the gaming company can show it as an asset.

Why isn't this a valid suggestion? Pros and cons?
♪♪Now you swear and kick and beg us That you're not a gamblin' man Then you find you're back in Vegas With a handle in your hand♪♪ Your black cards can make you money So you hide them when you're able In the land of casinos and money You must put them on the table♪♪ You go back Jack do it again roulette wheels turinin' 'round and 'round♪♪ You go back Jack do it again♪♪
AxelWolf
AxelWolf
Joined: Oct 10, 2012
  • Threads: 115
  • Posts: 12741
December 9th, 2015 at 6:06:32 PM permalink
Quote: Ahigh

Any updates on the Pinball? Anything you can share with us?
♪♪Now you swear and kick and beg us That you're not a gamblin' man Then you find you're back in Vegas With a handle in your hand♪♪ Your black cards can make you money So you hide them when you're able In the land of casinos and money You must put them on the table♪♪ You go back Jack do it again roulette wheels turinin' 'round and 'round♪♪ You go back Jack do it again♪♪
DRich
DRich
Joined: Jul 6, 2012
  • Threads: 63
  • Posts: 3293
December 9th, 2015 at 6:29:29 PM permalink
Quote: Ahigh



Not exactly looking graceful, but there it is anyway!



I am jealous of your work environment.
EvenBob
EvenBob
Joined: Jul 18, 2010
  • Threads: 402
  • Posts: 19879
December 9th, 2015 at 6:33:43 PM permalink
Quote: Ahigh


It's both insulting and off-topic to veer towards conversations like this IMO on this thread.
?



THIS insults you? This nothing insults you???

Do you read the stock message boards and
what they say about NTEK & the biggest stock
holder? They libel them every day, accusations
up the wazoo all day long. Hundreds of
posts a day, and THIS insults you?

Good grief.
"It's not enough to succeed, your friends must fail." Gore Vidal
GWAE
GWAE
Joined: Sep 20, 2013
  • Threads: 69
  • Posts: 6226
December 9th, 2015 at 6:33:59 PM permalink
Not everything in this world is an insult. Geee
Wizard
Administrator
Wizard
Joined: Oct 14, 2009
  • Threads: 978
  • Posts: 16500
December 9th, 2015 at 6:38:20 PM permalink
Quote: Ahigh

Not exactly looking graceful, but there it is anyway!



Thanks! I hope you're getting outside with it. You still owe me a unicycle race.
It's not whether you win or lose; it's whether or not you had a good bet.
wellwellwell
wellwellwell
Joined: Jun 17, 2015
  • Threads: 0
  • Posts: 62
December 9th, 2015 at 6:39:19 PM permalink
Quote: AxelWolf

Honestly I think it was a valid question and I found it interesting. Someone (Drich?) had a valid suggestion but I'm sure you have already thought about all that.

Perhaps this isn't the right thread for this type of question, however neither is talk about nerdy-cycles (-;


Edit.

Drich: You should try to get NTEK to assign the patent to NTGL so the gaming company can show it as an asset.

Why isn't this a valid suggestion? Pros and cons?



Who is assigned the patent application in the patent office is a moot point.

The Intellectual Property and other assets of the Gaming Division of NTEK were transferred to NTGL as part of the spinoff.

http://nanotechgaming.com/2015_02_02.html
DRich
DRich
Joined: Jul 6, 2012
  • Threads: 63
  • Posts: 3293
December 9th, 2015 at 6:46:25 PM permalink
Quote: wellwellwell

Who is assigned the patent application in the patent office is a moot point.

The Intellectual Property and other assets of the Gaming Division of NTEK were transferred to NTGL as part of the spinoff.

http://nanotechgaming.com/2015_02_02.html



Are you saying that they were supposed to transfer it and they didn't, or that it really isn't an asset?
wellwellwell
wellwellwell
Joined: Jun 17, 2015
  • Threads: 0
  • Posts: 62
December 9th, 2015 at 6:50:58 PM permalink
Quote: Ahigh


But can we stay on technical subjects here related to "inventions" as this is on the "Game Inventor's" board not the investment or business board.

It's both insulting and off-topic to veer towards conversations like this IMO on this thread.

Maybe someone has the acumen to ask a question about how the patent works instead of who owns it. MAYBE?



This thread may be on the "Game Inventor's" board as you state, but the following sentence written by MrV in setting up this thread has controlled basically what has been discussed so far. See the original post.

"This thread is designed for discussions about Nanotek, Nanotek gaming, its stock, its products, and its personnel."

  • Jump to: