Lost $1000, only got 1900 pts @ $1 per pt.
1000/1900 is 48% return.
Wtf???
Is this outside the realm of being legit?
Edit:
Wait.. it's $2 per pt for VP.
So might be in the realm of possible, even typical?
Quote: 100xOddsTriple play $1 stp 7/5 BP (98.25% return), $18/spin.
Lost $1000, only got 1900 pts @ $1 per pt.
1000/1900 is 48% return.
Wtf???
Is this outside the realm of being legit?
Edit:
Wait.. it's $2 per pt for VP.
So might be in the realm of possible, even typical?
link to original post
If it is Triple Play I would assume it is an IGT machine and therefore the odds of it being gaffed are very low. Probably just some bad luck. You only played about 500 games so obviously that is way too little to draw many conclusions from.
Quote: DRichQuote: 100xOddsTriple play $1 stp 7/5 BP (98.25% return), $18/spin.
Lost $1000, only got 1900 pts @ $1 per pt.
1000/1900 is 48% return.
Wtf???
Is this outside the realm of being legit?
Edit:
Wait.. it's $2 per pt for VP.
So might be in the realm of possible, even typical?
link to original post
If it is Triple Play I would assume it is an IGT machine and therefore the odds of it being gaffed are very low. Probably just some bad luck. You only played about 500 games so obviously that is way too little to draw many conclusions from.
link to original post
Thx .
Its the All Star cabinets. I guess igt?
That is not unlikely at all if you don't cash on any quads or decent multipliers.Quote: 100xOddsTriple play $1 stp 7/5 BP (98.25% return), $18/spin.
Lost $1000, only got 1900 pts @ $1 per pt.
1000/1900 is 48% return.
Wtf???
Is this outside the realm of being legit?
Edit:
Wait.. it's $2 per pt for VP.
So might be in the realm of possible, even typical?
link to original post
i did chart it:Quote: calwatchAt 200 spins and change if you aren't converting on multipliers, that is not unreasonable. How long were your multiplier droughts? Sometimes when I have a pen and a napkin handy I'll count out the multiplier gaps just to see how on target I am - yes, it is a form of gambler's fallacy but like charting numbers in roulette it is harmless and lets you more accurately determine if it is a real drought or if you are just not remembering the times you got multipliers back to back.
link to original post
https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/gambling/video-poker/38796-picking-stp-7-5-bp-98-25-over-9-6-ddb-99-in-this-scenario/#post919648
the avg time to get a multiplier after 146 hands was 1:15, which is the avg it takes to get a multiplier in stp, so it was reassuring.
But that charting was in another casino.
But you're probably right about converting on multipliers.
In that $1000 loss, i think i completely whiffed on multipliers a few times :(
In that $1000, i whiffed on getting quads on EVERY dealt trips, including trip aces twice.Quote: MentalThat is not unlikely at all if you don't cash on any quads or decent multipliers.Quote: 100xOddsTriple play $1 stp 7/5 BP (98.25% return), $18/spin.
Lost $1000, only got 1900 pts @ $1 per pt.
1000/1900 is 48% return.
Wtf???
Is this outside the realm of being legit?
Edit:
Wait.. it's $2 per pt for VP.
So might be in the realm of possible, even typical?
link to original post
link to original post
But i did get a few regular quads when holding a pair. (no Aces or baby quads)
And i also whiffed on every 8x and 10x multiplier. :(
My addiction to STP is over.
It's eye opening at the roller coaster variance STP bp is (var = 33) vs regular BP (var = 20).
I've done $50k coin-in at JoB (also var=20) for 'diamond in day' at caesars and it wasnt as screen punching aggravating as stp bp.
I am amazed at how people can handle the variance of ddb (var = 44) much less 'ult x' ddb.