I even played it, back in 09 at Casino Royale. At the time it was being heavily promoted. The speakers outside RC mentioned it again and again. As I recall they had three or four tables, too, which is a lot for a small casino. BTW I asked a dealer at an empty table what the difference was with regular BJ, and the man explained, drew a sample of two player hands against a dealer hand, and explained how the average palyer would play them. That's good service for any casino.
reports of my death are greatly exaggerated"
Quote: buzzpaffSwitch placed 21 tables 2 months ago in Colorado. So as Mark twain said "The
reports of my death are greatly exaggerated"
I guess if you can't make it in a real gaming market.....Blackhawk is the next best thing.
Quote: ParadigmI was in a casino in Washington State this week that has recently installed Switch (within the last 6 months I believe). Every table was $10 minimum (although I did find a $5 craps table). Switch was the only game I saw on a BJ sized table that was at a $5 minimum. Don't know if they do this routinely or not but that is how it was spread on Saturday night and it was busy.
It's confusing. A "$5" switch table is a $10 table, since you're forced to make two bets - one on each of your two hands.
Switch was just installed maybe 8 months ago at the card clubs here in Minneapolis. There's one table each at Canterbury and Running Aces. Treasure Island casino also put in a table. It's not as busy as the open BJ tables at those places, but it's more busy than 3 card poker, 4 card poker, or the MS stud, LIR, and Caribbean tables that Switch replaced.
A multi-bet "main wager" game becomes expensive on a per hand or per round basis: Deuces Wild (table game version) requires FOUR bets to stay in; most poker games are ANTE plus the PLAY/FLOP, or ANTE/BLIND plus a mandatory side bet, etc. Forget about adding possible RAISE, TURN, and RIVER bets to it...Switch, if you're listening...
What Boyd Gaming's Jokers Wild casino did was make their Three Card Poker table $2, so that playing the Pair Plus, the ANTE and the PLAY bets total $6; if a player plays only the pair plus, it's still close to their $3 table minimum anyway, and it gets action that is appropriate for their clientele. A lot of action.
I have helped design poker games (mainly Hong Kong Poker and Texas Dinero) that limits the main wager to only ANTE and PLAY on my assistance ("Two bets are expensive enough!!@"), with an optional RAISE, on the casino (house-banked) versions. It also kept the non-qualifying hands much lower and infrequent.
Blackjack Switch is very fine with only two units required, and it plays great. Maybe a version with one "Center bet" can be done: Win/lose/push combined. dunno, would be too Pai Gow-ish or BJ players......
Looks like I need to head out and play! Didn't know switch was in Washington.
Quote: buzzpaffSWITCH Do not tinker with success. 2 hands at $5 has certainly been a WINNER !
You're right - it is [a great game just as it].
Quote: AZDuffmanAnd it shows you can invent a new game that is not a poker-based carnival game. IS BJS a carnival game?
It's still considered a carnival game although it's a blackjack variant rather than a poker variant.
Quote: buzzpaff
SWITCH Do not tinker with success. 2 hands at $5 has certainly been a WINNER !
Quote: PaigowdanYou're right - it is [a great game just as it.
Thanks Buzz, Dan - anyway, the game is in Shuffle Master's hands now outside Vegas.
So, a $10 'Switch' table would equate to a $15 Blackjack table.
Of course, most players see the '2 bet requirement' and quite naturally double the minimum as a comparison.
Quote: SwitchAs the 2 hands are somewhat connected (by the 'Switch') in "Blackjack Switch" then playing 2 hands of $5 is roughly the same as playing one hand of $7.50.
So, a $10 'Switch' table would equate to a $15 Blackjack table.
Of course, most players see the '2 bet requirement' and quite naturally double the minimum as a comparison.
You are one step ahead of me. My thought exactly when I saw the $10 minimum sign at the Mardi Gras
Quote: charliepatrickIn the casino I go to they've replaced the BJ Switch by Burn 20 - essentially because it gives a better house percentage. However they only open it Fridays and Saturdays.
Are you near to Manchester Charlie?
Quote: ParadigmI bet that "Switch" will readily accept a BJ Switch table out for a new Burn 20 install since he created both games and Burn 20 is in its infancy while BJ Switch has already made it.
Although I hate removals I would agree with your statement Paradigm. The main direction of 'Burn 20' will be decided some time after November as that is when the game hopefully receives approval in Nevada.
Quote: buzzpaffAll I want from Santa Claus is a fading game like SWITCH!!
Hopefully not fading too much - 17 new tables installed in the US last month :-)
Games that are overall a big success will still have placements in specific locations that just don't work. Spanish 21 is wildly successful in WA state, but it doesn't seemed to have worked nearly as well in Las Vegas. I would venture to guess that Spanish 21 has been pulled out of casino's in Las Vegas. But try telling the Washington State gaming community that the game is "fading" and they will laugh at you.
I think it will be the same for Switch (and any successful game). Regional and local location matters for whatever reason. The locations that new games survive in long term will be different from game to game.
My guess is that Switch will cast a much wider net of long term placements than any new game for a long time. It isn't fading......just finding its niches and there will be many to find in my humble opinion.
I think Southampton (my local) is also sometimes used for trials. The one thing the casino liked about Switch was the strategy was quite complicated (I've only worked out some of the plays) so they felt safe that few players could beat it. They introduced Burn 20 and replaced Switch, rather than Switch lost out. They've only got one spare table, open at weekends, so I guess if another trial came along that would take over its slot.
At the end of the day it's the games that players play. Out of London there's usually Roulette, Blackjack and 3-card. Other games are around in the larger casinos - I even saw Pai Gow tiles once.
I thought that Southampton had kept 'Switch' as well as 'Burn 20' which is why I chose Salford as they have 'Burn 20' in only - maybe 'Switch' dropped off a little at Southampton.
I was in Swansea and Cardiff last week - Aspers have 'Switch' and Les Croupiers are just about to install it. Grosvenor, Cardiff have 'Burn 20' and Grosvenor, Swansea are trialing my new poker game 'XX Poker'.
The Birmingham casinos are my local casinos and I first played poker at Sgt. Yorke. Unfortunately the casino is not there anymore as I'm sure you know although Grosvenor are in new premises on Broad Street and Broadway is not far away.
DD 3-2 Go Figure ! LOL
Southampton's table isn't open that often - Switch didn't make that much money as a few of us knew how to play, the dealers forgot the 22 rule, and the Friday lot had to make two £2.50 bets. I don't know about Burn 20, but at least you only have to play one £3 bet and the "Friday" way of playing is actually closer to the correct strategy (standing vs 10, hitting 12s, etc.)
Quote: charliepatrickThanks - I did play it in Swansea when last there. There seemed to be a few variations around (i) you can't break a BJ (e.g. AT, T9 vs 9) so it gets paid before you can switch {I discussed this with management and got nowhere} (ii) you can take "even money" against an Ace (how generous!).
I always showed the variation that allowed players to 'Switch' a Blackjack - it may not have been explained to them by the time the game got to the casino.
Taking 'even money' against an Ace was an optional rule and was worth around 0.1% to the player.
As an aside, as I'm sure you know, the convention of offering even money is technically an option that a player takes to make a bet that pays 2/1, so it seems illogical for a casino to offer "Even Money" as it can't be accomplished by the bet mechanism. (I don't know if true, I heard that a casino once prevented a player take even money since that actually construed lending the player the money to make the bet - seems stupid, but that's the story.)
In Southampton, Grosvenor didn't allow the "Even Money" option, whereas Stanleys did - so perhaps that is why it wasn't being played so often. A smart operator would have added a "bonus" that all dealt BJs won!
'Burn 20' was not given enough chance to flourish, IMO, although the ENHC version is not as good as the US version.
I will be heading down to the new Aspers towards Christmas so I'll drop you a note when I'm heading there and maybe we can grab a beer?
Thanks for the updates Charlie.
Quote: NicksGamingStuffFitzgerarlds took it out yesterday and replaced it with a 3 card poker table.
Disappointing but it doesn't surprise me - there is a new manager there and he doesn't like the game.
Quote: boymimboSwitch is by far my favorite variation of Blackjack. I hope the game survives.
Seconded :-) Thanks boymimbo.
There are still 100+ tables in the US so hopefully it will last a while longer.
I wonder what the reasons were (for the disliking) - bad numbers? It's a great innovation.Quote: SwitchDisappointing but it doesn't surprise me - there is a new manager there and he doesn't like the game.
Quote: RoyalBJI wonder what the reasons were (for the disliking) - bad numbers? It's a great innovation.
James Grosjean says all these new game variations
are the Achilles Heel of the casino. Many of them
are very beatable for an AP. But its not like it was
with Thorp and his big mouth, announcing to the
world how to beat BJ. If a game can be beaten now,
its kept a secret so the maximum amount can be
gotten from it. Grosjean claims to be the one that took
down Baccalette and buried it. He says "Baccalette
was so obviously beatable that if we didn't kill it,
somebody else would have."
Quote: RoyalBJI wonder what the reasons were (for the disliking) - bad numbers? It's a great innovation.
Good guess - a high roller, at a previous casino where the manager worked, had 2 or 3 big wins on the game and so the hold % took a nosedive.
Quote: EvenBobGrosjean claims to be the one that took
down Baccalette and buried it. He says "Baccalette
was so obviously beatable that if we didn't kill it,
somebody else would have."
Baccalette? U meant "Baccarat" in USA? It's the most profitable game that saved Las Vegas in the past 2-4 years, thanks to the Chinese players. May be you did not mean Baccarat.
Quote: RoyalBJBaccalette? U meant "Baccarat" in USA? It's the most profitable game that saved Las Vegas in the past 2-4 years, thanks to the Chinese players. May be you did not mean Baccarat.
Baccalette is more like roulette, but with cards. Actually, it's not that different at all from the card-based roulette at some casinos in CA. I think the name is baccarat + roulette = baccalette.